Issue 1 (15) 2012

THE PROBLEM COMPENSATION OF MORAL HARM IN FAMILY LAW

THE PROBLEM COMPENSATION OF MORAL HARM IN FAMILY LAW

S.N. Tagaeva

Russian and Tajik (Slavonic) University
30, M. Tursun-Zade st., Dushanbe, Republic of Tajikistan, 734025
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

The article investigates the Institute compensation of moral harmand the possibility of wider use in family law. Despite the fact that the Tajik Family Code allows the use of civil law to the relationsbetween family members, it would be correct extension of the scope of the Institute of compensation of moral harm by securingsuch a rule is in family law. Special attention compensation for moral harm in the parent and similar relationships.

Since a very early age, children are vulnerable to various forms of violence in their families. Therefore, it is the commission of violations of the right of a minor non-pecuniary damage should be widely applied. It is noted that the institution of non-pecuniary damage is directed primarily at smoothing the physical and mental suffering caused by personal relations and other intangible benefits. But the moral damage caused to property relations, is compensable only in cases specified by law. Unfortunately, in family law there is a certain circle of relations, which are proprietary, but the violation of which can cause mental suffering subjects of family relationships. But the feasibility of non-pecuniary damage in the protection of family property rights is excluded. But the family property relations, in contrast to the civil law does not have an equivalence, since the measure and expense of family relationships are not applicable due to the strong influence on their moral and ethical principles. In particular, the importance of non-pecuniary damage is great in the regulation and maintenance obligations of the marriage contract.


Keywords: Family and liability; compensation of moral harm; parental rights; termination of parental rights; adoptive wrongful conduct; physical or mental suffering; maintenance obligations; the marriage contract; the exercise of parental rights

 

 Bibliograficheskij spisok

  1. Antokol'skaja M.V. Semejnoe pravo: uchebnik. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Jurist, 2003. 333 s.

  2. Bespalov Ju.F. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy realizacii semejnyh prav rebenka v Rossijskoj Federacii: dis. ... d-ra jurid. nauk. M, 2002. 348 s.

  3. Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik . 3-e izd., pererab. i dop./pod red. A.P. Sergeeva, Ju.K. Tolstogo. M.: Prospekt, 1998. T. 3. 632 s.

  4. Kriminologija: uchebnik / pod red. V.N. Kudrjavceva, V.E. Jeminova. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Jurist#, 1999. 678 s.

  5. Maksimovich L.B. Brachnyj dogovor v rossijskom prave. M.: Os'-89, 2003. 144 s.

  6. Rjasencev V.A. Sovetskoe semejnoe pravo. M., 1982. 256 s.

  7. URL: http://psylist.net/family/00013.htm (data obrawenija: 12.09.2011).

 


      

      

 
The Perm State University
614990, Perm, street Bukireva, 15
+7 (342) 2 396 275, +7 963 012 6422
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
Publishing 4 times a year
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in РИНЦ (the Russian index of scientific citing)

The founder: the State educational institution of the higher vocational training
“The Perm State University”.