Issue 3 (17) 2012

THE REASONS AND THE ASPECT CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PARTICIPATION IN THE LEGALLY BINDING RELATIONS

THE REASONS AND THE ASPECT CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PARTICIPATION IN THE LEGALLY BINDING RELATIONS

V.G. Golubtsov

Perm State National Research University

15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

The Russian Federation, being an equal right participant of the civil legal relations and acting on equal terms with other subjects of law, has distinctive specific features of its civil and legal status, which are manifested particularly in the Russian Federation participation in legally binding relations.

The author justified that the situations defined by the legislation when the Russian Federation acts directly a saparty in an obligation are exclusively the manifestation of aspecific public function. Therefore the possibility of the situation when the Russian Federation directly participates in civil legal obligation as a party should be directly or indirectly fixed in the legislation.

The legal capacity of the Russian Federation is defined by the author as a functional one; therefore the mentioned direct or indirect legal fixing of the Russian Federation acting as a party in a specific obligation is mandatory.

The state bodies acting on behalf of the Russian Federation in the civil turnover have no right to enter into any legal relations at their option in case there is no legally defined competence or direct instruction for the possibility to conclude a contract on behalf of the state.

Taking into account the fact that contractual relations are the most common type of the relations with the state, the systematization of the contracts with the Russian Federation as an actual or possible contract party is viewed to be essentially important. The article in question is devoted to this systematization.

The author gives a detailed analysis of the cases when the legislation provides for the state participation in the legally binding relations and proposes a system of reasons for such relations beginning, with this analyzing the specific features of the Russian Federation civil and legal status when participating in the civil turnover of the legally binding relations.

Besides defining the system of reasons for the Russian Federation entering into the property relations, the author analyzed special cases of such participation and the associated problems of the law application, and based on that the legislative measures for changing the relation regulation were proposed.

The article is also devoted to the analysis of the theoretical regulations which have been regulating and regulate the state participation in the legally binding relations. In particular, the author justified the separation of the state contract as a specific legal construction which is an intermediary for satisfying the state needs.

The research also contains the analysis of the existing trends in the mentioned relations, their criticism and personal proposals of the author as referred to the current Russian legislation reforming.

Keywords: legally binding relations, civil turnover, civil and legal status of the Russian Federation

Bibliograficheskij spisok

1. Agarkov M.M. Objazatel'stvo po sovetsko­mu grazhdanskomu pravu. M.: Jurid. izd-vo NKJu SSSR, 1940. 192 s.

2. Antimonov B.S. Osnovanija dogovornoj otvetstvennosti socialisticheskih organiza­cij. M.: Jurid. lit., 1962. 176 s.

3. Braginskij M.I. Obwee uchenie o hozjajstvennyh dogovorah. Minsk, 1967. 260 s.

4. Braginskij M.I. Uchastie Sovetskogo gosudarstva v grazhdanskih pravootnoshe­nijah. M.: Jurid. lit., 1981. 190 s.

5. Braginskij M.I., Vitrjanskij V.V. Dogovor­noe pravo. Kn. 1: Obwie polozhenija. M., 2007. 848 s.

6. Bratus' S.N. Juridicheskaja otvetstvennost' i zakonnost' (ocherk teorii). M., 2001. S. 81–82.

7. Bratus' S.N., Lunc L.A. Voprosy hozjajst­vennogo dogovora. M.: Gosjurizdat, 1954. 155 s.

8. Bjudzhetnyj kodeks RF: Feder. zakon Ros. Federacii ot 31 ijulja 1998 g. №145–FZ (red. ot 03.12.2011g.) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 1998. №31, st. 3823.

9. Vedel' Zh. Administrativnoe pravo Francii. M.: Progress, 1973. 512 s.

10. Vodnyj kodeks RF: Feder. zakon Ros. Federacii ot 3 ijunja 2006 g. №74–FZ (red. ot 19.06.2007 g.) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 2006. №23, st. 2381.

11. Demin A. Gosudarstvennye kontrakty (publichno-pravovoj aspekt) // Hozjajstvo i pravo. 1997. №8. S. 148–155.

12. Ioffe O.S. Plan i dogovor v socialis­tiches­kom hozjajstve. M.: Jurid. lit., 1971. 216 s.

13. Klejn N.I. Postavka produkcii dlja gosu­darstvennyh nuzhd // Zakon. 1995. №6. S. 63–65.

14. Krasavchikov O.A. Grazhdansko–pravovoj dogovor: ponjatie, soderzhanie i funkcii // Grazhdansko–pravovoj dogovor i ego funkcii: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr. Sverdlovsk, 1980. S. 3–20.

