Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2020. Issue 3 (49)

Title: FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF ELECTORAL LAW AS IMPLEMENTED IN ELECTORAL SYSTEMS
Authors:

K. M. Khudoley, Perm State University

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0003-1805-0674
ResearcherID: E-3186-2016
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»:       DOI: 10. 17072/1995-4190-2015-2-29-40
DOI: 10. 17072/1995-4190-2016-34-391-401

D. M. Khudoley, Perm State University

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0001-5870-1537
ResearcherID: E-3184-2016
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»:       DOI: 10. 17072/1995-4190-2015-2-18-28
DOI: 10. 17072/1995-4190-2016-33-258-267
Requisites: Khudolej K. M., Khudolej D. M. Realizatsiya osnovnykh printsipov izbiratel'nogo prava v izbiratel'nykh sistemakh [Fundamental Principles of Electoral Law as Implemented in Electoral Systems].. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2020. Issue 49. Pp. 442–475. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2020-49-442-475
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2020-49-442-475
Annotation:

 Introduction: the article analyzes the fundamental principles of electoral law and how they are implemented in various electoral systems. Purpose: to identify the objective criteria a democratic electoral system must meet. Methods: along with general scientific methods, there have been used specific scientific methods, including comparative legal and systemic ones. Results: there have been identified three principles of electoral law that can be recognized as fundamental: the principles of equal, free, and fair election. They mutually presuppose, guarantee, and supplement each other. Moreover, provisions of one principle can be corrected by provisions of the others. Thus, the principles of equal, free and fair election form an integral sustainable system whose elements are in a dialectical unity. These principles cover all the subjects of electoral law and electoral process and they must be followed at each stage of elections. Furthermore, they are complex and include provisions of a number of secondary principles (the principles of universal, equal, direct suffrage in a secret ballot, etc.). Conclusions: the above principles are implemented to the greatest extent in ranked voting. Some ranked voting systems ensure proportional representation of parties. Elections held based on such voting assure free and equal participation ofboth independent and party candidates. Many other majoritarian, proportional or mixed-member electoral systems do not meet the abovementioned criteria.

