Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2020. Issue 3 (49) |
||||||||||
Title: | LEGAL STATUS OF INDIVIDUALS AS SUBJECTS OF SOCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT |
|||||||||
Authors: |
E. A. Istomina, Ural State Law University |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
|
||||||||
ORCID: | 0000-0003-4984-7627 |
ResearcherID: | X-2041-2019 |
|||||||
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: |
--- |
|||||||||
M. Yu. Fedorova, Constituional Court of the Russian Federation |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | |||||||||
ORCID: | 0000-0002-3680-759Х |
ResearcherID: | AAM-6627-2020 |
|||||||
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: | DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2020.04.02.89 | |||||||||
Requisites: | Istomina E. A., Fedorova M. Yu. Pravovoe polozhenie grazhdan kak sub"ektov upravleniya sotsial'nymi riskami [Legal Status of Individuals Subjects of Social Risk Management]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2020. Issue 49. Pp. 576–603. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2020-49-576-603 |
|||||||||
DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2020-49-576-603 |
|||||||||
Annotation: |
Introduction: the article analyzes current legislation of Russia and some foreign countries as well as the views of Russian and foreign scholars on the legal status of individuals as subjects of the social security legal relations in the context of the social risk management (SRM) conceptual framework. Purpose and objectives: based on the modern ideas of social risks, to study the status of individuals as actors within the SRM system having specific rights and responsibilities. Methods: analysis and synthesis of scientific and legal information, historical and comparative methods. Results: today social security is considered a vital part of the SRM system. Having analyzed the specific features and dynamics of social risks, the authors conclude that to some considerable degree these risks are subjective in nature, which should determine a more active role of individuals. The article analyzes not only the legal personality of individuals in the social security legal relations but also – in a broader context – their agency in the SRM system. The authors provide examples of legislative regulation in some foreign countries: the French Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the United States of America. Different models of the individuals’ participation in the SRM system are presented. Based on the extent of different SRM subjects’ involvement and the distribution of the responsibility for the protection against social risks among them, the authors identify paternalistic, market-based (liberal), mixed (complex), and transitional models. Based on the extent of the individual’s interest in the protection against social risks and their readiness for taking actions in this sphere, the authors distinguish active and passive SRM models (with the latter one including indifferent and parasitical models). Conclusions: the paper offers a new approach to the understanding of social risks and protection against these (including through social security), and also to the role of individuals as subjects of social risk management. |
|||||||||
Keywords: | social risk; social security; social risks management; management models; individual; legal status; social provision. |
|||||||||
download the full-version article | ||||||||||
References: | 1. Al'gin A. P. Risk i ego rol' v obshchestvennoj zhizni [Risk and Its Role in Public Life]. Moscow, 1989. 192 p. (In Russ.). 2. Bykov A. A., Porfir'ev B. N. Ob analize riska, koncepciyakh i klassifikacii riskov [On the Risk Analysis, Concepts and Classifications]. Problemy analiza riskov – Issues of Risk Analysis. 2006. Vol. 3. Issue 4. Pp. 319–337. (In Russ.). 3. Vasil'eva Yu. V., Shuraleva S. V. K voprosu o stanovlenii i sovremennom sostoyanii paradigm rossijskogo trudovogo prava i prava social'nogo obespecheniya [On the Formation and Current Status of the Paradigms of Russian Labor Law and Social Security Law]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2018. Issue 41. Pp. 454–477. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2018-41-454-477. (In Russ.). 4. Glukhareva L. I. Obyazannosti cheloveka i grazhdanina v kontekste teorii prav cheloveka [Duties of Man and Citizen in the Context of the Theory of Human Rights]. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava – History of State and Law. 2009. Issue 7. Access from the legal reference system 'ConsultantPlus'. (In Russ.). 5. Grebennikova E. V. Sub"ektnost' lichnosti: teoreticheskie aspekty problemy [Individual's Capacity: Theoretical Aspects]. Vestnik TGPU – Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2013. Issue 6 (134). Pp. 140–142. (In Russ.). 6. Grechuk L. A. Sub"ekty-poluchateli v prave social'nogo obespecheniya Rossii: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Recipients in Social Security Law of Russia: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Tomsk, 2002. 21 p. (In Russ.). 7. Zakharov M. L., Tuchkova E. G. Pravo social'nogo obespecheniya: Uchebnik [Social Security Law: Textbook]. Moscow, 2002. 560 p. (In Russ). 