|
Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2020. Issue 2 (48) |
||||||||||
| Title: | INNOMINATE PHENOMENA IN CIVIL LAW | |||||||||
| Authors: |
S. I. Suslova, Irkutsk Institute (Branch) of the All-Russian State University of Justice (RLA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia) |
 |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | |||||||
| ORCID: | 0000-0002-7487-6879 | ResearcherID: | R-7761-2016 | |||||||
| Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: | DOI: 10.17150/2500-4255.2017.11(2).299-307 DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20199108071 |
|||||||||
| Requisites: | Suslova S. I. Nepoimenovannost' v grazhdanskom prave [Innominate Phenomena in Civil Law]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2020. Issue 48. Pp. 322–347. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2020-48-322-347 | |||||||||
| DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2020-48-322-347 | |||||||||
| Annotation: |
Introduction: despite numerous references to the term ‘innominate’ when describing various civil law phenomena, there have been no scientific attempts to analyze its nature. In Russian civil law, only the problems of innominate contracts and innominate methods for securing performance of obligations have been studied so far. Even in specialized works that deal with some particular types of innominate phenomena, this issue is not analyzed as a complex phenomenon that is crucial not only for law of obligations but for civil law in general. Currently, innominate objects of civil rights, innominate legal facts, innominate remedies, innominate legal rights remain an unexplored field. Moreover, there is no list of innominate legal phenomena. Thus, it appears necessary to develop a scientific approach to innominate phenomena in civil law. Purpose: the article aims to define the concept of innominate phenomena in civil law, to distinguish between the concepts ‘innominate phenomena’ and ‘gaps in law’, to identify innominate legal phenomena in civil law, to develop classification of those, and to describe the innominate phenomena being the least studied in civil law science. Methods: based on the dialectical method, which is the key method for legal studies, the following tasks were accomplished: innominate phenomena and views on their nature were studied from the perspective of historical variability; existing scientific views on innominate phenomena and their features were evaluated; innominate phenomena were analyzed in relation to other legal categories. The following methods were used as well: the comparative legal method, the method of alternatives, the structural functional method, the formal legal method, the historical legal method, and the method of legal interpretation. Results: the author’s definition of innominate phenomena in civil law was proposed. Based on the doctrine of determinism, there were identified criteria for distinguishing between the concepts ‘gaps in law’ and ‘innominate phenomena’. Classifications of innominate civil law phenomena were developed. They can be used by law enforcement agencies in resolving legal disputes that involve phenomena of this kind. Conclusions: innominate legal phenomena are positive civil law phenomena reflecting the principle of freedom of participants in civil relations. Prohibitions concerning the existence of innominate legal phenomena established by Russian legislation contradict its basic principles. Therefore, it is necessary to expand the scope of authorized and admissible innominate phenomena. |
|||||||||
| Keywords: | innominate; atypicality; objects; legal facts; legal rights; remedy; gap in law | |||||||||
 |
download the full-version article | |||||||||
