Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2022. Issue 4 (58) |
||||||||||
Title: | LIMITS OF THE EXERCISE OF FAMILY RIGHTS |
|||||||||
Authors: |
M. V. Ulianova, Russian State University of Justice |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
|
||||||||
ORCID: | 0000-0002-8609-783X |
ResearcherID: | --- | |||||||
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: |
--- |
|||||||||
Requisites: | Ulianova M. V. Predely osuschestvleniya semeynykh prav [Limits of the Exercise of Family Rights]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2022. Issue 58. Pp. 658–682. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-658-682 |
|||||||||
DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-658-682 |
|||||||||
Annotation: |
Introduction: modern ideas about the exercise of rights are associated with the concepts of limits of the exercise of rights and abuse of rights. This topic is discussed in the paper with regard to the science of family law. Researchers use the concept of the abuse of parental rights in works on family law, the legislator – when referring to measures of family law protection and the extreme form of responsibility. Meanwhile, the content of the interrelated concept of the limits of the exercise of family rights has not yet been researched in detail as distinguished from other concepts. There are no works providing insight into the scope of this concept determined by its belonging to family law, no studies discussing the common and distinctive features of the concept in relation to other branches (in particular, in relation to civil law, where the abovementioned categories have been developed sufficiently). The existence of concepts that do not have a well-developed comprehensive definition negatively affects both social relations and law enforcement. Purpose: to define the concept of ‘the limits of the exercise of family rights’, to identify the attributes of the limits of the exercise of family rights, the meaning of the formation of the term. Methods: historical, comparative-legal, structural-functional. Results: the paper provides a study of the category ‘limits of the exercise of the right’ from a historical perspective; identifies the attributes of the definition of this concept, thus distinguishing it from other similar concepts; provides understanding of the limits of the exercise of family rights and fulfilment of obligations as presented in the science of family law; offers the term ‘limits of the exercise of family rights and fulfilment of obligations’. Conclusions: the conclusions drawn as a result of the research conducted can be applied in the development of scientific knowledge about the exercise of family rights and fulfillment of obligations. |
|||||||||
Keywords: | limits of the exercise of family rights; exercise of family rights; fulfillment of family obligations; limits of family law; boundaries of family law; abuse of parental rights |
|||||||||
download the full-version article | ||||||||||
References: | 1. Agarkov M. M. Problema zloupotrebleniya pravom v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave [The Problem of Abuse of Right in Soviet Civil Law]. Izvestiya AN SSSR – Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences. 1946. Issue 6. Pp. 423-436. (In Russ.). 2. Anikin A. S. Soderzhanie i osushchestvlenie sub"ektivnogo grazhdanskogo prava [The Content and Exercise of a Civil Right]. Yurist – Jurist. 2008. Issue 3. Pp. 61–63. (In Russ.). 3. Antokol'skaya M. B. Semeynoe pravo [Family Law: textbook]. Moscow, 2010. 432 p. (In Russ.). 4. Belov A. P. Zloupotreblenie pravom vo vneshneekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti [Abuse of Right in Foreign Economic Activity]. Pravo i ekonomika – Law and Economics. 