Issue 4 (22) 2013

Markaryan_NEGATIVE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE HOUSING RIGHTS

NEGATIVE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE HOUSING RIGHTS

L.V. Markaryan

Perm Institute for Economy and Finance
614068, Perm, Ekaterininskaya st., 141
E-mail:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract: The right acknowledgement, as a universal approving method of the housing right protection, can be realized in two types: a positive one and a negative one. The differentiation of the two mentioned types of the right acknowledgement originates from the essence of this protection method, which is expressed in two levels: at the law-making level – as a protection measure defined by the housing legislation as the possibility to state the presence or the absence of the subjective housing right; at the law-enforcement level – as a specific request to state the presence or the absence of the subjective housing right. The three types of the negative acknowledgement of the right of usage are researched: acknowledging the person as the one who lost his right to use the apartment; acknowledging the person as the one who stopped his right to use the apartment; acknowledging the person as the one who did not acquire the right to use the apartment. The general feature of the studied housing right protection methods is the subject whose housing rights need to be protected, i.e. a person who has the right of using the apartment. The conclusion is made about the possibility to qualify the negative right acknowledgement only as referred to the claim for the acknowledgement of the housing right non-acquisition. The subject of the negative acknowledgement is also the right for the forced lodging into the apartment of other persons, which is not given to the family members of the apartment owner and family members of the apartment hirer, with the exception for his infant children. Negative right acknowledgement is also a method of protecting the right to use the common property in the apartment block, and also – of protecting the corporative housing rights.

Keywords: housing rights; negative right acknowledgement; housing right protection; the right of using the apartment; loss of the right of using; stopping the right of using; methods of the housing right protection

Bibliograficheskij spisok

1. Apelljacionnoe opredelenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 20.03.2012 g. po delu № 11-1422. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

2. Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossijskoj Federacii za 2009 god. URL: http://www.rg.ru/2010/05/28/doklad-lukin-dok.html (data obrashhenija: 19.07.2013).

3. Karpenko N.V. Osobennosti zhilishhnogo pravootnoshenija, voznikajushhego pri pol'zovanii zhilym pomeshheniem v obshhezhitii // Ros. jurid. zhurnal. 2013. №1. S. 120–125.

4. Malein N.S. Grazhdanskij zakon i prava lichnosti v SSSR. M.: Jurid. lit., 1981. 216 s.

5. O prave grazhdan Rossijskoj Federacii na svobodu peredvizhenija, vybor mesta prebyvanija i zhitel'stva v predelah Rossijskoj Federacii: zakon Ros. Federacii ot 25 ijunja 1993 g. №5242-1 (red. ot 30.12.2012) // Ros. gaz. 1993. 10 avg.

6. Ob utverzhdenii Administrativnogo reglamenta predostavlenija Federal'noj migracionnoj sluzhboj gosudarstvennoj uslugi po registracionnomu uchjotu grazhdan Rossijskoj Federacii po mestu prebyvanija i po mestu zhitel'stva v predelah Rossijskoj Federacii: prikaz FMS RF ot 11 sent. 2012 g. №288 (red. ot 15.07.2013 g.) // Ros. gaz. 2013. 17 apr.

7. Ob utverzhdenii Pravil registracii i snjatija grazhdan Rossijskoj Federacii s registracionnogo uchjota po mestu prebyvanija i po mestu zhitel'stva v predelah Rossijskoj Federacii i perechnja dolzhnostnyh lic, otvetstvennyh za registraciju: postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Ros. Federacii ot 17 ijulja 1995 g. №713 (red. ot 21.05.2012) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 1995. №30, st. 2939.

8. Opredelenie Verhovnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii ot 14 ijulja 2004 g. po delu №19-V04-19 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

9. Opredelenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 2 marta 2011 g. po delu №33-3485 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

10. Opredelenie Permskogo kraevogo suda ot 10 sent. 2012 g. po delu №33-8048 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

11. Opredelenie Permskogo kraevogo suda ot 7 sent. 2011 g. po delu №33-8981 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

12. Opredelenie Sankt-Peterburgskogo gorodskogo suda ot 5 okt. 2011 g. po delu №33-15031/11 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy «Konsul'tantPljus».

13. Semenovskij G. Pravo sobstvennosti prevaliruet nad pravom pol'zovanija // Zhilishhnoe pravo. 2009. №9. S. 27–32.

14. Trofimov E.N. O sohranenii prava pol'zovanija sluzhebnymi zhilymi pomeshhenijami v obshhezhitijah za nekotorymi kategorijami grazhdan posle prekrashhenija voenno-sluzhebnyh i trudovyh otnoshenij s voinskoj chast'ju (uchrezhdeniem) // Pravo v Vooruzh. Silah. 2011. №7. S. 38–42.

15. Farshatov I.A. Ohrana i zashhita zhilishhnyh prav grazhdan, prozhivajushhih v obshhezhitijah // Zhilishhnoe pravo. 2008. №4. S. 36–41.

16. Shishkin D.A. Sluzhebnye zhilye pomeshhenija // Grazhdanin i pravo. 2000. №6. S. 8–91.

17. Shhennikova L.V. Neprikosnovennost' sobstvennosti na zhilishhe i zashhita interesov sosedej // Ros. justicija. 2001. №4. S. 24–25.