| References: | 1. Aktual'nye problemy predprinimatel'skogo i korporativnogo prava v Rossii i za rubezhom: sbornik nauchnykh statej III Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii / pod red. S. D. Mogilevskogo, M. A. Egorovoj [Current Problems of Business and Corporate Law in Russia and Abroad: Сollection of Scientific Articles of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference; ed. by S. D. Mogilevskiy, M. A. Egorova]. Moscow, 2016. 493 p. (In Russ.). 2. Anisimov A. P. Prava zhivotnykh v rossijskom i zarubezhnom prave [The Rights of Animals in the Russian and Foreign Law]. Agrarnoe i zemel'noe pravo – Agrarian and Land Law. 2016. Issue 1. Pp. 103–108. (In Russ.). 3. Arbitrazhnyj process: uchebnik / otv. red. V. V. Yarkov [Commercial Proceedings: Textbook; ed. by V. V. Yarkov]. Moscow, 2017. 752 p. (In Russ.). 4. Barinova E. A. Veshchnye prava v sisteme sub"ektivnykh grazhdanskikh prav [Property Rights in the System of Civil Rights]. Aktual'nye problemy grazhdanskogo prava: Sbornik statej [Current Problems of Civil Law: Collection of Articles]. 2003. Issue 6. Pp. 137–174. (In Russ.). 5. Besprozvannyj D. B. Determinaciya pravovykh predpisanij [The Determination of the Legal Orders]. Social'no-politicheskie nauki – Socio-Political Sciences. 2012. Issue 2. Pp. 65–68. (In Russ.). 6. Braginskij M. I. Osnovy ucheniya o nepoimenovannykh (bezymyannykh) i smeshannykh dogovorakh [Fundamentals of the Doctrine of Innominate and Mixed Contracts]. Moscow, 2007. 79 p. (In Russ.). 7. Bulygina M. A. Mena imushchestvennykh prav [An Exchange of the Property Rights]. Rossijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal – Russian Juridical Journal. 2016. Issue 3. Pp. 161–173. (In Russ.). 8. Bunge M. Prichinnost'. Mesto principa prichinnosti v sovremennoj nauke [Causality. The Place of the Causal Principle in Modern Science]. Moscow, 1962. 512 p. (In Russ.). 9. Vasilevskaya L. Yu. Cifrovye prava kak novyj ob"ekt grazhdanskikh prav: problemy yuridicheskoj kvalifikacii [Digital Rights as a New Object of Civil Rights: Problems of Legal Qualification]. Khozyajstvo i pravo – Business and Law. 2019. Issue 5. Pp. 3–14. (In Russ.). 10. Vasil'ev V. V. Determinizm v sisteme grazhdanskogo prava Rossijskoj Federacii: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Determinism in the Civil Law System of the Russian Federation: Synopsis of Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2015. 60 p. (In Russ.). 11. Veter N.Yu. Ponyatie, priznaki i yuridicheskaya sushchnost' obkhoda zakona [The Concept, Signs and Legal Nature of the Circumvention of Law]. Vlast' Zakona – Power of Law. 2014. Issue 4. Pp. 175–185. (In Russ.). 12. Gavrilov E. V. Pravovaya poziciya Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii o kompensacii nematerial'nogo (reputacionnogo) vreda yuridicheskim licam [The Legal Standing of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation with Regard to the Compensation for Non-Financial (Reputation) Damage to Legal Entities]. Rossijskij sud'ya – Russian Judge. 2018. Issue 7. Pp. 33–37. (In Russ.). 13. Gavrilov E. V. Prinesenie izvineniya kak sposob zashchity chesti, dostoinstva i delovoj reputacii [Apologizing as a Way to Protect Honor, Dignity and Business Reputation]. Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika – Legislation and Economy. 2012. Issue 7. Pp. 16–21. (In Russ.). 14. Gorokhov D. B., Gorokhova Yu. V. Zhivotnye i rasteniya – sub"ekty prava po zakonodatel'stvu Rossijskoj Federacii: konstataciya absurda ili nauchnoe otkrytie? [Animals and Plants - Subjects of the Law According to the Legislation of the Russian Federation: the Statement of Absurdity or the Scientific Discovery?]. Advokat – Lawyer. 2016. Issue 11. Pp. 5–20. (In Russ.). 15. Gruzdev V. V. Differenciaciya v grazhdanskom prave [Differentiation in Civil Law]. Notarius – Notary. 2018. Issue 8. Pp. 8–12. (In Russ.). 16. Gudkov D. V. Problema kvalifikacii otnoshenij storon do razresheniya otlagatel'nogo usloviya [Legal Qualification of Parties' Relations during Pendency of a Suspensive Condition]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava – Civil Law Review. 2015. Issue 3. Pp. 7–56. (In Russ.). 17. Dal' V. Tolkovyj slovar' zhivago velikoruskago yazyka [Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language]. Available at: https://www.slovardalja.net/word.php?wordid=28757 (accessed 22.01.2020). (In Russ.). 