|
Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2021. Issue 3 (53) |
||||||||||
| Title: | THE SUBJECT AREA OF INFORMATIZATION OF COURT DECISIONS |
|||||||||
| Authors: |
S. B. Polyakov, Perm State University |
 |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
|
|||||||
| ORCID: | 0000-0003-3027-6713 |
ResearcherID: | G-7684-2017 |
|||||||
| Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
|
I. A. Gilev, ООО 'Organizatsionno-tekhnologicheskie resheniya 2000' (Limited Liability Company) |
|
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
|
||||||||
| ORCID: | 0000-0001-9681-2676 |
ResearcherID: | B-8516-2019 |
|||||||
| Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
| Requisites: | Polyakov S. B., Gilev I. A. Predmetnaya oblast' informatizatsii sudebnykh resheniy [The Subject Area of Informatization of Court Decisions]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2021. Issue 53. Pp. 462–487. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2021-53-462-487 |
|||||||||
| DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2021-53-462-487 |
|||||||||
| Annotation: |
Introduction: we have created an information technology support program, named ‘Laser-IP-GPK-2020’, designed to provide assistance in making reasoned court decisions according to the rules of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in ordinary proceedings. With the help of this program, we demonstrate in the paper the complexity of the law enforcement process for a person and the assistance that software can provide to overcome this complexity. The paper shows the subject area of the information system created by us, outlines the ways of further enhancement of software intended to facilitate law enforcement, and challenges the myths about the robot judge. Purpose: to determine the possible types of software to be developed in accordance with the types of law enforcement operations, provided that the discretion function remains with law enforcement officers; to determine the directions of the formalization of law enforcement operations and the possibilities of gradual transfer of some of them to artificial intelligence. Methods: the universal dialectical-materialistic method, employed when converting the law enforcement process into the language of information technology; analysis and synthesis of the law enforcement process, the formal-legal method – for converting the requirements of law and legal science to law enforcement into software commands for the judge and the parties to the case; the object-oriented approach to modeling; the object-oriented programming methodology, a relational approach to database design. Results: the ‘Laser-IP-GPK-2020’ computer program contains a sequence of law enforcement operations and rules for their execution, the multiplicity and complexity of which exceeds the capabilities of most law enforcement officers. This program is designed to prevent law enforcement errors resulting from the limited human capabilities with regard to retaining knowledge of the multitude of rules of law enforcement operations, and to obviate the expenditure of time required for each individual judge to solely produce a reasoned decision in a case. Conclusion: the selection and development of particular IT solutions to be applied in law enforcement practice when solving legal cases are determined by the analysis of the law enforcement process, which is the subject area of the program. |
|||||||||
| Keywords: | information technology; subject area; law enforcement operations; judicial discretion; text of a legal act; legal facts, factual background, circumstances of a case; software; judge; parties to a case; algorithm; legal interpretation; conflict of laws; gaps in law; reasoned judgment |