15. Krjazhevskih K.P. Otvetstvennost' kazen­nyh predprijatij i uchrezhdenij // Zakonoda­tel'stvo. 2000. №12. S. 8–17.

16. Lejst O.Je. Sankcii v sovetskom prave. M.: Gosjurizdat, 1962. 238 s.

17. Lesnoj kodeks RF: Feder. zakon Ros. Federacii ot 4 dek. 2006 g. №200–FZ (red. ot 06.12.2011 g.) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 2006. №50, st. 5278.

18. Maleina M.N. Pravovoe regulirovanie orga­nizacii i provedenija loterej // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2003. №6. S. 29–37.

19. Masevich M.G. Dogovor postavki i ego rol' v ukreplenii hozrascheta. Alma–Ata: Izd-vo AN KazSSR, 1964. 318 s.

20. Muhomorov D.V. Subsidiarnaja otvetstven­nost' publichnyh obrazovanij po objaza­tel'stvam sozdannyh imi uchrezhdenij // Zakonodatel'stvo. 2002. №8. S. 24–29.

21. Nozdrachev A.F. Gosudarstvo kak zakaz­chik produkcii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1994. №7. S. 42.

22. O gosudarstvennyh i municipal'nyh unitar­nyh predprijatijah: Feder. zakon Ros. Federacii ot 14 nojab. 2002 g. №161–FZ (red. ot 30.11.2011g.) // Sobr. zakonodatel'­stva Ros. Federacii. 2002. №48, st. 4746.

23. O dogovore arendy lesnogo uchastka, nahodjawegosja v gosudarstvennoj ili municipal'noj sobstvennosti: Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Ros. Federacii ot 28.05.2007 g. №324 (red. ot 17.11.2007 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2007. №23. St. 2793.

24. O koncessionnyh soglashenijah: Feder. zakon Ros. Federacii ot 21 ijulja 2005 g. №115–FZ (red. ot 25.04.2012 g.) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 2005. №30, ch. 2, st. 3126.

25. O koordinacii mezhdunarodnyh i vneshne­jekonomicheskih svjazej sub#ektov Rossijskoj Federacii: Feder. zakon Ros. Federacii ot 4 janv. 1999 g. №4-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 1999 g. №2. St. 231.

26. O nekotoryh voprosah praktiki rassmotre­nija arbitrazhnymi sudami sporov s uchastiem gosudarstvennyh i municipal'nyh uchrezhdenij, svjazannyh s primeneniem stat'i 120 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii: postanovlenie Plenuma VAS Ros. Federacii ot 22 ijunja 2006 g. №21 (red. ot 19.04.2007 g.) // Vestn. VAS RF. 2006. №8. S. 53–57.

27. O porjadke peredachi v doveritel'noe upravlenie zakreplennyh v federal'noj sobstvennosti akcij akcionernyh obwestv, sozdannyh v processe privatizacii, i zakljuchenii dogovorov doveritel'nogo upravlenija jetimi akcijami: postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Ros. Federacii ot 7 avg. 1997 g. №989 (red. ot 26.07.2004 g.) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 1997. №45, st. 5193.

28. O porjadke predostavlenija gosudarstven­nyh garantij Rossijskoj Federacii po zaimstvovanijam, osuwestvljaemym sub#ektami Rossijskoj Federacii ili municipal'nymi obrazovanijami dlja obespechenija zemel'nyh uchastkov inzhenernoj infrastrukturoj i modernizacii ob#ektov kommunal'noj infrastruktury v celjah zhiliwnogo stroitel'stva: posta­novlenie Pravitel'stva Ros. Federacii ot 3 ijunja 2006 g. №351 (red. ot 07.11.2008 g.) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 2006. №24, st. 2604.

29. O postavkah tovarov dlja federal'nyh i gosudarstvennyh nuzhd: Feder. zakon Ros. Federacii ot 13 dek. 1994 g. №60-FZ (red. ot 19.07.2011g.) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 1994. №34, st. 3540.

30. O privatizacii gosudarstvennogo i munici­pal'nogo imuwestva: Feder. zakon Ros. Federacii ot 21 dek. 2001 g. №178–FZ (red. ot 06.12.2011 g.) // Sobr. zakonoda­tel'stva Ros. Federacii. 2002. №4, st. 251.

