Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2021. Issue 1 (51) |
||||||||||
Title: | KNOWLEDGE AS A NEW FORM OF LAW |
|||||||||
Authors: |
S. A. Bochkarev, Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | ||||||||
ORCID: | 0000-00003-3217-7508 | ResearcherID: | --- | |||||||
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
Requisites: | Bochkarev S. A. Znanie kak novaya forma prava [Knowledge as a New Form of Law]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2021. Issue 51. Pp. 6–29. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2021-51-6-29 |
|||||||||
DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2021-51-6-29 | |||||||||
Annotation: |
Introduction: the article draws attention to the fact that the subject of philosophical and legal discussion no longer includes issues of deep order. Questions of the influence of disciplines on each other remain out of sight. Among those is the question of the lesson that philosophy teaches to law in the modern era. The search for an answer to this question points to the changing attitude of philosophy towards the phenomenon of knowledge. The cognitive aspect of the problem is related to the new understanding of the real meaning of knowledge, its extensiveness. Today philosophy declares and justifies the thesis of knowledge as a new form of being. Purpose: by testing the philosophical hypothesis, to establish that knowledge has always taken place but as a form of being it was long in the shadow of consciousness. In the new reality, knowledge transformed into the dominant format. Methods: comparative and historical analysis. Results: the study confirmed both the validity of the philosophical approach to knowledge as a form of being and the claim of this phenomenon to the status of a new form of law. Knowledge exists in three key and inextricably interrelated hypostases: as an object of evolution of public consciousness; as a result of concrete historical development; as an object of everyday life, when legal knowledge about an incident is developed ‘here and now’ by participants in legal proceedings. |
|||||||||
Keywords: | law; philosophy of law; gnoseology of law; epistemology of law; philosophy of criminal law; knowledge; criminal law knowledge; form of being; form of law; sense; will |
|||||||||
download the full-version article | ||||||||||
References: | 1. Alekseev S. S. Filosofiya prava [Philos-ophy of Law]. Moscow, 1998. 336 p. (In Russ.). 2. Babaev M. M., Pudovochkin Yu. E. Di-alektika traditsiy i novatsiy v ugolovnom prave [Dialectics of Traditions and Innovations in Criminal Law]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauch-nyy zhurnal – The Criminalist's Library. Scien-tific Journal. 2015. Issue 2. Pp. 9–28. (In Russ.). 3. Bochkarev S. A. Teoretiko-metodolo¬gi-ches¬koe issledovanie ugolovnogo prava kak sistemy nauchnogo znaniya: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Theoretical and Methodological Study of Criminal Law as a System of Scientific Knowledge: Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2020. 539 p. (In Russ.). 4. Vernadskiy V. I. Filosofskie mysli natu-ralista [A Naturalist's Philosophical Thoughts]. Moscow, 1988. 520 p. (In Russ.). 5. Windscheid B. Uchebnik pandektnogo prava: Obshhaya chast'. Perevod s ne-metskogo; per. pod red. i s predisl.: Pakhman S. V. [Textbook of Law of Pandects: General Part; transl. from German under the ed. of S.V. Pakhman]. St. Petersburg, 1874. 375 p. (In Russ.). 6. Hegel G. Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of Law]. Moscow, 2000. 464 p. (In Russ.). 7. Hegel G. W. F. Filosofiya prava. Per. s nem.: Red. i sost. D.A. Kerimov i V.S. Nersesyants; Avt. vstup. st. i primech. V.S. Nersesyants [Philosophy of Law; transl. from German; ed. and comp. by D. A. Kerimov and V. S. Nersesyants; preface and commentary by V. S. Nersesyants]. Moscow, 1990. 524 p. (In Russ.). 8. Hegel G. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk [Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sci-ences]. Moscow, 1974. Vol. 1. Nauka logiki [Science of Logic]. 