18. Egorova M. A., Krylov V. G., Romanov A. K. Deliktnye obyazatel'stva i deliktnaya otvetstvennost' v anglijskom, nemeckom i francuzskom prave: uchebnoe posobie / otv. red. M. A. Egorova [Tort Obligations and Tort Liability in the English, German and French Law: Tutorial; ed. by M.A. Egorova]. Moscow, 2017. 376 p. (In Russ.). 19. Demin A. V. Princip opredelennosti nalogooblozheniya: monografiya [The Principle of Taxation Certainty: Monograph]. Moscow, 2015. 368 p. (In Russ.). 20. Avkhadeev V. R., Astashova V. S., Andrichenko L. V. et al. Dogovor kak obshchepravovaya cennost': monografiya [Agreement as a Legal Value: Monograph]. Moscow, 2018. 381 p. (In Russ.). 21. Dolganichev V. V. Vozbuzhdenie i podgotovka del gruppovogo proizvodstva [Institution and Preparation of Group Proceedings]. Moscow, 2017. 176 p. (In Russ.). 22. Dolzhikov A. V. "Rukopisi ne goryat": nepisanye prava v konstitucionnom pravosudii ['Manuscripts Don't Burn': Unwritten Rights in Constitutional Adjudication]. Sravnitel'noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie – Comparative Constitutional Review. 2014. Issue 1. Pp. 120–137. (In Russ.). 23. Zhbankov M. A., Shtykova N. N. Sootnoshenie veshchno-pravovykh i special'nykh iskov zashchity prav na zemel'nye uchastki (na primere sudebnoj praktiki Vladimirskoj oblasti) [The Correlation between Proprietary and Special Claims for Protection of Title to Land Plots (on the Example of Case Law of the Vladimir Region)]. Pravovye voprosy nedvizhimosti – Legal Issues of Real Estate. 2019. Issue 1. Pp. 26–30. (In Russ.). 24. Zav'yalov A .A. "Publichnye" servituty ['Public' Servitudes]. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v Rossijskoj Federacii – Property Relations in the Russian Federation. 2019. Issue 9. Pp. 92–99. (In Russ.). 25. Karapetov A. G. Rastorzhenie narushennogo dogovora v rossijskom i zarubezhnom prave [Termination of a Breached Contract in Russian and Foreign Law]. Moscow, 2007. 876 p. (In Russ.). 26. Kirsanova E. E. Vozniknovenie novykh ob"ektov pravovoj zashchity v usloviyakh cifrovoj ekonomiki [Origination of New Legal Protection Objects in Conditions of the Digital Economy]. Yurist – Jurist. 2018. Issue 11. Pp. 19–24. (In Russ.). 27. Korporativnoe pravo: uchebnyj kurs / otv. red. I. S. Shitkina [Corporate Law: Training Course; ed. by I.S. Shitkina]. Moscow, 2018. Vol. 2. 990 p. (In Russ.). 28. Komissarova E. G., Torkin D. A. Nepoimenovannye sposoby obespecheniya obyazatel'stv v grazhdanskom prave [Innominate Methods of Securing Obligations in Civil Law]. Moscow, 2008. 144 p. (In Russ.). 29. Komissarova E. G. Metodologicheskie aspekty nauchno-ponyatijnogo apparata v civilistike [Methodological Aspects of Scientific Concepts Formation in Civil Science]. Metodologicheskie problemy civilisticheskikh issledovanij – Methodological Problems of the Civil Researches. 2019. Vol. 1. Issue 1. Pp. 197–216. (In Russ.). 30. Arzumanova L. L., Lapteva A.V ., Shniger D. O., Belyaev M. A., Slesarev S. A. Kommentarij k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 26 marta 1998 g. № 41-FZ "O dragocennykh metallakh i dragocennykh kamnyakh" (postatejnyj) [Commentary on the Federal Law No. 41-FZ 'On Precious Metals and Precious Stones' of March 26, 1998 (Itemized)]. 2018. (In Russ.). 31. Krasnova T. S. Servitutnye tipy ogranichenij (obremenenij) prav na nedvizhimost': zarubezhnyj opyt i novelly rossijskogo zakonodatel'stva [Servitude Types: Foreign Experience and Draft Amendments to Russian Legislation]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossijskoj Federacii – Herald of Economic Justice. 2015. Issue 1. Pp. 142–162. (In Russ.). 32. Lazarev V. V. Probely v prave i puti ikh ustraneniya [Gaps in Law and Ways to Eliminate Them]. Moscow, 1974. 184 p. (In Russ.). 33. Maksimov V. A. Usloviya okhranosposobnosti proizvedenij v avtorskom prave [Conditions of Protectability of Works in Copyright]. Leningradskij yuridicheskij zhurnal – Leningradskiy Juridical Journal. 