Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2022. Issue 4 (58) |
||||||||||
Title: | DIGITALIZATION OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AS A WAY TO ENSURE ACCESS TO JUSTICE |
|||||||||
Authors: |
N. A. Razveykina, Samara National Research University |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | ||||||||
ORCID: | 0000-0002-0287-9421 |
ResearcherID: | AEA-6098-2022 |
|||||||
Статьи автора в БД «Scopus» и «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
E. G. Shikhanova, Samara National Research University |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | |||||||||
ORCID: | 0000-0001-9568-6989 |
ResearcherID: | AAI-5475-2021 |
|||||||
Статьи автора в БД «Scopus» и «Web of Science»: | DOI: 10.15293/2226-3365.1806.06 | |||||||||
A. V. Dmitriev, Autonomous Non-profit Organization of Higher Education Humanities University |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | |||||||||
ORCID: | 0000-0002-4342-5821 |
ResearcherID: | GUE-4140-2022 |
|||||||
Статьи автора в БД «Scopus» и «Web of Science»: | DOI: 10.35853/UfH-Public/Private-2020-24 DOI: 10.35853/UfH-RMP-2019-L07 |
|||||||||
Requisites: | Razveykina N. A., Shikhanova E. G., Dmitriev A. V. Digitalization of Legal Proceedings as a Way to Ensure Access to Justice. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2022. Issue 58. Pp. 621–627. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-621-627 |
|||||||||
DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-621-627 |
|||||||||
Annotation: |
Introduction: rapid spread of the coronavirus infection caused restrictions that have affected all areas of social relations. Russian legal proceedings have also changed significantly. The new context revealed problems in ensuring the work of the courts and administration of justice. The purpose of the article is to analyze the problems of the justice system during the pandemic, in particular, the inability to exercise the right to protection, lack of access to justice, violation of procedural deadlines, technical unpreparedness of courts for the implementation and use of information technologies in justice. Methods: general scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, comparison and classification, abstraction and axiomatic method); statistical methods; special legal methods such as content analysis of legal acts and interpretation of laws. Results: we have analyzed legislation and compared Russian experience with the level of digitalization of judicial systems in foreign countries. The study indicates a low level of digital transformation of Russian legal proceedings and poor quality of the changes that have taken place. The realization of the right to judicial protection appears to be the most urgent problem. Conclusions: the pandemic showed unreadiness of the Russian judicial system for the rapid implementation of information technologies. However, it seems likely that in the short term, due to the information technology development, it will become possible in some cases to abandon the practice of face-to-face hearings on a wide range of cases. |
|||||||||
Keywords: | digitalization of justice; online justice; information technology in legal proceedings; pandemic |
|||||||||
download the full-version article |
||||||||||
References: | 1. Andreeva O. I., Kachalova O. V. Rossiyskiy ugolovnyy protsess v epokhu koronavirusa: vyzovy vremeni [Russian Criminal Proceedings in the Era of Coronavirus: Challenges of Time]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo – Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2020. Issue 36. Pp. 5–15. DOI: 10.17223/ 22253513/36/1. (In Russ.). 2. Campbell M., Fredman S., Reeves A. Palliation or Protection: How Should the Right to Equality Inform the Government's Response to Covid-19? International Journal of Discrimination and the Law. 2020. Issue 20 (4). Pp. 183–202. DOI: 10.1177/1358229120969611. (In Eng.). 3. Denault V., Patterson M. L. Justice and Nonverbal Communication in a Post-Pandemic World: An Evidence-Based Commentary and Cautionary Statement for Lawyers and Judges. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 2021. Issue 45(1). DOI: 10.1007/s10919-020-00339-x. (In Eng.). 4. Freckelton I. COVID-19 and Family Law Decision-Making. Journal of Law and Medicine. 2020. Issue 27(4). Pp. 846–855. (In Eng.). 5. German A. S. Distantsionnoe sudoproizvodstvo v Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Remote Proceedings in the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation]. Pravosudie – Justice. 2020. Vol. 2. Issue 3. Pp. 100–118. DOI: 10.37399/ 2686-9241.2020.3.100-118. (In Russ.). 