Issue 1 (23) 2014

PastukhovP.S. ROLE AND IMPORTANCE TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PROOF

ROLE AND IMPORTANCE TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PROOF

P.S. Pastukhov

Perm State National Research University
15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract: The article reveals the modernization of the Criminal Procedure Evidence based on the rapidly developing information and communication technologies, the use of technical knowledge to provide innovative criminal procedural activities. The analysis explores the complex value of technical knowledge in criminal law, criminal procedure and criminalistics activity. It is concluded that the use of digital technology, computer equipment, technical knowledge in criminal procedure proving to optimize the activity of the investigator, the process of gathering evidence to make more efficient. The process of gathering evidence, based on the achievements of science and technology is not only effective, but also more civilized. Staff body of inquiry and investigative body will not need to use unacceptable methods of influence on personality to obtain confessions, if evidence can be collected through scientific and technical, sometimes even without the participation of the suspect. As a result of attracting competent persons increased reliability of evidence that leads to their objectification. Using modern computer hardware allows to identify new sources of evidentiary information, collect and attach to the case file new evidence. Achieved the purpose of criminal proceedings: protection of the rights and lawful interests of individuals and organizations, victims of crime, protection against illegal and unreasonable charges, conviction and restriction of rights and freedoms.

Keywords: criminal procedure proof; evidence; technical knowledge; information and telecommunications technology; providing proof

References

1. Konstitucija Rossijskoj Federacii: prinjata vsenar. golosovaniem 12 dek. 1993 g. (red. ot 30.12.2008) // Ros. gaz. 2008. 31 dek.

2. Koldin V.Ja. Kriminalistika: vchera, segodnja, zavtra // Ros. justicija. 2011. №3. S. 21–24.

3. Ob utverzhdenii Instrukcii o porjadke predstavlenija rezul'tatov operativno-rozysknoj dejatel'nosti organu doznanija, sledovatelju ili v sud: рrikaz MVD Rossii №776, Minoborony Rossii №703, FSB Rossii №509, FSO Rossii №507, FTS Rossii №1820, SVR Rossii №42, FSIN Rossii №535, FSKN Rossii №398, SK Rossii №68 ot 27 sent. 2013 g. // Ros. gaz. 2013. 13 dek.

4. Ob utverzhdenii Instrukcii o porjadke provedenija sotrudnikami organov vnutrennih del glasnogo operativno-rozysknogo meroprijatija obsledovanie pomeshhenij, zdanij, sooruzhenij, uchastkov mestnosti i transportnyh sredstv: рrikaz MVD Ros. Federacii ot 30 marta 2010 g. №249 // Ros. gaz. 2010. 7 ijulja.

5. Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 11 janv. 2009 g. №7 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tant¬Pljus».

6. Ugolovnyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii: Feder. zakon Ros. Federacii ot 13 ijunja 1996 g. №63-FZ (red. ot 25.11.2013) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 1996. №25, st. 2954.

7. Ugolovno-processual'nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 18 dek. 2001 g. №174-FZ (red. ot 25.11.2013) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 2001. №52, ch. I, st. 4921.