Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2017. Issue 1 (35) |
||||||||||
Title: | PRINCIPLE NULLUM CRIMEN SINE LEGE IN THE HISTORY OF RUSSIAN CRIMINAL LAW | |||||||||
Authors: |
E. Yu. Tikhonravov, |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | ||||||||
ORCID: | 0000-0003-2132-842X | ResearcherID: | S-6967-2016 | |||||||
Статьи автора в БД «Scopus» и «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
Requisites: | Tikhonravov E. Yu. Printsip nullum crimen sine lege v istorii otechestvennogo ugolovnogo prava [Principle Nullum Crimen Sine Lege in the History of Russian Criminal Law]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Juridicheskie Nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2017. Issue 38. Pp. 548–557. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-38-548-557 | |||||||||
DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-38-548-557 | |||||||||
Annotation: |
Introduction: the principle nullum crimen sine lege was applied by the courts of the Russian Empire and of the USSR in the light of the competition of two interests. The first one, which this principle aims to safeguard, is ensuring of personal freedom – an opportunity to do everything which is not prohibited by the law. The second one is the need to prevent harmful acts which the legislature failed to foresee and criminalize in advance. Purpose: to conduct historical and theoretical research into the application of the principle nullum crimen sine lege in Russian criminal law; based on the research, to draw conclusions which would be beneficial and important for the contemporary legal practice. Methods: the methodological framework of the research is based on general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, comparison, system approach, historical and statistical methods) and specific scientific methods (legal dogmatic, legal comparative, legal historical). Results: both interests – ensuring of personal freedom and the need to prevent harmful acts which the legislature failed to foresee and criminalize in advance – should find their implementation in judicial practice. It is argued that exactly this approach secures the survival and progress of the body politic. The article provides a method to determine lawful but nevertheless harmful acts which should be prevented by judges by means of reaching guilty verdicts, notwithstanding the legally binding principle nullum crimen sine lege. Conclusions: the findings of the paper suggest that due to the need to prevent harmful acts which the legislature failed to foresee and criminalize in advance, the principle nullum crimen sine would not be followed by judges on all occasions. |
|||||||||
Keywords: | nullum crimen sine lege; personal freedom; gaps in the law; analogia legis | |||||||||
download the full-version article |
||||||||||
References: | 1. Buckovskiy N. A. Ocherk kassatsionnogo po-ryadka otmeny resheniy po sudebnym ustavam 1864 goda [Essay on the Cassation Procedure of Reversal of a Judgment According to the 1864 Judicial Statutes]. St. Petersburg, 1866. 181 p. (In Russ.). 2. Gradovskiy A. D. O sudebnom tolkovanii zakonov po russkomu pravu [On the Judicial Interpretation of Laws According to the Russian Law]. Zhurnal grazhdanskogo i ugolovnogo prava – Journal of Civil and Criminal Law. 1874. Issue 1. Pp. 1–62. (In Russ.). 3. Dagel' P. S. Ob analogii v sovetskom ugolovnom prave [On the Analogy According to Soviet Criminal Law]. Rossiyskiy kriminologi¬cheskiy vzglyad – Russian Criminological Outlook. 2009. Issue 4. Pp. 82–86. (In Russ.). 4. Drobyshevskiy S. A., Tikhonravov E. Yu. Spo¬soby vospolneniya probelov v prave [Methods of Filling Gaps in the Law]. Moscow, 2014. 176 p. (In Russ.). 5. Dubrovin F. P. O razmerakh dopustimosti ana¬logii pri primenenii ugolovnogo zakona (okonchanie) [On the Scope of Admissibility of Analogy in Criminal Law Application (ending)]. Zhurnal ministerstva yustitsii – Journal of the Ministry of Justice. 1899. Issue 6. Pp. 1–35. (In Russ.). 6. Durmanov N. D. Ponyatie prestupleniya [The Notion of Crime]. Moscow, Leningrad, 1948. 315 p. (In Russ.). 7. Ioffe O. S. Otvetstvennost' po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu [Responsibility According to Soviet Civil Law]. Leningrad, 1955. 310 p. (In Russ.). 8. K razrabotke proekta obshchey chasti Ugolovnogo kodeksa SSSR [On Drafting the General Part of the Criminal Code of the USSR]. Sovetskaya yustitsiya – Soviet Justice. 1938. Issue 20–21. Pp. 18–19. (In Russ.). 9. Kaufman M. A. Probely v ugolovnom prave i sposoby ikh preodoleniya: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Gaps in Criminal Law and Methods of Gap-Filling: Synopsis of Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2009. 