|||||||||
 |
download the full-version article | |||||||||
| References: | 1. Alikperov Kh. D. Komp'yuternaya programma opredeleniya mery nakazaniya [Computer Program for Determining the Measure of Punishment]. Baku, 2019. 212 p. (In Russ.). 2. Alikperov Kh. D. Elektronnaya tekhnologiya opredeleniya mery nakazaniya [Electronic Technology for Determining the Measure of Punishment]. St. Peterburg, 2020. 170 p. (In Russ.). 3. Bevzenko R. Kak ya pobedil sudebnogo robota-yurista // I pochemu eto budet dlit'sya nedolgo [How I Defeated the Trial Robot Lawyer // And Why It Will not Last Long]. Available at: https://zakon.ru/blog/2018/05/21/kak_ya_pobedil_sudebnogo_robota-yurista__i_pochemu_eto_bu¬det _dlitsya_nedolgo#comment_464411. (In Russ.). 4. Vlasenko N. A. Razumnost' i opredelennost' v pravovom regulirovanii [Reasonableness and Certainty in Legal Regulation]. Moscow, 2015. 157 p. (In Russ.). 5. Zarubina M. N., Novikova M. M. K voprosu o sushhnosti elektronnogo pravosudiya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [On the Essence of Electronic Justice in the Russian Federation]. Administrator suda – Court's Administrator. 2017. Issue 1. Pp. 9–12. (In Russ.). 6. Ivanov M. Resheniya robota-sud'i polnost'yu ustraivayut sluzhiteley Femidy [Decisions of the Robot Judge Completely Satisfy the Servants of Themis]. Available at: https://legal.re¬port/resheniya-robota-sudi-polnostyu-ustraivayut-sluzhitelej-femidy/. (In Russ.). 7. Yin K., Solomon D. Ispol'zovanie Turbo-Prologa [Using Turbo Prolog]. Moscow, 1993. 608 p. (In Russ.). 8. Informatika: ucheb. posobie dlya studentov vysshikh pedagogicheskikh uchebnykh zavedeniy [Informatics: textbook for students of higher pedagogical education institutions]. A. V. Mogilev, E. K. Khenner, N. I. Pak; ed. by A. V. Mogilev]. Moscow, 2006. 336 p. (In Russ.). 9. Kolokolov N. A. «Elektronnye vesy pravosudiya» – nashe budushhee ['The Electronic Scales of Justice' as Our Future]. Rossiyskiy sud'ya – Russian Judge. 2020. Issue 11. Pp. 61–64. (In Russ.). 10. Kondrashov I., Ivanov A., Zscheyge H., Pronin A., Sergo A., Gasteyer T., Vashkevich A., Kvitko R., Nesterenko A., Savel'ev A., Pereverzev S., Kalyatin V., Budylin S. LegalTech i yuristy budushhego [LegalTech and Lawyers of the Future]. ZAKON – Law. 2017. Issue 11. Pp. 20–36. (In Russ.). 11. Korolev D. S., Gunin N. S., Slautskiy S. A. K voprosu ponyatiya ob iskusstvennykh neyronnykh setyakh [On the Concept of Artificial Neural Networks]. Problemy obespecheniya bezopasnosti pri likvidatsii posledstviy chrezvychaynykh situatsiy – Problems of Ensuring Safety in the Elimination of the Consequences of Emergency Situations. 2015. Vol. 2. Issue 1(4). Pp. 61–63. Available at: https://cyberlenin¬ka.ru/ar¬ticle/n/k-voprosu-po¬nya¬tiya-ob-iskusstvennyh-neyronnyh-setyah. (In Russ.). 12. Kostyukova A. P. Bazy dannykh: ob-shhiy kurs. Uchebnoe posobie [Databases: General Course. Study Guide]. Moscow, 2018. Part 1. 82 p. (In Russ.). 13. Kuptsova S. N. Sudeyskoe pravo: obshheteoreticheskiy i sravnitel'nyy aspekt: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Judge-Made Law: General Theoretical and Comparative Aspect: Synopsis of cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Penza, 2017. 32 p. (In Russ.). 14. Luchshe zvonite Solu: smogut li tekhnologii zamenit' advokata? [It is Better to Call Saul: Can Technology Replace a Lawyer?]. Available at: https://www.forbes.ru/brandvoice/ipquorum/391127-luchshe-zvonite-solu-smogut-li-tehnologii-zamenit-advokata. (In Russ.). 15. Mar'yasov K. V. Pravovye riski perekhoda k tsifrovomu obshhestvu i tsifrovoy ekonomike v usloviyakh sovremennoy Rossii [Legal Risks of the Transition to a Digital Society and Digital Economy in the Conditions of Modern Russia]. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika – Juridical Techniques. 2019. Issue 13. Pp. 728–733. (In Russ.). 16. Maslov I. V. Otzyv na monografiyu doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora Alikperova Khanlara Dzhafarovicha «Elektronnaya tekhnologiya opredeleniya mery nakazaniya» («Elektronnye vesy pravosudiya») [Review of the Monograph of the Doctor of Law, Professor Alikperov Khanlar Dzhafarovich 'Electronic Technology for Determining the Measure of Punishment' ('The Electronic Scales of Justice')]. Rossiyskiy sud'ya – Russian Judge. 2020. Issue 11. Pp. 55–60. (In Russ.). 17. Nikiforova T. S., Smirnova K. M. Ostavyat li roboty yuristov bez raboty? [Will Robots Put Lawyers Out of Work?]. ZAKON – Law. 2017. Issue 11. Pp. 110–123. (In Russ.). 18. Obshhaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Akademicheskiy kurs v trekh tomakh [General Theory of State and Law. Academic Course in Three Volumes]. Ed. by M. N. Marchenko. Vol. 2: Pravo [Law]. Moscow, 2007. 816 p. (In Russ.). 19. Operatsii tolkovaniya prava: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie [Operations of Interpretation of Law: study guide]. V. S. Blagodareva et al.; ed. by S. B. Polyakov. Perm, Higher School of Economics – Perm Branch, 2021. 70 p. (In Russ.). 20. Polyakov S. B. Diagnostika pravosoznaniya pravoprimeniteley: uchebnoe posobie [Diagnostics of Legal Conscience of Law Enforcement Officers: Textbook. Study Guide]. Perm, 2017. 357 p. (In Russ.). 21. Polyakov S. B., Gilev I. A. Algoritmy sudebnogo resheniya [Algorithms for a Judgment]. Perm, 2020. 416 p. (In Russ.). 22. Porokhnina A. A. Algoritm tolkovaniya prava v pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti: vypusknaya kvalifikatsionnaya rabota magistra [Algorithm for the Interpretation of Law in Law Enforcement: Master's Graduate Qualification Work]. Perm, 2018. 135 p. (In Russ.). 23. Reshetnyak V. I. Elektronnoe pravosudie i sudebnoe predstavitel'stvo v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsessakh [Electronic Justice and Legal Representation in Civil and Commercial Proceedings]. Advokat – Advocate. 2011. Issue 5. Pp. 16–22. (In Russ.). 24. Reshetnyak V. I. Zarubezhnyy opyt ispol'zovaniya informatsionnykh tekhnologiy dlya organizatsii deyatel'nosti sudov [Foreign Experience of Using Information Technologies for Organizing the Operation of Courts]. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya – Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2013. Issue 2 (39). Pp. 298–303. (In Russ.). 25. Reshetnyak V. I. Elektronnoe pravosudie v grazhdanskom protsesse Avstralii [Electronic Justice in Australian Civil Procedure]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal – Russian Juridical Journal. 2016. Issue 3 (108). Pp. 174–178. (In Russ.). 26. Smagina E. S. Ispol'zovanie informatsionnykh tekhnologiy kak al'ternativa masshtabnym izmeneniyam grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva, napravlennym na povysheniye effektivnosti grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva i optimizatsiyu sudebnoy nagruzki [The Use of Information Technologies as an Alternative to Large-Scale Changes in Civil Procedural Legislation Aimed at Increasing the Efficiency of Civil Court Proceedings and Optimizing the Judicial Caseload]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure. 2018. Vol. 8. Issue 1. Pp. 51–59. (In Russ.). 27. Trapeznikova E. V. Reshenie spora o soderzhanii predpisaniya (pravo ili obyazannost'?) [Resolving a Dispute over the Content of an Order (Right or Duty?)]. Ex jure. 2020. Issue 3. Pp. 16–32. (In Russ.). 