452 p. (In Russ.). 9. Gribanov D. V. Chuvstvo prava [Sense of Law]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie – Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Pravovedenie. 2010. Issue 3 (290). Pp. 253–260. (In Russ.). 10. Greene R. Zakony vlasti / per. s angl. E. Ya. Mi¬gunovoy [Laws of Power; transl. from English by E. Ya. Migunova]. Moscow, 2009. 382 p. (In Russ.). 11. Zakomlistov A. F. Yuridicheskaya filosofiya [Legal Philosophy]. St. Petersburg, 2003. 548 p. (In Russ.). 12. Ioffe O. S. Izbrannye trudy po gra-zhdanskomu pravu: Iz istorii tsivilisticheskoy mysli. Grazhdanskoe pravootnoshenie. Kritika teorii "khozyaystvennogo prava" [Selected Works on Civil Law: From the History of Civil Thought. Civil Legal Relationship. Criticism of the Theory of 'Economic Law']. Moscow, 2009. 777 p. (In Russ.). 13. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma / per. s nem. N. O. Losskogo [Critique of Pure Rea-son; transl. from German by N.O. Losskiy]. Moscow, 2015. 734 p. (In Russ.). 14. Kasavin I. T. Prostranstvo: bytiystven-naya osnova znaniya [Space: the Existential Basis of Knowledge]. Epistemologiya i filosofi-ya nauki – Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. 2008. Vol. XVIII. Issue 4. Pp. 5–15. (In Russ.). 15. Kerimov D. A. Izbrannye proizvedeni-ya. V 3 t. [Selected Works. In 3 vols.]. Moscow, 2007. Vol. 2. 376 p. (In Russ.). 16. Kerimov D. A. Metodologiya prava: Predmet, funktsii, problemy filosofii prava. 5-e izd. [Methodology of Law: Subject, Functions, Problems of Philosophy of Law. 5th ed.]. Mos-cow, 2009. 520 p. (In Russ.). 17. Kibal'nik A. G. Traditsii i novatsii v ugolovnom prave: ochevidnoe i neveroyatnoe [Traditions and Innovations in Criminal Law: the Obvious and the Incredible]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal – The Criminal-ist's Library. Scientific Journal. 2015. Issue 5 (22). Pp. 70–74. (In Russ.). 18. Kudryavtsev V. N. Izbrannye trudy po sotsial'nym naukam: v 3 t. T. 1 [Selected Works on Social Sciences: In 3 vols.]. Moscow, 2002. Vol. 1. 566 p. (In Russ.). 19. Lisitsyn-Svetlanov A. G. Filosofiya prava: klassicheskie idei i vyzovy sovremennosti [Philosophy of Law: Classical Ideas and Chal-lenges of Modernity]. Transformatsiya para-digmy prava v tsivilizatsionnom razvitii che-lovechestva: doklady chlenov RAN / pod obshh. red. chl.-korr. RAN A. N. Savenkova [Transfor-mation of the Paradigm of Law in the Civiliza-tion Development of Mankind: Reports of Members of the Russian Academy of Sciences; ed. by Corresponding Member of the RAS A. N. Savenkov]. Moscow, 2019. Pp. 153–164. (In Russ.). 20. Losev A. F. Pozdnie stoiki [Late Stoics]. Rimskie stoiki. Seneka, Epiktet, Mark Avreliy [The Roman Stoics. Seneca, Epictetus, Marcus Aurelius]. Moscow, 1995. P. 365. (In Russ.). 21. Luria A. R. Priroda chelovecheskikh konfliktov. Ob"ektivnoe izuchenie dezorgani-zatsii povedeniya cheloveka [The Nature of Human Conflicts. An Objective Study of Disor-ganization of Human Behavior]. Moscow, 2002. 527 p. (In Russ.). 22. Makarov V. L. Ekonomika znaniy: uro-ki dlya Rossii [Economy of Knowledge: Les-sons for Russia]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk – Herald of the Russian Academy of Sci-ences. 2003. Vol. 73. Issue 5. P. 450. (In Russ.). 23. Mal'tsev G. V. Sotsial'nye osnovaniya prava [Social Foundations of Law]. Moscow, 2013. 799 p. (In Russ.). 24. Merkel A. Yuridicheskaya entsiklopedi-ya [Legal Encyclopedia]. St. Petersburg, 1902. 256 p. (In Russ.). 25. Muromtsev S. Opredelenie i osnovnoe razdelenie prava [Definition and Basic Division of Law]. Moscow, 1879. 250 p. (In Russ.). 26. Nersesyants V.S. «Obraz vraga» – avtoportret obshhestva ['Image of the Enemy' as a Self-Portrait of Society]. Platon – Plato. 2014. Issue 4. Pp. 51–52. (In Russ.). 27. Savenkov A. N. Filosofiya prava, pravovoe myshlenie i global'nye problemy sov-remennoy tsivilizatsii [Philosophy of Law, Legal Thinking and Global Problems of Modern Civi-lization]. Transformatsiya paradigmy prava v tsivilizatsionnom razvitii chelovechestva: dokla-dy chlenov RAN / pod obshh. red. chl.