Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2019. Issue 1 (43)

Title: SPECIFIC ASPECTS OF TAKING A NEGATORY ACTION TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY IN A BLOCK OF FLATS
Authors:

V. V. Stepanov, Perm State University

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0001-9209-2122
ResearcherID: A-2566-2017
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»:       DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2015-1-133-140
        10.17072/1995-4190-2017-37-350-360
Requisites: Stepanov V. V. Osobennosti primeneniya negatornogo iska dlya zashhity prav sobstvennikov pomeshheniy v mnogokvartirnom dome [Specific Aspects of Taking a Negatory Action to Protect the Rights of the Owners of Property in a Block of Flats]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2019. Issue 1. Pp. 94–120. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-43-94-120
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-43-94-120
Annotation:

Introduction: the paper analyzes application of the negatory mechanism as a remedy for the protection of the joint shared ownership right to common property in a block of flats. The purpose is to articulate the general approaches to identifying the reason and the subject matter of the negatory action, the fact and means of proof in the respective cases, as well as the proposals to improve the practices in applying civil, housing, and procedural legislation by the court of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts. Methods: the dialectical approach serves as the methodological basis for the research. General scientific (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, system-based approach) and special scientific methods (technical legal, comparative legal approaches) are applied. Results: the paper deals with standard situations which require taking a negatory action to restore the ownership right to common property; the respective law enforcement practice has been examined, different approaches in particular categories of cases have been identified. Conclusions: a court-established fact of using, modifying an object of common property in disregard of the procedure for obtaining approval of the owners of property in a block of flats (prescribed in the Housing Code of the Russian Federation) is a sufficient reason for satisfying the negatory action aimed to stop unlawful behavior of the defendant and to restore the demandant’s violated right. This approach can also be applied in case of such actions taken by one of the owners of property in a block of flats as placing signboards on the facade of the building, installing cable television equipment, communications, Internet lines, as well as in case of situations connected with bringing the defendant’s indoor space in line with the requirements of the current legislation. This approach may only be changed if there is established special legal regulation to handle particular types of exploitation of common property in a block of flats.