2000. Issue 3. Pp. 54–63. (In Russ.). 5. Bespalov Yu. F. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy realizatsii semeynykh prav rebenka v RF: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Theoretical and Practical Problems of Exercise of the Child's Family Rights in the Russian Federation: Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2002. 348 p. (In Russ.). 6. Bratus' S. N. O sootnoshenii grazhdanskoy pravosposobnosti i sub"ektivnykh grazhdanskikh prav [On the Relationship of Civil Legal Capacity and Civil Rights]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo – Soviet State and Law. 1949. Issue 8. Pp. 30–37. (In Russ.). 7. Bratus' S. N. Predely osushchestvleniya grazhdanskikh prav [Limits of the Exercise of Civil Rights]. Pravovedenie – Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Pravovedenie. 1967. Issue 3. Pp. 79–86. (In Russ.). 8. Wagatsuma S., Ariizumi T. Grazhdanskoe pravo Yaponii [Civil Law of Japan: in 2 books]. Ed. by R. O. Khalfin. Transl. from Japan. by V. V. Baturenko. Moscow, 1983. Book 1. 351 p. (In Russ.). 9. Vengerova L. Pedagogicheskiy etyud [Pedagogical Essay]. Moscow, 2004. 232 p. (In Russ.). 10. Wudarski A., Ul'yanova M. V. Pravovoy status biologicheskogo ottsa v sluchayakh mnozhestvennosti ottsovstva: evropeyskiy sravnitel'nyy analiz [The Legal Status of the Biological Father in Cases of Multiple Paternity: a European Comparative Analysis]. Lex Russica. 2022. Vol. 75. Issue 1 (182). Pp. 147–163. (In Russ.). 11. Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil Law]. Ed. by E. A. Sukhanov. Moscow, 2000. Vol. 1. 652 p. (In Russ.). 12. Hobbes T. Osnovy filosofii. Chast' tret'ya. O grazhdanine [Fundamentals of Philosophy. Part Three. On the Citizen]. Sochineniya [Works: in 2 vols.]. Moscow, 1989. Vol. 1. 662 p. (In Russ.). 13. Gromozdina M. V. Osushchestvlenie roditel'skikh prav pri razdel'nom prozhivanii roditeley po zakonodatel'stvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Exercise of Parental Rights in the Event of Separation of Parents under the Legislation of the Russian Federation: monograph]. Access from the legal reference system 'ConsultantPlus'. (In Russ.). 14. Gulyaev A. M. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo. Obzor deystvuyushchego zakonodatel'stva, kassatsionnoy praktiki Pravitel'stvuyushchego Senata i proekta Grazhdanskogo ulozheniya: posobie k lektsiyam [Russian Civil Law. Review of the Current Legislation, Cassation Practice of the Governing Senate and the Draft Civil Code: Lecture Guide]. St. Petersburg, 1913. 638 p. (In Russ.). 15. Gribanov V. P. Osushchestvleniyе i zashchitа grazhdanskikh prav [Exercise and Protection of Civil Rights]. Moscow, 2001. 410 p. (In Russ.). 16. Danilin V. I., Reutov S. I. Yuridicheskie fakty v sovetskom semeynom prave [Legal Facts in Soviet Family Law]. Sverdlovsk, 1989. 156 p. (In Russ.). 17. Deryugina T. V. Predely osushchestvleniya grazhdanskikh prav [Limits of the Exercise of Civil Rights: monograph]. Moscow, 2010. 246 p. (In Russ.). 18. Dmitrik N. A. Osushchestvlenie subˮek¬tiv¬nykh grazhdanskikh prav s ispol'zovaniem seti Internet [Exercise of Civil Rights Using the Internet]. Moscow, 2006. 178 p. (In Russ.). 19. Emel'yanov V. I. Razumnost҆, dobrosovestnost', nezloupotreblenie grazhdanskimi pravami [Reasonableness, Conscientiousness, Non-Abuse of Civil Rights]. Zakonnost' – Legality. 1998. Issue 10. Pp. 54–55. (In Russ.). 20. Il'in I. Obshchee uchenie o prave i gosudarstve (fragmenty) [General Doctrine of Law and State (Fragments)]. Pravovedenie – Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Pravovedenie. 1992. Issue 3. Pp. 93–99. (In Russ.). 21. Ioffe O. S. Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo [Soviet Civil Law]. Moscow, 1967. 611 p. (In Russ.). 