Issue 1 (31) 2016

 

Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2016. Issue 1 (31)
Title: ON THE PROBLEM OF APPLYING LIMITATION OF ACTION TO THE PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT: CASE STUDY OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Authors: Himatov H.N.
Tajik National University		 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: --- ResearcherID: ---
«Scopus» & «Web of Science» article: --- 
Requisites: Himatov H.N. K probleme primeneniya normy iskovoy davnosti k brachnomu dogovoru po zakonodatel'stvu Respubliki Tadzhikistan i Rossiyskoy Federatsii [On the Problem of Applying Limitation of Action to the Prenuptial Agreement: Case Study of the Republic of Tajikistan and the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2016. № 1(31). Pp. 82–89. (In Russ.)
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-1-82-89
Annotation: Introduction: the article analyzes the issues of applying limitation of action to the prenuptial agreement according to the legislation of the Republic of Tajikistan and the Russian Federation. Purpose: to study the problems of application of limitation period to the claim for holding a prenuptial agreement invalid. Methods: the methodological framework of the research is based on a set of methods of scientific cognition. The author uses general scientific methods (dialectics, analysis, and synthesis) and methods specific to legal science (comparative legal, formal-legal). Results: it is noted that the possibility of applying civil legislation regulations to the prenuptial agreement directly depends on its legal nature. The author shows that the prenuptial agreement is a contract of civil nature having some peculiarities. So it should be referred to as a civil contract of a specific kind. Having analyzed the legislation of the Republic of Tajikistan and the Russian Federation, the author argues that it is impossible to apply limitation period to the prenuptial agreement. It is also noted that current legislation does not support the idea of applying limitation of action to the claim for holding a prenuptial agreement invalid, which is present in judicial practice and in works by some experts. The author emphasizes the inconsistence of the legislature’s position on the problem of applying limitation period to the prenuptial agreement and states that it contradicts the interests of civil circulation. Conclusions: limitation of action should be applied to the claim for holding a prenuptial agreement invalid under law and its direct regulations. So it is proposed to introduce legislative provisions that stipulate application of limitation period to the prenuptial agreement.
Keywords: period of limitation of action; prenuptial agreement; invalidity of a prenuptial agreement; legal nature; civil contract; alimony agreement; property relations; obligations to perform
  download the full-version article
References: Antokol'skaja M.V. Semeynoe pravo: uchebnik [Family Law: Textbook]. Moscow: Yurist Publ., 2002. 336 p. (In Russ.).
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 22 maya 2013 g. po delu № 11-17902 [Appellate Ruling of the Moscow City Court of May 22, 2013 on the Case № 11-17902]. Available at: http://base. consul­tant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req= doc;base=SOJ;
n=674709;dst= 0;ts=4CBD9499E285875D4B0
FDA52BA183D09;rnd= 0.5405289207119495 (accessed: 12.07.2015). (In Russ.).
Braginskiy M.I., Vitryanskiy V.V. Dogovornoe pravo. Kniga pervaya: obshchie polozheniya [Contract Law. Book One: General Provisions]. Moscow: Statut Publ., 2002. 848 p. (In Russ).
Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik [Civil Law: Textbook]; ed. by A.P. Sergeev, Yu.K. Tol­stoy. Moscow: Sole trader L.V. Rozhnikov, 2000. Vol. 3. 632 p. (In Russ.).
Zhilinkova I.V. Brachnyi kontrakt [The Prenuptial Agreement].Kharkov, 1995. 172 p. (In Russ.).
Zaboev K.I. Pravovye i filosofskie aspekty grazhdansko-pravovogo dogovora [The Legal and Philosophical Aspects of Civil Contracts]. St. Petersburg: "Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press" Publ., 2003. 278 p. (In Russ.).
Kabyshev O.A. Pravo na alimenty [Right to Alimony]. Moscow: PRIOR Publ., 1998. 144 p. (In Russ.).
Kommentariy k Semeynomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Commentary to the Family Code of the Russian Federation]; ed. by I.M. Kuznetsova. Moscow: Yurist Publ., 2002. 596 p. (In Russ.).
Levushkin A.N., Serebryakova A.A. Semeynoe pravo: ucheb. posobie. [Family Law: Textbook]. Ulyanovsk: Ulyanovsk St. Univ. Publ., 2011. 368 p. (In Russ.).
Makhmudov M. Khukuk va ukhdadorikhoi khamsaron dar oila [Rights and Obligations of Spouses]. Dushanbe: ER-graf Publ., 2003. 164 p. (In Tajik).
Makhmudzoda M., Khudoyarzoda B. Khukuki oilavii Chumkhurii Tochikiston: kitobi darsi [Family Law of the Republic of Tajikistan: Textbook]. Dushanbe: ER-graf Publ., 2015. 496 p. (In Tajik).
Muratova S.A. Semeynoe pravo: uchebnik [Family Law: Textbook]. Moscow: YuNITI-DANA: Zakon i pravo Publ., 2009. 367 p. (In Russ.).
NechaevaA.M. Novy Semeynyy kodeks [The New Family Code]. Gosudarstvo i pravo – The State and Law. 1996. № 6. Pp. 56–66. (In Russ).
Nechaeva A.M. Semeynoe pravo: kurs lektsiy [Family Law: Course of Lectures]. Moscow: Yurist Publ., 1999. 336 p. (In Russ.).
Nizamieva O.N. Dogovornoe regulirovanie imushchestvennykh otnosheniy suprugov: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Contractual regulation of spouses' property relations. Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Kazan, 1999. 24 p. (In Russ.).
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 20 yanv. 2015 g. № 5-KG14-144 [Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of January 20, 2015 № 5-KG14-144]. Available at: http://base.
consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req= doc;base
=ARB;n=418510;fld= 134;from=22997;rnd=0.9
73925075493753 (accessed: 11.07.2015). (In Russ.).
Postanovlenie prezidiuma Sankt-Peterburg­skogo gorodskogo suda ot 09 sent. 2009 g. № 44g-144 [Resolution of the Presidium of the St. Petersburg City Court of September 9, 2009 № 44g-144]. Available at: http://base.
consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req= doc;base
=SOJ;n=2535;dst=0;ts= 17A30412669B84142
CB7CA5629C99C34;rnd= 0.95148578030057
25 (accessed: 16.08.2015). (In Russ.).
Pchelintseva L.M. Kommentariy k Semeynomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Commentary to the Family Code of the Russian Federation]. Moscow: NORMA (Izdatel'skaya gruppa NORMA-INFRA-M) Publ., 2000. 696 p. (In Russ.).
Pchelintseva L.M. Semeynoe pravo Rossii: uchebnik [Family law of Russia: Textbook]. Moscow: Norma Publ., 2004. 688 p. (In Russ.).
Semeynoe pravo: uchebnik [Family law: Textbook]; ed. by P.V. Krasheninnikov. Moscow: Statut Publ., 2008. 302 p. (In Russ.).
Slepakova A.V. Pravootnosheniya sobstvennosti suprugov [Legal Relationship of Spouses' Ownership]. Moscow: Statut Publ., 2005. 444 p. (In Russ.).
Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik. V 2 tomakh [Soviet Civil Law: Textbook. In 2 vols.]; ed. by O.A. Krasavchikov. Moscow: Vyssh. shk. Publ., 1985. Vol. 1. 544 p. (In Russ.).
Chefranova E.A. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v rossiyskoy sem'ye: Prakticheskoe posobie. [Property Relations in the Russian Family: Practical Guide]. Moscow: Yurist Publ., 1997. 168 p. (In Russ.).
Financing: ---

 

The Perm State University
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing

The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year