|
Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2021. Issue 2 (52) |
||||||||||
| Title: | THE PLACE OF MOTIONS AND COMPLAINTS IN MODERN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE |
|||||||||
| Authors: |
O. A. Maximov, Ulyanovsk State University |
 |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | |||||||
| ORCID: | 0000-0002-7071-8566 |
ResearcherID: | AAO-2672-2021 |
|||||||
| Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
| Requisites: | Maximov O. A. Mesto khodataystv i zhalob v sovremennom ugolovnom protsesse [The Place of Motions and Complaints in Modern Criminal Procedure]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2021. Issue 52. Pp. 372–393. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2021-52-372-393 |
|||||||||
| DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2021-52-372-393 |
|||||||||
| Annotation: |
Introduction: this paper studies motions and complaints in the context of criminal procedure in the Russian Federation. Purpose: to determine the place of the right to file motions and complaints in the structure of rights of persons involved in criminal proceedings, in the system of human rights, the place of motions and complaints in the criminal procedure form, their role in achieving the purpose of criminal procedure. Methods: system analysis, formal and dialectical logic, interpretation of legal norms, comparative historical method, comparative legal method. Results: the sole purpose of criminal procedure is to protect rights and lawful interests of persons involved in criminal proceedings. The scope and the very existence of the legal institution of motions and complaints directly depend on the current purpose of procedure. This legal institution is a regulatory implementation of the right to appeal against procedural actions and decisions, which is among the ‘law-enforcement’ principles that currently determine the form (type) of criminal procedure. The scope of this principle includes both complaints and motions. The right to file motions and complaints serves to ensure that substantive rights can be exercised and also has its individual significance among other inalienable human rights as an element of the ‘right to a right’. The right to file motions and complaints is enshrined in international acts on human rights. The principle of the right to appeal against procedural actions and decisions is the most important guarantee of the purpose of criminal proceedings being achieved, a mandatory component of the criminal procedure form. The right to file motions and complaints consists in legal entitlement to bring into action the state apparatus with the aim of the applicant’s procedural interest being satisfied. Conclusions: the right to file motions and complaints is a key right for building criminal procedure relations aimed at protecting the rights and freedoms of persons involved in criminal proceedings. |
|||||||||
| Keywords: | motions; complaints; purpose of criminal procedure; criminal procedure form; principles of criminal procedure; rights and freedoms; persons involved in criminal proceedings |
|||||||||
 |
download the full-version article | |||||||||
| References: | Alekseev S. S. Voskhozhdenie k pravu. Poiski i resheniya [Ascent to the Right. Searches and Solutions]. Moscow, 2001. 752 p. (In Russ.). 2. Alekseev S. S. Obshhaya teoriya prava. V dvukh tomakh [General Theory of Law. In 2 vols.]. Moscow, 1982. Vol. 2. 360 p. (In Russ.). 3. Andreeva O. I., Grigor'ev V. N., Zaytsev O. A., Trubnikova T. V. Zloupotreblenie pravom, ego preduprezhdenie i presechenie v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii: nekotorye itogi issledovaniya [Abuse of Right, Its Prevention and Suppression in the Criminal Procedure of Russia: Some Results of Research]. Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal – Russian Journal of Criminology. 2018. Vol. 12. Issue 6. Pp. 914–924. DOI: 10.17150/2500-4255.2018.12(6).914–924. (In Russ.). 4. Bezrukov S. S. Printsipy ugolovnogo protsessa: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Principles of Criminal Procedure: Synopsis of Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2016. 58 p. (In Russ.). 5. Grigor'ev V. N. Ugolovno-protses-sual'naya forma ili administrativnyy reglament: sovremennye trendy [Criminal Procedure Form or Administrative Regulations: Current Trends]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo – Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law. 2018. Vol. 9. Issue 1. Pp. 42–51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14. 2018.103. (In Russ.). 6. Kapitsyn V. M. Prava cheloveka i mekhanizmy ikh zashhity: Uchebnoe posobie [Human Rights and Mechanisms for Their Protection: Study Guide]. Moscow, 2003. 