Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2017. Issue 1 (35)


Makhov V.N.,
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0003-3728 -6068 ResearcherID: М-3497-2016
Статьи автора в БД «Scopus» и «Web of Science»:       ---

Vasilenko A.S.,
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0003-4029-8502 ResearcherID: N-6839-2016
Статьи автора в БД «Scopus» и «Web of Science»:       ---
Chebukhanova L.V.,
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0001-5642-6674 ResearcherID: P-1966-2015
Статьи автора в БД «Scopus» и «Web of Science»:       ---
Requisites: Makhov V. N., Vasilenko A. S., Chebukhanova L. V. Elementy vosstanovitel'nogo pravosudiya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Elements of Restorative Justice in Criminal Proceedings]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Juridicheskie Nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2017. Issue 35. Pp. 107–121. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-35-107-121
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-35-107-121

Introduction: the article is aimed at the analysis of reputable and qualified public members involvement in the sphere of criminal proceedings and in the resolution of criminal conflicts through mediation under control of the court in foreign countries, especially those with the Anglo-Saxon law system. In the United States and other common law countries, restorative justice has demonstrated some good results. Restorative justice considers an offence not only as violation of the law, but primarily the victim’s rights violation. It also sees it as a wrongdoing, stating that the offence was committed not so much against public order and the State, but as trespass to the person. Restorative justice is aimed not only at punishing the offender and compensating for damages caused to the victim, but also, to a certain extent, at the offender’s correction. It is generally recognized that incarceration does not correct the accused, and it can aggravate the vices of the individual in many cases. Restorative justice is able to avoid such issues. Not accidentally, the application of restorative justice programs, including these in the criminal process, is recommended by a number of international legal norms, especially in resolution of criminal cases against minors. In our country, the attitude to juvenile justice is ambiguous. However, this circumstance does not give the grounds to ignore the practice of the USA and other countries and gradually implement the elements of restorative justice that are acceptable to our criminal procedure. Purpose: to analyze the formation of the restorative justice paradigm, as well as the current practice of restorative justice programs in the countries of the Anglo-Saxon legal system, to identify some positive practices and substantiate the proposals for the consolidation of restorative justice programs in criminal procedure of the Russian Federation. Methods: there were used the dialectical, historical, comparative legal, system-structural, and logical-legal methods. Results: It is concluded that there is necessity for legislative consolidation of the possibility of the restorative justice programs use in criminal procedure of the Russian Federation. It is proposed to introduce relevant amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.

