Issue 2 (20) 2013

Kirpichev The Right for the Business Reputation of the State and Municipal Formations, State Official Bodies and Municipal Government Bodies

The Right for the Business Reputation of the State and Municipal Formations, State Official Bodies and Municipal Government Bodies

А.Ye. Kirpichev

Russian academy of justice
69a, Novocheremushkinskaya st., Moscow, Russia, 117418
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

This article is aimed to explore the possibilities of using the term “business reputation” for reputation of state, municipalities and their bodies and, therefore, of using proper Civil Law methods for defending their reputation. Although there is no legal definition of the term “business reputation”, the author concludes that that the term can be used only in the sphere of business, but due to the absence of common term “reputation” in the Russian Civil Law, in jurisprudence the “business reputation” is usually interpreted extendedly.

Thus, state and municipalities are subjects of such reputation as far as non-profit organizations not only in cases, when they are making business but in the case of any type of their economic activities. Sometimes according to the jurisprudence the reputation of such bodies is not defended by the Civil Law rules, if a critical opinion concerns public services, provided by the Russian Federation, its subjects and the municipalities. The reputation of state and municipalities belongs to their bodies and the population of the territory, too.

Keywords: the state legal personality; municipal bodies; business reputation

Bibliograficheskij spisok

1. Anisimov A.L. Chest', dostoinstvo, delovaja reputacija pod zashhitoj zakona. M.: Norma, 2004. 88 s.

2. Beljaeva O.A. Predprinimatel'skoe pravo: ucheb. posobie / pod red. V.B. Ljandresa. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: KONTRAKT, INFRA-M, 2009. 271 s.

3. Grazhdanskij kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii. Chast' pervaja: Feder. zakon RF ot 30 nojab. 1994 g. №51-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 1994. №32, st. 3301.

4. Karhalev D.N. Ohranitel'noe pravootnoshenie po zashhite chesti, dostoinstva i delovoj reputacii lica // Arbitr. i grazhd. process. 2010. №1. S. 28–34.

5. Kirillovyh A.A. Korporativnoe pravo: kurs lekcij. M.: Justicinform, 2009. 192 s.

6. Konstitucija Rossijskoj Federacii: prinjata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12 dek. 1993 g. // Ros. gaz. 2009. 21 janv.

7. Maleina M.N. Zashhita chesti i delovoj reputacii neopredelennogo kruga lic // Vestnik grazhd. prava. 2010. №1. S. 173–180.

8. Maslennikov M.I. Izmenenie prioritetov v razvitii gosudarstvennogo sektora jekonomiki v razvityh stranah. Ekaterinburg: In-t jekonomiki Ural. otd-nija RAN, 2009. 172 s.

9. Melehin A.V. Teorija gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Jurist, 2009. 639 s.

10. Mihalevich E.V. Delovaja reputacija: sub#ekty grazhdanskih pravootnoshenij, imejushhie pravo na ee zashhitu // Jurist. 2012. №4. S. 34–41.

11. Opredelenie Vladimirskogo oblastnogo suda ot 19 janv. 2012 g. po delu №33-147/2012 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Garant».

12. Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozhenij punkta «v» chasti pervoj i chasti pjatoj stat'i 4 Federal'nogo zakona «O statuse chlena Soveta Federacii i statuse deputata Gosudarstvennoj Dumy Federal'nogo Sobranija Rossijskoj Federacii» v svjazi s zaprosom gruppy deputatov Gosudarstvennoj Dumy» [Jelektronnyj resurs]: postanovlenie Konstituc. suda RF ot 27 dek. 2012 g. №34-P. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Garant».

13. Postanovlenie FAS Povolzhskogo okruga ot 10 apr. 2012 g. po delu №A57-13372/2010 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Garant».

14. Postanovlenie FAS Ural'skogo okruga ot 18 okt. 2005 g. №F09-3389/05-S6 po delu №A50-5310/2005 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Garant».

15. Soshnikova M. Delovaja reputacija: grazhdansko-pravovye i jekonomicheskie aspekty // Korporativnyj jurist. 2008. №1.

16. Spektor A.A. K voprosu o kategorijah «sub#ekt predprinimatel'skoj dejatel'nosti» i «sub#ekt predprinimatel'skogo prava» // Predprinimatel'skoe pravo. [Pril. «Biznes i pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom»]. 2012. №2. S. 40–43.

17. Tolstoj V.S. Lichnye neimushhestvennye pravootnoshenija. M.: Jelit, 2006. 200 s.

18. Frolovskij N.G. Zashhita delovoj reputacii juridicheskogo lica // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2012. №4. S. 48–52.