28. Chvirov V. V., Chizhov M. V. Sovershenstvovanie sudebnoy deyatel'nosti na osnove informatsionnykh i kommunikatsionnykh tekhnologiy [Improvement of Judicial Activity on the Basis of Information and Communication Technologies]. Rossiyskoe pravosudie – Russian Justice. 2018. Issue 6 (146). Pp. 59–69. (In Russ.). 29. Cherdantsev A. F. Logiko-yazykovye fenomeny v prave, yuridicheskoy nauke i praktike [Logical and Linguistic Phenomena in Law, Legal Science and Practice]. Ekaterinburg, 1993. 192 p. (In Russ.). 30. Yuridicheskaya kontseptsiya robotizatsii: monografiya [The Legal Concept of Robotization: monograph]. Ed. by Yu. A. Tikhomirov, S. B. Nanba. Moscow, 2019. 240 p. (In Russ.). 31. Yuridicheskiy battl: robot ot MegaFon vs Roman Bevzenko [Legal Battle: MegaFon's Robot vs Roman Bevzenko]. Available at: https://pra¬vo. ru/lf/story/202675/. (In Russ.). 32. Alarie B., Niblett A., Yoon A. H. How Artificial Intelligence Will Affect the Practice of Law. University of Toronto Law Journal. 2018. Vol. 68. Supplement 1. Pp. 106–124. (In Eng.). 33. Baron J. R. Law in the Age of Exabytes: Some Further Thoughts on 'Information Inflation' and Current Issues in E-Discovery Search. Richmond Journal of Law & Technology. 2011. Vol. 17. Issue 3. (In Eng.). 34. Katz D. M., Bommarito II M. J., Blackman J. A General Approach for Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States. PloS ONE. 2017. Vol. 12. Issue 4. (In Eng.). 35. Flaga-Gieruszyńska K. E-Justice as an Example of Informatization of Civil Procedure. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia Informatica. 2017. Vol. 45. Pp. 15–24. DOI: 10.18276/si.2017.45-02. (In Eng.). 36. Lepore L., Pisano S., Alvino F., Paolone F. The Dark Side of E-justice Implementation. An Empirical Investigation of the Relation between Cultural Orientation and Information System Success. Organizing for Digital Innovation. Ed. by A. Lazazzara, R. Nacamulli, C. Rossignoli, S. Za. Springer, 2019. Pp. 49–61. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-90500-6_5. (In Eng.). 37. Markovic M. Rise of the Robot Lawyers? Arizona Law Review. 2019. Vol. 61. Issue 2. Pp. 325–350. (In Eng.). 38. Maxwell K. T., Schafer B. Concept and Context in Legal Information Retrieval. JURIX. 2008. Pp. 63–72. (In Eng.). 39. McGinnis J. O., Pearce R. G. The Great Disruption: How Machine Intelligence Will Transform the Role of Lawyers in the Delivery of Legal Services. Fordham Law Review. 2013. Vol. 82. P. 3041–3066. (In Eng.). 40. Whiteman M. Appellate Jurisprudence in the Internet Age. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property. 2017. Vol. 14. Issue 3. Pp. 255–284. (In Eng.). 41. Mills M. Artificial Intelligence in Law: The State of Play 2016. Thomson Reuters. February 23, 2016. (In Eng.). 42. Oard D. W., Webber W. Information Retrieval for e-Discovery. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval. 2013. Vol. 7. Issues 2–3. Pp. 99–237. (In Eng.). 43. Reiling D. Technology for Justice. How Information Technology Can Support Judicial Reform. 2010. 44. Velicogna M. Justice Systems and ICT. What Can Be Learned from Europe? Utrecht Law Review. 2007. Issue 3(1). Pp. 129–147. (In Eng.). 45. Use of Information Technology in European courts. Thematic report CEPEJ Studies No. 24. 2016. (In Eng.). |
|||||||||
| Received: | 01.03.2021 | |||||||||
| Financing: |
--- |
|||||||||
The Perm State University
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013
The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing
The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013
The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing
The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year