288 p. (In Russ.). 7. Kondrat I. N. Prava cheloveka i ugolovno-protsessual'nyy zakon (dosudebnoe proizvodstvo) [Human Rights and Criminal Procedure Law (Pre-Trial Proceedings)]. Moscow, 2012. 318 p. (In Russ.). 8. Luchaire F. Konstitutsionnaya zashhita prav i svobod lichnosti. [Constitutional Protection of the Rights and Freedoms of the Individual]. Transl. from French by S. V. Bobotov, D. I. Vasil'ev; ed. by S. V. Bobotov. Moscow, 1993. 382 p. (In Russ.). 9. Matuzov N. I. Lichnost'. Prava. Demokratiya (teoreticheskie problemy sub''ektivnogo prava) [Personality. Rights. Democracy (Theoretical Problems of the Right)]. Saratov, 1972. 292 p. (In Russ.). 10. Mikhaylovskaya I. B. Tseli, funktsii i printsipy rossiyskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (ugolovno-protsessual'naya forma) [Objectives, Functions and Principles of Russian Criminal Proceedings (Criminal Procedure Form)]. Moscow, 2003. 144 p. (In Russ.). 11. Prava cheloveka. Uchebnik dlya VUZov [Human Rights. Textbook for institutions of higher education]. Ed. by the Corresponding Member of the RAS, Dr. jurid. sci. E. A. Lukasheva]. Moscow, 1999. 573 p. (In Russ.). 12. Printsipy rossiyskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: soderzhanie i problemy realizatsii: monografiya [Principles of Russian Criminal Justice: Essence and Problems of Implementation: Monograph]. Ed. by Dr. jurid. sci., Prof. N. S. Manova]. Moscow, 2019. 360 p. (In Russ.). 13. Rasskazov L. P., Uporov I. V. Estestvennye prava cheloveka: Uchebnoe posobie [Natural Rights of Man: Study Guide]. St. Petersburg, 2001. 96 p. (In Russ.). 14. Smirnov A. V. Sostyazatel'nyy protsess [Adversary Process]. St. Petersburg, 2001. 320 p. (In Russ.). 15. Child J. J. Defense of a Basic Voluntary Act Requirement in Criminal Law from Philosophies of Action. New Criminal Law Review. 2020. Vol. 23 (4). Pp. 437–470. Available at: https://doi. org/10.1525/nclr.2020.23.4.437. (In Eng.). 16. Christensen M. J. The Perestroika of International Criminal Law: Soviet Reforms and The Promise of Legal Primacy in International Governance. New Criminal Law Review. 2020. Vol. 23 (2). Pp. 236–270. Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1525/ nclr.2020.23.2.236. (In Eng.). 17. Huq A. Z. A Right to a Human Decision. Virginia Law Review. 2019. Vol. 105. U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 713. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3382521. (In Eng.). 18. Rakar I., Tičar B. Normative Principles in the System of Criminal Justice. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice. 2016. Vol. 24. Issue 2–3. Pp. 135–150. DOI: 10.1163/15718174-24032089. (In Eng.). 19. Hilgert J. A. Building a Human Rights Framework for Workers' Compensation in the United States: Opening the Debate on first Principles. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2012. Vol. 55. Issue 6. Special Issue: Rethinking Workers' Compensation: The Human Rights Perspective. Pp. 506–518. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22023; https://on-line¬library.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ajim.220 23-fn1. (In Eng.). 20. Kremens K., Jasiński W. Editorial of Dossier 'Admissibility of Evidence in Criminal Process. Between the Establishment of the Truth, Human Rights and the Efficiency of Proceedings'. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal. January-April 2021. Vol. 7. Issue 1. Pp. 15–42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1. 537. (In Eng.). 21. Mujuzi J. D. Victim Participation in the Criminal Justice System in the European Union Through Private Prosecutions: Issues Emerging from the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice. 2016. Vol. 24. Issue 2–3. Pp. 506–518. DOI: 10.1163/15718174-24032088. (In Eng.). 22. Perry M. J. The Morality of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 2020. Vol. 42. Issue 2. Pp. 434–478. DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2020.0023. (In Eng.). 23. Pinto M. Historical Trends of Human Rights Gone Criminal. Human Rights Quarterly. 2020. Vol. 42. Issue 4. Pp. 729–761. DOI: 10.1353/hrq. 2020.0039. (In Eng.). 24. Pitcher K. M. Rights-Analysis in Addressing Pre-Trial Impropriety: An Obstacle to Fairness? Obstacles to Fairness in Criminal Proceedings: Individual Rights and Institutional Forms. Ed. by J. D. Jackson, S. J. Summers. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018. Pp. 273–300. DOI: 10.5040/9781782 258384.ch-014. (In Eng.). |
|||||||||
| Received: | 02.04.2021 | |||||||||
| Financing: |
--- |
|||||||||
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013
The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing
The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year