-korr. RAN A. N. Savenkova [Transformation of the Paradigm of Law in the Civilizational Develop-ment of Mankind: Reports of Members of the Russian Academy of Sciences; ed. by Corre-sponding Member of the RAS A. N. Savenkov]. Moscow, 2019. Pp. 9–92. (In Russ.). 28. Sartre J.-P. Problemy metoda. Stat'i / Per. s fr. V. P. Gaydamaka [Method Problems. Articles; transl. from French by V. P. Gaydamak]. Moscow, 2008. 222 p. (In Russ.). 29. Solov'ev V. Filosofskoe nachalo tsel'nogo znaniya [The Philosophical Principles of Integral Knowledge]. Minsk, 1999. 911 p. (In Russ.). 30. Sorokin V. V. Volya v prave: aktual-izatsiya problemy [Will in Law: Bringing the Problem to Light]. Istoriko-pravovye problemy: novyy rakurs – Historical-Legal Problems: the New Viewpoint. 2012. Issue 5. Pp. 258–262. (In Russ.). 31. Spinoza B. Izbrannye proizvedeniya v dvukh tomakh [Selected Works in Two Vols.]. Moscow, 1957. Vol. 1. 631 p. (In Russ.). 32. Toshhenko Zh. T. Novye tendentsii v razvitii rossiyskoy sotsiologii [New Trends in the Development of Russian Sociology]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – Sociological Studies. 2013. Issue 4 (348). Pp. 3–13. (In Russ.). 33. Trubetskoy E. N. Trudy po filosofii prava / Vstup. st. sost. i primech. I.I. Evlampieva [Proceedings on the Philosophy of Law; preface and commentary by I. I. Evlampiev]. St. Petersburg, 2001. 543 p. (In Russ.). 34. Feuerbach L. Istoriya filosofii. So-branie proizvedeniy v trekh tomakh. Per. s nem. Pod obshh. red. M. M. Grigor'yana [The Histo-ry of Philosophy. Collected Works in 3 vols.; transl. from German; ed. by M. M. Grigor'yan]. Moscow, 1967. Vol. 3. 486 p. (In Russ.). 35. Ferri E. Ugolovnaya sotsiologiya [Criminal Sociology]. Moscow, 1908. 657 p. (In Russ.). 36. Chukin S. G. Plyuralizm, solidarnost', spravedlivost'. K probleme identichnosti filosof-sko-pravovogo diskursa v situatsii postmoderna [Pluralism, Solidarity, Justice. On the Problem of Identity of Philosophical and Legal Dis-course in the Postmodern Situation]. St. Peters-burg, 2000. 280 p. (In Russ.). 37. Shershenevich G. Obshhaya teoriya prava [General Theory of Law]. Moscow, 1912. 698 p. (In Russ.). 38. Shibutani T. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya [Social Psychology]. Moscow, 1969. 534 p. (In Russ.). 39. Schopenhauer A. Izrecheniya. Aforizmy zhiteyskoy mudrosti / Per. s nem. F. Cherni-govets, R. Kresin [Sayings. Aphorisms of the Wisdom of Life; transl. from German by F. Chernigovets, R. Kresin]. Minsk, 2011. 250 p. (In Russ.). 40. Schopenhauer A. Sobranie sochineniy: V 6 t. [Collected Works: In 6 vols.]. Vol. 1. Mir kak volya i predstavlenie / Per. s nem.; Pod ob-shh. red. A. Chanysheva [The World as Will and Representation; transl. from German; ed. by A. Chanyshev]. Moscow, 1999. 495 p. (In Russ.). 41. Shul'ts V. L. Sotsiologiya znaniya: is-toriya i metodologiya [Sociology of Knowledge: History and Methodology]. Moscow, 2006. 194 p. (In Russ.). 42. Allen R. J., Leiter B. Naturalized Epis-temology and the Law of Evidence. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=293732 or http://dx.doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.293732. (In Eng.). 43. Binder J. Das Problem der Juristischen Persönlichkeit. 1907. 146 р. In Germ.). 44. Demogue R. Des Notions Fondamenta-les du Droit Privé. 1911. 681 p. (In Fr.). 45. Dernburg H. Pandekten. 1902. Part I. 368 р. (In Germ.). 46. Endemann F. Lehrbuch des Bürgerli-chen Rechts. 1903. Part I. Pp. 1050. (In Germ.). 47. Engle E. Ontology, Epistemology, Axi-ology: Bases for a Comprehensive Theory of Law (September 15, 2008). Appalachian Jour-nal of Law. 2009. Vol. 8. Pp. 103–122. Availa-ble at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1268528. (In Eng.). 48. Finnis J. M. What Is the Philosophy of Law? Rivista di Filosofia del Diritto. 2012. Is-sue 1. Pp. 67–78. Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 12-67; Oxford Legal Studies Re-search Paper No. 45/2012. Available at: https://ssrn.com/ab¬stract=2109921. (In Eng.). 