Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2016. Issue 1 (31) |
||||||||||
Title: | CONFLICTS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PROCEDURAL LAW REGULATING GROUNDS FOR CHANGING OR CANCELLING THE COURT DECISIONS UNDER CASSATIONAL PROCEDURE | |||||||||
Authors: | Borisevich G.Ya. Perm State University |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | ||||||||
ORCID: | --- | ResearcherID: | --- | |||||||
«Scopus» & «Web of Science» article: | --- | |||||||||
Requisites: | Borisevich G.Ya. Kollizii protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, reguliruyushchego osnovaniya dlya izmeneniya ili otmeny sudebnykh resheniy v kassatsionnom poryadke [Conflicts of the Russian Federation Procedural Law Regulating Grounds for Changing or Cancelling the Court Decisions under Cassational Procedure]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2016. № 1(31). Pp. 90–97. (In Russ.) | |||||||||
DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-1-90-97 | |||||||||
Annotation: | Introduction: the article considers disputable issues of grounds for changing or cancelling the cassation court decisions in accordance with the Russian procedural law. Purpose: to prove the necessity for a unified approach to the legal regulation of the grounds for changing or cancelling the cassation court decisions in the procedural law of Russia. Methods: the methodological framework of the research is based on a set of methods of scientific cognition, with the dialectical method being the dominant one. The author uses general scientific methods (dialectic, analysis, synthesis, abstraction and concretization) and specific scientific methods (comparative legal, technical legal). Results: it is found that at present Russia has all reasons to unify not only the civil, arbitration and administrative legislation, but also the criminal procedural law in respect to the regulation of intersectoral complex institutions. The contents of the cassation reasons for changing or cancelling the court decisions in the criminal, civil, administrative proceedings should be unified. The author proposes an acceptable variant of contents of the corresponding norms of the Criminal Procedural Code, Civil Procedural Code, Code of Administrative Court Procedure of the Russian Federation. Attention is given to the fact that the grounds for changing or cancelling the court decisions by the cassation court comply with the “pure” cassation as per the Criminal Procedural Code, Civil Procedural Code, Code of Administrative Court Procedure, but as per the Arbitration Procedural Code, at the arbitration courts of the regions they are stipulated for the mixed cassation, protecting rights and legal interests of citizens and institutions at a higher level. Conclusions: in the procedural law of Russia and the practice of its application for intersectoral institutions, in particular in the cassation procedure, it is necessary to generate a unified approach to the regulation of the reasons for changing or cancelling the decisions by the cassation court. This is of a significant theoretical and practical importance because it really provides the court system unity, the court practice uniformity, the rights of citizens to equal protection by the court and the law. | |||||||||
Keywords: | incorrect application of the substantive law; considerable violation of the procedural law norms | |||||||||
download the full-version article |
||||||||||
References: | BorisevichG.Ya. OsoglasovannostinormUPK, GPK, APKRF, reglamentiruyushchikhapellyatsionnoeproizvodstvo [On the Correspondence of the Appeal Procedure Norms in the Criminal Procedure Code, Civil Procedure Code, Administrative Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. 20 let Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Aktual'nye problemy yuridicheskoy nauki i pravoprimeneniya v usloviyakh sovershenstvovaniya rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva. Chetvertyy Permskiy mezhdunarodnyy kongress uchenykh-yuristov (g. Perm', 18–19 okt. 2013 g.) [20 Years of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Current Issues of Legal Science and Law Enforcement under the Conditions of Russian Legislation Improvement. Fourth Perm International Congress of Legal Scholars (Perm, October 18–19, 2013)]. Moscow: Statut Publ., 2014. P. 325–329. (In Russ.). Grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe zakonodatel'stvo. Kommentariy [Civil Procedural Legislation. Commentary]. Moscow: Yurid. lit. Publ., 1991. 