Keywords: negatory action; property owner; block of flats; common property; action proceedings; group action; evidence; reason for an action; subject matter of an action
  download the full-version article
References: 1. Afonina A. V. Razmeshchenie informatsionnykh i reklamnykh vyvesok [Placement of Information and Commercial Signboards]. Access from the legal reference system 'ConsultantPlus'. (In Russ.).
2. Bratus' M. B. O sootnoshenii (konkurentsii) veshchno-pravovykh i obyazatel'stvenno-pravovykh sposobov zashchity prava sobstvennosti [Correlation of in rem and in personam methods of protection of the right of ownership]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law. 2005. Issue 6. Pp. 128–134. (In Russ.).
3. Buynova Yu. V. Pravovye problemy pereustroystva (pereplanirovki) zhilykh pomeshcheniy [Legal Issues of Reorganization (Alterations) of Living Accommodations]. Yurist – Jurist. 2007. Issue 9. Pp. 25–27. (In Russ.).
4. Vlasova O. I. Pravovoe regulirovanie otnosheniy sobstvennosti na obshchee imushchestvo mnogokvartirnogo doma: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Legal Regulation of Ownership Relationships in Common Property in a Block of: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2008. 21 p. (In Russ.).
5. Gordeev D. P. Podkhody k regulirovaniyu soderzhaniya obshchego imushchestva v mnogokvartirnom dome [Approaches to Regulation of the Maintenance of Common Property in a Block of Flats]. Zhilishchnoe pravo – Housing Law. 2006. Issue 6. Pp. 11–28. (In Russ.).
6. Gushchin V. V., Kurganova L. S. Pereplanirovka i pereustroystvo zhilogo pomeshcheniya [Alterations and Reorganization of a Living Accommodation]. Zhilishchnoe pravo – Housing Law. 2006. Issue 4. Pp. 13–15. (In Russ.).
7. Duksin P. A. Problemy vozniknoveniya prava obshchey dolevoy sobstvennosti na zemel'nyy uchastok u sobstvennikov pomeshcheniy mnogokvartirnogo zhilogo doma [Issues of Creation of Commonly Shared Ownership Right for a Land Plot in Property Owners in a Block of]. Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika – Legislation and Economics. 2009. Issue 6. Pp. 44–48. (In Russ.).
8. Egorov A. V., Erokhova M. A., Shirvindt A. M. Obobshchenie primeneniya arbitrazhnymi sudami norm GK RF o veshchno-pravovykh sposobakh zashchity prava [Summarizing the Application of the RF Civil Code Norms Regulating Proprietary Remedies by Arbitration Courts]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava – Civil Law Review. 2007. Issue 4. Pp. 108–140. (In Russ.).
9. Egorov A. V. Obshchaya dolevaya sobstvennost': mekhanizm zashchity prav sosobstvennikov [Joint Shared Ownership: Remedies for Joint Owners' Rights Protection]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava – Civil Law Review. 2012. Issue 4. Pp. 4–41. (In Russ.).
10. Zarubin A. V. Osobennosti primeneniya veshchno-pravovykh sposobov zashchity k dole v prave obshchey sobstvennosti [Peculiarities of Application of Proprietary Protection Methods to Share in Common Property Right]. Grazhdanskoe pravo – Civil Law. 2017. Issue 5. Pp. 21–24. (In Russ.).
11. Kirakosyan S. A. Reklamnaya konstruktsiya ili vyveska? [Advertising Construction or a Signboard?]. Yurist – Jurist. 2012. Issue 17. Pp. 27–30. (In Russ.).
12. Kovtkov D. I. Pereplanirovka i rekonstruktsiya zhilogo pomeshcheniya: razlichiya, pravovoe regulirovanie, praktika [Alterations and Reconstruction of Living Accommodation: Differences, Legal Regulation, Practice].
Yurist – Jurist. 2009. Issue 9. Pp. 37–46. (In Russ.).
13. Krasnokutskiy V. A. Zashchita prava sobst-ven¬nosti [Protection of Property Right]. Rimskoe chastnoe pravo: uchebnik / pod red. I. B. Novitskogo, I. S. Pereterskogo [Roman Private Law: Textbook; ed. by I. B. Novitskiy, I. S. Pereterskiy]. Moscow, 2004. 544 p. (In Russ.).
14. Kudina S.A. Osushchestvlenie pravomochiy sobstvennika obshchego imushchestva v mnogokvartirnom dome: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Executing the Powers of a Common Property Owner in a Block of Flats: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Volgograd, 2010. 33 p. (In Russ.).
15. Laskina N. V. Kapital'nyy remont, rekonstruktsiya, pereustroystvo i pereplanirovka ob"ektov nedvizhimosti: yuridicheskie aspekty [Overhaul, Reconstruction, Reorganization and Alterations of Real Estate Units: Juridical Aspects]. Access from the legal reference system "ConsultantPlus". (In Russ.).
16. Latypov D. N. Priznanie prava kak sposob zashchity grazhdanskikh prav: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Recognition of Right as a Remedy for Civil Rights: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Perm, 2010. 30 p. (In Russ.).