Keywords: electoral law; suffrage; electoral law principles; electoral system; majoritarian electoral systems; proportional electoral systems; mixed proportional systems; semi-proportional electoral systems.
  download the full-version article
References: 1. Belov S. A. Sistemnoe pravovoe regulirovanie izbiratel'noy sistemy [System Legal Regulation of Electoral System]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal – Russian Juridical Journal. 2011. Issue 1. Pp. 88–100. (In Russ.).
2. Berlyavskiy L. G. Sravnitel'noe izbira-tel'¬noe pravo [Comparative Electoral Law]. Moscow, 2013. 240 p. (In Russ.).
3. Bondar' N. S. Vlast' i svoboda na vesakh konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya: zaschita prav i svobod Konstitutsionnym Sudom Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The Power and Freedom on Scales of the Constitutional Justice: Protection of the Rights and Freedoms by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, 2003. 780 p. (In Russ.).
4. Vol'skiy V. I. Protsedury golosovaniya v malykh gruppakh s drevneyshikh vremen do nachala XX veka [Voting Procedures in Small Groups from the Ancient Times to the Beginning of the 20th Century]. Moscow, 2014. 76 p. (In Russ.).
5. Vol'skiy V. I., Karpov A. V. Primenenie razlichnykh variantov pravila peredachi golosov [Application of Different Versions of Single Transferable Vote System]. Politiya – Politeia. 2011. Issue 2. Pp. 162–174. (In Russ.).
6. Hegel G.W.F. Nauka logiki. V 3 tomakh [Science of Logic. In 3 vols.]. Moscow, 1970. Vol. 1. 501 p. (In Russ.).
7. Demina N. Metod markiza Kondorse ili svetlyy put' spaseniya demokratii [The Marquis de Condorcet Method, or the Bright Way of the Rescue of Democracy]. Available at: http:www.po¬lit.ru/ article/2010/05/21/maskin_condorset. (In Russ.).
8. Zarubezhnoe izbiratel'noe pravo: ucheb. posobie / Pod red V.V. Maklakova [Foreign Electoral Law: tutorial; ed. by V. V. Maklakov]. Moscow, 2003. 288 p. (In Russ.).
9. Ivanchenko A. A., Kynev A. V., Lyubarev A. E. Proportsional'naya izbiratel'naya sistema v Rossii: Istoriya, sovremennoe sostoyanie, perspektivy [Proportional Electoral System in Russia: History, Current State, Prospects]. Moscow, 2005. 333 p. (In Russ.).
10. Kant I. Metafizika nravov [Metaphysics of Morals]. Istoriya politicheskikh i pravovykh ucheniy: Khrestomatiya // pod red. O. E. Leysta [History of Political and Legal Studies: Chrestomathy; ed. by O. E. Leyst]. Мoscow, 2000. 512 p. (In Russ.).
11. Konstitutsii zarubezhnykh gosudarstv / оtv. red. V. V. Maklakov [Constitutions of Foreign States; ed. by V. V. Maklakov]. Moscow, 1999. 584 p. (In Russ.).
12. Konstitutsionnoe (gosudarstvennoe) pravo zarubezhnykh stran: Chast' obschaya / Pod red. B.A. Strashuna [Constitutional (State) Law of Foreign Countries: General Part; ed. by B.A. Strashun]. Moscow, 2000. Vol. 1–2. 784 p. (In Russ.).
13. Lakeman E., Lambert J.D. Issledovanie mazhoritarnoy i proportsional'noy izbiratel'nykh sistem [A Study of Majority and Proportional Electoral Systems]. Moscow, 1958. 366 p. (In Russ.).
14. Lyubarev A. E. Proportsional'naya i smeshannaya izbiratel'naya sistemy na regional'nykh i munitsipal'nykh vyborakh v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: problemy «sfabrikovannogo bol'shinstva» [Proportional and Mixed Electoral Systems in the Regional and Municipal Elections in the Russian Federation: Problems of the 'Fabricated Majority']. NB: Voprosy prava i politiki – NB: Matters of Law and Politics. 2013. Issue 8. Pp. 65–118. (In Russ.).
15. Mayer H. Izbiratel'noe pravo kak instrument raspredeleniya vlasti ili izbiratel'noe pravo i politika [Suffrage as an Instrument of Distribution of the Power, or Suffrage and Politics]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie – Comparative Constitutional Review. 2005. Issue 1. Pp. 62–68. (In Russ.).
16. Nersesyants V.S. Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of Law]. Moscow, 1997. 652 p. (In Russ.).
17. Taagepera R., Shugart M.S. Opisanie izbiratel'nykh sistem [Description of Electoral Systems]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. Issue 3. Pp. 114–136. (In Russ.).
18. Bartoldi J., Tovey C., Trick M. Voting Schemes for Which It Can Be Difficult to Tell Who Won the Election. Social Choice and Welfare. 2006. Vol. 2. Pp. 157–165. DOI: 10.1007/ BF00303169. (In Eng.).
19. Bawn K. The Logic of Institution Preferences: German Electoral Law as a Social Choice Outcome. American Journal of Political Science. 1993. Vol. 37. Issue 4. Pp. 965–989. DOI: 10.2307/2111539. (In Eng.).
20. Benoit K. Hungary's Two–Vote Electoral System. Representation. 1996. Vol. 33. Issue 4. Pp. 162–170. DOI: 10.1080/00344899608522977. (In Eng.).
21. Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences; ed. by B. Grofman, A. Lijphart. New York, 1986. 335 p. (In Eng.).
22. LeGrand R. Descriptions of Ranked-Ballot Voting Methods. Available at: http://www.cs. wustl.edu/~legrand/rbvote/desc.htlm. (In Eng.).
23. Lijphart A. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws, 1945-1985. The American Political Science Review. 1990. Vol. 84. Issue 2. Pp. 481–496. DOI: 10.2307/1963530. (In Eng.).
24. McLean I. E.J. Nanson, Social Choice and Electoral Reform. Australian Journal of Political Science. 1996. Vol. 31. Issue 3. Pp. 369–385. DOI: 10.1080/10361149651102. (In Eng.).
25. Reilly B. Social Choice in the South Seas: Electoral Innovation and the Borda Count in the Pacific Islands Countries. Political Science Review. 2002. Vol. 23. Issue 4. Pp. 355–372. DOI: 10.1177/0192512102023004002. (In Eng.).
26. Reynolds A., Reilly B., Ellis A. Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook. Stockholm, 2008. 237 p. (In Eng.).
27. Shulze M. A New Monotonic, Clone-Independent, Reversal Symmetric, and Condorcet-Consistent Single-Winner Election Method. Social Choice and Welfare. 2011. Vol. 26. Pp. 267–303. (In Eng.).
28. Siavelis P.M. La Lógica Oculta de la Selección de Candidatos en las Elecciones Parlamentarias Chilenas. Estudios Públicos. 2005. Issue 98. Pp. 189–225. (In Span.).
29. Smith W. Descriptions of Voting Systems. Available at: http://www.m-shulze.9mail.de/ votedesc.pdf (In Eng.).
30. Taagepera R, Shugart M.S. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. Yale, 1989. 292 p. (In Eng.).
31. Tideman N. Collective Decisions and Voting: The Potential for Public Choice. Burlington, 2006. 337 p. (In Eng.).
32. Young H.P. Optimal Voting Rules. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1995. Vol. 1. Pp. 51–64. (In Eng.).

Received: 08.02.2020
Financing: ---
The Perm State University
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing

The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year