| Annotation: |
Introduction: the article considers introduction into the system of the state power organization of such an element as delegation of particular public authorities to the subjects of private law. Purpose: to analyze the relations emerging when subjects of private law exercise functions and powers characteristic of governmental bodies; to identify the forms of delegation and gaps emerging in the system of public administration; to perform analysis of each form of delegating authoritative powers. Methods: the research is based on analysis of statutory regulation, technical and comparative law methods. Results: the identified forms of delegating state powers of authority accepted in the Russian Federation are as follows: co-regulation, self-regulation and quasi-regulation; establishment of an organization with a special status combining the features of a state body and those of a non-profit organization but having the right to engage in business activities; management of a territory by a private law organization; outsourcing of the functions of governmental bodies. It has been revealed that the RF Constitution does not provide for (but also does not prohibit) delegating powers of authority to non-governmental organizations. Permissibility of such delegation is based on the broad interpretation of the RF Constitution general provisions given in some rulings of the RF Constitutional Court. Conclusions: modern ideology of libertarianism, which proves inefficiency of the government in performing its public functions, has a considerable influence on the content of the administrative reform. One of the reform lines is the government’s renunciation of excessive authorities and their delegation to the third sector – different non-governmental organizations. Lack of unified rules of such delegation in the Russian Federation entails abuses, as well as the government’s refusal to control the efficiency of performing public functions.
|
| References: |
1. Bakhrakh D. N., Skorokhodova V. V. Delegiro¬vanie kommercheskim bankam vlastnykh polno¬mochiy [Delegation of Authority to Commer¬cial Banks]. Sovremennoe pravo – Modern Law. 2007. Issue 11. Pp. 2–5. (In Russ.).
2. Belov V. A. Samoregulirovanie i samoreguli-ruemaya organizatsiya kak sostavlyayushchaya chast' obshchestvennykh otnosheniy [Self-Regulation and Self-Regulative Organization as an Element of Public Relations]. Konkurentnoe pravo – Competition Law. 2014. Issue 4. Pp. 32–36. (In Russ.).
3. Vasil'yeva A.F. Delegirovanie gosudarstven-nykh funktsiy sub"ektam chastnogo prava [Delegation of State Functions to Subjects of Private Law]. Pravovedenie – Pravovedenie. 2008. Issue 2. Pp. 65–75. (In Russ.).
4. Gritsenko E. V. Konstitutsionnye osnovy i pra¬vovye formy privlecheniya chastnykh sub"¬ektov k resheniyu munitsipal'nykh zadach v Rossii v sravnitel'noy perspektive [Constitu¬tional Framework and Legal Forms of Attraction of Private Entities to the Solution of Municipal Problems in Russia in Comparative Perspective]. Zakon – «ZAKON» journal. 2013. Issue 2. Pp. 113–128. (In Russ.).
5. Dement'yev A.N. Zakonodatel'naya deval'va¬tsiya polnomochiy ispolnitel'nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti: posledstviya i predely dopustimogo [Legislative Devaluation of Powers of Executive State Authorities: Consequences and Available Limits]. Konsti¬tutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo – Consti¬tutional and Municipal Law. 2016. Issue 7. Pp. 37–41. (In Russ.).
6. Egorova M. A. Chastno-publichnye nachala priobreteniya statusa samoreguliruemoy orga¬nizatsii nekommercheskoy korporatsiey [The Private-Public Bases of a Noncommercial Corporation's Acquisition of the Status of the Self-Regulatory Organization]ю Predprinima¬tel'skoe pravo – Entrepreneurial Law. 2013. Issue 1. Pp. 25–32. (In Russ.).
7. Ershova I. V. Samoregulirovanie predprinimatel'skoy i professional'noy deyatel'nosti: voprosy teorii i zakonodatel'stva [Self-Regu¬lation of Business and Professional Activities: Issues of Theory and Legislation]. Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava – Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2014. Issue 10. Pp. 2142–2150. (In Russ.).
8. Zarshchikov A. V. Pravo sobstvennosti publich¬nykh obrazovaniy na zemlyu v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: konstitutsionno-pravovoe issledova¬nie: avtoref. diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk [The Public Entities' Property Right to the Ground in the Russian Federation: Constitutional Research: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Penza, 2015. 28 p. (In Russ.).
9. Komarova V. V. Osobyj pravovoy status territoriy v Rossii (na primere innovatsionnogo tsentra "Skolkovo") [Special Legal Status of Territories in Russia (on the Example of "Skolkovo" Innovation Center)]. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya – Russian Justitia. 2011. Issue 6. Pp. 44–47. (In Russ.).
10. Petrov D. A. Pravovoy status samoreguliru-emoy organizatsii v sfere predprinimatel'stva: diss. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [The Legal Status of a Self-Regulatory Organization in the Field of Entrepreneurship: Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2016. 433 p. (In Russ.).
