|
Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2020. Issue 2 (48) |
||||||||||
| Title: | EFFICIENCY OF LAW IN THE TERMINOLOGICAL APPARATUS OF THE THEORY OF LAW |
|||||||||
| Authors: |
I. P. Kozhokar |
 |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | |||||||
| ORCID: | 0000-0002-5186-5413 |
ResearcherID: | S-4500-2018 |
|||||||
| Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: | DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2018-42-558-586 | |||||||||
| Requisites: | Kozhokar I. P. Effektivnost' prava v kategorial'nom apparate teorii prava [Efficiency of Law in the Terminological Apparatus of the Theory of Law]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2020. Issue 48. Pp. 196–225. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2020-48-196-225 |
|||||||||
| DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2020-48-196-225 |
|||||||||
| Annotation: |
Introduction: the term ‘efficiency’ is one of the most popular in juridical literature, it is applied to law, legislation, legal regulation, legal norms, law enforcement, functions and functioning of law, and to many other legal phenomena. However, the use of this concept in legal theory and branch-specific studies is usually not restrained by any methodological framework, which results in an impression of its uncontrolled application, when any theoretical and methodological value of this phenomenon vanishes. The fact that lawyers employ the meanings of this term from related sciences, especially economics, and the direct application of the general scientific philosophical understanding of efficiency create great difficulties for legal understanding of the concept. The terminological apparatus of the theory of law is constantly broadened with new terms and concepts that are close to efficiency of law and need to be understood in terms of the relation hereto, while the study of legal efficiency, which a priori should be as up-to-date as possible, still adheres to the theoretical basis developed in the 70-80s of the last century. Purpose: to clarify the place of law efficiency in the terminological apparatus of the theory of law through determining its autonomy and relationship with other related legal categories. Method: the dialectical method of cognition was used as the main method, which allowed us to consider the development of the legal phenomenon under study from the historical perspective, within different types of understanding of law, and in dynamics of development; there were also used general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, comparison, analogy) and specific scientific methods (historical-legal, juridical-dogmatic, legal modeling, and legal interpretation methods). Results: the paper demonstrates the dependence of the law efficiency concept on the types of understanding of law. The specific legal understanding of law efficiency as a correspondence between the actual and prescribed behavior merges with the concept ‘implementation of law’. The variety of ideas of law efficiency being different in their content and the use of this term for various, often purely stylistic, purposes proves the lack of a clear theoretical and legal understanding of the concept. The paper demonstrates relations between law efficiency and such categories as law effect, law profit, law expediency, law effectiveness, and law optimality. It has been proved that most often efficiency of law is identified with effectiveness of law (achievement of the goal of a legal norm). The attempts to apply the broadest possible understanding of law efficiency led to its merging with such categories as essence, content, goals, tasks, functions of law, legal culture, legal psychology, legal consciousness. Efficiency of law should be considered in conjunction with such new concepts as regulatory and actual legal impact, deregulation, ‘regulatory guillotine’. |