Keywords: restorative justice; juvenile justice; mediation; family conference; conciliation; mediated agreement
  download the full-version article
References: 1. Balaeva A. V., Zhenodarova E. D., Karnozo-va L. M. Osnovy gumanitarnoy kompetentnosti sud'i, rassmatrivayushchego ugolovnye dela v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh: Metodiches¬koe posobie [The Basis of the Humanitarian Competence of a Judge Dealing with Criminal Cases against Minors: Tutorial]. Moscow, 2011. 174 p. (In Russ.).
2. Bazemore G. Tri paradigmy yuvenal'noy yustitsii – Pravosudie po delam nesovershennoletnikh: Perspektivy razvitiya [Three Paradigms of Juvenile Justice – Juvenile Justice: Prospects for Development]. Issue 1. Moscow, 1999. Pp. 67–99. (In Russ.).
3. Golovko L. V. Al'ternativy ugolovnomu presledovaniyu v sovremennom angliyskom prave [Alternatives to Prosecution in the Contemporary English Law]. Pravovedenie – Pravovedenie. 1998. Issue 3. Pp. 101–103 (In Russ.).
4. Grinenko A. V. Vliyanie gumanizatsii ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii na ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo [The Impact of Humanization of Criminal Legislation of the Russian Federation on Criminal Justice]. Sud'ya – Judge. 2011. Issue 7. Pp. 10–13. (In Russ.).
5. Zehr H. Vosstanovitel'noe pravosudie: novyj vzglyad na prestuplenie i nakazanie [Changing Lenses: a New Focus for Crime and Justice]. Moscow, 1998. Available at:Зер-Х.-Восстанови¬тельное-правосудие.pdf (accessed 01.12.2016). (In Russ.).
6. Karnozova L., Maksudov R., Flyamer M. Vosstanovitel'noe pravosudie: idei i perspektivy dlya Rossii [Restorative Justice: Ideas and Prospects for Russia]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya – Russian Justitia. 2000. Issue 11. Pp. 42–44. (In Russ.).
7. Karnozova L. M. Ugolovnaya yustitsiya i grazhdanskoe obshhestvo. Opyt paradigmal'nogo analiza [Criminal Justice and Civil Society. The Experience of Paradigmatic Analysis]. Moscow, 2010. 480 p. (In Russ.).
8. Kukhta K. I., Makhov V. N. Pravovoy status zhertvy prestupleniya (poterpevshego) v ugo¬lovnom protsesse SShA [The Legal Status of the Victim in the Criminal Process in the USA]. Moscow, 2008. 216 p. (In Russ.).
9. Kukhta K. I. Pravovoy status zhertvy pre-stupleniya (poterpevshego) v ugolovnom protsesse SShA: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk [The Legal Status of the Victim in the Criminal Process in the USA: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2006. 23 p. (In Russ.).
10. McElrea F. W. D. Novozelandskaya model' semeynykh konferentsiy. Pravosudie po delam nesovershennoletnikh: Mirovaya mozaika i perspektivy v Rossii [The New Zealand Model of Family Group Conferencing – Juvenile Justice: Global Mosaic and Prospects in Russia]. Vol. 2. Moscow, 2000. Pp. 40–71. (In Russ).
11. Makhov V. N., Peshkov M. A. "Sostyaza-tel'nost'" modeley ugolovnogo protsessa SShA ["Contentiousness" of the Models of the USA Criminal Process]. Gosudarstvo i pravo – State and Law. 1999. Issue 12. Pp. 81–87. (In Russ.).
12. Makhov V. N., Peshkov M. A. Yuristy SShA o modelyakh ugolovnogo protsessa [USA Lawyers about Models of the Criminal Process]. Sledovatel' (federal'noe izdanie) – Investigator (Federal Edition). 1999. Issue 6. Pp. 38–48. (In Russ.).
13. Pokrovskaya V. L. Vnedrenie vosstanovitel'nykh tekhnologiy v deyatel'nost' sub"ektov profilaktiki Permskogo kraya: Metodicheskie materialy [Implementing Reconstructive Technologies in the Activity of the Subjects of Prevention in the Perm Region: Educational materials]. Perm, 2009. Pp. 30–34. (In Russ.).
14. Rabota s pravonarusheniyami nesovershennoletnikh [The Work with Juvenile Delinquency]. Available at:
&id=224&Itemid=224 (accessed 01.12.2016). (In Russ.).
15. Tkachev V. N. Opytnaya model' yuvenal'noy yustitsii v Rostovskoy oblasti i ee rasprostranenie v regionakh Rossii [The Experimental Model of Juvenile Justice in the Rostov Region and its Distribution in the Regions of Russia]. Available at:
4582 (accessed 01.12.2016). (In Russ.).
16. Bazemore G., Schiff M. Community Justice. Restorative Justice: Prospects for a New Social Ecology for Community Corrections. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice. 1996. Issue 20(2). Pp. 311–334. (In Eng.).