2017. Issue 3. Pp. 85–91. (In Russ.). 34. Malyshev K. Kurs obshchego grazhdanskogo prava Rossii: v 4 t. [The Course of General Civil Law of Russia: in 4 vols.]. St. Petersburg, 1878. Vol. 1. 366 p. (In Russ.). 35. Medvedev I. R. Razreshenie gorodskikh konfliktov [Urban Conflicts Resolution]. Moscow, 2017. 372 p. (In Russ.). 36. Mengliev Sh. Imushchestvennye prava kak ob"ekt prava i pravootnosheniya [Property Rights as an Object of Law and Legal Relations]. Available at: http://law.edu.ru/doc/document.asp?docID =123494. (In Russ.). 37. Metel'skaya V. V., Shevcov S. G. Servituty v sisteme veshchnykh prav [Servitudes in the System of Property Rights]. Krasnodar, 2009. 158 p. (In Russ.). 38. Ovchinnikov S. N. Princip determinizma v metodologii pravovedeniya [The Principle of Determinism in the Methodology of Law Science]. Pravovedenie – Pravovedenie. 1984. Issue 2. Pp. 35–39. (In Russ.). 39. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Akademicheskij kurs v trekh tomakh / otv. red. M. N. Marchenko [General Theory of State and Law. Academic Course in Three Volumes; ed. by M. N. Marchenko]. Moscow, 2007. Vol. 2. Pravo [Law]. 816 p. (In Russ.). 40. Panasyuk O. S. Probely v prave i sposoby ikh preodoleniya i ustraneniya: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Gaps in Law and Ways to Overcome and Eliminate Them: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Stavropol, 2012. 21 p. (In Russ.). 41. Perfil'eva V. Spory vokrug statusa mesta pod parkovku [Disputes over the Status of a Parking Space]. Zhilishchnoe pravo – Housing Law. 2016. Issue 11. Pp. 53–56. (In Russ.). 42. Postatejnyj kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii, chasti vtoroj: v 3 t. / pod red. P. V. Krasheninnikova [Article-by-Article Commentary on the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Part Two: in 3 vols.; ed. by P. V. Krasheninnikov]. Moscow, 2011. Vol. 3. 533 p. (In Russ.). 43. Rogaleva M. A. Algoritm kvalifikacii grazhdanskikh del (na primere zashchity prav investorov v sfere rynka cennykh bumag) [Algorithm for Qualifying Civil Cases (a Case Study of Protecting the Rights of Investors in the Securities Market)]. Moscow, 2018. 204 p. (In Russ.). 44. Svit Yu. P. Rasporyazhenie pravom trebovaniya o privlechenii k subsidiarnoj otvetstvennosti [Disposal of the Right to Claim Subsidiary Liability]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2018. Issue 7. Pp. 37–41. (In Russ.). 45. Sdelki, predstavitel'stvo, iskovaya davnost': Postatejnyj kommentarij k stat'yam 153–208 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii / otv. red. A. G. Karapetov [Transactions, Representation, Limitation: Article-by-Article Commentary on Articles 153–208 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation; ed. A. G. Karapetov]. Moscow, 2018. 1264 p. (In Russ.). 46. Semenov V. V. Preimushchestvennoe pravo pokupki imushchestva kak sposob zashchity imushchestvennykh interesov [Preferential Right to Purchase Property as a Method of Property Interest Protection]. Yurist – Jurist. 2015. Issue 19. Pp. 23–26. (In Russ.). 47. Semenov V. V. Sposoby zashchity grazhdanskikh prav v kontekste Konstitucii i Grazhdanskogo kodeksa [Civil Rights Protection Means within the Framework of the Constitution and the Civil Code]. Advokatskaya praktika – Advocate's Practice. 2018. Issue 4. Pp. 21–23. (In Russ.). 48. Sinicyn S. A. Veshch' kak ob"ekt grazhdanskikh prav: vozmozhnye i dolzhnye kriterii identifikacii [A Thing as an Object of Civil Rights: Possible and Proper Identification Criteria]. Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika – Legislation and Economy. 2016. Issue 11. Pp. 7–17. (In Russ.). 49. Spektor E. I. Probely v zakonodatel'stve i puti ikh preodoleniya: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Gaps in Legislation and Ways to Overcome Them: Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2003. 127 p. (In Russ.). 50. Spirkin A. G. Filosofiya: uchebnik [Philosophy: Textbook]. Moscow, 2000. 368 p. (In Russ.). 