DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2015-2-119-124


О.А. Burkina

Perm Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia

125, Karpinskogost., Perm, 614012

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

А.А. Ustinov

Perm Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia

125, Karpinskogost., Perm, 614012

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


Introduction: the article considers a controversial issue about introduction of such type of punishment as confiscation of property as a measure of combating corruption-related crimes. Purpose: the authors analyse and compare different approaches to defining legal nature of confiscation of property. Methods: the methodological framework of the research is based on a set of methods of scientific cognition, among which the dialectic method is the major one. The authors use general scientific methods (dialectics, analysis and synthesis, abstraction and concretization) and methods specific to legal science (technical, comparative legal). Special attention is paid to the comparative and systemic methods of research. Results: the authors view corruption as a serious threat for the system of public authority in the Russian Federation. Corruption does not only mean primitive kinds of bribery and elementary abuse. Combating corruption-related crimes requires taking complex measures of different character, including improvement of criminal legislation and enforcement practice, particularly improvement of the effectiveness of administering punishments for persons guilty of committing such crimes. The main method of criminal law is compulsion, which must be legal, justified, fair and ineluctable. Confiscation of property has always been one of the most effective types of punishment in combating corruption-related crimes. Being a strict enough kind of punishment, it does not lead to severance of a convict’s useful social relations, criminal deformation of his personality, or social maladjustment, which is typical of the penalties implying imprisonment. In our opinion, confiscation of property is an effective measure when convicting of the crimes of mercenary nature, especially those causing damage to the state. The authors maintain that confiscation of property should necessarily be introduced into the system of punishments for criminal offences. Conclusions: thus, the item «j» - confiscation of property – must be included into Article 44 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as well as confiscation of property must be included into Part 3 of Article 45 of the Code as an additional type of punishment. Introduction of this type of penalty will allow for increasing the efficiency of combating corruption-related offences.



Keywords: doctrine of сriminal law; confiscation of property; compulsion; penal system; types of punishment; corruption; combating corruption; corruption-related crime


1.   Davitadze M.D. Ugolovnaya politika i ugolovnyy zakon [Criminal Policy and Criminal Law] // Problemy primeneniya ugolovnogo zakona v sovremennykh usloviyakh: sb. nauch. st. po itogam mezhvuz. nauch.-prakt. seminara v Mosk. un-te MVD Rossii 24 maya 2013 g., pamyati d.yu.n., professora N.I. Vetrova – The Problems of Criminal Law Enforcement in Modern Conditions: The Collection of Articles of the Research-to-Practice Seminar in Moscow University of MIA of Russia on 24 May, 2013 in Remembrance of Professor N.I. VetrovM., Yurisprudentsiya, 2014. Pp. 36–39. (In Russ).

2.   Konventsiya OON protiv korruptsii: prinyata Gener. Assambleey OON na 51-m Plenarnom zasedanii 31 okt. 2003 g.) [UN Convention Against Corruption (Adopted by the General Assembly of the UN at the 51st Plenary Session on 31 October, 2003)] // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii – Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2006. № 12. Art. 1231. (In Russ).

3.   Konventsiya ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za korruptsiyu ot 27 yanv. 1999 g. [The Convention on Criminal Responsibility for Corruption of 27 January, 1999] // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii. – Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation/ 2009. № 20. Art. 2394. (In Russ).

4.   Lopashenko N.A. Konfiskatsiya imushche-stva [Confiscation of Property]. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2012. 160 p. (In Russ).

5.   Luneev V.V. Poroki ugolovnogo zakono-tvorchestva. (Komu sluzhit UK)[The Blemishes of Criminal Lawmaking] URL: (data obrashcheniya: 31.10.2014). (In Russ).

6.   Montesk'ye Sh.L. O dukhe zakonov [The Spirit of Laws]. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 31.10.2014). (In Russ).

7.   Naumov A.V., Kibal'nik A.G., Orlov V.N., Volosyuk P.V. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo: uchebnik [International Criminal Law. Textbook]. Moscow: Yurayt, 2014. 464 p. (In Russ).

8.   O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye za-konodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s prinyatiem Federal'nogo zakona «O ratifikatsii konventsii soveta Evropy o preduprezhdenii terrorizma» i Federal'nogo zakona «O protivodeystvii terrorizmu»: Feder. zakon ot 27 iyulya 2006 g. № 153-FZ [On the Introduction of Amendments to Some Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation in the Connection with the Adoption of the Federal Law “On Ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism” and the Federal Law “On Countering Terrorism”: The Federal Law of 27 June, 2006 № 153-FZ] // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federatsii – Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2006. № 31. Ch. 1. Art. 3452. (In Russ).

9.   O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Feder. zakon ot 8 dek. 2003 g. № 162-FZ [On the Introduction of Amendments and Additions to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: The Federal Law of 8 December, 2003 № 162-FZ] // Ros. gazeta – The Russian Gazette. 2003. № 3366. (In Russ).

10. O Doktrine ugolovnogo prava [On the Doctrine of Criminal Law]. URL: iles/dok2012/doktrina30052012.doc (data obrashcheniya: 31.10.2014). (In Russ).




The Perm State University
614990, Perm, street Bukireva, 15
+7 (342) 2 396 275, +7 963 012 6422
ISSN 1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
Publishing 4 times a year
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in РИНЦ (the Russian index of scientific citing)

The founder: the State educational institution of the higher vocational training
“The Perm State University”.