DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2015-1-86-92

RESTORATION OF VIOLATED RIGHTS: PRINCIPLE OF CIVIL RIGHTS, PURPOSE, OR METHOD OF PROTECTION OF CIVIL RIGHTS

V.V. Tutinina

Moscow Academy of Economics and law

23 D., Varshavskoe shosse, Moscow,117105

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Introduction: in this article the correlation between the restoration of violated rights as a principle of civil law, the purpose and method of protection of civil rights. Purpose: the author analyzes the relation of these categories for the correct understanding of each of them. Methods: the methodological basis of this study is a set of methods of scientific cognition, among which the leading role is the dialectical method. This article uses scientific (dialectics, analysis and synthesis, abstraction and concretization) and private scientific research methods (formal-legal, comparative legal, technical and legal). Results: the ratio of the target (result) protection of civil rights and protection of civil rights, the author proposes to consider as the dependence of the choice of remedy against specific objectives (results); the author proves independence restore the situation that existed before the violation of rights, as a method of protection of civil rights, highlights and formulates the basic criteria for the use of the analyzed remedy, including the availability and legality of the provisions which authorized the person wants to recover, the violation of the former provisions, the existence of the infringed rights, the possibility of a real recovery by eliminating the consequences of misconduct. Conclusions: restoration of violated rights, should be considered in three aspects: as the principle of protection of civil rights, which means among other things the need, the necessity of restoration of violated rights; as one of the goals of protection of civil rights, along with the suppression, prevention, and elimination of violations of the right and others; and also as a way of protection of civil rights.

Keywords: principles of civil law; civil rights; the purpose of protection of civil rights, protection of civil rights;
list of methods of protection of civil rights; restoration of violated rights;
restoring the situation that existed before the violation of rights; broken law; conditions methods of protection

References

1.   Andreev Yu.N. Mekhanizm grazhdansko-pravovoy zashchity [The Mechanism of Civil Protection]. M.: Norma, Infra-M, 2010. 464 p. (In Russ).

2.   Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Moskovskogo oblastnogo suda ot 29 iyulya 2013 g. po delu № 33-13350 [Appeal Decision of Moscow Regional Court dd. 29.07.2013 in re № 33-13350] [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant-Plyus». (In Russ).

3.   Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik; v 2 ch. [Сivil Law: Textbook] / pod red. A.P. Sergeeva, Yu.K. Tolstogo. M.: Teis, 2005. Ch. 1. 765 p. (In Russ).

4.   Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chasti pervoy (postateynyy) [The Comment to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Part One (Itemized)] / G.E. Avilov, V.V. Bezbakh, M.I. Braginskiy i dr.; pod red. O.N. Sa­dikova. 3-e izd., ispr., pererab. i dop. M.: KONTRAKT, INFRA-M, 2005. 1062 s. (In Russ).

5.   Kuznetsova O.A. Normy-printsipy rossiyskogo grazhdanskogo prava [Norms-principles of Russian Civil Law]. M.: Statut, 2006. 269 p. (In Russ).

6.   Kuznetsova O.A. Vosstanovlenie polozheniya, sushchestvovavshego do narusheniya prava, i presechenie deystviy, narushayushchikh pravo, kak tseli i sposoby zashchity grazhdanskikh prav [The Restoration of the Situation Existing Prior to the Violation and Suppression of Actions Violating the Right as the Goals and Methods of Protection of Civil Rights] // Yuridicheska nauka i pravookhranitel'naya praktika – Jurisprudence and law-enforcement practice. 2013. № 3(25). P. 36–41. (In Russ).

7.   Latypov D.N., Akinfieva V.V. Sootnoshenie sposobov i tseley zashchity prav [The Ratio of the Ways and Purposes of Protecting the Rights] // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Ser.: Yuridicheskie nauki – Bulletin of the Perm university. Series: Jurisprudence. 2013. № 4(22). P. 193–198. (In Russ).

8.   Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 25 okt. 2011 № 5910/11 po delu № A65-15665/2010-SA2-34 [The Decision of the Presidium of the Supreme arbitration court dd. 25.10.2011 in re № 5910/11] [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant-Plyus». (In Russ).

9.   Postanovlenie Semnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 14 yanv. 2010 g. № 17AP-12542/2009-GK po delu № A50-16784/2009 [The Decision of Seventeenth Arbitration Appeal Court dd. 14.01.2010 in re № 17AП-12542/2009-ГК] [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant-Plyus». (In Russ).

10. Postanovlenie Semnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 13 avg. 2012 g. № 17AP-7504/2012-GK po delu № A50-3037/2012 [The Decision of Seventeenth Arbitration Appeal Court dd. 13.08.2012 in re № 17АП-7504/2012-ГК] [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant-Plyus». (In Russ).

11. Postanovlenie Shestogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 31 okt. 2013 g. № 06AP-5111/2013 po delu № A73-5030/2013 [The Decision of Sixth Arbitration Appeal Court dd. 31.10.2013 in re № 06АП-5111/2013] [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant-Plyus». (In Russ).

12. Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Povolzhskogo okruga ot 13 dek. 2010 g. po delu № A12-23698/2009 [The Decision of the Federal arbitration court of the Volga region dd. 13.12.2010 in re № A12-23698/2009] [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant-Plyus». (In Russ).

13. Problemy razvitiya chastnogo prava: Sbornik statey k yubileyu Vladimira Saurseevicha Ema [Problems of Development of Private Law: a Collection for the Anniversary of Vladimir Sourceevich Em] / pod red. E.A. Sukhanov, N.V. Kozlova. M.: Statut, 2011. 559 p. (In Russ).

14. Rozhkova M.A. Sredstva i sposoby pravovoy zashchity storon kommercheskogo spora [Tools and Remedies of the Parties to a Commercial Dispute]. M.: Volters Kluver, 2006. 416 p. (In Russ).

15. English Private Law (2^nd Edition): Ed. by P. Birks. Oxford University Press, 2004. 342 p. (In Eng).

16. Goff R., Jones G. The Law of Restitution. 5^th ed. London: Sweet & Naxwell, 1998. 540 p. (In Eng).

17. Markesinis B.S., Lorenz W., Dannemann G. The German Law of obligations. Vol. 1. The Law of Contracts and Restitution: A Comparative Introdaction. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997. 942 p. (In Eng).