51 p. (In Russ.). 10. Lyublinskiy P. I. Primenenie ugolovnogo zakona po analogii [Analogical Application of Criminal Law]. Pravo i zhizn' – Law and Life. 1924. Issue 1. Pp. 40–50. (In Russ.). 11. Lyublinskiy P. I. Tekhnika, tolkovanie i kazuistika Ugolovnogo kodeksa [Technique, Interpretation and Casuistry of the Criminal Code]. Petrograd, 1917. 267 p. (In Russ.). 12. Poznyshev S. V. Uchebnik ugolovnogo prava [Textbook on Criminal Law]. Moscow, 1923. 300 p. (In Russ.). 13. Ponyatie analogii v sovetskom ugolovnom prave i praktika ee primeneniya [The Notion of Analogy in Soviet Criminal Law and Practice of its Application]. Sovetskaya yustitsiya – Soviet Justice. 1939. Issue 3. Pp. 8–13. (In Russ.). 14. Pustoroslev P. P. Programma lektsiy po obshchey chasti russkogo ugolovnogo prava s kratkim izlozheniem nekotorykh ponyatiy i ob"yasneniy [Lectures on the General Part of the Russian Criminal Law with Summary of Some Concepts and Explanations]. Yuriev, 1904. 425 p. (In Russ). 15. Rossiyskoe zakonodatel'stvo X–XX vekov [Russian Legislation of the 10th–20th Centuries]. Moscow, 1988. Vol. 6. 432 p. (In Russ). 16. Svod zakonov Rossiyskoy imperii [Code of Laws of the Russian Empire]. St. Petersburg, 1912. Vol. 16. Part 1. 680 p. (In Russ). 17. Spasovich V. D. Uchebnik ugolovnogo prava [Textbook on Criminal Law]. St. Petersburg, 1863. Vol. 1. 428 p. (In Russ.). 18. Tagantsev N. S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. Chast' obshchaya [Russian Criminal Law. General Part]. St. Petersburg, 1902. Vol. 1. 823 p. (In Russ.). 19. Shargorodskiy M. D. Analogiya v istorii ugo¬lovnogo prava i v sovetskom ugolovnom prave [Analogy in the History of Criminal Law and in Soviet Criminal Law]. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost' – Socialist Legality. 1938. Issue 7. Pp. 50–60. (In Russ.). 20. Ackermann B. Das Analogieverbot im Geltenden und Zukuenftigen Strafrecht. Breslau–Neukirch, 1934. 50 p. (In Germ.). 21. Ehrlich E. Die Juristische Logik. Tuebingen, 1925. 337 p. (In Germ.). 22. Feuerbach P. J. A. Lehrbuch des Gemeinen in Deutschland Gueltigen Peinlichen Rechts. Giessen, 1847. 878 p. (In Germ.). 23. Glaser S. Nullum Crimen Sine Lege. Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law. 1942. Vol. 24. Issue 1. Pp. 29–37. (In Eng.). 24. Hall J. Nulla Poena Sine Lege. The Yale Law Journal. 1937. Vol. 47. Issue 2. Pp. 165–193. (In Eng.). 25. Jhering R. Law as a Means to an End. Boston, 1913. 483 p. (In Eng.). 26. Kelsen H. Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley, 1970. 356 p. (In Eng.). 27. Krey V. Studien zum Gesetzesvorbehalt im Strafrecht: eine Einfuehrung in die Problematik des Analogieverbots. Berlin, 1977. 268 p. (In Germ.). 28. Lapenna I. The New Russian Criminal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure, I. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1961. Vol. 10. Issue 3. Pp. 421–453. (In Eng.). 29. Locke J. Two Treatises of Government. London, 1821. 405 p. (In Eng.). 30. Maris C. W. Milking the Meter – On analogy, Universalizability and World Views. Legal Knowledge and Analogy: Fragments of Legal Epistemology, Hermeneutics, and Linguistics; ed. by P. Nerhot. Dordrecht, 1991. Pp. 71–106. (In Eng.). 31. Mokhtar A. Nullum Crimen, Nulla Poena Sine Lege: Aspects and Prospects. Statute Law Review. 2005. Vol. 26. Issue 1. Pp. 41–55. (In Eng.). DOI: 1 0.1093/slr/hmi005. 32. Pound R. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. Clark, 2003. 306 p. (In Eng.). 33. Preuss L. Punishment by Analogy in National Socialist Penal Law. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 1936. Vol. 26. Issue 6. Pp. 847–856. (In Eng.). 34. Priester J.-M. Zum Analogieverbot im Strafrecht. Juristische Methodenlehre und analytische Philosophie; Ed. by H.-J. Koch. Koe¬nigstein im Taunus, 1976. Pp. 155–185. (In Germ.). 35. Rejewski E. Die Stellung des Strafrichters zur 'Schuldfrage' unter dem Gesichtswinkel der Abgrenzung der Ausdehnenden Auslegung zur Analogie. Breslau-Neukirch, 1937. 71 p. (In Germ.). 36. Schreiber H-L. Gesetz und Richter. Zur geschichtlichen Entwicklung des Satzes nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege. Frankfurt am Main, 1976. 265 p. (In Germ.). 37. The Use of Analogy in Criminal Law. Columbia Law Review. 1947. Vol. 47. Issue 4. Pp. 613–629. (In Eng.). 38. Vogenauer S. Die Auslegung von Gesetzen in England und auf dem Kontinent. B. I. Tuebin¬gen, 2001. 663 p. (In Germ.). 39. Zippelius R. Juristische Methodenlehre: eine Einfuehrung. Muenchen, 1985. 112 p. (In Germ.). |
|||||||||
Financing: | --- |