11. Romanikhin A. V. Samoregulirovanie po-rossiyski [Self-Regulation in Russian way]. Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika – Law and Economics. 2004. Issue 3. Pp. 32–36. (In Russ.).
12. Sovremennye problemy organizatsii publichnoy vlasti: monografiya [Current Problems of the Organization of Public Authority: monograph; ed. by S. A. Avak'yan]. Moscow, 2014. 596 p. (In Russ.).
13. Tolstykh V. L. Mif o voyne kak tsentral'nyy element mezhdunarodno-pravovoy ideologii [The Myth of the War as a Central Element of International Legal Ideology]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal – Russian Juridical Journal. 2015. Issue 6. Pp. 43–53. (In Russ.).
14. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' [Encyclopedic Dictionary; ed. by I. E. Andreevskij]. Vol. 9a. St. Petersburg, 1893. 977 p. Available at: http://dlib.rsl.ru/viewer/01003924242#?page=1 (accessed 20.02.2017). (In Russ.).
15. Affordable Housing and Public – Private Partnerships. University of Colorado Law School, USA, 2009. Available at: https://
ru.scribd.com/document/329013144/Nestor-M-Davidson-Robin-Paul-Malloy-Affordable (ac¬cessed 20.02.2017). (In Eng.).
16. Balleisen E. J., Eisner M. The Promise and Pitfalls of Co-Regulation: How Governments Can Draw on Private Governance for Public Purpose. Available at: http://www.tobinproject.
org/sites/tobinproject.org/files/assets/New_Perspectives_Ch6_Balleisen_Eisner.pdf (accessed 20.02.2017). (In Eng.).
17. Brandsen T., De Donk W., Putters K. The Intangible Third Sector. Hybridity and Change as the Basis for a New Conceptualization / Paper presented at the conference of the European Sociological Association, Murcia, 23–26 September, 2003. Available at: https://
www.um.es/ESA/papers/Rn6_7b3.pdf (accessed 20.02.2017). (In Eng.).
18. Castro D. Benefits and Limitations of Industry Self-Regulation for Online Behavioral Adver¬tising. Available at: http://www.itif.org/files/
2011-self-regulation-online-behavioral-adverti¬sing.pdf (accessed 20.02.2017). (In Eng.).
19. Codes and Co-regulation. Available at: https://
www.alrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/publi¬cations/11_codes_and_co-regulation.pdf (ac¬cessed 20.02.2017). (In Eng.).
20. Cornuell R. C. Reclaiming the American Dream: The Role of Private Individuals and Voluntary Associations (Philanthropy and Society). Transaction Publishers, 1993. 199 p. (In Eng.).
21. Creveld van M. The Rise and Decline of the State. Cambridge University Press. 1999. 436 р. (In Eng.).
22. De Jasay A. The State. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1998. 238 p. (In Eng.).
23. Hayek F. A. Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy. Routledge, 2012. 584 р. (In Eng.).
24. Hepburn G. Alternatives to Traditional Regulation. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/
gov/regulatory-policy/42245468.pdf (accessed 20.02.2017). (In Eng.).
25. Heupel M., Zangl B. Die empirische Realität des „neuen Krieges". Available at: http://edoc.
vifapol.de/opus/volltexte/2008/502/pdf/AP_27_2003.pdf (accessed 20.02.2017). (In Germ.).
26. Hibou B. Privatizing the State. Columbia University Press, 2004. 279 p. (In Eng.).
27. Hybrid Rule and State Formation. Public-Private Power in the 21st century. Edited by Shelley L. Hurt and Ronnie D. Lipschutz. New York, 2016. 258 p. (In Eng.).
28. Mises L. Liberalism in the Classical Tradition. Available at: https://mises.org/system/tdf/
Liberalism%20In%20the%20Classical%20Tradition_3.pdf?file=1&type=document (accessed 20.02.2017). (In Eng.).
29. Nielsen E. Regulation, Co-Regulation, or Self Regulation. What is the best approach? Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/livelink-getfile?llNodeId=21969&llVolId=-2000 (ac-cessed 20.02.2017). (In Eng.).
30. Rothbard Murray N. For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto. 2006. 420 p. Available at: https://mises.org/system/tdf/For%20a%20
New%20Liberty%20The%20Libertarian%20Ma¬nifesto_3.pdf?file=1&type=document (accessed 20.02.2017). (In Eng.).
31. Schnee P., Unterberg S. Privatisierung von Polizeiaufgaben. Ein Rückzug des Staates? Available at: http://www.deutschlandfunk.de/
privatisierung-von-polizeiaufgaben-ein-rueck¬zug-des-staates.724.de.html?dram:article_id=3
60178 (accessed 20.02.2017). (In Germ.).
|
