Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2017. Issue 4 (38) |
||||||||||
Title: | APPLICATION OF BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGIES IN SYSTEMATIZING THE RESULTS OF INTELLECTUAL ACTIVITY | |||||||||
Authors: |
O. A. Ruzakova, |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | ||||||||
ORCID: | 0000-0002-7746-399X | ResearcherID: | 0-7746-2014 | |||||||
Статьи автора в БД «Scopus» и «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
E. S. Grin, |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | |||||||||
ORCID: | 0000-0002-9630-1742 | ResearcherID: | F-5817-2016 | |||||||
Статьи автора в БД «Scopus» и «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
Requisites: | Ruzakova O. A., Grin E. S. Primenenie tekhnologii Blockchain k sistematizatsii rezul'tatov intellektual'noy deyatel'nosti [Application of Blockchain Technologies in Systematizing the Results of Intellectual Activity]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Juridicheskie Nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2017. Issue 38. Pp. 508–520. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-38-508-520 |
|||||||||
DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-38-508-520 |
|||||||||
Annotation: |
Introduction: this article offers a comparative analysis of systematization of the results of intellectual activity in the Russian Federation and abroad. Systems for the registration of creative works in various countries, including Russia, function in different areas. There are registers in libraries and archives, as well as those maintained by organizations for the collective management of rights. In Europe, for example, a register of so-called orphan works (works whose authors are unknown) has been created. At the same time, the fact that a variety of such registers exist often makes commercialization of copyrighted objects quite difficult, especially if the turnover in rights to such objects takes place predominantly on the Internet. This article considers various registration systems for the results of creative work and identifies possibilities for the application of blockchain technologies to the systematization of such results. Purpose: to identify regulatory models for the systematization of the results of creative work in the digital sphere for the purpose of using blockchain technologies for the registration of rights to the results of intellectual activity. Methods: the methodological framework of the research is based on dialectical, formal, functional and other general research methods, as well as special methods used by legal scholars: comparative law research and technical research. Results: the authors have identified and described the existing Russian and foreign mechanisms utilized for the systematization of the results of creative work. Based on the comparative analysis offered herein, the possibilities of using blockchain technologies to systematize the results of intellectual activity have been demonstrated for the purpose of the subsequent creation of a single register of intellectual property. Conclusions: the analysis of systematization of the results of intellectual activity in accordance with Russian law and laws of some foreign countries enables us to conclude that the use of blockchain technologies for the purpose of systematizing the results of intellectual activity makes it possible to store, disseminate and transfer information about copyright objects and their rightsholders, their disposal systems, users, etc., and, thusly, can be used instead of the existing databases for intellectual property. The systematization of the results of intellectual activity on the basis of blockchain technologies answers the necessary technical requirements, safety requirements, requirements to decentralization, provides various access levels, and eliminates the need to have a third party to verify the transactions. The use of blockchain technologies would make registration and maintenance of registers by organizations for collective management of copyright and related rights and other organizations much less expensive, and would help to eliminate unnecessary intermediaries in this area. |
|||||||||
Keywords: | blockchain; intellectual property; copyright; systemization of the results of intellectual activity; copyright registration; Internet systems for the registration of rights; registers of copyrighted items | |||||||||
download the full-version article |
||||||||||
References: | 1. Avtorskie i smezhnye s nimi prava. Postateynyy kommentariy glav 70 i 71 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii; pod red. P. V. Krasheninnikova [Copyright and Related Rights. Article-by-article Commentary on Chapters 70 and 71 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation; ed. by P. V. Krashenin¬nikov]. Moscow, 2010. 480 p. (In Russ.). 2. Bulgakov I. T. Pravovye voprosy ispol'zovaniya tekhnologii blokcheyn [Legal Issues of the Use of Blockchain]. Zakon – ZAKON. 2016. Issue 12. Pp. 80–88. (In Russ.). 3. Novoselova L. A., Grin' E. S., Vorozhevich A. S. K voprosu ob uchete prav na olimpiyskuyu simvoliku [The issue of rights for Olympic symbols]. Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kul'¬tury – Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoy kultury. 2017. Issue 6. P. 88. (In Russ.) 4. Patentnoe pravo. Postateynyy kommentariy glavy 72 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii; pod red. P. V. Krasheninnikova [Patent Law. Article-by-article Commentary on Chapter 72 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation; ed. by P. V. Krasheninnikov]. 