720 p. (In Russ.). Kontseptsiya edinogo Grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Concept of the Unified Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation].Moscow: Statut Publ., 2015. 225 p. (In Russ.). Krasheninnikov P.V. Vstupitel'noe slovo [Opening Remarks]. Kontseptsiya edinogo Grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Concept of the Unified Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Moscow: Statut Publ., 2015. P. 11. (In Russ.). O garmonizatsii protsessual'nykh norm, reguliruyushchikh apellyatsionnoe proizvodstvo v sootvetstvii s UPK, GPK, APK RF [On the Harmonization of the Procedural Norms Regulating Appeal Proceedings in Accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the Administrative Procedure Code of the Russian federation]. Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava – Current Problems of Russian Law. 2014. № 8. Pp. 1761–1764. (In Russ.). O edinom podkhode regulirovaniya instituta kassatsionnogo proizvodstva v sootvetstvii s UPK, GPK i APK RF [On the Unified Approach to Regulating the Cassation Proceedings Institution in Accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Сode, the Administrative Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Samarsk. gosudarstv. un-ta. Seriya «Yurisprudentsiya» – Vestnik of SamaraStateUniversity. Humanitarian Series. Jurisprudence. 2014. № 11/2 (122). Pp. 154–160. (In Russ.). Osmanov T.S. Proizvodstvo v sude kassatsionnoy instantsii po ugolovnym delam v sootvetstvii s prinyatiem Federal'nogo zakona ot 29 dek. 2010 g. № 433-FZ [The Court of Cassation Proceedings in Criminal Cases According to the Federal Law Accepted on December 29, 2010 № 433-FZ]. Rossiyskiy sud'ya – The Russian judge. 2011. № 7. Pp. 38–41. (In Russ.). Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Astrakhanskogo oblastnogo suda ot 25.11.2014 g. № 44u-115-2014 [Decision of the Presidium of the Astrakhan Regional Court of 25.11.2014, № 44u-115-2014]. Access from the legal reference system «Konsul'tantPlyus». (In Russ.). Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kareliya ot 30 dek. 2014 g. № 444-42-2014 [Decision of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Karelia, December 30, 2014, № 444-42-2014]. Access from the legal reference system «Konsul'tantPlyus». (In Russ.). Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Permskogo kraevogo suda ot 25 dek. 2013 g. № 44u-153 4u-3268 [Decision of the Presidium of the Perm Regional Court of December 25, 2013 № 44u-153 4u-3268]. Access from the legal reference system «Konsul'tantPlyus». (In Russ.). Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Permskogo kraevogo suda ot 16 yanv. 2015 g. 44u-4-2015 [Decision of the Presidium of the Perm Regional Court of January 16, 2015 № 44u-4-2015]. Access from the legal reference system «Konsul'tantPlyus». (In Russ.). Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Permskogo kraevogo suda ot 15 maya 2015 g. 44u-47-2015 [Decision of the Presidium of the Perm Regional Court of May 15, 2015 № 44u-47-2015]. Access from the legal reference system «Konsul'tantPlyus». (In Russ.). Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Permskogo kraevogo suda ot 11 sent. 2015 g. 44u-112-2015 [Decision of the Presidium of the Perm Regional Court of September 11, 2015 № 44u-112-2015]. Access from the legal reference system «Konsul'tantPlyus». (In Russ.). Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Permskogo kraevogo suda ot 18 sent. 2015 g. 44u-123-2015 [Decision of the Presidium of the Perm Regional Court of September 18, 2015 № 44u-123-2015]. Access from the legal reference system «Konsul'tantPlyus». (In Russ.). Proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam v sude kassatsionnoy instantsii v svete postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 28 yanv. 2014 g. № 2 [The Court of Cassation Proceedings in Criminal Cases in Terms of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, of January 28, 2014 № 2]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya – Russian justice. 2014. № 7. P. 35. (In Russ.). Reshetnikova I.V. Rol' nauki protsessual'nogo prava v razvitii odnoimennoy otrasli prava [The Role of the Procedural Law Theory in the Development of Procedural Law]. Zakon – Law.2014. № 12. Pp. 58–64. (In Russ.). Ugolovno-protsessual'noe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Uchebnik 3-e izdanie. Otv. red. Lupinskaya P.A., Voskobitova L.A. [Criminal Procedural Law of the Russian Federation. Textbook, 3rd Edition ]; ed. by P.A. Lupinskaya, L.A. Voskobitova Moscow: Norma Infra-M Publ., 2013. 1008 p. (In Russ.). |
|||||||||
Financing: | --- |