|
Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2020. Issue 2 (48) |
||||||||||
| Title: | LEGAL LIABILITY IN CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL PROCEEDINGS AND IN MEDIATION PROCEDURE |
|||||||||
| Authors: |
M. R. Zagidullin, Kazan Federal University |
 |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | |||||||
| ORCID: | 0000-0002-7638-4413 | ResearcherID: | AAK-1827-2020 | |||||||
| Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: | DOI: 10.29042/2018-2439-2442 DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2017-7-1-97-143 DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2017-7-2-73-111 DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2017-7-4-112-148 DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2017-7-5-113-133 DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2017-7-6-77-92 DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2017-7-6-93-119 DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2018-8-2-183-191 DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2019-9-2-121-137 DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2019-9-3-101-125 |
|||||||||
| Requisites: | Zagidullin M. R. Mery yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsessakh i protsedure mediatsii [Legal Liability in Civil and Commercial Proceedings and in Mediation Procedure]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2020. Issue 48. Pp. 388–405. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2020-48-388-405 | |||||||||
| DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2020-48-388-405 | |||||||||
| Annotation: |
Introduction: the article is concerned with the analysis of the legal liability institution in civil and commercial proceedings, as well as in the mediation procedure, where this institution, although implemented similarly, still has a fairly large number of distinctions, specific features and disputable aspects that have not been eliminated by the recent judicial reform. Purpose: to identify the current differences and problems in the legal liability regulation in civil and commercial proceedings and in the mediation procedure, and to develop proposals for their elimination, including through studying experience of some leading countries. Methods: theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic, comparative methods, juridical dogmatic method, and legal norm interpretation. Results: analysis of Russian procedural legislation has revealed a fairly large number of unreasonable differences in legal regulation in the areas under study, as well as insufficient maturity of measures against bad faith procedural behavior. At the same time, analysis of legislation in a number of foreign countries allowed us to discover some interesting norms covering legal liability. Conclusions: for improving the efficiency of legal liability measures in civil proceedings, in commercial proceedings, and in the mediation procedure, it is necessary to: revise the principle of calculating the fines imposed by court, make the fine amount conditional upon the amount of the claim and the dispute category, and reduce the differences in their amounts depending on the subject’s legal status; to mutually complement civil proceedings and commercial proceedings with sanctions for breaching the adversarial principle and the rules of evidence, and for bad faith procedural behavior, and to standardize these measures; to strengthen legal liability in the mediation procedure. |
|||||||||
| Keywords: | legal liability; civil proceedings; commercial proceedings; mediation procedure |
|||||||||
 |
download the full-version article | |||||||||
| References: | Antoshin A. N. Rassmotrenie zayavleniy o falsifikacii dokazatel'stv v arbitrazhnom processe [Consideration of Applications Concerning Falsification of Evidence in Commercial Proceedings]. Zakonnost' – Legality. 2011. Issue 5. Pp. 52–55. (In Russ.). 2. Grel' Ya. V. Zloupotrebleniya storon processual'nymi pravami v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom processe: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Abuse of Procedural Rights by the Parties in Civil and Commercial Proceedings: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Novosibirsk, 2006. 207 p. (In Russ.). 3. Evseev E. F. Nekotorye voprosy vzyskaniya kompensacii za fakticheskuyu poteryu vremeni v grazhdanskom processe [Some Questions Concerning the Recovery of Compensation for the Effective Time Loss in a Civil Trial]. Advokat – Lawyer. 2013. Issue 12. Pp. 31–41. (In Russ.). 4. Zhukov A. A. Processual'nye obyazannosti i sankcii v sfere dokazyvaniya [Procedural Duties and Sanctions in the Field of Evidence]. Yuridicheskaya nauka – Legal Science. 2015. Issue 4. Pp. 187–192. (In Russ.). 5. Zagidullin M. R . Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' v rossiyskom Civilisticheskom processe: istoriko-pravovoe issledovanie [Legal Responsibility in the Russian Civil Process: Historical and Legal Research]. Moscow, 2019. 143 p. (In Russ.). 6. Kalinina M. V. Kompensaciya za fakticheskuyu poteryu vremeni: problemy pravoprimeneniya [Compensation for Actual Loss of Time: Enforcement Problems]. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy process – Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure. 2010. Issue 6. Pp. 21–23. (In Russ.). 7. Ovanesyan G. M. Grazhdanskiy process: vozmozhen li privod dlya eksperta, specialista i perevodchika? [The Civil Procedure: Is It Possible for an Expert, a Specialist, and an Interpreter to Be Brought before the Court?]. Yuridicheskiy fakt – Legal Fact. 2018. Issue 28. Pp. 25–30. (In Russ.). 8. Parfir'ev D. N. Problemy shtrafnoy grazhdansko-processual'noy otvetstvennosti [Problems of Penal Civil Procedural Responsibility]. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy process – Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure. 2014. Issue 3. Pp. 18–23. (In Russ.). 9. Shan'kin D. A. Kompensaciya za fakticheskuyu poteryu vremeni [Compensation for the Actual Loss of Time]. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – The Buryat State University Bulletin. 2013. Issue 2. Pp. 173–176. (In Russ.). 10. Shevchenko I. M. K voprosu ob istrebovanii dokazatel'stv v arbitrazhnom processe [Revisiting Disclosure of Evidence in the Arbitration Procedure]. Rossiyskiy sud'ya – Russian Judge. 2016. Issue 7. Pp. 16–20. (In Russ.). 11. Yudin A. V. Zloupotreblenie processual'¬nymi pravami v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Abuse of Procedural Rights in Civil Proceedings: Synopsis of Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2009. 47 p. (In Russ.). 12. Yandukova A. A. Fal'sifikaciya dokazatel'stv v arbitrazhnom processe. [Falsification of Evidence in the Arbitration Process]. Fundamental'nye i prikladnye issledovaniya v sovremennom mire – Fundamental and Applied Research in the Modern World. 2016. Issue 16-3. Pp. 130–131. (In Russ.). 13. Brunchweiler A., Giroud S., Raetzo N. Swit¬zerland. International Civil Procedure – Second Edition. Juris Publishing Inc., 2019. (In Eng.). 14. Bruni A. Mediation in Italy. November 2011. Available at: https://mediate.com/articles/ BruniA1.cfm (accessed 07.01.2020). (In Eng.). 15. Cadiet L. Introduction to French Civil Justice System and Civil Procedural Law. Available at: http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/cg/law/lex/rlr28/ CADIET3.pdf (accessed 07.01.2020). (In Eng.). 16. D'Urso L. Italy's Mediation Law: An Overview. Available at: https://www.imimediation. org/2017/06/22/italys-mediation-law-an-overview/ (accessed 07.01.2020). (In Eng.). 17. Gottwald P. Civil Procedure Reform in Germany. American Journal of Comparative Law. 1997. Vol. 45, Issue 4. (In Eng.). 18. Iannini A. Italian Legislation on Mediation. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa. eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2011/453175/IPOL-JURI_NT(2011)453175_EN.pdf (accessed 10.01.2020). (In Eng.). 19. Maleshin D., Silvestri E., Sitgikov R., Valeev D. Reforming Russian Civil Procedure. Russian Law Journal. 2016. Issue 4(1). Pp. 142–147. DOI: 10.17589/2309-8678-2016-4-1-142-147. (In Eng.). 20. Ragu A., Artus Ch. Reform of the French Civil Procedure: Labour Litigation Impacted? The National Law Review. March 20, 2020. Available at: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/reform-french-civil-procedure-labour-litigation-impacted (accessed 04.04.2020). (In Eng.). 21. Schütze R. A. International Civil Procedure Law in the German Code of Civil Procedure (Zpo): Kommentar (de Gruyter Kommentar). Walter de Gruyter, 2008. 504 p. (In Eng.). 22. Rühl G. Preparing Germany for the 21st Century: The Reform of the Code of Civil Procedure. Cambridge University Press. March 06, 2019. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/ core/journals/german-law-journal/article/pre¬pa-ring -germany-for-the-21st-century-the-reform-of-the-co¬de-of-civil-procedure/653046EA1A39A6F0A16 D813BB2683366 (accessed 07.01.2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200014036. (In Eng.). 23. Silvestri E. Too Much of a Good Thing: Alternative Dispute Resolution in Italy. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3253 62078_Too_much_of_a_good_thing_Alternative_Di¬s¬pute_Resolution_in_Italy (accessed 07.01.2020). DOI: 10.5553/TMD/13863878201 7021004007. (In Eng.). |
|||||||||
| Received: | 05.03.2020 | |||||||||
| Financing: | --- | |||||||||
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013
The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing
The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year