2010. 464 p. (In Russ.) 5. Postateynyy kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiskoy Federatsii, chasti chetver¬toy; pod red. P. V. Krasheninnikova [Article-by-article Commentary on the Part Four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation; ed. by P. V. Krasheninnikov]. 2011. 926 p. (In Russ.). 6. Pravo intellektual'noy sobstvennosti: uchebnik; pod red. L. A. Novoselovoy [Intellectual Proper¬ty Right: Textbook; ed. by L. A. Novoselova]. Vol. 1. Obschie polozheniya [General provi¬sions]. Moscow, 2017. 511 p. (In Russ.). 7. Ruzakova O. A. Problemy gosudarstvennoy registratsii v grazhdanskom prave [Problems of State Registration in the Civil Law]. Zakono¬datel'stvo – Legislation. 2002. Issue 2. Pp. 23–28. (In Russ.). 8. Ruzakova O. A., Ruzakov A. B. Problemy unifi¬katsii zakonodatel'stva stran ES v oblasti avtor¬skogo prava [Problems of Unification of Legislation of the EU Countries in the Field of Copyright]. Patenty i licenzii. Intellektual'nye prava – Patents and Licenses. Intellectual Rights. 2015. Issue 1. Pp. 70–75. (In Russ.). 9. Savel'ev A. I. Dogovornoe pravo 2.0: «umnye» kontrakty kak nachalo konca klassicheskogo dogovornogo prava [Contract Law 2.0: "Smart Contracts" and the Beginning of the End of the Classic Contract Law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava – Civil Law Review. 2016. Issue 3. Pp. 32–60. (In Russ.). 10. Allaby D. Business Designer at Fjord Australia. The Trust Trade-Off: Permissioned vs Permis¬sionless Blockchains. Available at: https:// www.fjordnet.com/conversations/the-trust-trade-off-permissioned-vs-permissionless-blockchains/ (accessed 30.05.2017). (In Eng.). 11. Burstall R., Clark B. Blockchain, IP and the Fashion Industry. Managing Intellectual Proper¬ty. Available at: http://www.managingip.com/ Article/3667444/Blockchain-IP-and-the-fashion-industry.html (accessed 30.05.2017). (In Eng.). 12. Bussmann O. BankThink. A Public or Private Blockchain? New Ethereum Project Could Mean Both. March 01 2017, 9:30 am EST. Available at: https://www.americanbanker.com/opinion/a-public-or-private-blockchain-new-ethereum-pro¬ject-could-mean-both (accessed 30.05.2017). (In Eng.). 13. Grewal-Carr V., Marshall S. Blockchain: Enigma. Paradox. Opportunity (Deloitte). Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/con-tent/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/Innovation/de¬loitte-uk-blockchainfull-report.pdf (accessed 30.05.2017). (In Eng.). 14. Grin E. S., Grin O. S. An Open License Contract in Intellectual Property: Russian Ex-perience. Kutafin University Law Review. 2017. Vol. 4. Issue 1. Pp. 269–279. (In Eng.). 15. Grin E. S. Intellectual Property in Sports: Trade¬mark Use Features. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture. 2016. Issue 7. P. 30. (In Eng.). 16. Herther N. K. Libraries, Orphan Works, and the Future of Copyright. Available at: http://news-breaks.infotoday.com/NewsBreaks/Libraries-Orphan-Works-and-the-Future-of-Copyright-113842.asp (accessed 30.05.2017). (In Eng.). 17. Khatri B. Resurrecting Copyright Formalities: No 'Deadly' Human Rights Implications. LLLM Research Paper. Laws 532: Human Rights and Intellectual Property. Victoria University of Wellington, 2016. 25 р. Avai-lable at: http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/bit-stream/handle/10063/5226/paper.pdf?sequence =1 (accessed 30.05.2017). (In Eng.). 18. Mark Bide. Arrow – Steps Towards Resolving the 'Orphan Works Problem'. Serials. March 2010. Issue 23(1). Available at: http://www.edi-teur.org/files/Collaborations/Publications/Serials%20March%202010%20-%20Mark%20Bide %20-%20ARROW%20-%20steps%20towards %20resolving%20the%20orphan%20works%2 0problem.pdf (accessed 01.06.2017). (In Eng.). 19. Meadows I., Crawford S., Piesse D. (EY). Blockchain Technology as a Platform for Di-gitization. Implications for the Insurance In-dustry. Available at: http://www.ey.com/Pub-lication/vwLUAssets/EY-blockchain-technolo¬gy-as-a-platform-for-digitization/%24FILE/EY -blockchain-technology-as-a-platform-for-digi¬tization.pdf (accessed 30.05.2017). (In Eng.). 20. Mendis D. Orphan Works. Available at: http:// www.Сopyrightuser.org/topics/orphan-works/ (accessed 30.05.2017). (In Eng.). 21. Satoshi Nakamoto. Bitcoin: a Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Available at: www.bit-coin.org//https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf (acces¬sed 30.05.2017). (In Eng.). 22. Silver J. Blockchain or the Chaingang? Cha-llenges, Opportunities and Hype: the Music In¬dustry and Blockchain Technologies. Available at: http://www.create.ac.uk/publications/block-chain-or-the-chaingang-challenges-opportuniti¬es-and-hype-the-music-industry-and-blockchain-technologies/ (accessed 30.05.2017). (In Eng.) 23. Shinner S. Blockchain Technology and IP. Avai¬lable at: https://www.taylorwessing.com/down-load/article-blockchain-technologyand-ip.html (accessed 30.05.2017). (In Eng.). 24. Thompson С. The Difference between a Private, Public & Consortium Blockchain. A Simple Explanation for Dummies. Available at: http:// www.blockchaindailynews.com/The-difference-between-a-Private-Public-Consortium-Blockcha¬in_a24681.html (accessed 30.05.2017). (In Eng.). 25. Toves J. A., Hickey T. B. Parsing and Matching Dates in VIAF. Available at: http://journal.co¬de4lib.org/articles/9607 (accessed 01.06.2017). (In Eng.). |
|||||||||
Financing: | --- |