|
Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2018. Issue 4 (42) |
||||||||||
| Title: | BASIC RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF FAMILY MEMBERS OF THE OWNER OF A DWELLING |
|||||||||
| Authors: |
T. P. Strogonova, Perm State University |
 |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
|
|||||||
| ORCID: | 0000-0003-4432-5168 |
ResearcherID: | --- | |||||||
| Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
| Requisites: | Strogonova T.P. Osnovnye prava i obyazannosti chlenov sem'i sobstvennika zhilogo pomeshcheniya [Basic Rights and Obligations of Family Members of the Owner of a Dwelling]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2018. Issue 4. Pp. 700–723. (In Russ.).DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2018-42-700-723 |
|||||||||
| DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2018-42-700-723 |
|||||||||
| Annotation: |
Introduction: the paper provides classification of status rights ofafamily member of the owner of a dwelling, a list of his basic obligations, and analysis of the kind and limits of his legal responsibility. All this taken together characterizes the legal status of this subject of civil legal relations and derivative housing relations. It is stated that not all rights and obligations of a person form his legal status, but only those which characterize features of the corresponding subject of law. The author provides a detailed analysis of the current legislation defining the factual content of the status of a family member of the owner of a dwelling, offers suggestions for its improvement. The research also relies on studying the experience of foreign countries and analysis of judicial practice. Methods: general scientific (formal and dialectical logic, comparison, description, structural-functional analysis, synthesis, classification, interpretation); specific scientific (legal-dogmatic); theoretical (formal and dialectical logic, structural-functional analysis, legal-dogmatic), empirical (comparison, description, classification, interpretation). Results: classification of approaches to understanding the right to use a dwelling, its nature and limits; proposals to introduce changes into the current legislation, particularly, in the art. 17 and 35 of the Housing Code of the Russian Federation, art. 292 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation; a list of status rights and obligations of family members of the owner of a dwelling developed by the author. Conclusions: it is proposed to complicate the procedure for a person in the status of a family member of the owner of a dwelling to be moved into such a dwelling; particularly, the owner must be forced to define the legal status of each person moved into by him and the list of obligations of that person within the limits permitted by the legislation. The author considers the right to use a dwelling (right of residence) of a family member of the owner of this dwelling to be a right of obligation with some features of the in rem nature. It is proposed to understand this right as the one providing a family member of the owner with the opportunity to use a certain dwelling with the aim of living there or with some other purpose specified by law due to the statement of the owner’s intention to consider this person to have a family law relationship with the owner and also consequent opportunities to satisfy the person’s social-cultural and household needs through using the features of the dwelling. |
|||||||||
| Keywords: | civil law; housing law, family member of the owner of a dwelling; legal status of the family member of the owner of a dwelling |
|||||||||
 |
download the full-version article | |||||||||