31. O privatizacii zhiliwnogo fonda v Rossijs­koj Federacii: zakon Ros. Federacii ot 4 ijulja 1991 g. №1541–1 (red. ot 11.06.2008g.) // Vedomosti SND i VS RSFSR. 1991. №28, st. 959.

32. O razmewenii zakazov na postavki tovarov, vypolnenie rabot, okazanie uslug dlja gosudarstvennyh i municipal'nyh nuzhd: Feder. zakon Ros. Federacii ot 21 ijulja 2005 g. №94-FZ (red. ot 12.12.2011 g.) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 2005. №30, ch. 1, st. 3105.

33. O soglashenijah o razdele produkcii: Feder. zakon Ros. Federacii ot 30 dek. 1995 g. №225–FZ (red. ot 19.07.2011g.) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 1996. №1, st. 18.

34. Ob akcionernyh obwestvah: Feder. zakon Ros. Federacii ot 26 dek. 1995 g. №208-FZ (red. ot 30.11.2011 g.) // Sobr. zako­nodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 1996. №1, st. 1.

35. Ob obespechenii predstavlenija interesov gosudarstva v organah upravlenija akcionernyh obwestv (hozjajstvennyh tova­riwestv), chast' akcij (doli, vklady) kotoryh zakrepleny v federal'noj sobstvennosti: postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Ros. Federacii ot 21 maja 1996 g. №625 (red. ot 24.06.1998 g.) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 1996. №22, st. 2698.

36. Ob obwestvah s ogranichennoj otvetstven­nost'ju: Feder. zakon Ros. Federacii ot 8 janv. 1998 g. №14–FZ (red. ot 06.12.2011 g.) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 1998. №7, st. 785.

37. Ob obwih principah organizacii zakonodatel'nyh (predstavitel'nyh) i ispolni­tel'nyh organov gosudarstvennoj vlasti sub#ektov Rossijskoj Federacii: Feder. zakon Ros. Federacii ot 6 okt. 1999 g. №184-FZ (red. ot 23.04.2012 g.) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 1999. №42, st. 5005.

38. Ob osnovah gosudarstvennogo reguli­rovanija vneshnetorgovoj dejatel'nosti: Feder. zakon Ros. Federacii ot 8 dek. 2003 g. №164-FZ (red. ot 06.12.2011 g.) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 2003. №50, st. 4850.

39. Ob upravlenii federal'noj sobstvennost'ju, nahodjawejsja za rubezhom: postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Ros. Federacii ot 5 janv. 1995 g. №14 (red. ot 24.02.2010 g.) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 1995. №3, st. 203.

40. Popov V.V. O primenenii st.120 GK RF v chasti privlechenija k subsidiarnoj otvetstvennosti uchreditelja i sobstvennika uchrezhdenija federal'nogo zheleznodoro­zhnogo transporta // Vestn. VAS RF. 2000. №7. S. 125–128.

41. Prus E.P. Subsidiarnoe objazatel'stvo v rossijskom grazhdanskom prave // Vestn. VAS RF. 2004. №10. S. 164–178.

42. Ryzhkov Ju.V. Praktika rassmotrenija del, svjazannyh s primeneniem subsidiarnoj otvetstvennosti // Vestn. VAS RF. 2000. №6. S. 108–115.

43. Suhanov E.A. Grazhdanskij kodeks v hozjajstvennoj praktike // Hozjajstvo i pravo. 1997. №5. S. 78–89.

44. Suhanov E.A. Ob otvetstvennosti gosudarst­va po grazhdansko–pravovym objazatel'st­vam // Vestn. VAS RF. 2001. №3. S. 116–125.

45. Halfina R.O. Pravovoe regulirovanie postavki produkcii v narodnom hozjajstve. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1963. 266 s.

46. Jakovlev V.F. Grazhdanskij kodeks i gosudarstvo // Grazhdanskij kodeks Rossii. Problemy. Teorija. Praktika: sb. st. pamjati S.A. Hohlova / otv. red. A.L. Makovskij; Issled. Centr chastnogo prava. M., 1998. S. 58–66.

47. Jakovlev V.F. O nekotoryh voprosah prime­nenija chasti pervoj GK RF arbitrazhnymi sudami // Vestn. VAS RF. 1995. №5. S. 88–100.

48. Jakushev V.S. Hozjajstvennaja sistema: ponjatie, priznaki, funkcii // Sov. gosudarstvo i pravo. 1976. №6. S. 50–58.