17. Makeev P. O poryadke predostavleniya zemel'nykh uchastkov pod mnogokvartirnymi domami v obshchuyu dolevuyu sobstvennost' sobstvennikov pomeshcheniy [On a Procedure for Granting the Land Plots under Blocks of Flats for Joint Shared Ownership of Property Owners]. Zhilishchnoe pravo – Housing Law. 2013. Issue 1. Pp. 75–85. (In Russ.).
18. Markova I. V. Upravlenie obshchim imushchestvom v mnogokvartirnom dome kak raznovidnost' upravleniya imushchestvom sobstvennika: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Management of Common Property in a Block of Flats as a Type of an Owner's Property Management: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Samara, 2009. 27 p. (In Russ.).
19. Moreva I. M. Pravovaya priroda priznaniya zaregistrirovannogo prava otsutstvuyushchim [The Legal Nature of Declaration of the Registered Right as Absent]. Lex russica – Lex Russica. 2016. Issue 9. Pp. 62–73. (In Russ.).
20. Oganesyan A. N. Osobennosti primeneniya veshchno-pravovykh sposobov zashchity grazhdanskikh prav na nedvizhimoe imushchestvo: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Features of Applying Proprietary Remedies for Civil Rights to Real Property: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2012. 27 p. (In Russ.).
21. Osipova L. V. Isk o priznanii prava otsutstvuyushchim v arbitrazhnoy praktike [A Claim for Recognition of the Right as Absent in Arbitration Practice]. Vestnik arbitrazhnoy praktiki – Vestnik Arbitrazhnoy Praktiki. 2018. Issue 6. Pp. 3–9. (In Russ.).
22. Pevnitskiy S. G. Veshchnye prava na imushchestvo v mnogokvartirnykh domakh: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid nauk [Real Property Rights in Blocks of Flats: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2006. 22 p. (In Russ.).
23. Pevnitskiy S. G. Obshchee imushchestvo mnogokvartirnogo doma kak ob''ekt prava obshchey dolevoy sobstvennosti [Common Property in a Block of Flats as an Object of Joint Shared Ownership Right]. Notarius – Notary. 2005. Issue 3. Pp. 37–39. (In Russ.).
24. Piskunova M. G., Kindeeva E. A. Rekonstruktsiya i pereplanirovka: osobennosti registratsii i tekhnicheskogo ucheta [Reconstruction and Alterations: Features of Registration and Technical Management]. EZh-Yurist – EZh-Jurist. 2006. Issue 23. (In Russ.).
25. Podshivalov T. P. Negatornyy isk: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Negatory Action: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Saratov, 2011. 22 p. (In Russ.).
26. Sidorenko A. D., Chefranova E. A. Osobennosti pravovogo rezhima obshchey dolevoy sobstvennosti na obshchee imushchestvo v mnogokvartirnom dome [Features of Legal Regime of Joint Shared Ownership of Common Property in a Block of Flats]. Notarius – Notary. 2004. Issue 6. Pp. 29–40. (In Russ.).
27. Spor o priznanii pereustroystva i (ili) pereplanirovki zhilogo pomeshcheniya nezakonnoy (na osnovanii sudebnoy praktiki Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda) [Disputes over Declaring the Reorganization and (or) Alterations of a Living Accommodation to be Illegal (from Judicial Practice of Moscow City Court)]. Pomoshchnik advokata: elektron. zhurn – Associate Lawyer: Electronic Journal. 2019. Access from the legal reference system 'ConsultantPlus'. (In Russ.).
28. Stepanov V. V. Protsessual'nye formy, oposreduyushchie zashchitu prav soobshchestva sobstvennikov pomeshcheniy v mnogokvartirnom dome [Procedural Forms Mediating Protection of Rights of the Community of Apartment Block Premise Owners]. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess – Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure. 2018. Issue 8. Pp. 23–27. (In Russ.).
29. Stepanov V. V. Upravlyayushchie organizatsii kak sub''ekty prava na obrashchenie v sud v zashchitu prav i zakonnykh interesov sobstvennikov pomeshcheniy v mnogokvartirnom dome [Property Management Companies as Subjects of Right to Take a Legal Action to Protect the Rights and Legal Interests of Property Owners in a Block of Flats]. Zakon i pravo – Law and Legislation. 2018. Issue 7. Pp. 63–66. (In Russ.).
30. Strembelev S. V. Veshchno-pravovoy effekt rekonstruktsii zdaniy [Proprietary Effect of Buildings Reconstruction]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava – Civil Law Review. 2010. Issue 3. Pp. 131–146. (In Russ.).
31. Strembelev S. V. Pravovye aspekty razmeshcheniya reklamnykh konstruktsiy na elementakh obshchego imushchestva mnogokvartirnogo doma [Legal Aspects of Placement of Advertising Constructions on the Elements of Common Property in a Block of Flats]. Arbitrazhnye spory – Arbitration Disputes. 2009. Issue 3. Pp. 113–121. (In Russ.).