51. Suslova S. I. Nepoimenovannost' v grazhdanskom prave: k postanovke voprosa [On the Problem of the 'Unnamed' in Civil Law]. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki – Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki. 2018. Vol. 160. Issue 2. Pp. 404–414. (In Russ.). 52. Sukhanov E. A. Veshchnoe pravo: Nauchno-poznavatel'nyj ocherk [Property Law: Scientific and Educational Essay]. Moscow, 2017. 559 p. (In Russ.). 53. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Kurs lekcij / Berezhnov A. G., Vorotilin E. G., Lejst O. E., Lungu P. F. i dr. / pod red. M. N. Marchenko. 2-e izd. [Theory of State and Law. Lecture Course; A. G. Berezhnov, E. G. Vorotilin, O. E. Lejst, P. F. Lun¬gu et al.; ed. by M. N. Marchenko. 2nd ed.]. Moscow, 1996. 475 p. (In Russ.). 54. Uranskij F. R. K voprosu o ponyatii i vidakh probelov v prave [On the Concept and Types of Gaps in Law]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seria 11. Pravo – The Moscow University Herald. Series 11. Law. 2005. Issue 5. Pp. 111–121. (In Russ.). 55. Uranskij F. R. Probely v prave i sposoby ikh vospolneniya v pravoprimenitel'noj deyatel'nosti: dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk [Gaps in Law and Ways to Fill Them in Law Enforcement: Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2005. 192 p. (In Russ.). 56. Filippova S. K voprosu o ponyatii, sostave i strukture ustavnogo kapitala khozyajstvennogo obshchestva [On the Concept, Composition and Structure of the Authorized Capital of a Business Company]. Khozyajstvo i pravo – Business and Law. 2018. Issue 11. Pp. 35–52. (In Russ.). 57. Fomina L. A. Probely v grazhdanskom prave Rossii: ponyatie, sushchnost', sposoby preodoleniya: monografiya [Gaps in the Civil Law of Russia: Concept, Essence, Methods of Overcoming: Monograph]. Volgograd, 2008. 169 p. (In Russ.). 58. Khlikova O. G. Dolya v prave obshchej dolevoj sobstvennosti na zhilye pomeshcheniya kak ob"ekt grazhdanskikh i zhilishchnykh prav [A Share in the Right of Shared Own Property to Residential Areas as an Object of Civil and Housing Rights]. Prolog: zhurnal o prave – Prologue: Law Journal. 2017. Issue 4. Pp. 13–16. DOI: 10.21639 / 2313-6715.2017.4.3. (In Russ.). 59. Chashkova S. Yu. Svoboda formirovaniya uslovij dogovora o surrogatnom materinstve kak netipichnoj dogovornoj konstrukcii [Freedom to Formulate the Terms of a Surrogacy Agreement as an Atypical Contractual Design]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2016. Issue 2. Pp. 58–64. (In Russ.). 60. Chervyakov K. K. Fakt priznaniya otcovstva i ego znachenie dlya vozniknoveniya roditel'skogo pravootnosheniya [The Fact of Recognition of Paternity and Its Significance for the Emergence of Parental Legal Relationship]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo – Soviet State and Law. 1973. Issue 5. Pp. 112–115. (In Russ.). 61. Shevciv O. S. Nekotorye aspekty ponyatiya imushchestva kak ob"ekta grazhdanskikh prav [Some Aspects of the Concept of Property as an Object of Civil Rights]. Leningradskij yuridicheskij zhurnal – Leningradskiy Juridical Journal. 2015. Issue 4. Pp. 121–128. (In Russ.). 62. Shevcov S. G. Usmotrenie i prichinno-sled¬stvennye svyazi v grazhdanskom prave [Discretion and the Causal Relationship in Civil Law]. Sovremennoe pravo – Modern Law. 2012. Issue 3. Pp. 78–81. (In Russ.). 63. Shelyutto M. L. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva. Obzor IV Ezhegodnykh nauchnykh chtenij, posvyashchennykh pamyati professora S. N. Bratusya [Problems of Enhancement of Civil Legislation. Overview of the IV Annual Conference Devoted to the Memory of Professor S. N. Bratus]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law. 2010. Issue 1. Pp. 144–153. (In Russ.). 64. Yakovlev A. S. Imushchestvennye prava kak ob"ekty grazhdanskikh pravootnoshenij: avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk [Property Rights as Objects of Civil Legal Relations: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Voronezh, 2003. 25 p. (In Russ.). 