Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2021. Issue 4 (54)

Title: PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INTERESTS IN REGULATION OF LAND USE
Authors:

G. N. Eyrian, Perm State University

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-3024-6816
ResearcherID: F-7623-2016
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»:       DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-38-535-547
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-45-540-563
Requisites: Eyrian G. N. Sochetanie interesov obshhestva i chastnykh interesov v regulirovanii ispol'zovaniya zemel' [Public and Private Interests in Regulation of Land Use]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2021. Issue 54. Pp. 699–721. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2021-54-699-721
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2021-54-699-721
Annotation:

Introduction: the article analyzes the evolution of Russian legislation on the use of land plots in the post-Soviet period from the perspective of public and private interests as reflected therein. Purpose: to analyze the development of the legislation of the Russian Federation on the use of land plots, with a focus on relations regarding the economic exploitation of the land plot as a natural resource; to assess current legislation from the perspective of the balance of public and private interests. Methods: methods of formal logic, historical, comparative legal and system-structural methods. Results: the development of legislation on the use of land plots in the Russian Federation has been inconsistent. At the first stage, before the adoption of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the public interest acted as the limit of the exercise of ownership of land and other natural resources. The Constitution of the Russian Federation does not directly establish the social function of ownership of land and other natural resources. The provisions of the Constitution imply thepotential opportunity for the development of various concepts of ownership in land law. Currently, the Land Code of the Russian Federation reflects the social function of ownership, which follows from a number of basic principles of land legislation. The legislator subordinated the regulation of relations on the use of land plots to public interests and, at the same time, liberalized the rights and obligations of the owners of land plots in contrast to the Land Code of the RSFSR of 1991. From our point of view, this circumstance demonstrates the legislator's desire to harmonize land and civil legislation in the regulation of land use.

