Issue 4 (22) 2013

GodovalovaMN_PRESUMING OF GUILT: NOTION AND MEANING IN THE CIVIL LAW

PRESUMING OF GUILT: NOTION AND MEANING IN THE CIVIL LAW

M.N. Godovalova

Perm State National Research University
15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract: The article is devoted to the research of the guilt presuming issues in the civil law. In the work, the doctrinal approaches to defining the notion of the guilt presuming are viewed. The necessity is shown to distinguish between the notion of presumption and the notion of presuming, and their correlation as the generic and the specific notions. It is explained that when the guilt presuming is studied from numerous multi-ordinal positions – as a legal norm, as a supposition, as a regulation method, as a means of regulation, as a legal fact, as a means of interpretation, as the duties of the law enforcer, - the independent value of the guilt presumption is lost as of the highly probabilistic supposition fixed in the legal norm. The realization of the guilt presuming when bringing to the civil liability, should not be identified either with the guilt presumption, nor with the noem-presumption, and should be viewed as the right enforcing guilt presuming. The guilt presuming is the process of fixing the guilt supposition in a legal norm, it is the norm-presumption itself, it is the process of realizing the guilt supposition, including the duty of the court to recognize the supposed fact as a fact in evidence. With the account for the importance and significance of the guilt presuming for the civil legal regulation, and due to the fact that the guilt presuming is a significant feature of the civil law in particular, which differentiates it from the public law branches, the question is raised in the article about the possibility to acknowledge it as a civil law principle.

Keywords: presuming; guilt; guilt presuming; guilt presumption functions; guilt presumption realization; legal suppositions; norms-presumptions; civil law principle

Bibliograficheskij spisok

1. Andreev A.A. Osnovanija osvobozhdenija ot jeventual'noj otvetstvennosti // Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2010. №1. S. 14–16.

2. Babaev V.K. Prezumpcii v sovetskom prave. Gor'kij: Gor'k. vyssh. shk. MVD SSSR, 1974. 124 s.

3. Baranov V.M., Pershin V.B., Pershina I.V. Metodologicheskie predposylki formirovanija teorii pravovyh prezumpcij // Jurid. tehnika. 2008. №2. S. 18–28.

4. Barinov N.A. Imushhestvennye potrebnosti i grazhdanskoe pravo. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta, 1987. S. 65–66.

5. Barkov A.V. Grazhdansko-pravovye sredstva v mehanizme pravovogo regulirovanija: voprosy metodologii // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teorija i praktika. 2008. №5. S. 56–59.

6. Barkov A.V. Dogovor kak sredstvo pravovogo regulirovanija rynka social'nyh uslug. M.: Jurist, 2008. 291 s.

7. Bronnikova M.N. Grazhdansko-pravovaja prezumpcija po rossijskomu zakonodatel'stvu: soderzhanie, pravovye formy i primenenie: dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. Samara, 2006. 24 s.

8. Bulaevskij B.A. «Vosstanovlenie» oprovergnutoj prezumpcii // Advokat. 2010. №10. S. 22–25.

9. Bulaevskij B.A. K voprosu o ponjatii prezumpcij v prave // Zhurn. ros. prava. 2010. №3. S. 63–71.

10. Bulaevskij B.A. Funkcii pravovyh prezumpcij // Zhurn. ros. prava. 2011. №3. S. 33–41.

11. Volozhanin V.P. Juridicheskie predpolozhenija v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave i processe: avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. Sverdlovsk, 1953.

12. Gavrilov Je.P. Pravovaja otvetstvennost' patentnogo poverennogo // Patentnyj poverennyj. 2010. №1. S. 10–17.

13. Kaminskaja V.I. Uchenie o pravovyh prezumpcijah v ugolovnom processe / otv. red. N.N. Poljanskij; Akad. nauk SSSR. In-t prava. M.; L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1948. 132 s.

14. Karanina N.S. Pravovye prezumpcii v teorii prava i rossijskom zakonodatel'stve: avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. M., 2006. S. 5–6. 28 s.

15. Kachur N.F. Prezumpcii v sovetskom semejnom prave: dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. Sverdlovsk, 1982. 220 s.

16. Korobov P.V. Vidy osvobozhdenija ot ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti i princip prezumpcii nevinovnosti // Ros. justicija. 2012. №1. S. 37–40.

17. Kuznecova O.A. Prezumpcii v grazhdanskom prave. SPb.: Jurid. centr Press, 2004. 349 s.

18. Kuznecova O.A. Principy grazhdanskogo prava: sovremennoe sostojanie voprosa // Vlast' zakona. 2011. №4(8). S. 87–95.

19. Mejer D.I. O juridicheskih vymyslah i predpolozhenijah, o skrytnyh i pritvornyh dejstvijah. Kazan', 1854. 127 s.

20. Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti stat'i 107 Ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii v svjazi s zhaloboj grazhdanina Jestonskoj Respubliki A.T. Fedina: postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 6 dek. 2011 g. №27-P // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 2011. №51, st. 7552.

21. Postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 27.09.2010 g. №KG-A40/7120-10 po delu №A40-104761/09-122-697 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

22. Puginskij B.I. Grazhdansko-pravovye sredstva v hozjajstvennyh otnoshenijah. M.: Jurid. lit., 1984. 224 s.

23. Serikov Ju.A. Processual'nye funkcii pravovyh prezumpcij v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: avtoref. dis. …kand. jurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2005. 26 s.

24. Serova O.A., Pisarev G.A. Ogranichenija kak jelementy mehanizma grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovanija // Vestnik Samarskoj gumanitarnoj akademii. Ser.: Pravo. 2012. №1. S. 43–48.

25. Ugolovno-processual'nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 18 dek. 2001 g. №174-FZ (red. ot 23.07.2013) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 2001. №52, ch. I, st. 4921.

26. Hromova N.M. Princip prezumpcii nevinovnosti pri osobom porjadke sudebnogo razbiratel'stva // Zhurn. ros. prava. 2013. №6. S. 107–115.

27. Cukanov N.N. O kriterijah pravovoj prezumpcii // Zakonotvorcheskaja tehnika v sovremennoj Rossii: sostojanie, problemy, sovershenstvovanie: sb. st.; v 2 t. / pod red. V.M. Baranova. N. Novgorod, 2001. T. 1. S. 502–509.