|||||||||
| Keywords: | law efficiency; legal regulation efficiency; legal norm efficiency; law effectiveness; law profitability; legal regulation optimization; terminological apparatus of the theory of law; deregulation; 'regulatory guillotine'; regulatory legal impact evaluation; actual legal impact evaluation |
|||||||||
 |
download the full-version article | |||||||||
| References: | . Aleksandrov O. V. "Regulyatornye gil'o¬ti¬ny": mezhdunarodnyy opyt ustraneniya prepyat¬stviy dlya biznesa i investirovaniya [Regulatory Guillotines: International Experience in Removing Barriers to Business and Investment]. Torgovaya politika – Trade Policy. 2019. Issue 1 (17). Рp. 107–119. (In Russ.). 2. Aleksandrova Z. E. Slovar' sinonimov rus¬skogo yazyka [Dictionary of Synonyms of the Russian Language]. Moscow, 1968. 600 p. (In Russ.). 3. Bayl'dinov E. T. K voprosu ob effektivnosti sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava [On the Efficiency of Modern International Law]. Sovremennoe pravo – Modern Law. 2011. Issue 1. Pp. 134–142. (In Russ.). 4. Black J. Ekonomika. Tolkovyy slovar': anglo-russkiy [Economics. Explanatory Dictionary: English-Russian]. Moscow, 2000. 829 p. (In Russ.). 5. Varlamova N. V. Effektivnost' pravovogo regulirovaniya: pereosmyslenie koncepcii [Effeciency of Legal Regulation: Rethinking the Concept]. Pravovedenie. 2009. Issue 1. Pp. 212–232. (In Russ.). 6. Vishnevskiy A. A. Zavereniya ob obstoyatel'stvakh: k voprosu ob effektivnosti pravovoy konstrukcii [Statements of Circumstances: Their Efficiency]. Zakon. 2017. Issue 11. Pp. 176–183. (In Russ.). 7. Vlasov M. P. Ekonomiko-matematicheskie metody v kommercheskoy deyatel'nosti [Economic and Mathematical Methods in Commercial Activities]. St. Petersburg, 2012. (In Russ.). 8. Gadzhiev G. A. Normokontrol' v sochetanii s deliktnymi iskami – effektivniy sposob zaschity prav predprinimateley. Kommentariy k Postanovleniyu KS RF ot 06.07.2018 № 29-P [Regulatory Compliance Verification Combined with Tort Lawsuits is an Effective Way to Protect the Rights of Entrepreneurs. Commentary on the Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation No. 29-P of July 6, 2018]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federacii – Herald of Economic Justice. 2018. Issue 12. Pp. 63–71. (In Russ.). 9. Gubin E. P. Gosudarstvennoe regulirovanie rynochnoy ekonomiki i predprinimatel'stva: pravovye problemy [State Regulation of Market Economy and Entrepreneurship: Legal Problems]. Moscow, 2006. 312 p. (In Russ.). 10. Didikin A. B. "Regulyatornaya gil'otina" v mekhanizme vzaimodeystviya rossiyskogo gosudarstva i obschestva ['Regulatory Guillotine' in the Mechanism of Interaction of the Russian State and Society]. Akademik – Academician. 2019. Issue 2. Pp. 10–15. (In Russ.). 11. Didikin A. B. Monitoring fakticheskogo vozdeystviya v sisteme pravovykh sredstv uluchsheniya regulyatornoy sredy [Monitoring the Actual Effect in the System of Legal Means of Improving the Regulatory Environment]. Monitoring pravoprimeneniya – Monitoring of Law Enforcement. 2019. Issue 3 (32). Pp. 16–20. (In Russ.). 12. Zhinkin S. A. O vliyanii psikhologiches-kikh faktorov na effektivnost' norm prava [On the Influence of Psychological Factors on the Effectiveness of the Rule of Law]. Yurist-Pravoved – Jurist-Legist. 2007. Issue 6 (25). Pp. 74–76. (In Russ.). 13. Zhinkin S. A. O metodologicheskikh principakh issledovaniya effektivnosti norm zakonodatel'stva [On the Methodological Principles of Studying the Effeciency of Legislative Norms]. Rossiyskiy sledovatel' – Russian Investigator. 2008. Issue 19. Pp. 33–34. (In Russ.). 