Issue 1 (23) 2014

MikryukovV.A. MikryukovaG.A. SOME ISSUES RELATED TO APPLICATION OF CIVIL LAW BY ANALOGY

SOME ISSUES RELATED TO APPLICATION OF CIVIL LAW BY ANALOGY

V.A. Mikryukov

Moscow State Law University
9, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya st., Moscow, 123995
e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

G.A. Mikryukova

Moscow State Law University
9, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya st., Moscow, 123995
e-mail: mikryukovаThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract: Fundamental impossibility of gapless legal regulation of property and non-property relations between the initiative entities with autonomous will who are in equal legal status and autonomous in terms of organization and property, necessitates the use of tools such as analogy of statute and analogy of law.

Regular and typical lagging of civil law behind economic development requires a fairly rare resort to the analogy, but this institution becomes even more significant in specific, transitional, reform oriented periods of society’s life.

In modern conditions of development of Russian civil law the need to understand a number of theoretical problems of the statute and law analogy theory and to apply it in strict compliance with the basic principles of civil law has become urgent.

First of all, negative answer to the question whether the application of civil law by analogy is undesirable phenomenon, which must be eliminated, is substantiated; it is shown that the use of analogy exposes identified gaps to the legislator and does not prevent it to regulate overlooked relation in its sole discretion, besides, the very proclamation of the possibility to use the analogy in civil relations contributes to implementation of right vesting character of civil regulation and its preferential optionality.

Positive answer is given to the second pressing question, i.e. admissibility of the application by analogy of not only the statute but also other acts containing norms of civil law, as well as of quasi-rulemaking court stipulations; corresponding commendable court practices are shown.

Particular attention is given to the possibility to use, as analogy, special imperative norms, that provide for the origination or termination of restrictions and encumbrances of civil rights, as well as the measures of civil responsibility. Criticism relating to the use of such analogy as contradicting to the principles of civil law established by Art. 1, CC RF, is expressed. Proposals to refine the wording of Art. 6, CC RF, are offered.

Keywords: civil law; analogy of statute; analogy of law; analogy use limits; restriction on rights

References

1. Balashov A.N., Mishutina Je.I. Voprosy primenenija analogii zakona i analogii prava v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve // Ros. justicija. 2009. №10.

2. Bogdanov D.E. Voprosy dogovornoj spravedlivosti v otechestvennoj sudebnoj praktike // Ros. sud'ja. 2012. №12.

3. Braginskij M.I., Vitrjanskij V.V. Dogovornoe pravo. Obshhie polozhenija. M.: Statut, 1998. 848 s.

4. Vas'kovskij E.V. Civilisticheskaja metodologija. Ch. 1: Uchenie o tolkovanii i primenenii grazhdanskih zakonov. Odessa, 1901. 375 s.

5. Vestnik VAS RF. 2011. №4.

6. Vestnik VAS RF. 2007. №8.

7. Vestnik VAS RF. 2006. №1.

8. Vestnik VAS RF.1998. №11.

9. Vestnik VAS RF. 2012. №2.

10. Vestnik VAS RF. 2011. №11.

11. Vestnik VAS RF. 2009. №9.

12. Gavrilov Je. O naimenovanii juridiches­kogo lica // Hozjajstvo i pravo. 2011. №12.

13. Gavrilov Je. O neustojke // Hozjajstvo i pravo. 2012. №10.

14. Gorohov B.A., Knyshev V.P., Potapenko S.V. Praktika primenenija Grazhdanskogo processual'nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii: prakt. posobie / pod red. V.N. Solov'eva. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Jurajt, 2009. 674 s.

15. Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik; v 3 t. / pod red. A.P. Sergeeva. M.: RG Press, 2011. T. 1. 1008 s.

16. Grazhdanskoe pravo: v. 4 t. T. 1: Obshhaja chast' / otv. red. E.A. Suhanov. M.: Volters Kluver, 2007. 720 s.

17. Kabanova I.E. Pravovoe regulirovanie lizinga nedvizhimosti v Rossijskoj Federacii: monografija / pod obshh. red. M.A. Egorovoj. M.: Justicinform, 2013. 228 s.

18. Ljubarskaja T. Analogichnoe primenenie // JeZh-jurist. 2008. №27.

19. Momotov V.V., Uletova G.D., Markova-Murashova S.A. Primenenie instituta analogii v material'nom i processual'nom prave Rossii: istorija i sovremennost' // Sovremennoe pravo. 2011. №10.

20. O proekte Federal'nogo zakona «O normativnyh pravovyh aktah v Rossijskoj Federacii» // Zhurnal ros. prava. 2013. №3.

21. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 15 nojabrja 2007 g. №815-O-O.

22. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 11 ijunja 2013 g. №18431/12.

23. Postanovlenie FAS Ural'skogo okruga ot 25 nojab. 2009 g. №F09-9253/09-S6; Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 17 fevr. 2011 g. №A56-46149/2009; Postanovlenie FAS Central'nogo okruga ot 15 apr. 2010 g. №F10-872/10; Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 27 marta 2013 g. №A53-5344/2012; Postanovlenie FAS Central'nogo okruga ot 27 dek. 2012 g. №A09-238/2012 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

24. Postanovlenie FAS Ural'skogo okruga ot 9 apr. 2012 g. №F09-4920/11 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus»..

25. Postanovlenie FAS Ural'skogo okruga ot 1 sent. 2009 g. №F09-6292/09-S5 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

26. Postanovlenie Tret'ego arbitrazhnogo apelljacionnogo suda ot 15 maja 2013 g. №03AP-1467/13 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

27. Postanovlenie Odinnadcatogo arbitrazhnogo apelljacionnogo suda ot 24 dek. 2012 g. №11AP-14827/12; Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 26 ijunja 2007 g. №A42-8832/2006; Postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 14 ijulja 2008 g. №KG-A40/3905-08-P [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

28. Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 21 sent. 2011 g. №A56-2651/2010 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

29. Postanovlenie FAS Povolzhskogo okruga ot 1 avg. 2008 g. №A65-13804/06 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

30. Praktika primenenija Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii, chasti pervoj: 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. / pod obshh. red. V.A. Belova. M.: Jurajt; Jurajt-Izdat, 2011. 1301 s.

31. Problemy registracii prav, fiksacii i udostoverenija juridicheskih faktov grazhdanskogo prava: sb. st. / otv. red. M.A. Rozhkova. M.: Statut, 2013. 336 s.

32. Punkt 19 Informacionnogo pis'ma Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 29 dek. 2001 g. №65 «Obzor praktiki razreshenija sporov, svjazannyh s prekrashheniem objazatel'stv zachetom vstrechnyh odnorodnyh trebovanij» // Vestnik VAS RF. 2002. №3.

33. Ruzanova V.D. Tretejskoe razbiratel'stvo: normativno-pravovye osnovy razreshenija sporov // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2011. №8.

34. Svoboda dogovora i ee predely. T. 2: Predely svobody opredelenija uslovij dogovora v zarubezhnom i rossijskom prave / A.G. Karapetov, A.I. Savel'ev. M.: Statut, 2012. 453 s.

35. Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 1996. №6, st. 492.

36. Cherdancev A. Primenenie zakona po analogii // Ros. justicija. 1998. №6.

37. Jakovlev V.F. Grazhdansko-pravovoj metod regulirovanija obshhestvennyh otnoshenij: 2-e izd., dop. M.: Statut, 2006. 240 s.