Issue 3 (17) 2012

Bogdanov Klyachin CONDITIONS AND REASONS FOR THE CIVIL AND LEGAL LIABILITY OF THE PERSON HAVING SOLE FUNCTIONS OF THE STOCK COMPANY EXECUTIVE BODY

CONDITIONS AND REASONS FOR THE CIVIL AND LEGAL LIABILITY OF THE PERSON HAVING SOLE FUNCTIONS OF THE STOCK COMPANY EXECUTIVE BODY

A.V. Bogdanov

Perm State National Research University

614990, Perm, Bukireva st., 15

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

A.A. Klyachin

Perm State National Research University

614990, Perm, Bukireva st., 15

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

The authors of the article discover the conditions and the reasons of the civil and legal liability of the person having sole functions of the stock company executive body. On the basis of the current legislation analysis the authors come to the conclusion that for considering the matter of the executive body sole functions person liability, all the essential elements of the offence are used, the illegal action (or no action) should be defined as well as shareholder’s or company’s losses and the cause-and-effect relationship and the presumed fault. The article defines civil and legal contents of such categories as good faith and reasonableness of the action (or no action) of the person having sole functions of the stock company executive body. It is proved that justifiable actions (or no action) of the manager should comply simultaneously with two criteria: the action (or no action) should be performed entirely to the benefit of the company, the action (or no action) should be performed with good faith and reasonably. In the conclusion of the article the authors justify the practicability of formalizing the preliminary crime in the legislation as related to the liability of the person having the sole functions of the stock company executive body. In case the legal body incurs losses due to the activities of the person having sole functions of the stock company executive body, the civil offence elements structure should include illegal actions, cause-and-effect relationship and losses.

Keywords: the civil and legal liability; of the person having sole functions of the stock company executive body; the stock company

Bibliograficheskij spisok

1. Braginskij M.I. // Kommentarij chasti pervoj Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii. M., 1995.

2. Grazhdanskoe pravo: v 2 t. / pod red. prof. E. A. Suhanov. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: BEK, 2000. T. 1. 816 s.

3. Ivanov I.L. Otvetstvennost' upravljajuwih pered akcionernym obwestvom (opyt Rossii i Germanii) // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1998. №11. S. 94–102.

4. Kaverina T.V. Organy upravlenija akcionernogo obwestva // Aktual'nye problemy grazhdanskogo prava: sb. st. / pod red. O.Ju. Shilohvosta. M.: NORMA, 2003. Vyp. 7. S. 90−121.

5. Kvanina V.V. Professional'naja i predprini­matel'skaja dejatel'nost' // Civilist. 2011. №2. S. 27 33.

6. Kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii chasti pervoj (postatejnyj) /pod red. O.N. Sadikova. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop., s ispol'zovaniem sudebno-arbitr. praktiki. M.: Jurid. firma «KONTRAKT: INFRA», 2002. 940 s.

7. Kuznecova O.A. Prezumpcii v grazhdanskom prave. SPb.: Jurid. centr «Press», 2004. 349 s.

8. Kuznecova O.A. Grazhdansko-pravovaja otvetstvennost': neobosnovannyj otryv civilisticheskoj nauki ot obwej teorii prava // Aktual'nye problemy chastnopravovogo regulirovanija: materialy Vseros. IX nauch. foruma (g. Samara, 27−28 maja 2011 g.) / nauch. red. N.A. Ba¬rinov; otv. red. S.V. Martysh¬kin. Samara, 2011. S. 398−406.

9. Rubeko G.L. Pravovoj status organov upravlenija akcionernyh obwestv. M.: Statut, 2007. 190 s.

10. Teljukina M.V. Kommentarij k Federal'­nomu zakonu «Ob akcionernyh obwestvah» (postatejnyj). M.: Volters Kluver, 2005. 656 s.

11. Shitkina I. Dogovor peredachi polnomochij edinolichnogo ispolnitel'nogo organa akcionernogo obwestva upravljajuwej organizacii // Hozjajstvo i pravo. 2006. №3.

12. Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti rjada polozhenij Tamozhennogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii v svjazi s zaprosom Arbitrazhnogo suda goroda Sankt-Peterburga i Leningradskoj oblasti, zhalobami Otkrytyh akcionernyh obwestv «Avtovaz» i «Kombinat "Severonikel'", Obwestv s ogranichennoj otvetstvennost'ju «Vernost'», «Vita-Pljus» i «Nevsko-Baltijskaja transportnaja kompanija», Tovariwestva s ogranichennoj otvetstven­nost'ju «Sovmestnoe Rossijsko-Juzhno­afrikanskoe predprijatie "Jekont" i grazhda­nina A.D. Chulkova»: postanovle­nie Konstituc. suda Ros. Federacii ot 27 apr. 2001 g. №7-P // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 2001. №23, st. 2409.

13. Proekt Federal'nogo zakona Rossijskoj Federacii «O vnesenii izmenenij v Grazhdanskij kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii: chast' pervuju, vtoruju, tret'ju i chetvertuju», podgotovlennyj vo ispolnenie ukaza Prezidenta Rossijskoj Federacii ot 18.07.2008 №1108 «O sovershenstvovanii grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva» s jekspertnym zakljucheniem po proektu [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

14. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 22 maja 2007 g. №871/07; postanovlenie FAS Volgo-Vjatskogo okruga ot 30 janvarja 2009 g. po delu №A11-1302/2008-K1-15/97; postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 12 avgusta 2008 g. №KG-A40/7089-08; postanovlenie FAS Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 25 dekabrja 2008 g. №F04-7557/2008 (17100-A27-16) [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

15. Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Ural'skogo okruga ot 6 dekabrja 2005 g. №F09-3772/05-S6 po delu №A60-17629/2005 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tant­Pljus».

16. Postanovlenie FAS Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 7 dekabrja 2010 g. po delu №A46-19160/2008 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».