DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2015-4-47-51

Defects of debt relationship as one of the elements
of the legal regulation mechanism

I.P. Kozhokar

Saratov State Academy of Law

1, Volskaya st., Saratov, 410056

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Introduction: The article considers the issue of defectiveness of one of the elements of the legal regulation mechanism, namely debt relationship. Purpose: to analyze some defects of the structural elements of debt relationship. Methods: the methodological framework of this research is based on a set of methods of scientific cognition, among which the dialectical method is the major one. The author also uses general scientific methods, such as analysis, synthesis, and also specific scientific methods, such as formal-legal, technical-legal. Results: particular defects of debt relationship are analyzed, some ways of their elimination are presented. Conclusions: every element of debt relationship (subject, object) may be defective to some extent. It is also essential to consider this problem in terms of the concept of exercising rights.

Keywords: law of obligations; debt relationship; defects; mechanism of legal regulation 

References

1. Alekseev S.S. Mehanizm pravovogo regulirovanija v socialisticheskom gosudarstve [The mechanism of legal regulation in a socialist state]. M.: Jurid. lit. Publ., 1966. 187 p. (In Russ.).
2. Vavilin E.V. Mehanizm osushhestvlenija grazhdanskih prav i ispolnenija objazannoste : avtoref. dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk. [The mechanism of execution of civil rights and performance of obligations. Synopsis of Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. M., 2009. 56 p. (In Russ.).
3. Vavilin E.V. Principy grazhdanskogo prava. Mehanizm osushhestvlenija i zashhity grazhdanskih prav [The principles of civil law. The mechanism of implementation and protection of civil rights]. Saratov: Saratov State Academy of Law Publ., 2012. 364 p. (In Russ.).
4. Postanovlenie Odinnadcatogo arbitrazhnogo apelljacionnogo suda ot 26.09.2012 g. po delu № A55-3637/2012 [Resolution of the 11^th Arbitration Appellate Court of 26.09.2012 on the case № A55-3637/2012] [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus» –Access from the legal reference system «Konsul'tantPljus». (In Russ.).
5. Postanovlenie FAS Volgo-Vjatskogo okruga ot 10.05.2011 g. po delu № A79-9849/2008 [Resolution of the Volga-Vyatka Federal District Federal Arbitration Court of 10.05.2011 on the case № A79-9849/2008] [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus» – Access from the legal reference system «Konsul'tantPljus». (In Russ.).
6. Postanovlenie FAS Ural'skogo okruga ot 25.08.2009 g. № F09-6126/09-S6 po delu № A76-1513/2009-32-11 [Resolution of the Urals Federal District Federal Arbitration Court of 25.08.2009  № F09-6126/09-S6 on the case № A76-1513/2009-32-11] [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus» – Access from the legal reference system «Konsul'tantPljus». (In Russ.).
7. Smetannikov A.E. Opredelenie i vidy nedostatkov tovara [Definition and types of defects of goods]. Juridicheskij mir [Juridical world]. 2007. Pp. 34–38. (In Russ.).
8. Chegovadze L.A. Struktura i sostojanie grazhdanskogo pravootnoshenija [Structure and state of civil legal relationship]. M.: Statut Publ., 2004. 542 p. (In Russ.).