14. Zhinkin S. A. O novykh metodologicheskikh podkhodakh k issledovaniyu problem effektivnosti prava [On the New Methodological Approaches to Studying the Problems of Efficiency of Law]. Rossiyskiy sledovatel' – Russian Investigator. 2009. Issue 10. Pp. 30–31. (In Russ.). 15. Zhinkin S. A. Psikhologicheskie problemy effektivnosti prava [Psychological Problems of the Efficiency of Law]. St. Petersburg, 2009. 337 p. (In Russ.). 16. Zhinkin S. A. Effektivnost' prava: antropologicheskoe i cennostnoe izmerenie: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Efficiency of Law: Anthropological and Value Dimension: Synopsis of Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Krasnodar, 2009. 41 p. (In Russ.). 17. Zakharkina A. V., Kuznetsova O. A. Razvitie instrumentov pryamogo finansirovaniya sub"ektov malogo i srednego predprinimatel'stva: pravovoy aspekt [Development of the Instruments for Direct Financing of Small and Medium-Sized Business: the Legal Aspect]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2019. Issue 46. Pp. 651–671. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-46-651-671. (In Russ.). 18. Ibragimova S. V. Social'naya effektivnost' prava [The Social Effectiveness of Law]. Permskiy yuridicheskiy al'manakh – Perm Legal Almanac. 2018. Issue 1. Pp. С. 227–232. (In Russ.). 19. Ikonickaya I. A. Problemy effektivnosti v zemel'nom prave [Problems of Efficiency in Land Law]. Moscow, 1979. 183 p. (In Russ.). 20. Kak obespechit' effektivnost' zakona: nauchnoe izdanie / otv. red. Yu. A. Tikhomirov, N. N. Tolmacheva, S. A. Bogolyubov [How to Ensure the Efficiency of Law: Scientific Publication; ed. by Yu. A. Tikhomirov, N. N. Tolmacheva, S .A. Bo¬golyubov]. Moscow, 2019. 208 p. (In Russ.). 21. Kamchatov K. V., Zyablina M.V., Aristar¬khov A. L. Povyshenie effektivnosti zaschity prav uchastnikov dogovora uchastiya v dolevom stroitel'stve [Enhancing Efficient Protection of the Rights of Parties to Shared Construction Contracts]. Zakonnost' – Legality. 2017. Issue 8. Pp. 12–16. (In Russ.). 22. Kerimov D. A. Problemy obschey teorii prava [Problems of the General Theory of Law]. Moscow, 2000. 82 p. (In Russ.). 23. Covey S. R. Sem' navykov vysokoeffektivnykh lyudey: Moschnye instrumenty razvitiya lichnosti [The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People: Restoring the Character Ethic]. Moscow, 2012. 530 p. (In Russ.). 24. Kozhevnikov V. V. Effektivnost' norm prava i effektivnosti ikh primeneniya: problema sootnosheniya [The Efficiency of Legal Norms and the Efficiency of Their Application: the Problem of Relation]. Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika – Law and State: Theory and Practice. 2017. Issue 3 (147). Pp. 39–44. (In Russ.). 25. Kozlov V. A. Voprosy teorii effektivnosti pravovoy normy: avtoref. diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Issues of the Theory of the Legal Norm Efficiency: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Leningrad, 1976. 26 p. (In Russ.). 26. Kozlova N. V. Razvitie instituta ocenki reguliruyuschego vozdeystviya: vvedenie mekhanizma «regulyatornoy gil'otiny» [The Development of the Institute of Regulatory Impact Assessment: Introducing a 'Regulatory Guillotine']. Akademik – Academician. 2019. Issue 2. Pp. 16–19. (In Russ.). 27. Kommercheskaya elektroenergetika: slovar'-spravochnik [Commercial Electroenergetics: Glossary]. Moscow, 2006. 112 p. (In Russ.). 28. Kostin A. A., Posmetukhina E. A. Sootnoshenie ponyatiy "effektivnostꞌ" i "rezul'tativnostꞌ" na primere tamozhennoy deyatel'nosti [Elucidation of the Relation of 'Productivity' and 'Effectiveness' Concepts through the Example of Customs Activities]. Rossiyskoe predprinimatel'stvo – Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. 2014. Vol. 15, Issue 3. Pp. 75–88. (In Russ.). 