49. Loutzenhiser G. Philosophical Theoris-ing on Taxation. Oxford Journal of Legal Stud-ies. 2020. Vol. 40. Issue 4. Pp. 905–925. Avail-able at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa030. (In Eng.). 50. Gold A. S., Miller P. B. Introduction to Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law (August 28, 2014). Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law; ed. by A. S. Gold, P.B. Mil-ler. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2488563. (In Eng.). 51. Greenberg M. Naturalism in Episte-mology and the Philosophy of Law (May 20, 2011). Law and Philosophy. UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 07-17. Available at: https://ssrn. com/abstract=987523. (In Eng.). 52. Haack S. Epistemology Legalized: Or, Truth, Justice, and the American Way. Ameri-can Journal of Jurisprudence. 2004. Vol. 49. Pp. 43–61. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=682642. (In Eng.). 53. Hershovitz S. The End of Jurisprudence (October 27, 2014). Yale Law Journal. Forth-coming. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract= 2515494. (In Eng.). 54. Holmes O. W. The Path of the Law. Harvard Law Review. 1897. Vol. 10. Issue 8. 457 р. (In Eng.). 55. Jellinek G. System des Subjectiven öf-fentlichen Rechts. 1919. (In Germ.). 56. Jenecke C. Shaken Baby Syndrome, Wrongful Convictions, and the Dangers of Aversion to Changing Science in Criminal Law. University of San Francisco Law Review. 2014. Vol. 48. Pp. 147–188. Available at: https://ssrn.com/ab¬stract=2483551. (In Eng.). 57. Jhering R. Geist des Römischen Rechts. 1906. Vol. III. 782 р. (In Germ.). 58. Kornhauser L.A. Doing without the Concept of Law. New York University School of Law. Public Law Research Paper No. 15-33. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2640605 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn. 2640605. (In Eng.). 59. Oberdiek J. Introduction: Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Torts. Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Torts; ed. by J. Oberdiek. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2493785. (In Eng.). 60. Pardo M. S. The Field of Evidence and the Field of Knowledge. Law and Philosophy. July 2005. Vol. 24. Available at: https://ssrn.com/ab¬stract=691703. (In Eng.). 61. Patterson D. Notes on the Methodology Debate in Contemporary Jurisprudence: Why Sociologists Might Be Interested. Law & Sociol-ogy. 2006. Vol. 8. Pp. 254–258. (In Eng.). 62. Regelsberger F. Pandekten. 1893. Vol. I. 717 p. (In Germ.). 63. Robinson P. H., Darley J. M. Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioral Science In-vestigation. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract= 660742. (In Eng.). 64. Saleille R. De la Personalite Juridique. 1910. 684 р. (In Fr.). 65. Schauer F. In Defense of Rule-Based Evidence Law: And Rule-Based Epistemology Too (September 1, 2008). Available at: https://ssrn. com/abstract=1261980 or http://dx.doi.org/10. 2139/ssrn.1261980. (In Eng.). 66. Schauer F. On the Nature of the Nature of Law (May 9, 2011). Available at: https://ssrn. com/abstract=1836494 or http://dx.doi.org/10. 2139/ssrn.1836494. (In Eng.). 67. Schlag P. The Knowledge Bubble — Something Amiss in Expertopia. Forthcoming; ed. by J. Desautels-Stein, C. Tomlins. Search of Contemporary Legal Thought. December 14, 2016. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2741144 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2741144. (In Eng.). 68. Smith S. D. Jurisprudence: Beyond Ex-tinction? San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 07-108. Available at: https://ssrn. com/abstract=1009249 or http: // dx.doi.org/10. 2139/ssrn.1009249. (In Eng.). 69. Rodriguez-Blanco V. Philosophising on International Law: Jovanović's Conception of Normativity and Rationality. Revus. 2020. Is-sue 43. Available at: http://journals.openedition. org/revus/6461. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.4000/re¬vus.6461. (In Eng.). |
|||||||||
Received: | 02.12.2020 | |||||||||
Financing: | --- |