22. Ioffe O. S., Gribanov P. V. Predely osushchestvleniya sub"ektivnykh grazhdanskikh prav [Limits of the Exercise of Civil Rights]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo – Soviet State and Law. 1964. Issue 7. Pp. 76-85. (In Russ.). 23. Zamriy O. N. Zloupotreblenie interesom v semeynykh pravootnosheniyakh mezhdu roditelyami i det'mi [Abuse of Interest in Family Legal Relations between Parents and Children: monograph]. Tver, 2018. 219 p. (In Russ.). 24. Kamyshanskiy V. P. Ogranichenie prava sobstvennosti (grazhdansko-pravovoy analiz): avtoref. dis. ... dokt. yurid. nauk [Restriction of Property Rights (Civil Law Analysis): Synopsis of Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2000. 56 p. (In Russ.). 25. Knyazeva E. V. K voprosu o spravedlivosti v pravovom regulirovanii semeynykh otnosheniy [On Justice in Legal Regulation of Family Relations]. Sed'moy Permskiy kongress uchenykh-yuristov (g. Perm', 18-19 noyabrya 2016 g.): sbornik nauchnykh statey [The Seventh Perm Congress of Lawyers (Perm, 2016, November 18-19): collection of scientific articles]. Ed. by V. G. Golubtsov, O. A. Kuznetsova. Moscow, 2017. 592 p. (In Russ.). 26. Kommentariy k grazhdanskomu kodeksu RF, chasti pervoy [Commentary on the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Part One]. Ed. by T. E. Abova, A. Yu. Kabalkin. Moscow, 2004. 553 p. (In Russ.). 27. Confucius. Ya veryu v drevnost' [I Believe in Antiquity]. Comp., transl. and comment. by I. I. Semenenko. Moscow, 1995. 384 p. (In Russ.). 28. Krasheninnikov P. V. Staraya novaya sem'ya, semeynoye zakonodatel'stvo [Old New Family, Family Legislation]. Sobranie sochineniy [Collected Works: in 10 vols.]. Moscow, 2019. Vol. 6. 336 p. (In Russ.). 29. Maksimenko S. T. Osushchestvlenie grazh¬danskikh prav i ispolnenie obyazannostey: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Exercise of Civil Rights and Performance of Duties: Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Saratov, 1970. 224 p. (In Russ.). 30. Malinovskiy A. A. Zloupotreblenie pravom [Abuse of Right]. Moscow, 2002. 128 p. (In Russ.). 31. Malinovskiy A. A. Sposoby osushchestvleniya prava [Ways of Exercising the Right]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law. 2007. Issue 3. Pp. 48–56. (In Russ.). 32. Mal'ko A. V. Stimuly i ogranicheniya v prave [Incentives and Restrictions in Law]. Moscow, 2003. 250 p. (In Russ.). 33. Malein N. S. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' i spravedlivost' [Legal Responsibility and Fairness]. Moscow, 1992. 204 p. (In Russ.). 34. Maleina M. N. Lichnye neimushchestvennye prava grazhdan: ponyatie, osushchestvlenie, zashchita [Personal Non-Property Rights of Citizens: Concept, Exercise, Protection]. 2nd ed., rev. and exp. Moscow, 2001. 168 p. (In Russ.). 35. Matantsev D. A. Zloupotreblenie pravom v grazhdanskom i semeynom zakonodatel'¬stve i doktrine Rossiyskoy Federatsii: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Abuse of the Right in Civil and Family Law and Doctrine of the Russian Federation: Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2012. 220 p. (In Russ.). 36. Meyer D. I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo [Russian Civil Law: in 2 parts]. Based on the 8th ed., 1902, rev. and exp. Moscow, 1997. Part 2. 292 p. (In Russ.). 37. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chasti pervoy [Scientific and Practical Commentary on the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Part One]. Ed. by V. P. Mozolin, M. N. Maleina. Moscow, 2004. 848 p. (In Russ.). 38. Nechaeva A. M. Predely osushchestvleniya roditel'skikh prav [Limits of the Exercise of Parental Rights]. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost' – Socialist Legality. 1986. Issue 7. Pp. 19–21. (In Russ.). 