29. Kriminalizaciya i dekriminalizaciya kak formy preobrazovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva / otv. red. V. P. Kashepov [Criminalization and Decriminalization as a Form of Transformation of Criminal Legislation; ed. by V. P. Kashepov]. Moscow, 2018. 280 p. (In Russ.). 30. Kurochkin S. A. Ob effektivnosti norm grazhdanskogo processual'nogo prava [On Efficiency of Norms of Civil Procedural Law]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law. 2012. Issue 4 (184). Pp. 24–32. (In Russ.). 31. Laychenkova N. N. Otdel'nye aspekty sootnosheniya ponyatiy "ekonomicheskaya effektivnostꞌ" i "effektivnost' finansovogo prava" [Certain Aspects of the Relationship between the Concepts of 'Economic Efficiency' and 'Efficiency of Financial Law']. Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal – Leningradskiy Juridical Journal. 2018. Issue 2 (52). Pp. 155–162. (In Russ.). 32. Lapaeva V. V. Effektivnost' zakona i metody ee izucheniya [Efficiency of Law and Methods of Studying It]. Effektivnost' zakona (metodologiya i konkretnye issledovaniya) / otv. red. V. M. Syrykh, Yu. A. Tikhomirov [Efficiency of Law (Methodology and Specific Research); ed. by V. M. Syrykh, Yu. A. Tikhomirov]. Moscow, 1997. Pp. 28–44. (In Russ.). 33. Libanova S. E. Zavisimost' effektivnosti norm grazhdanskogo prava ot edinoobraziya pravoprimeneniya [Dependence of the Efficiency of Civil Law Rules on the Uniformity of Law Enforcement]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2009. Issue 10. Pp. 70–75. (In Russ.). 34. Lopatnikov L. I. Ekonomiko-matemati-ches¬kiy slovar': slovar' sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy nauki [Economics and Mathematics Dictionary: Dictionary of Modern Economics]. Moscow, 2003. 519 p. (In Russ.). 35. Lyubimov Yu., Novak D., Cygankov D., Nesterenko A., Varvarin A., Ibragimov R., Zharkova O., Moskvitin O., Maslova N., Verle E. «Regulyatornaya gil'otina» ['Regulatory Guillotine']. Zakon. 2019. Issue 2. Pp. 20–36. (In Russ.). 36. Marochkin S. Yu. Problema effektivnosti norm mezhdunarodnogo prava [The Problem of the Efficiency of International Law Rules]. Irkutsk, 1988. 147 p. (In Russ.). 37. Nersesyanc V. S. Filosofiya prava [The Philosophy of Law]. Moscow, 2006. 848 p. (In Russ.). 38. Nikitinskiy V. I. Effektivnost' norm trudovogo prava [Efficiency of Labor Law Rules]. Moscow, 1971. 248 p. (In Russ.). 39. Nugaeva N. R. Problema effektivnosti pra¬va v istorii otechestvennogo pravovedeniya [Problem of Law Efficiency in the History of Domestic Jurisprudence]. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava – History of State and Law. 2015. Issue 21. Pp. 8–13. (In Russ.). 40. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka [Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Moscow, 1999. 944 p. (In Russ.). 41. Pashkov A. S., Yavich L. S. Effektivnost' deystviya pravovoy normy (k metodologii i metodike sociologicheskogo issledovaniya) [Efficiency of the Legal Norm (on the Methodology and Techniques of Sociological Research)]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo – Soviet State and Law. 1970. Issue 3. Pp. 40–48. (In Russ.). 42. Pikurov N. I. Problemy prognozirovaniya rezul'tatov deystviya novogo ugolovnogo zakona [Problems of Predicting Results of a New Criminal Law Coming into Force]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2018. Issue 2. Pp. 9–18. (In Russ.). 43. Prokhorov L. A., Prokhorova M. L. Effektivnost' ugolovno-pravovykh garantiy realizacii prava na oplatu truda i poluchenie ustanovlennykh zakonom vyplat (st. 145.1 UK RF) [The Efficiency of Criminal Law Guarantees for the Implementation of the Right to Labour Remuneration and the Receipt of the Statutory Payments (Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, Art. 145(1))]. Rossiyskiy sledovatel' – Russian Investigator. 2016. Issue 19. Pp. 32–35. (In Russ.). 