17. Bazemore G., Umbreit M. Rethinking the Sanctioning Function in Juvenile Court: Retribution or Restorative Responses to Youth Crime. Crime and Delinquency. 1995. Issue 41(3). Available at:
8602_Rethinking_the_Sanctioning_Function_in_Juvenile_Court_Retributive_or_Restorative_Res¬ponse_to_Youth_Crime (accessed 01.12.2016). (In Eng.).
18. Bazemore G., Umbreit M. A Comparison of Four Restorative Conferencing Models. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. February 2001. Available at:
38.pdf (accessed 01.12.2016) (In Eng.).
19. Braithwaite J. Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation. 2002. Oxford University Press, at 249. Available at:
wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Restorative-Justice-and-Respon.pdf (accessed 01.12.2016). (In Eng.).
20. Feld B. The Punitive Juvenile Court and the Quality of Procedural Justice: Disjunctions between Rhetoric and Reality. Crime & Delinquency. 1990. Issue 36. Pp. 443–466 (In Eng.).
21. Gehm J. R. Victim-Offender Mediation Programs: An Exploration of Practice and Theoretical Frameworks. Western Criminology Review. 1998. Issue 1(1). Available at: (accessed 01.06.2016). (In Eng.).
22. Griffiths J. Ideology in Criminal Procedure or a Third «Model» of the Criminal Process. The Yale Law Journal. 1970. Vol. 79. Pp. 359–417. (In Eng.).
23. Hudson J., Morris A., Maxwell G., Galaway B. Family Group Conferences: Perspectives on Policy and Practice. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press. 1996. 240 p. (In Eng.).
24. Maxwell G., Morris A. Family, Victims and Culture: Youth Justice in New Zealand. Wellington, NZ: Social Policy, 1993. Available at:
1993-family-victims-and-culture.pdf (accessed 01.06.2016). (In Eng.).
25. McAnany P. D., Thompson D., Fogel D. Probation and Justice: Reconsideration of Mission. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, 1984. 408 p. (In Eng.).
26. Melton G. Taking Gault Seriously: Toward a New Juvenile Court. Nebraska Law Review. 1989. Issue 68. Рр. 146–181. (In Eng.).
27. Miller J. Lost One Over the Wall; The Massachusetts Experiment in Closing Reform Schools. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1991. 279 р. (In Eng.).
28. Restorative Justice: How it Works / Marian Liebmann. Publisher: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. 15 April 2007. 472 p. (In Eng.).
29. Restorative Justice: the Government's Strategy July 2003. Response by Victim Support. Available at: (accessed 01.06.2016). (In Eng.).
30. Restorative Justice. Available at: http://www. (accessed 01.03.2013). (In Eng.).
31. Rothman D. Conscience and Convenience; The Asylum and its Alternatives in Progressive America. New York: HarperCollins, 1980. 469 p. (In Eng.).
32. Schneider A. Deterrence and Juvenile Crime: Results from a National Policy Experiment. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990. 127 p. (In Eng.).
33. Umbreit M., Zehr H. Agency and Institute of Criminology, Victoria University of Wellington. Family Group Conferences: A Challenge to Victim-Offender Mediation? VOMA Quarterly. Issue 7. 1995–1996. Pp. 4–8. (In Eng.).
34. Umbreit M. S. Restorative Justice through Victim-Offender Mediation: A Multi-Site Assessment. Western Criminology Review. 1998.
Issue 1(1). Available at:
v1n1/umbreit.html (accessed 01.03.2013). (In Eng.).
35. Walgrave L. Restorative Justice for Juveniles: Just a Technique or a Fully Fledged Alternative? Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. 1995. Issue 34(3). Pp. 228–249. (In Eng.).
36. Whyt J. How Do You Mediate a Criminal Case? The American Bar Association Criminal Justice Section Newsletter. Vol. 15. Issue 1. Fall 2006. Available at:
2006.authcheckdam.pdf (accessed 01.06.2016). (In Eng.).
37. Zehr H. Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice. Scottsdale, PA: Herald Press, 1990. 271 p. (In Eng.).
Financing: ---




The Perm State University
614990, Perm, street Bukireva, 15
+7 (342) 2 396 275, +7 963 012 6422
ISSN 1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
Publishing 4 times a year
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in РИНЦ (the Russian index of scientific citing)

The founder: the State educational institution of the higher vocational training
“The Perm State University”.