65. Akkermans B. The New Dutch Civil Code: the Borderline between Property and Contract. Towards a Unified System of Land Burdens; ed. by S. van Erp and B. Akkermans. Antwerp-Oxford, 2006. Pp. 163–183. (In Eng.). 66. Canaris C.-W. Die Feststellung von Lücken im Gesetz: eine methodologische Studie über Voraussetzungen und Grenzen der richterlichen Rechtsfortbildung praeter legem. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1964. 219 p. (In Germ.). 67. Cuellar M. Causal Reasoning and Data Analysis in the Law: Definition, Estimation, and Usage of the Probability of Causation. SSRN Electronic Journal. January 2018. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn. 3188098. (In Eng.). 68. Favre D. Living Property: A New Status for Animals within the Legal System. Marquette Law Review. 2010. Vol. 93. Issue 3. (In Eng.). 69. Favre D. Equitable Self-Ownership for Animals. Duke Law Journal. 2000. Vol. 50. Issue 2. Pp. 473–502. (In Eng.). 70. Keller A. Die Kritik, Korrektur und Interpretation des Gesetzeswortlautes. Winterthur, 1960. 305 p. (In Eng.). 71. Kyritsis D. Interpreting Legislative Intent. SSRN Electronic Journal. September 4, 2018. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3243732. (In Eng.). 72. Manssen G. Staatsrecht II: Grundrechte. Munich, 2012. 277 p. (In Germ.). 73. Mel'nichenko R. S. Problemi zastosuvannya sudom nepoimenovanikh sposobiv zakhistu tsivil'nikh prav ta interesiv [Problems of Application of the Unnamed Methods of Protection of the Civil Rights and Interests by the Court]. Molodii vchenii – Young Scientist. 2015. Issue 8. Pp. 99–102. (In Ukr.). 74. Oman N. B. 'Private Law and Local Custom', in Oxford Handbook of New Private Law Theory (Henry Smith et al eds. Forthcoming). SSRN Electronic Journal. October 22, 2019. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3468516. (In Eng.). 75. Preuß N. Digitaler Nachlass – Vererbbarkeit eines Kontos bei einem sozialen Netzwerk. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift. 2018. Heft 43. (In Germ.). 76. Rupp H. H. Ungeschriebene Grundrechte unter dem Grundgesetz. Juristen Zeitung. 2005. 60. Jg. H. 4. Pp. 157–160. (In Germ.). 77. Reyes C. L., Rosario N. M., Cannon R. M., Tall R. Panel I: Blockchain and the Law. The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law. 2019. Vol. 34. Issue 1. (In Eng.). 78. Shavell S. The Mistaken Restriction of Strict Liability to Uncommon Activities. The Journal of Legal Analysis, Forthcoming. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3298135. (In Eng.). 79. Shavell S. On the Redesign of Accident Liability for the World of Autonomous Vehicles. Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center Discussion Paper No. 1014. Available at: https://ssrn. com/abstract=3437474. (In Eng.). 80. Shyam G. Is the Classification of Animals as Property Consistent with Modern Community Attitudes? UNSW Law Journal. 2018. Vol. 41(4). Pp. 1418–1444. (In Eng.). 81. Shyam G. The Legal Status of Animals: The World Rethinks Its Position. Alternative Law Journal. 2015. Issue 4 (40). Pp. 266–270. DOI: 10.1177/1037969X1504000411. (In Eng.). 82. Tarnavs'ka M. I. Vibir sposobu zakhistu tsivil'nogo prava ta interesu: praktichnii aspekt [Choosing a Way to Protect Civil Rights and Interests: Practical Aspect]. Mitna sprava – Customs. 2014. Issue 4 (94). (In Ukr.). 83. Walter A. Bitcoin, Libra und sonstige Kryptowährungen aus zivilrechtlicher Sicht. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift. 2019. Issue 50. (In Germ.). 84. Zitelmann E. Lücken im Recht. Leipzig, 1903. 46 p. (In Germ.). |
|||||||||
| Received: | 26.12.2019 | |||||||||
| Financing: | Acknowledgments: The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 19-111-50009 | |||||||||
The Perm State University
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013
The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing
The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013
The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing
The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year