44. Psikhologiya A-Ya. Slovar'-spravochnik [Psychology A-Z. Glossary]. Moscow, 2000. 448 p. (In Russ.). 45. Punchenko S. I. O yuridicheskoy, social'noy i inykh vidakh effektivnosti norm prava [On the Legal, Social and Other Types of Efficiency of Legal Norms]. Yuridicheskiy vestnik Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Legal Bulletin of the Kuban State University. 2010. Issue 5. Pp. 64–66. (In Russ.). 46. Punchenko S. I. Social'naya effektivnost' prava v sovremennoy Rossii (teoreticheskiy aspekt): dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Social Effectiveness of Law in Modern Russia (Theoretical Aspect): Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Krasnodar, 2016. 169 p. (In Russ.). 47. Rayzberg B. A., Lozovskiy L. Sh., Starodubceva E.B. Sovremennyy ekonomicheskiy slovar' [Modern Economics Dictionary]. Moscow, 1997. 496 p. (In Russ.). 48. Rogacheva O. S. Nauchno-teoreticheskaya interpretaciya kategorii "effektivnostꞌ" v administrativno-deliktnom prave [Scientific and Theoretical Interpretation of Category 'Efficiency' in Administrative Delict Law]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo – Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2009. Issue 2 (7). Pp. 260–275. (In Russ.). 49. Rumak V. Vazhno ne stavit' vo glavu ugla pravovye tradicii, a reshat' ekonomicheskuyu zadachu (Interv'yu s E.P. Gubinym) [It Is Important to Solve the Economic Problem Rather than Prioritize Legal Traditions (Interview with E.P. Gubin)]. Zakon. 2019. Issue 3. Pp. 8–18. (In Russ.). 50. Salamatina I. V., Smol'nikov D. I. Normativnoe deregulirovanie v Rossii [Deregulation in Russia]. Zakon. 2018. Issue 3. Pp. 37–44. (In Russ.). 51. Seleznev V. A. O sporadichnosti primeneniya otdelnykh norm Osobennoy chasti KoAP RF ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lic [On the Sporadic Application of Certain Provisions of the Special Part of the Administrative Code on Administrative Liability of Legal Entities]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law. 2019. Issue 6. Pp. 137–150. DOI: 10.12737 / jrl.2019.6.13. (In Russ.). 52. Sovetskie zakony, dozhivshie do 2020-go: nalog na kholostyakov i instrukciya po bor'be s mukhami [Soviet Laws that Have Survived to 2020: Bachelor Tax and Instructions for Combating Flies]. Komsomol'skaya Pravda. 2020. February 19–26. (In Russ.). 53. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Effektivnost' zakona i monitoring [Efficiency of Law and Monitoring]. Moscow, 2010. 52 p. (In Russ.). 54. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Effektivnost' zakona: ot celi k rezul'tatu [Efficiency of Law: from Purpose to Result]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law. 2009. Issue 4. Pp. 3–9. (In Russ.). 55. Fedosova V. A. Effektivnost' deystviya norm sovetskogo gosudarstvennogo prava [The Effectiveness of the Norms of Soviet State Law]. Voronezh, 1984. 157 p. (In Russ.). 56. Filosofiya: Enciklopedicheskiy slovar' / pod. red. A. A. Ivina [Philosophy: Encyclopedic Dictionary; ed. by A. A. Ivin]. Moscow, 2004. 1072 p. (In Russ.). 57. Khoroshil'cev A. I. Effektivnost' prava: ponyatie i osobennosti [Efficiency of Law: Concept and Features]. Obschestvo i pravo – Society and Law. 2011. Issue 2 (34). Pp. 47–51. (In Russ.). 58. Khropanyuk V. N. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of State and Law]. Moscow, 1995. 384 p. (In Russ.). 59. Shundikov K. V. Celi, sredstva i rezul'taty v pravorealizacionnom processe [Goals, Tools and Results in the Legal Process]. Pravovedenie. 2001. Issue 4. Pp. 30–39. (In Russ.). 60. Shuplecova Yu.I. Pravovoe regulirovanie lesnykh otnosheniy v Rossiyskoy Federacii: monografiya [Legal Regulation of Forestry Relations in the Russian Federation: Monograph]. Moscow, 2018. 216 p. (In Russ.). 