| References: | 1. Alekseev S. S. Grazhdanskoe pravo v sovremen¬nuyu epokhu [Civil Law in the Modern Era]. Ekaterinburg, 1999. P. 24. (In Russ.). 2. Babaev A. B. Sistema veschnykh prav: monogra¬fiya [The System of Real Rights: Monograph]. Moscow, 2006. Pp. 252–258. (In Russ.). 3. Basin Yu. G. Voprosy sovetskogo zhilischnogo prava [Issues of Soviet Housing Law]. Alma-Ata, 1963. 244 p. (In Russ.). 4. Batova O. V. Ponyatie zhilischno-pravovykh do¬go¬vorov i mesto zhilischnogo prava v otechest¬vennoy sisteme prava [The Concept of Housing-Law Contracts and the Place of Housing Law in the Domestic Legal System]. Yurist – Jurist. 2006. Issue 3. Pp. 34–39. (In Russ.). 5. Emel'kina I. A. Institut ogranicheniya prava sobstvennosti v pol'zu sosedey (sosedskoe pra¬vo) v rossiyskom prave i v prave otdel'¬nykh evropeyskikh stran [я Restrictions of owner¬ship title in favor of neighbors (neighbors' rights) in Russian law and law of European countries]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava – Civil Law Review. 2016. Issue 2. Pp. 79–112. (In Russ.). 6. Ershov V. Otnosheniya, reguliruemye grazhdanskim pravom [Relations Regulated by Civil Law]. Rossiyskaya yusticiya – Russian Justitia. 1996. Issue 1. Pp. 12–14. (In Russ.). 7. Ershova N. M. Imuschestvennye pravootno¬sheniya v sem'e [Property Legal Relations in the Family]. Moscow, 1979. P. 38. (In Russ.). 8. Israfilov I.M. Zhilischnye prava chlenov sem'i sobstvennika kvartiry [Housing Rights of Members of the Family of the Owner of the Apartment]. Gosudarstvo i pravo – State and Law. 1996. Issue 1. P. 27. (In Russ.). 9. Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu RF, chasti pervoy / pod red. O. N. Sadikova [Commentary to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Part One; ed. by O. N. Sadikov]. Moscow, 1997. P. 530. (In Russ.). 10. Le Corre P.-M. Imuschestvennye problemy ne¬sostoyatel'nykh predpriyatiy i konkursnoe proizvodstvo [Property Issues of Insolvent Enterprises and Bankruptcy Proceeding]. Pravo. Zhurnal Visshey shkoly ekonomiki – Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2014. Issue 1. Pp. 169–171. (In Russ.). 11. Pchelinceva L. Pravovaya priroda prava grazhdan na zhilische [The Legal Nature of the Citizens' Right to Housing]. Konstitucionnoe pravo: Vostochnoevropeyskoe obozrenie – Constitutional Law: Eastern European Review. 2004. Issue 2 (47). P. 199. (In Russ.). 12. Pchelinceva L. M. Problemy issledovaniya prirody i soderzhaniya konstitucionnogo prava grazhdan na zhilische [Problems of Studying the Nature and Content of the Citizens' Constitutional Right to Housing]. Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo – Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2004. Issue 2. Pp. 11–14. (In Russ.). 13. Rossiyskoe grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik; v 2 t. / V.S. Em, I.A. Zenin, N.V. Kozlova i dr.; otv. red. E.A. Sukhanov. 2-e izd., stereotip. [Russian Civil Law: Textbook: in 2 vols.; V. S. Em, I. A. Zenin, N. V. Kozlova et al.; ed. by E. A. Sukhanov. 2nd ed., stereotype]. Vol. 1. Obschaya chast'. Veschnoe pravo. Nasledstvennoe pravo. Intellektual'nye prava. Lichnye neimuschestvennye prava [Common Part. Real Right. Inheritance Law. Intellectual Property Rights. Personal Non-Property Rights]. Moscow, 2011. P. 599. (In Russ.). 14. Sergeev A. G. Konstitucionnoe pravo na zhilische. Teoretiko-pravovoy aspekt [Constitutional Right to Housing. Theoretical and Legal Aspect]. Yuridicheskiy mir – Juridical World. 2009. Issue 10. Pp. 22–24. (In Russ.). 15. Serebrovskiy V. I. Nasledstvennoe pravo [In¬he¬ritan¬ce Law]. Moscow, 1948. P. 8. (In Russ.). 16. Suslova S. I. Zhilischnye prava: ponyatie i sis¬tema [Housing Rights: Concept and System]. Moscow, 2011. Pp. 116–117. (In Russ.). 17. Tololaeva N. V. Posledstviya narusheniya obyazatel'stva solidarnym dolzhnikom [The Consequences of Breach of an Obligation by a Joint Debtor]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava – Civil Law Review. 2013. Issue 5. Pp. 65–86. (In Russ.). 18. Tolstoy Yu.K. Zhilischnoe pravo: uchebnik. 2-e izd. [Housing Law: Textbook. 2nd ed.]. Moscow, 2011. Pp. 36–37. (In Russ.). 