Issue 2 (20) 2013

Tagaeva ON THE ISSUE OF THE CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP IN THE FAMILY OFFENCE

ON THE ISSUE OF THE CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP IN THE FAMILY OFFENCE

S.N. Tagaeva

Russian-Tajik (Slavic) University
30, Tursunzade ul., Dushanbe, Republic of Tajikistan, 734025
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

In this article, the author notes that to bring the offender to justice according to the norms of family law does not always require a complete set of elements of the offense. Everyone knows that some of the common reasons of family-legal responsibility include:

• unlawful conduct (action or inaction) of the person who is supposed to be blamed;
• presence of a victim of harm or loss;
• causal connection between the wrongful conduct of the offender and then comes the negative effects;
• culpability of the offender.

Responsibility in family law can arise when abridged, incomplete structure of the offense. Mandatory grounds of family-legal liability are two elements of the offense: the wrongful conduct of the subject of family relationships and his guilt. The author considers the causal link between the unlawful conduct and not of consequences to the mandatory grounds of family and legal liability.

With the qualification of a particular family of the offense is one of the main tasks of the judiciary and other state agencies, is to select among all the circumstances, most importantly, the decisive factor that should be considered the cause. And in each case, an offense causing harm family has its own causal connection between the action of a family member, and the result of the come, as the causal relationship between the various phenomena is unique, so every result has a cause. Of course, the existence of a causal connection between the wrongful conduct and the subsequent actions of these malicious result, expressed in violation of rights of another family member, is one of the necessary conditions in order to entrust the responsibility of the offender for this malicious result.

The author concludes that a cause and effect relationship is important in the classification of certain types of family offenses.

Keywords: cause-and-effect relationship; family offense; guilt

Bibliograficheskij spisok

1. Antokol'skaja V.V. Semejnoe pravo: uchebnik. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Jurist, 2003. 333 s.

2. Vorozhejkin E.M. Semejnye pravootnoshenija v SSSR. M.: Jurid. lit., 1972. 335 s.

3. Egorov N.D. Grazhdansko-pravovaja otvetstvennost' / Grazhdanskoe pravo / pod red. A.P. Sergeeva, Ju.K. Tolstogo. M.: TK Velbi, Prospekt, 2003. S. 524–526.

4. Semejnoe pravonarushenie: ponjatie, harakteristika, osobennosti // Voprosy juvenal'noj justicii. №3(29), 2010. URL: http://juvenjust.org/index.php?s=d78c91b5ff37d64b9d796 ddcdab888c4&showtopic=1473

5. Kazanceva A.E. Objazannosti i prava roditelej (zamenjajushhih ih lic) po vospitaniju detej i otvetstvennost' za ih narushenie / pod red. B.L. Haskel'berga. Tomsk, 1987. 144 s.

6. Markosjan A.V. Juridicheskie fakty v semejnom prave Rossijskoj Federacii: avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. M., 2007. 24 s.

7. Muratova S.A., Tarsamaeva N.Ju. Semejnoe pravo: ucheb. posobie. M.: Novyj Jurist, 1999. 272 s.

8. Nechaeva A.M. Pravonarushenija v sfere lichnyh semejnyh otnoshenij. M., 1991. 238 s.

9. Novickij I.B., Lunc L.A. Obshhee uchenie ob objazatel'stve. M.: Jurid. lit., 1950. 416 s.

10. Rossijskoe ugolovnoe pravo: v 2 t. / pod red. L.V. Inogamovoj-Hegaj, V.S. Komissarova, A.I. Raroga. M.: Prospekt, 2006. T. 1. 520 s.

11. Spiridonov L.I. Teorija gosudarstva i prava : uchebnik. M., 2001. 304 s.

12. Spirkin A.G. Filosofija. M.: Gardariki, 2003. 628 s.

13. Chicherova L.E. Grazhdansko-pravovaja otvetstvennost' v semejnom prave // Civilist. zap. Vyp. 5: Problemy kodifikacii grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva v RF / pod red. V.A. Rybakova, A.Ja. Grishko. M.: Izd. gr. «Jurist», 2004. S. 528–602.

14. Chicherova L.E. Nekotorye voprosy otvetstvennosti v semejnom prave // Semejnoe i zhilishhnoe pravo. 2004. №2. S. 144–148.

15. Obespechenie prioritetnoj zashhity prav i interesov nesovershennoletnih URL: http://www.to-1.ru/articles/220/ (data obrashhenija: 15.03.2013).

16. Shershen' T.V. Problemy otvetstvennosti v sovremennom rossijskom semejnom prave // Semejnoe i zhilishh. pravo. 2010. №1. S. 3–6.

17. URL: http://formaslov.ru/search/search/?search (data obrashhenija: 15.03.2013).