Issue 4 (18) 2012

Schennikova THE CIVIL LAW DOCTRINE ABOUT THE NATIONALIZATION

THE CIVIL LAW DOCTRINE ABOUT THE NATIONALIZATION

L.V. Schennikova

Kuban State University

149, Stavropolskay st., Krasnodar, 350040

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

In the center of attention of granted the article one of the bases of emergence of the right of a public property – nationalization. The nationalization is not working construction because the necessary and ad hoc act isn't passed. The reason of it is not readiness of this concept from a civil law doctrine. The author analyzes the civil law literature devoted to a problem of nationalization. Among sources – works of the pre-revolutionary scientist who have made the significant contribution to research of a problem. The particular interest is represented by M.V. Venetsianov's book devoted to expropriation from the point of view of civil law, published in 1891. The author emphasizes, what exactly the pre-revolutionary civil law science proved vitality of institute of nationalization. It should be constantly operating to define first of all conditions of application of the given grounds of the termination of the right of private ownership for each separate case. Among modern researchers, the author allocates deep according to the analysis of article of V. Belov devoted to nationalization as categories of civil law. The author proves that nationalization is institute normal as regulates the normal economic relations and is necessary institute for ensuring forward economic development of the country. As article affirms that this institute allows to overcome individualism of participants of the civil law relations and to carry out idea of public interest (for the public weal). The institute of nationalization is considered as private because he guarantees protection of interests of individuals against the state arbitrariness. In a civil law system nationalization joins in area of the right real. The author suggests to understand the compulsory termination of the right of private ownership and emergence of the right of a public property as nationalization on property complexes on the basis of the state and imperious act adopted according to the law on nationalization, for the purpose of satisfaction of public interests and under condition of payment of the equivalent and reasonable compensation.

Keywords: nationalization; property; civil law; civil doctrine

Bibliograficheskij spisok

1. Ali Halil' Ibragim. Pravovye voprosy nacionalizacii inostrannoj sobstvennosti: avtoref. dis. … kand. jurid. nauk. M., 1972. 20 s.

2. Belov V.A. Nacionalizacija v rossijskom grazhdanskom prave: istorija i sovremennost' // Zakonodatel'stvo. 1999. №2, 3.

3. Venecianov M.V. Jekspropriacija s tochki zrenija grazhdanskogo prava. Kazan': Tip. Imperat. un-ta, 1891. 114 s.

4. Gubin E.P. Nacionalizacija kak instrument gosudarstvennogo regulirovanija rynochnoj jekonomiki // Ros. sud'ja. 2005. №2. S. 42–46.

5. Dorofeeva Ju.A. Nacionalizacija: voprosy mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava: avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. Saratov, 2001. 23 s.

6. Mikolenko Ja.F. Nacionalizacija kak osnova vozniknovenija i pravovogo rezhima gosudarstvennoj socialisticheskoj sobstven­nosti // Pravovedenie. 1961. №2. S. 128–132.

7. Sklovskij K.I. Sobstvennost' v grazhdanskom prave. M.: Statut, 2010. 893 s.

8. Sopova A. Shedevr russkogo moderna mozhet ischeznut' // Izvestija. 2012. 3 avg.

9. Tak zdanie univermaga «Moskva» puskaetsja s molotka iz-za dljawejsja neskol'ko let procedury bankrotstva kompanii (Dulenkova A. Univermag «Moskva» prodaet svoe istoricheskoe zdanie) // Izvestija. 2012. 3 avg.