39. Ozhegov S. I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Ed. by N. Yu. Shvedova. Moscow, 1987. 797 p. (In Russ.). 40. Orlovskiy P. E. O proekte osnov grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva [On the Project of Civil Legislation Fundamentals]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo – Soviet State and Law. 1961. Issue 1. Pp. 91–96. (In Russ.). 41. Pashin V. M. Institut zloupotrebleniya sub"ektivnymi pravami de lege ferenda [Institute of Abuse of Rights de lege ferenda]. Aktual'nye problemy grazhdanskogo prava: sbornik statey [Current Problems of Civil Law: Collected Articles]. Moscow, 2003. Issue 7. Pp. 28–62. (In Russ.). 42. Podmarev A. A. Konstitutsionnye osnovy ogranicheniya prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: avtoref. dis. ...kand. yurid. nauk [Constitutional Foundations for the Restriction of Rights and Freedoms of the Person and Citizen in the Russian Federation: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Saratov, 2001. 24 p. (In Russ.). 43. Pokrovskiy I. A. Osnovnye problemy grazh¬danskogo prava [Main Problems of Civil Law]. Moscow, 2001. 350 p. (In Russ.). 44. Porotikova O. A. Problemy zloupotrebleniya sub"ektivnym grazhdanskim pravom [Problems of Abuse of Civil Right]. Moscow, 2019. 242 p. (In Russ.). 45. Ryasentsev V. A. Semeynoe pravo [Family Law: textbook]. Moscow, 1971. 296 p. (In Russ.). 46. Ryasentsev V. A. Usloviya i yuridicheskie posledstviya otkaza v zashchite grazhdanskikh prav [Conditions and Legal Consequences of Denial of Civil Rights Protection]. Sovetskaya yustitsiya – Soviet Justice. 1962. Issue 9. Pp. 7–10. (In Russ.). 47. Samoylova M. V. Osushchestvlenie prava lichnoy sobstvennosti grazhdan SSSR [Exercise of the Right to Personal Property of Citizens of the USSR]. Voprosy grazhdanskogo prava i protsessa [Issues of Civil Law and Process: collected articles]. Leningrad, 1969. 37 p. (In Russ.). 48. Semeynoe pravo [Family Law: textbook]. Ed. by Yu. F. Bespalov, O. A. Egorova, O. Yu. Il'i¬¬na. Moscow, 2015. 415 p. (In Russ.). 49. Spencer H. Sinteticheskaya filosofiya [Synthetic Philosophy]. Transl. from Eng. Kiev, 1997. 512 p. (In Russ.). 50. Ul'bashev A. Kh. Obshchee uchenie o lichnykh pravakh [General Doctrine of Personal Rights]. Moscow, 2019. 255 p. (In Russ.). 51. Khudyakova O. Yu. Ustanovlenie proiskhozhdeniya detey po zakonodatel'stvu RF i SShA: sravnitel'noe issledovanie: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Establishing the Origin of Children under the Legislation of the Russian Federation and the United States: a Comparative Study: Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2009. 210 p. (In Russ.). 52. Shelyutto M. L. Voprosy, voznikayushchie v sudebnoy praktike po delam o proiskhozhdenii rebenka [Issues Arising in Judicial Practice in Cases on the Child's Origin]. Kommentariy sudebnoy praktiki [Commentary on Judicial Practice]. Ed. by K. B. Yaroshenko. Moscow, 2011. Issue 16. Pp. 121–134. (In Russ.). 53. Chefranova E. A. Mekhanizm semeyno-pravovogo regulirovaniya imushchestvennykh otnosheniy suprugov: dis. ... dokt. yurid. nauk [The Mechanism of Family Law Regulation of Property Relations of Spouses: Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2007. 630 p. (In Russ.). 54. Jaspers K. Smysl i naznacheniya istorii [The Origin and Goal of History]. Moscow, 1991. 530 p. (In Russ.). 55. Dieter H. Familienrecht. Walter de Gruyter, 2012. 346 p. (In Germ.). 56. Lamont R. Family Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. 648 p. (In Eng.). 57. Lowe N., Douglas G. Bromley's Family Law. Oxford University Press, 2015. 1127 p. (In Eng.). 58. Rauscher T. Familienrecht. Heidelberg, 2008. 494 p. (In Germ.). |
|||||||||
Received: | 01.03.2022 | |||||||||
Financing: |
--- |