Issue 3 (17) 2012

Haritonova The Unification Treaty as an independent type of contract

The Unification Treaty as an independent type of contract

Yu.S. Haritonova

Moscow Academy of Economics and Law

23, Warsaw highway, Moscow, 117105

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Currently used in practice countless varieties of contracts, many of which are built on models that are not mentioned in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Still, it marked the model contracts are sufficiently representative. Using this principle is fairly consistent "results orientation" among the types of civil law contracts can allocate contracts for the association of persons, in which the activity of several individuals to achieve common goals. A test of association means that the sides, making the action under contract, must pursue the same goal, a means of achieving that could be a joint activity.

We offer a select group of contracts for the association of persons, some clarifying the classification of civil contracts and expanding the number of its contractual structures. Consideration of this group due to the inclusion of treaties establishing nepravosubektnyh formations, including the subjects of taxation or competitive relationships, allows us to give the whole group and the new name more accurately reflects the nature of these associations on an abstract level: the merger agreement.

Note that this association may be assumed as an association of property and of persons that are inextricably linked in our view. When the merged entity, their activities will be carried out on the basis of the property or skills. Conversely, if the combined assets are worth it for certain persons, property managers, to ensure its effective use, retrieve its useful properties.

The main features of the considered type of contract are: the existence of a common legal goal of participants; bring together the participants and their activities to achieve this goal, the management of the association.

For further classification of types of contracts mentioned above can be used to combine separate classification criteria. In this case it is understood that the treaties, combined in some groups, at each subsequent stage is representative of the preceding. Pending an agreement on joint activities aimed at creating and managing collective entities, as recognized and not recognized as legal subjects.

Thus, depending on whether the entity is created or not, this type of species will be agreements on the establishment of law (legal entities) and not the subject of law formations.

Keywords: merger agreement; the type of contract; not the subject of law; joint activities

Bibliograficheskij spisok

1. Belov V.A. Ponjatie korporativnogo prava // Korporativnoe pravo: aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki / pod obw. red. V.A. Belova. M.: Jurajt-Izdat, 2009. 993 s.

2. Beljaeva O.A. Pravovye problemy aukcionov i konkursov. M.: Jurisprudencija, 2011. 296 s.

3. Beljaeva O.A. Predprinimatel'skoe pravo: kurs lekcij. 3-e izd. M.: Justicinform, 2007. S. 30–37.

4. Braginskij M.I. Dogovory ob uchrezhdenii kollektivnyh obrazovanij// Pravo i jekono­mika. 2003. №3.

5. Braginskij M.I., Vitrjanskij V.V. Dogovornoe pravo. Obwie polozhenija. 3-e izd., ster. M.: Statut, 2001. Kn. 1. 1743 s.

6. Bratus' S.N. Sub#ekty grazhdanskogo prava. M.: Gosjurizdat, 1950.

7. Vinichenko E. Konsolidirovannaja gruppa nalogoplatel'wikov // Konsul'tant. 2012. №5.

8. Gordon M.V. Sistema dogovorov v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave // Uchen. zap. Har'k. jurid. in-ta. 1954. Vyp. 5. S. 65–87.

9. Gorodov O.A. Nedobrosovestnaja konkurencija: teorija i pravoprimenitel'naja praktika. M.: Statut, 2008. 216 s.

10. Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik; v 2 t. T. 2, polutom 1 / otv. red. E.A. Suhanov. M.: BEK, 1999. 682 s.

11. Dvoreckaja A.E., Nikol'skij Ju.B. Finansovo-promyshlennye gruppy: menedzhment + finansy. M.: PRINT¬LAJN, 1995.

12. Zobova E.P. Konsolidirovannaja gruppa: osnovnye ponjatija i osobennosti administrirovanija // Nalogovaja proverka. 2012. №1.

13. Iljushnikov S.M. O suwestvennyh uslovijah dogovora prostogo tovariwestva// Obwestvo i pravo. 2009. №2. S. 13–20.

14. Kozlova N.V. Uchreditel'nyj dogovor o sozdanii kommercheskih obwestv i tovariwestv. M.: BEK, 1994. 174 s.

15. Kommentarij k chasti vtoroj Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii dlja predprinimatelej / pod obw. red. M.I. Braginskogo. M.: Fond «Pravovaja kul'tura», 1996. Gl. 55, st. 1041–1054. 749 s.

16. Lermontov Ju. Sozdanie konsolidirovannoj gruppy nalogoplatel'wikov // Audit i nalogooblozhenie. 2012. №1. S. 11–16.

17. Markov P.A. Teorija reorganizacii kommercheskih juridicheskih lic: problemy pravovogo regulirovanija i pravoprimenenija: avtoref. dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk. M., 2012.

18. Mihajlov N.I. Pravovaja organizacija finansovo-promyshlennyh grupp v Rossii: sostojanie i perspektivy. M.: Volters Kluver, 2005.

19. Predprinimatel'skoe pravo Rossijskoj Federacii / otv. red. E.P. Gubina, P.G. Lahno. M.: Jurist#, 2003. 1001 s.

20. Tal'chikov S.A. Ponjatie i soderzhanie dogovora prostogo tovariwestva v predprinimatel'skoj sfere: avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. M., 2009. 30 s.

21. Filippova S.Ju. Chastnopravovye sredstva organizacii i dostizhenija pravovyh celej. M.: Statut, 2011. 320 s.

22. Haritonova Ju.S. K voprosu ob organizacionnyh pravootnoshenijah v dogovore prostogo tovariwestva // Aktual'nye problemy grazhd. prava, grazhd. i arbitr. processa: v 2 ch. Ch. 1. Grazhd. pravo: materialy nauch. konf. Voronezh, 15–16 marta 2002 g. / pod red. E.I. Nosarevoj, T.N. Safronovoj. Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezh. gos. un-ta, 2002.

23. Shitkina I.S. Pravovoe regulirovanie organizacii i dejatel'nosti holdinga kak formy predprinimatel'skogo ob#edinenija: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra jurid. nauk. M., 2006. 23 s.