61. Effektivnost' zakonodatel'stva: voprosy teorii i praktika / otv. red. Yu. A. Tikhomirov, V. P. Emel'yancev [Efficiency of Legislation: Theory and Practice; ed. by Yu. A. Tikhomirov, V. P. Emel'yantsev]. Мoscow, 2015. 336 p. (In Russ.). 62. Effektivnost' pravovykh norm / Kudryavcev V. N., Nikitskiy V. I., Samoschenko I. S., Glazyrin V. V. [Efficiency of Legal Norms; V. N. Kudryavtsev, V. I. Nikitskiy, I. S. Samoshchenko, V. V. Glazyrin]. Moscow, 1980. 280 p. (In Russ.). 63. Yurlov S. A. Opredelennost' normativnogo regulirovaniya sporta kak predposylka ustanovleniya chetkikh predelov avtonomii sportivnykh organizaciy i effektivnoy zaschity prav sportsmenov [Certainty of Regulatory Activities as a Prerequisite to Establishment of Clear Limits of the Autonomy of Sports Organizations and the Effective Protection of the Rights of Athletes]. Lex Russica. 2018. Issue 10. Pp. 85–97. (In Russ.). 64. Camacho-Miñano M., Pascual-Ezama D., Urquia-Grande E. On the Efficiency of Bankruptcy Law: Empirical Evidence in Spain. International Insolvency Review. 2013. Vol. 22, Issue 3. Pp. 171–187. (In Eng.). 65. Coleman J. L. Efficiency, Exchange, and Auction: Philosophic Aspects of the Economic Approach to Law. California Law Review. 1980. Vol. 68, Issue 2. Pp. 221–249. (In Eng.). 66. Cooter R. D. Liberty, Efficiency, and Law. Law and Contemporary Problems. 1987. Vol. 50, Issue 4. Pp. 141–163. (In Eng.). 67. Efficiency and a Rule of Free Contract – a Critique of 2 Models of Law and Economics. Harvard Law Review. 1984. Vol. 97, Issue 4. Pp. 978–996. (In Eng.). 68. Etsegenet Kedir M. Major Women's Right Issues in Ethiopia: Examining Efficiency of the Law and its Enforcement. International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies. 2017. Vol. 5, Issue 1. Pp. 43–59. (In Eng.). 69. Fokou E., Bélanger A. Effectiveness and Efficiency: Epistemological Obstacles to Economism in Civil Law of Contracts. Revue Générale de Droit. 2019. Vol. 49, Issue 1. Pp. 5–66. (In Eng.). 70. Garello P. The Breach of Contract in French Law: between Safety of Expectations and Efficiency. International Review of Law and Economics. 2002. Vol. 22, Issue 4. Pp. 407–420. (In Eng.). 71. Harel A. Efficiency and Fairness in Criminal Law – the Case for a Criminal-Law Principle of Comparative Fault. California Law Review. 1994. Vol. 82, Issue 5. Pp. 1181–1229. (In Eng.). 72. Liscow Z. Counter-Cyclical Bankruptcy Law: an Efficiency Argument for Employment-Preserving Bankruptcy Rules. Columbia Law Review. 2016. Vol. 116, Issue 6. Pp. 1461–1501. (In Eng.). 73. Luttikhuis K. The Effectiveness and Efficiency of Corporate Insolvency Law-Part Two. International Insolvency Review. 2009. Vol. 18, Issue 3. Pp. 237–253. (In Eng.). 74. Margolis S. Two Definitions of Efficiency in Law and Economics. Journal of Legal Studies. 1987. Vol. 16, Issue 2. Pp. 471–482. (In Eng.). 75. Niblett A. On the Efficiency of the Common Law: an Application to the Recovery of Rewards. European Journal of Law and Economics. 2017. Vol. 43, Issue 3. Pp. 393–417. (In Eng.). 76. Pacchi S. Enterprise and Crisis: Efficiency of the Mechanisms of Resolution of the Crisis from the Experience of Italian Law. Revista Chilena de Derecho. 2017. Vol. 44, Issue 2. Pp. 371–393. (In Eng.). 77. Staszkiewicz P., Morawska S. The Efficiency of Bankruptcy Law: Evidence of Creditor Protection in Poland. European Journal of Law and Economics. 2019. Vol. 48, Issue 3. Pp. 365–383. (In Eng.). |
|||||||||
| Received: | 10.01.2020 | |||||||||
| Financing: | --- | |||||||||
The Perm State University
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013
The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing
The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013
The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing
The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year