Keywords: public and private interests in land use; social function of land ownership; constitutional provisions on land
  download the full-version article
References: 1. Aver'yanova N. N. Konstitutsionnaya pravosub"ektnost' naroda kak obladatelya prava na zemlyu [Constitutional Legal Personality of the People as the Owner of the Title to Land]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law. 2017. Issue 4. Pp. 38–44. (In Russ.).
2. Anisimov A. P., Melikhov A. I. Konstitutsionno-pravovoe regulirovanie prava chastnoy sobstvennosti na zemel'nye uchastki [Constitutional Law Regulation of the Private Property Right to Land Plots: Monograph]. Volgograd, 2009. 216 p. Access from the legal reference system 'ConsultantPlus'. (In Russ.).
3. Anisimov A. P., Ryzhenkov A. Ya. Zemel'-naya funktsiya sovremennogo gosudarstva: monografiya [Land Function of the Modern State: Monograph]. Moscow, 2012. 192 p. Access from the legal reference system 'ConsultantPlus'. (In Russ.).
4. Asknaziy S. I., Martynov B. S. Grazhdanskoe pravo i reguliruemoe khozyaystvo [Civil Law and Regulated Economy]. Leningrad, 1927. 109 p. (In Russ.).
5. Brinchuk M. M. Pravovoy titul prirody: sobstvennost' ili dostoyanie? [Legal Title to Nature: Property or Heritage?]. Aktual'nye prob-lemy okhrany prava sobstvennosti na prirodnye resursy i ob"ekty: mezhdistsiplinarnyy podkhod: sbornik statey uchastnikov Mezhdu¬narodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashhennoy pamyati chlena-korrespondenta Akademii nauk Respubliki Tatarstan, doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora, zasluzhennogo yurista Respubliki Tatarstan A. A. Ryabova (Kazan', 26–27 oktyabrya 2018 g.) [Current Issues of Protection of the Property Right to Natural Resources and Objects: an Interdisciplinary Approach: Collection of Articles of the Participants of the International Scientific and Practical Conference Dedicated to the Memory of the Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan, Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Honored Lawyer of the Republic of Tatarstan A. A. Ryabov (Kazan, October 26-27, 2018)]. Ed. by Z. F. Safin, E. V. Luneva. Moscow, 2019. Pp. 26-32. (In Russ.).
6. Bondarenko N. L. Sotsial'naya funktsiya prava sobstvennosti v kontekste konstitutsionnogo printsipa ee neprikosnovennosti [Social Function of the Property Right in the Context of the Constitutional Principle of Its Inviolability]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo – Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2018. Issue 28. Pp. 106–116. (In Russ.).
7. Volkov G. A., Golichenkov A. K., Ko-zyr' O. M. Postateynyy nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy Zemel'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Article-by-Article Scientific and Practical Commentary on the Land Code of the Russian Federation]. Access from the legal reference system 'ConsultantPlus'. (In Russ.)
8. Galyatin M. Yu. SShA: pravovoe regulirovanie ispol'zovaniya zemel' [The USA: Legal Regulation of Land Use]. Moscow, 1991. 252 p. (In Russ.).
9. Ikonitskaya I. A., Krasnov N. I., Bashmakov G. S. Kontseptsiya zemel'nogo zakonodatel'stva rynochnoy ekonomiki [The Concept of Land Legislation of the Market Economy]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11: Pravo – Moscow University Bulletin. Series 11. Law. 1994. Special Issue. Pp. 183–205. (In Russ.).
10. Kommentariy k Konstitutsii RF [Commentary on the Constitution of the Russian Federation]. Ed. by L. V. Lazarev. Moscow, 2009. Available at: http://constitution.garant.ru/science-work/comment/5366634/. Access from the legal reference system 'Garant'. (In Russ.).
11. Krasnov N. I. Pravovoy rezhim zemel' spetsial'nogo naznacheniya [Legal Regime of Special Designation Lands]. Moscow, 1961. 213 p. (In Russ.)
12. Krasnov N. I. Pravovye problemy ratsional'nogo ispol'zovaniya zemli v SSSR [Legal Problems of Rational Land Use in the USSR]. Pravovoe i ekonomicheskoe obespechenie ratsional'nogo ispol'zovaniya zemel' v sotsialisticheskikh stranakh: Materialy Vsesoyuznoy nauchno-teore¬ti¬ches¬koy konferentsii, 2–5 sentyabrya 1981 g., g. Alma-Ata [Legal and Economic Support for the Rational Land Use in Socialist Countries: Proceedings of the All-Union Scientific and Theoretical Conference, September 2–5, 1981, Alma-Ata]. Alma-Ata, 1984. Pp. 7–15. (In Russ.).
13. Krassov O. I. Pravo sobstvennosti na zemlyu v stranakh Evropy: monografiya [Land Ownership in European Countries: Monograph]. Moscow, 2014. 400 p. Access from the legal reference system 'ConsultantPlus'. (In Russ.).
14. Mozolin V. P., Barenboym P. D. Grazhdanskiy kodeks kak «ekonomicheskaya konstitutsiya strany»? [Civil Code as 'Economic Constitution of the Country'?]. Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika – Legislation and Economy. 2009. Issue 4. Pp. 5–8. Access from the legal reference system 'ConsultantPlus'. (In Russ.).
15. Nakhratov V. V. Nachala prava obshhenarodnoy sobstvennosti na zemlyu [Fundamentals of the Right of National Ownership of Land]. Agrarnoe i zemel'noe pravo – Agrarian and Land Law. 2019. Issue 12. Pp. 127–131. (In Russ.).
16. Osnovy sovetskogo prava [Fundamentals of Soviet Law]. Ed. by D. Magerovskiy. Moscow; Leningrad, 1927. 520 p. (In Russ.).
17. Putin V. V. Rossiya na rubezhe tysyacheletiy [Russia at the Turn of the Millennium]. Nezavisimaya Gazeta – Independent Newspaper. December 30, 1999. (In Russ.).