19. Farshatov I. A. Pravo na zhilische v usloviyakh perekhoda k rynochnoy ekonomike [Certain problems arising in connection with the right to housing in the context of transition to market economy]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law. 2000. Issue 7. Pp. 49–54. (In Russ.). 20. Filippenko A. V. Prava i obyazannosti grazhdan, prozhivayuschikh sovmestno s sobstvennikom v prinadlezhaschem emu zhilom pomeschenii [The Rights and Obligations of Citizens Living Together with the Owner in the Premises Belonging to Him]. Pravovye voprosy stroitel'stva – Legal Issues of Construction. 2006. Issue 1. Pp. 17–19. (In Russ.). 21. Filippova E.S. Zhilischnoe pravo: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Housing Law: Textbook for Universities]. Moscow, 2007. P. 23. (In Russ.). 22. Chekmareva E. Pravo pol'zovaniya zhilymi pomescheniyami chlenami sem'i sobstvennika [The Right to Use the Premises by Members of the Owner's Family]. Notarius – Notary. 2004. Issue 1. Pp. 18–30. (In Russ.). 23. Shapovalova E.V. Prava na zhiloe pomeschenie byvshikh chlenov sem'i sobstvennika zhilogo pomescheniya, otkazavshikhsya ot uchastiya v ego privatizacii [Right to the residential property of former members of the residential property owner's family who elected not to participate in its privatization]. Semeynoe i zhilischnoe pravo – Family and Housing Law. 2015. Issue 5. Pp. 44–45. (In Russ.). 24. Shershenevich G. F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava [Textbook of Russian Civil Law]. Kazan, 1894. P. 231. (In Russ.). 25. Shershenevich G. F. Uchebnik russkogo grazh¬danskogo prava [Textbook of Russian Civil Law]. Moscow, 1995. P. 231. (In Russ.). 26. Sheshko G. F. Pravo na zhilische: kon¬sti¬tu-ci¬onnye principy i zhilischnoe zakonodatel'stvo [The Right to Housing: Constitutional Principles and Housing Legislation]. Civilist – Civilian. 2007. Issue 4. P. 34. (In Russ.). 27. Schennikova L. V. Veschnoe pravo: ucheb. posobie [Real Right: Tutorial]. Perm, 2001. P. 224. (In Russ.). 28. Schennikova L.V. Veschnye prava v grazh-danskom prave Rossii [Real Rights in Russian Civil Law]. Moscow, 1996. P. 105. (In Russ.). 29. Emmerich V., Sonnenschein J. Miete. Handkommentar § 535bis, 580a des Buergerlichen Gesetzbuches. Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz. Walter de Gruyter Verlag. Berlin, 2011. Pp. 177–178. (In Germ.). 30. Fliescher J. W. Die Kuendigung wegen Vertragsverletzungen im Mietrecht. Dusseldorf, 2009. P. 2. (In Germ.). 31. Jallamion C. Tradition et modernite de l'arbit¬rage et de la mediation au regard de l'histoire. Gazette du Palais. January 16–17, 2009. P. 3. (In Fr.). 32. Kaser M. Das romische Privatrecht. Die nachklassischen Entwicklungen. 2nd ed. Munich, 1975. Pp. 453–454. (In Germ.). 33. Koziol H., Bydlinski P., Bollenberger R. Allgemeines Burgerliches Gesetzbuch. Kommentar. Vienna, 2005. P. 243. (In Germ.). 34. Koziol H., Welser R., Kletecka A. Grundriss des burgerlichen Rechts. 2014. 2014. Vol. I. P. 243. (In Germ.). 35. Looschelders D. Schuldrecht. Allgemeiner Teil. 9th ed. 2011. P. 407. (In Germ.). 36. Meier S. in: Historisch-kritischer Kommentar zum BGB; M. Schmoeckel, J. Ruckert, R. Zim¬mermann (eds.). Vol. II. § 241–432. 2. Teilband. § 305–432. Tübingen, 2007. Pp. 2410–2411. (In Germ.). 37. Palandts Kommentar zum Burgerlichen Gesetzbuch. 71st ed. Bearb. Von Chr. Gruneberg. Munich, 2012. P. 626. (In Germ.). 38. Schulze R. Burgerliches Gesetzbuch. Handkommentar. 2nd ed. Baden-Baden, 2002. P. 1269. (In Germ.). 39. Schwab K.H., Prutting H. Sachenrecht. Ein Studienbuch. 32nd ed. Munich, 2006. P. 357. (In Germ.). 41. Stankovic O., Orlic M. Stvarno pravo. Drugo izd. Beograd, 1982. Pp. 21–22. (In Slov.). |
|||||||||
| Received: | 21.03.2018 | |||||||||
| Financing: | --- | |||||||||
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013
The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing
The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year