Issue 1 (19) 2013

Gladkovskaya ON IMPORTANCE OF LEGAL POSITIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR APPLICATION IN FAMILY LEGISLATION

ON IMPORTANCE OF LEGAL POSITIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR APPLICATION IN FAMILY LEGISLATION

E.I. Gladkovskaya

Kuban State University

43, Passage Shirokiy, the village Elisavetinskaya, Krasnodar, 350040

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, contained in the motivation part of its decisions, hold a special position among the estimating categories used in law enforcement, as they gloss the constitutional norms or disclose constitutional meaning of individual regulations of branch legislation.

It is generally recognized that legal positions, on which conclusions of the Constitutional Court are based in resolutory part of its decisions, are binding for all public agencies and officials, have a general legal effect and over-branch legal regulation potential. However, legal positions of the Constitutional Court on issues originated in the practice of application of family legislation are usually reflected in the motivation part of decisions of the Constitutional Court, in which consideration of complaints of citizens from violation of their constitutional rights by individual provisions of Family Code of the Russian Federation is rejected, in particular by art. 34, art. 36, art. 37, art. 44 and art. 46 of Family Code of the RF.

The given decisions of the Constitutional Court reflect the essence of disputes and interpretation of the constitutional meaning of provisions of the branch legislation applied at consideration of such disputes. In virtue of the mentioned unity of regulatory and doctrinal principles, the legal positions of the Constitutional Court expressed in judgments of rejection of adjudication of complaints initiated by disputes related to enforcement of property rights by married couples, studied by the author, take on special importance for law-enforcement practice. The author believes that the investigated legal positions of the Constitutional Court have to be directly applied by courts in the course of adjudication disputes on severance of a jointure of married couples, that will make a contribution to constitutionalization of the judicial practice.

Keywords: legal position; law-enforcement practice; interpretation; over-branch legal regulation potential; property legal relationships; branch family legislation; complaints; direct enforcement

Bibliograficheskij spisok

1. Anishina V. Pravovye pozicii Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossii // Ros. justicija. №7. 2000. S. 15–21.

2. Vitruk N.V. Pravovye pozicii Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii: ponjatie, priroda, juridicheskaja sila i znachenie // Konstituc. pravo: vostochnoevropejskoe obozrenie. 1999. №3(28). S. 96.

3. Gladkovskaja E.I. Realizacija semejnyh prav: voprosy pravoprimenenija // Vestnik Perm. un-ta. Ser.: Jurid. nauki. 2012. Vyp. 2(16). S. 90–91.

4. Gladkovskaja E.I. Semejnyj interes v imushhestvennyh pravootnoshenijah suprugov: avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. Rostov-n/D., 2007. S. 21.

5. Mavrin S.P. Pravovye pozicii Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii: priroda i mesto v nacional'noj pravovoj sisteme // Zhurnal konstituc. pravosudija. 2010. №6. S. 23–33.

6. Obzor zakonodatel'stva i sudebnoj praktiki Verhovnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii za tretij kvartal 2006 goda: utv. postanovleniem Prezidiuma Verhovnogo Suda Ros. Federacii ot 29 nojab. 2006 g. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus» [Izvlechenie (otvet na vopros 23)].

7. Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zhaloby grazhdanki Arbuzovoj Valentiny Pavlovny na narushenie ee Konstitucionnyh prav punktom 2 stat'i 44 Semejnogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii: opredelenie Konstituc. Suda Ros. Federacii ot 21 ijunja 2011 g. №779-O-O [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

8. Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zhalob grazhdan Kozlovoj Mariny Nikolaevny i Kozlova Sergeja Sergeevicha na narushenie ih konstitucionnyh prav punktom 1 stat'i 46 Semejnogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii: opredelenie Konstituc. Suda Ros. Federacii ot 13 maja 2010 g. №839-O-O [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

9. Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zhaloby grazhdanina Rjazapova Nagima Gabdylahatovicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav polozhenijami punkta 1 stat'i 12 i stat'i 14 Semejnogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii: opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda Ros. Federacii ot 18 dek. 2007 g. №851-O-O [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

10. Ob otkaze v prinjatii k rassmotreniju zhaloby grazhdanki Cerjuty Eleny Petrovny na narushenie ee konstitucionnyh prav punktom 2 stat'i 34 Semejnogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii: opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 1 marta 2011 g. №352-O-O [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

11. O vnesenii izmenenij v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossijskoj Federacii: Feder. zakon ot 30 nojab. 2011 g. №363-FZ] // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 2011. №43, ch. 1, st. 7041.

12. O vnesenii izmenenij v Federal'nyj konstitucionnyj zakon «O Konstitucionnom Sude Rossijskoj Federacii»: Feder. konstituc. zakon ot 3 nojab. 2010 g. №7-FKZ [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

13. O minimal'nom razmere oplaty truda: Feder. zakon ot 19 ijunja 2000 g. №82-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 2000. №26, st. 2729.

14. Opredelenie Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 7 ijunja 2011 g. №56-V11-1 po delu po isku Zaharovoj N.V., Leonovoj O.V. k Shatrovoj G.P. o vkljuchenii v nasledstvennuju massu 1/2 doli kvartiry i denezhnogo vklada [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

15. O raz#jasnenii Postanovlenija Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii ot 5 fevralja 2007 goda №2-P po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozhenij statej 16, 20, 112, 336, 376, 377, 380, 381, 382, 383, 387, 388 i 389 Grazhdanskogo processual'nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii: opredelenie Konstituc. Suda Ros. Federacii ot 11 nojab. 2008 g. №556-O-R, p. 4 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

16. Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti podpunkta «z» punkta 2 Perechnja vidov zarabotnoj platy i inogo dohoda, iz kotoryh proizvoditsja uderzhanie alimentov na nesovershennoletnih detej, v svjazi s zhaloboj grazhdanina L.R. Amajakjana: postanovlenie Konstituc. Suda Ros. Federacii ot 20 ijulja 2010 g. №17-P gorod Sankt-Peterburg // Vestnik Konstituc. Suda RF. 2010. №5.

17. Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti chasti vtoroj stat'i 5 Federal'nogo zakona «O minimal'nom razmere oplaty truda» v svjazi s zhalobami grazhdan A.F. Kutinoj i A.F. Povarnicinoj: postanovlenie Konstituc. Suda Ros. Federacii ot 27 nojab. 2008 g. №11-P // Vestnik Konstituc. Suda RF. 2008. №6.