18. Reutov E. V. Sotsial'naya solidarnost' v obshhestvennom diskurse (opyt regional'nogo issledovaniya) [Social Solidarity in Public Discourse (Local Research Experience)]. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial'naya praktika – Sociologicheskaja nauka i social'naja praktika. 2017. Vol. 5. Issue 3. Pp. 111–125. (In Russ.).
19. Rozenblyum D. S. Osnovnye momenty evolyutsii sovetskogo zemel'nogo prava [Highlights of the Evolution of Soviet Land Law]. Sovetskoe pravo – Soviet Law. 1923. Issue 3. Pp. 110–141. (In Russ.).
20. Rozenblyum D. S. Teoriya i praktika revolyutsionnogo raspredeleniya zemel' [Theory and Practice of the Revolutionary Land Distribution]. Sovetskoe pravo – Soviet Law. 1924. Issue 4. Pp. 37–67. (In Russ.).
21. Sukhanov E. A. Veshhnoe pravo: nauchno-poznavatel'nyy ocherk [Law of Things: A Scientific and Educational Essay]. Moscow, 2017. 560 p. Access from the legal reference system 'ConsultantPlus'. (In Russ.).
22. Sukhanov E. A. Veshhnye prava v novom Zemel'nom kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Real Rights in the New Land Code of the Russian Federation]. Ekologicheskoe pravo – Environmental Law. 2003. Issue 1. Pp. 50–54. (In Russ.).
23. Syrodoev N. A. Pravovye problemy povyshe¬niya effektivnosti ispol'zovaniya zemli v usloviyakh ekonomicheskoy reformy: dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora yuridicheskikh nauk v forme nauchnogo doklada, vypolnyayushhego takzhe funktsii avtoreferata [Legal Issues of Improving Land Use Efficiency in the Context of Economic Reform: Dr. jurid. sci. diss. in the form of a scientific report]. Moscow, 1990. 49 p. (In Russ.).
24. Chernov V. M. Zemlya i pravo [Land and Law]. Petrograd, 1917. 240 p. (In Russ.).
25. Chirkin V. E. Vyzovy vremeni i konstitutsiya: elementy obshhestvennogo dogovora [Challenges and the Constitution: Elements of a Social Contract]. Konstitutsionnoe pravo i politika: Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii: Yuridicheskiy fakul'tet MGU imeni M. V. Lomonosova, 28–30 marta 2012 g. [Constitutional Law and Policy: Collection of Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference: Faculty of Law of Lomonosov Moscow State University, March 28-30, 2012]. Ed. by S. A. Avak'yan]. Moscow, 2012. Access from the legal reference system 'ConsultantPlus'. (In Russ.).
26. Eyriyan G. N. Metodologicheskie aspekty issledovaniya zemel'nogo uchastka kak nedvizhimoy veshhi [Methodological Aspects of Research on the Land Plot as an Immovable Thing]. Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovaniy – Methodological Problems of the Civil Law Researches. Moscow, 2020. Issue 2. Pp. 339–355. (In Russ.).
27. Eyriyan G. N. Zemel'nyy uchastok kak ob"ekt ispol'zovaniya [Land Plot as an Object of Use]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2019. Issue 3. Pp. 540–563. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-45-540-563. (In Russ.).
28. Yakovlev V. F. Pravovoe gosudarstvo: voprosy formirovaniya [The Rule of Law: Issues of Formation]. Moscow, 2012. 488 p. Access from the legal reference system 'ConsultantPlus'. (In Russ.).
29. Alexander G. S. Reply: The Complex Core of Property. Cornell Law Faculty Publications. 2009. Paper 10. Available at: http://scho¬larship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/10. (In Eng.).
30. Bonilla D. Liberalism and Property in Colombia: Property as a Right and Property as a Social Function. Fordham Law Review. 2011. Vol. 80. Issue 3. Article 6. Pp. 1135–1170. Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol80/iss3/6. (In Eng.).
31. Davidson N. Sketches for a Hamiltonian Vernacular as a Social Function of Property. Fordham Law Review. 2011. Vol. 80. Pp. 1053–1070. (In Eng.).
32. Doebele W. A. The Evolution of Concepts of Urban Land Tenure in Developing Countries. Habitat International. 1987. Vol. 11. Issue 1. Pp. 7–22. (In Eng.).
33. Foster S., Bonilla D. The Social Function of Property: A Comparative Law Perspective. Fordham Law Review. 2011. Vol. 80. Pp. 101–113. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract= 1960022. (In Eng.).
34. Frazier T. Protecting Ecological Integrity within the Balancing Function of Property Law. Environmental Law. 1998. Vol. 28. Issue 1. Pp. 53–112. (In Eng.).
35. Mirow M. C. The Social-Obligation Norm of Property: Duguit, Hayem, and Others. Florida Journal of International Law. 2010. Vol. 22. Pp. 191–226. (In Eng.).
36. Macedo J. Urban Land Policy and New Land Tenure Paradigms: Legitimacy vs. Legality in Brazilian Cities. Land Use Policy. 2008. Vol. 25. Issue 2. Pp. 259–270. (In Eng.).
37. Mualam N., Sotto D. From Progressive Property to Progressive Cities: Can Socially Sustainable Interpretations of Property Contribute toward Just and Inclusive City-Planning? Global Lessons. Sustainability. 2020; 12(11):4472. DOI: 10.3390/su12114472. (In Eng.).
38. Osorio L. M. The Social Functions of Pro¬perty in Latin America. 2014. Available at: http://www.citego.org/bdf_fiche-document-1356 _en.html. (In Eng.).
39. Ondetti G. The Social Function of Property, Land Rights and Social Welfare in Brazil. Land Use Policy. 2016. Vol. 50. Pp. 29–37. (In Eng.).
40. Sayın Y., Lehavi A., Oder B. E., Önok M., Francavilla D., Torre de Silva V., Sudarshan R. Land Law and Limits on the Right to Property: Historical, Comparative and International Analysis. European Property Law Journal. 2017. Vol. 6. Issue 1. Pp. 4–52. (In Eng.).
Received: 01.02.2021
Financing:

---

 

G. N. Eyrian

Perm State University

 

The Perm State University
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing

The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year