Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2016. Issue 3 (33) |
||||||||||
Title: | INFLUENCE OF CHANGING THE CURRENT LEGISLATION UPON THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTELLECTUAL ACTIVITY IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION | |||||||||
Authors: |
Mirskikh I.Yu. |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | ||||||||
ORCID: | 0000-0001-7278-8843 | ResearcherID: | E-8002-16 | |||||||
«Scopus» & «Web of Science» article: |
10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.197 |
|||||||||
Mingaleva Zh.A. |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | |||||||||
ORCID: | 000-0001-7674-7846 | ResearcherID: | E-8001-2016 | |||||||
«Scopus» & «Web of Science» article: |
10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.197 |
|||||||||
Requisites: | Mirskikh I.Yu., Mingaleva Zh.A. Vliyanie deystvuyushchego zakonodatel'stva na razvitie intellektual'noy deyatel'nosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Influence of Changing the Current Legislation upon the Development of Intellectual Activity in the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2016. Issue 33. Pp. 311–318. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-33-311-318 | |||||||||
DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-33-311-318 | |||||||||
Annotation: | Introduction: the paper analyzes the influence of changing legislation in the sphere of protection and use of intellectual property upon legal regulation and practice of its application in the field of intellectual activity. Legislation changes in the intellectual property sphere have contradictory influence upon the regulation of the relevant legal relationship. That is why analysis of the dynamics of intellectual activity development and its dependence on changing legal norms and constructions is of great importance. Purpose: to analyze the existing civil legislation in order to work out practical recommendations on how to improve the efficiency of protection of intellectual activity results. Methods: methods of analysis and synthesis, methods of micro- and macroeconomic analysis of legal facts and events, interdisciplinary approach are used in the paper. Results: it has been revealed that current Russian legislation in the sphere of intellectual property protection is rather contradictory. It incorporates collusions and does not provide economic activity with secure non-contradictory legal regulation. There are collusions between the existing national legislation norms in the sphere of intellectual property protection and general international norms and principles. An attempt to bring norms of Russian legislation into line with norms and principles of international law has not been successful. Conclusions: it is important to bring national Russian legislation in the sphere of intellectual property protection into line with conventional international norms and principles. The specific features of Russian practice of conducting scientific activity ought to be taken into account. It is strongly recommended to change civil legislation with regard to the patenting system in force and methods of intellectual property registration existing in Russian patent practice. | |||||||||
Keywords: | intellectual property; intellectual activity results; innovation; exclusive rights | |||||||||
download the full-version article |
||||||||||
References: | Golubcov V. G. Sovershenstvovanie pravovogo regulirovaniya otnosheniy v sfere gosudarst-venno-chastnogo partnerstva na sovremennom etape [Improving the Legal Regulation of the State and Private Relations at its Modern Phase]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juri¬dicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2014. Issue 1(23). Pp. 179–188. (In Russ.). Danilina I. V. Informacionnye otnosheniya v seti Internet po povodu ob"ektov avtorskikh prav [Informational Relations on the Internet concerning Copyright Objects]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2010. Issue 4. Pp. 20–25. (In Russ.). Kuznetsova O. A. Metody nauchnogo issledova-niya v tsivilisticheskikh dissertatsiyakh [Methods of Scientific Research in Civil Dissertations]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie na¬uki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2014. Issue 4(26). Pp. 254–270. (In Russ.). Razuvaev V., Averina O. Nuzhen li zakon ob Internete? [Do We Need a Law on the Internet?]. EZh-Yurist – Economics and Life-Jurist. 2010. Issue 39. Pp. 34–36. (In Russ.). Ai Lijie Research on Legal Issue of Copyright Protection in the Internet. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Economy, Management and Education Technology. Vol. 29. 2015. Pp. 248–251. (In Eng.). Becker J. Territoriality, Copyright Protection on the Internet and Liability Questions. Int Assoc Sci Techn & Med Publishers. 1998. Pp. 32–39. (In Eng.). Cho Kyungchul, Kim Changseok, Shin Juneseuk. Differential Effects of Intellectual Property Rights on Innovation and Economic Performance: A Cross-industry Investigation. Science and Public Policy. Vol. 42. Issue 6. 2015. Pp. 827–840. (In Eng.). Hwang Hong Wu, Jollene Z. Yu, Eden S. H. Innovation, Imitation and Intellectual Property Rights in Developing Countries. Review of development economics. Vol. 20. Issue 1. 2016. Pp. 138–151. (In Eng.). Jeon Il-Ju The Scope and Limit of Protection of Copyright on the Internet. Journal of Industrial Property. Vol. 13. 2003. Pp. 327–346. (In Eng.). Mingaleva Zh., Mirskikh I. The Protection of Intellectual Property in Educational Process. In Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. Issue 83(2013). Pp. 1059–1062. (In Eng.). Mingaleva Zh., Mirskikh I. The Problems of Legal Regulation and Protection of Intellectual Property. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. Issue 81(2013). Pp. 329–333. (In Eng.). Yang Lei, Tsai Yingyi, Mukherjee Arijit. Intellectual Property Rights and the Quality of Transferred Technology in Developing Coun-tries. Review of Development Economics. 2016. Vol. 20. Issue 1. Pp. 239–249. (In Eng.) |
|||||||||
Financing: | --- |