6. Greener M. 'COVID Bail': the Response of Victorian Courts and Prisons in Navigating the Impact of COVID-19. Current Issues in Criminal Justice. 2021. Vol. 33. Issue 1. Pp. 89–93. DOI: 10.1080/10345329.2020.1859969. (In Eng.). 7. Lazareva V. A. Ugolovnyy protsess v usloviyakh pandemii i potom [Criminal Process in a Pandemic and Then]. Yuridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta – Juridical Journal of Samara University. 2020. Vol. 6. Issue 3. Pp. 84–90. DOI: 10.18287/2542-047X-2020-6-3-84-90. (In Russ.). 8. Legg M. The COVID-19 Pandemic, the Courts and Online Hearings: Maintaining Open Justice, Procedural Fairness and Impartiality. Federal Law Review. 2021. Vol. 49. Issue 2. Pp. 161–184. (In Eng.). 9. Markovicheva Е. V. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya rossiyskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Digital Transformation of Russian Criminal Proceedings]. Pravosudie – Justice. 2020. Vol. 2. Issue 3. Pp. 86–99. DOI: 10.37399/2686-9241.2020.3.86-99. (In Russ.). 10. Nomani M. Z. M., Hussain Z., Dhawan R. Judicial Policy for the Covid-19 Pandemic in Comparative Legal Perspective. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2021. Issue 13(1). Pp. 261–266. DOI: 10.31838/ijpr/2021. 13.1.50. (In Eng.). 11. Nomani M. Z. M., Nusrati N. A., Mohataj M. COVID-19 Pandemic and Challenges of Public Health Administration & Criminal Justice System. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2020. Issue 12(3). Pp. 728–735. DOI: 10.31838/ijpr/2020.SP3.102. (In Eng.). 12. Nomani M. Z. M., Sherwani F. Legal Control of Covid-19 Pandemic and National Lockdown in India. Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research. 2020. Issue 11(4). Pp. 32–35. (In Eng.). 13. Novikova K. S. Tsifrovye novatsii i elementy elektronnogo pravosudiya v arbitrazhnom sudoproizvodstve v period rasprostraneniya koronavirusnoy infektsii [Digital Innovations and Elements of Electronic Justice in Commercial Proceedings during the Spread of Coronavirus Infection]. Obrazovanie i pravo – Education and Law. 2020. Issue 4. Pp. 240–244. DOI: 10.24411/2076-1503-2020-10434. (In Russ.). 14. Novopavlovskaya Е. Е. Deyatel'nost' Kon¬stitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii v period pandemii COVID-19 [Functioning of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation during the COVID-19 Pandemic]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii – Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2020. Issue 3(87). Pp. 61–65. DOI: 10.35750/2071-8284-2020-3-61-65. (In Russ.). 15. Ribeiro F. O., Sallaberry J. D., Dos Santos E. A., Tavares G. O. D. Ações dos tribunais de contas no enfrentamento dos efeitos do coronavírus [Actions by the Courts of Accounts to Minimize the Effects of Coronavirus]. Revista de Administracao Publica. 2020. Issue 54(5). Pp. 1402–1416. DOI: 10.1590/0034-761220200244. (In Eng.). 16. Rossner M., Tait D., McCurdy M. Justice Reimagined: Challenges and Opportunities with Implementing Virtual Courts. Current Issues in Cri¬minal Justice. 2021. Vol. 33. Issue 1. Pp. 94–110. DOI: 10.1080/10345329.2020.1859968. (In Eng.). 17. Salikov M. Federalism in Russia: Current State and Emerging Trends. BRICS Law Journal. 2020. Issue 7(4). Pp. 127–152. DOI: 10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-4-127-152. (In Eng.). 18. Sheremetyev I. I. Ispol'zovanie sovremennykh tsifrovykh tekhnologiy pri sudebnom razbiratel'stve ugolovnykh del v distantsionnom rezhime [Modern Digital Technologies as Applied for Remote Consideration of Criminal Cases]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina (MGYuA) – Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). 2020. Issue 10 (74). Pp. 97–107. DOI: 10.17803/2311-5998.2020.74.10.097-107. (In Russ.). 19. Sofiychuk N. V., Kolpakova L. A. K voprosu o dostupe grazhdan k pravosudiyu v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [On the Access of Citizens to Justice in the Conditions of Digitalization of Criminal Proceedings]. Lex Russica. 2020. Vol. 73. Issue 11. Pp. 71–80. DOI: 10. 17803/1729-5920.2020.168.11.071-080. (In Russ.). 20. Spesivov N. V., Titov A. A. Pandemiya COVID-19 kak faktor «vynuzhdennoy tsifrovizatsii» rossiyskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [COVID-19 Pandemic as a Factor in Forced Digitalization of Russian Criminal Proceedings]. Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii – Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy. 2020. Issue 3(134). Pp. 193–200. DOI: 10.24411/2227-7315-2020-10086. (In Russ.). |
|||||||||
Financing: |
--- |