8. Il'in E. P. Psikhologiya riska [Psychology of Risk]. St. Petersburg, 2012. 267 p. (In Russ.). 9. Kashirin V. P. Sub"ektnost' lichnosti i ee istoki [Individual's Capacity and Its Origins]. Vestnik akademii prava i upravleniya – Bulletin of Academy of Law and Management. 2010. Issue 20. Pp. 76–84. (In Russ.). 10. Kurchenko O. S. Gosudarstvo kak sub"ekt prava social'nogo obespecheniya: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [State as a Subject of Social Security Law: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2009. 23 p. (In Russ.). 11. Kurchenko O. S. Zloupotreblenie social'no-obespechitel'nymi pravami: postanovka problemy [Abuse of Social Security Rights: a Problem Statement]. Rossijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal – Russian Juridical Journal. 2016. Issue 6(111). Pp. 155–166. (In Russ.). 12. Lebedeva L. F. Politika garantirovannogo dokhoda dlya pensionerov v SShA [The Policy of Guaranteed Retirement Income in the United States of America]. Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika – Regional Economics: Theory and Practice. 2017. Vol. 15. Issue 6 (441). Pp. 1055–1067. (In Russ.). 13. Luhmann N. Ponyatie riska [Definition of Risk]. THESIS. 1994. Issue 5. Pp. 135–160. (In Russ.). 14. Maculevich Yu. S. Grazhdane kak sub"ekty sovetskogo prava social'nogo obespecheniya: avtoref. diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Citizens as Subjects of Soviet Social Security Law: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 1990. 27 p. (In Russ.). 15. Machul'skaya E. E. Pravo social'nogo obespecheniya v usloviyakh rynochnoj ekonomiki: teoriya i praktika pravovogo regulirovaniya: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Social Security Law in Market Economy: Theory and Practice of Legal Regulation: Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2000. 349 p. (In Russ.). 16. Povarenkov A. Yu. Risk v trudovom prave i prave social'nogo obespecheniya: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Risk in Labor and Social Security Law: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Yaroslavl, 2010. 26 p. (In Russ.). 17. Pravo social'nogo obespecheniya: uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata / pod red. V.Sh. Shajkhatdinova [Social Security Law: Textbook for Academic Bachelor's Degree Programs; ed. by V. Sh. Shaykhatdinov]. Moscow, 2014. 717 p. (In Russ.). 18. Sal'nikov V. P., Romanovskaya V. B. Social'naya podderzhka naseleniya v SShA: opyt realizacii prava na social'noe obespechenie [Social Support of the Population in the U.S: the Experience of Implementing the Right to Social Security]. Yuridicheskaya nauka: istoriya i sovremennost' – Legal Science: History and the Presence. 2015. Issue 9. Pp. 99–104. (In Russ.). 19. Boloni G. The Politics of the New Social Policies: Providing Coverage against New Social Risks in Mature Welfare States. Policy & Politics. 2005. Vol. 33. Pp. 431–449. (In Eng.). 20. Castel R. L'insécurité Sociale: Qu'est-ce Qu'être Protégé? Texte Communiqué à Partir de la Rencontre-Débat du 16 Décembre 2004 Organisée par le Centre de Ressources Politique de la Ville en Essonne. Available at: http://www.crpve91.fr/Em¬p-loi,_economie/Insertion,_emploi/pdf/Renc2G.pdf (In Fr.). 21. Dupeyroux J.-J. Droit de la Sécurité Sociale. 15th ed. Paris, 2005. 1245 p. (In Fr.). 22. Essentials of Risk Theory; ed. by S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, M. Peterson. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer, 2003. 148 p. (In Eng.). 23. Fact Sheet. Social Security Administration. Available at: https://www.ssa.gov/news/ press/fact-sheets/basicfact-alt.pdf (In Eng.). 24. Hellström E., Kosonen M. Gouverner l'État-Providence et au-Delà des Solutions Pour un Monde Complexe et un Avenir Incertain. Available at: https://institutdelors.eu/wp-content/up¬loads/2018/01/gouverner-etatprovidence-hellstrom¬kosonen-ijd-ves-dec15.pdf (In Fr.). 25. L'année de Droit Social 2010. Textes, Jurisprudence, Commentaries; P.-H. Antonmattei, P.-Y. Verkindt, G. Vachet et autres. Wolters Kluwer France, 2011. 401 p. (In Fr.). 26. Lautier G. Démission. Départ Négocié. Licenciement. Retraite. Sanctions. Paris, 2004. 420 p. (In Fr.). 27. Lister R. Building Citizen's Welfare State: The 2000 John Baillie Memorial Lecture. New College, Mound Place, Edinburgh EH 2XL, 2000. 15 p. (In Eng.). 28. Pollak C. Essai D'approche Positive des Nouveaux Risqué Sociaux. Travail et Emploi. January–March 2011. Issue 125. Pp. 67–77. (In Fr.). 29. Retraite du Salarié: Cumul Emploi-Retraite. Vérifié le 01 Janvier 2016 – Direction de l'information Légale et Administrative (Premier Ministre). Available at: https://www.service-pub-lic.fr/particuliers/vosdroits/F13243 (In Fr.). 30. Targeting Social Benefits. International Perspectives and Trends; ed. by N. Gilbert. International Social Security Series. Vol. 1. New Brunswick, New Jersey, 2001. 232 p. (In Eng.). 31. Taylor-Gooby P. Does Risk Society Erode Welfare State Solidarity? Policy & Politics. 2011. Vol. 39. Issue 2. Рp. 158–159. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233547063_Does_risk_society_erode_welfare_state_solidarity (In Eng.). 32. World Report on Ageing and Health. World Health Organization. Luxembourg, 2015. 246 p. (In Eng.). |
|||||||||
Received: | 30.11.2019 | |||||||||
Financing: | --- |