Globalization and internationalization of the world economy have given rise to new forms and methods of intellectual property rights protection. Sustainable economic and cultural development is impossible without restructuring the national system of intellectual property rights protection. All this requires modernization of the national legal system, reformation the institutional structure of the society corresponding to contemporary tendencies of globalization. Intellectual property rights protect innovations and creations and reward innovative and creative activity. Intellectual property rights are international in character and in that respect they fit in rather well with the economic reality of the global economy. Globalization means intensive cooperation in world division labour between mass production and providing of services and high-technolopies and innovations. National borders are becoming more archaic. Many researches consider knowledge economy to be one of the main sources of power and wealth. Globalization opens market for all enterprises and spreads new methodology and instruments, increasing in that way the progress of information technologies.
Introduction of the Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation allowed to systematize the federal legislation on intellectual property. The basis of this system is recognition of subjective intellectual property rights for the results of intellectual activity and the means of individualization (for intellectual property) as exclusive ones. However, they differ from property rights and other material rights because they are intangible, and they differ from personal non-pecuniary rights of authors and other creators of intellectual results by the fact that they become a subject of civil circulation and allow to involve the objects of intellectual property into such circulation.
The aim of the paper is to present the institutional preconditions of globalization and to analize the methods of intellectual property protection in the conditions of globalization.
Keywords: Intellectual property protection; globalization; innovation
Bibliograficheskij spisok
Varfolomeeva Ju.A. Intellektual'naja sobstvennost' v uslovijah innovacionnogo razvitija. M.: Os'-89, 2006. 142s.
Varfolomeeva Ju.A. Mirohozjajstvennye aspekty upravlenija intellektual'noj sobstvennost'ju // Vneshnetorgovoe pravo.2005. №2. S. 16−20.
Vsemirnaja deklaracija po intellektual'noj sobstvennosti ot 26 ijunja 2000 g. // Intellekt. sobstvennost'. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. №4. 2002. S. 14.
Koroleva I.S. Rossija na puti v VTO: otraslevoj analiz / obw. red. I.S. Koroleva, G.I. Machavariani. M.: In-t mirovoj jekonomiki i mezhdunar. otnoshenij RAN, 2001. 150 s.
Mirskih I.Ju. Kommercheskaja tajna kak vid konfidencial'noj informacii: trudopravovoj i civilisticheskij aspekty: avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk. Perm', 2005. 25 s.
Mirskih I.Ju., Loginova T.E. O protivorechijah norm mezhdunarodnogo prava i prava Rossijskoj Federacii v sfere ohrany intellektual'noj sobstvennosti // Vestn. Perm. un-ta. Ser.: Jurid. nauki. 2010. №3(9) S. 128−132.
Sudarikov S.A. Pravo intellektual'noj sobstvennosti: uchebnik. M.: Propekt, 2010. 368 s.
Postaljuk M.P. Innovacionnye otnoshenija v jekonomicheskoj sisteme. Teorija, metodologija i mehanizm realizacii. Kazan': Izd-vo Kazan. gos. un-ta, 2006. 419 s.
Ptushenko A. Pravovaja zawita intellektual'noj sobstvennosti // Intellektual'naja sobstvennost'. 2002. №2. S. 52−53.
Fedotov M. Intellektual'naja sobstvennost' i zakon. (Zametki po povodu opublikovannoj monografii) // Intellekt. sobstvennost' 2002. №6. S. 78−79.
Jur'eva T.V. Intellektual'naja sfera i predprinimatel'stvo. Nepribyl'nyj sektor: (Al'ternativa biznesu i gosudarstvu). M.: IC «Ankija», 1994. 51 s.
Benko R. Protecting of Intellectual property Rights: Issues and Controversies // American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (AEI Studies 453) Ch 4. at15.
Geller E. International Intellectual Property, Conflict of Laws, and Internet Remedies // Intellectual Property and Information Law. Essays in honour of Herman Cohen Jehoram/ Ed. Kabel J., Mom G. Hague. 1998. P. 30−31.
Henderson E. TRIPS and the Third World: The Example of Pharmaceutical Patents in India // European Intellectual Property Review. 1997. №11, vol. 19.
Locke J. The Second Treatise. Section 27 in Two Treaties of Government edited by Peter Laslett. Cambridge University Press. 1970. 464 p.
Mingaleva Z. Mirskikh I. The Problems of Legal Regulation of Intellectual Property Rights in Innovation Activities in Russia // Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 2009. Vol. 41. P. 464−476.
Stiglitz J. Making Globalization Work. New York; London, 2006. R. 355.