32. Strembelev S.V. Pravovye problemy upravleniya mnogokvartirnymi domami: rol' TSZh [Legal Issues of Managing Blocks of Flats: Condominium Partnership Role]. Moscow, 2012. Issue 12. 143 p. (In Russ.).
33. Strembelev S. V. Upravlenie obshchim imushchestvom mnogokvartirnogo doma: kommerchesko-pravovoy aspekt: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Management of Common Property in a Block of Flats: Commercial and Legal Aspects: Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2009. 221 p. (In Russ.).
34. Fokov A.P. Problemy prava obshchey sobstvennosti: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Issues of Common Property Right: Theoretical and Practical Aspects: Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Ryazan, 2003. 336 p. (In Russ.).
35. Khaldeev A. V. O kontseptsii «zhilishcha» v praktike Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [On the Notion of Dwelling in the Practice of European Court of Human Rights]. Zhilishchnoe pravo – Housing Law. 2007. Issue 5. Pp. 3–11. Issue 6. Pp. 41–50. Issue 7. Pp. 3–18. (In Russ.).
36. Khodykin D. Pereplanirovka zhil'ya – problema uzakonivaniya i puti ee resheniya [Alterations of Dwelling – Legitimation Problem and Possible Solutions]. Zhilishchnoe pravo – Housing Law. 2018. Issue 10. Pp. 27–37. (In Russ.).
37. Chefranova E. A., Sidorenko A. D. Obshchee imushchestvo v mnogokvartirnom zhilom dome i ego funktsional'naya differentsiatsiya [Common Property in Blocks of Flats and Functional Differentiation Thereof]. Semeynoe i zhilishchnoe pravo – Family and Housing Law. 2015. Issue 4. Pp. 39–44. (In Russ.).
38. Shandurskiy D. I. Pravovaya priroda instituta organizatsionnogo gruppovogo iska v Rossii [Legal Nature of Representative Actions in Russia]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure. 2018. Issue 6. Pp. 208–225. (In Russ.).
39. Shatikhin N.V. Grazhdansko-pravovye aspekty primeneniya veshchno-pravovykh sredstv zashchity prava sobstvennosti: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid [Civil Law Aspects of Applying Proprietary Remedies for Property Right: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2010. 26 p. (In Russ.).
40. Shafir A. M. Praktika postroeniya dogovornykh otnosheniy operatorov svyazi s vladel'tsami zdaniy pri okazanii uslug abonentam [Practice of Building of Contractual Relations of Communications Provider with Possessors of Buildings When Rendering Services to Clients]. Yurist – Jurist. 2012. Issue 3. Pp. 24–29. (In Russ.).
41. Shchelkunova T. S. O problemakh razgranicheniya ponyatiy «reklama» i «vyveska» [On the Issues of Differentiating the Concepts of Advertisement and Signboard]. Arbitrazhnye spory – Arbitration Disputes. 2011. Issue 4. Pp. 88–99. (In Russ.).
42. Yarkov V. V. Gruppovoy isk v proekte edinogo GPK Rossii [Class Action in the Project of the Unified Code of Civil Procedure]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii – Herald of Economic Justice. 2015. Issue 8. Pp. 100–111. (In Russ.).
43. Yakhagoev R. V. Istoriko-pravovoy analiz mekhanizma zashchity prav sobstvennosti v Rimskoy imperii [Historical and Legal Analysis of Property Rights Protection Mechanism in the Roman Empire]. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava – History of State and Law. 2007. Issue 16. Pp. 29–30. (In Russ.).
44. Klonoff R. H. Class Actions and Other Multi-Party Litigation in a Nutshell. West Group Publishing, 2004. 402 p. (In Eng.).
45. Karlsgodt P. G. World Class Actions: A Guide to Group and Representative Actions around the Globe. Oxford University Press, 2012. 854 p. (In Eng.).
46. Schneider B. Das schweizerische Miteigentumsrecht. Bern, 1973. Cit. ex: Egorov A. V. Obshchaya dolevaya sobstvennost': mekhanizm zashchity prav sosobstvennikov [Joint Shared Ownership: Mechanism for Joint Owners' Rights Protection]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava – Civil Law Review. 2012. Issue 4. Pp. 4–41. (In Germ.).
47. Wieling H. J. Sachenrecht. Bd. 1. 5. Aufl. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 2006. Cit. ex: Egorov A. V. Obshchaya dolevaya sobstvennost': mekhanizm zashchity prav sosobstvennikov [Joint Shared Ownership: Mechanism for Joint Owners' Rights Protection]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava – Civil Law Review. 2012. Issue 4. Pp. 4–41. (In Germ.).
48. Yeazell S. C. From Medieval Group Litigation to the Modern Class Action. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987. 312 p. (In Eng.).
Received: 01.10.2018
Financing: ---

 


     

      

 
The Perm State University
614990, Perm, street Bukireva, 15
+7 (342) 2 396 275, +7 963 012 6422
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing

The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year