DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2015-2-41-48
Perm State University
15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Introduction: with the adoption of Part IV of the Civil Code of Russian Federation significantly changed the use of intellectual property as part of a complex object. The paper studies the complex object of intellectual property rights. In the absence of specific studies, complex object of intellectual property rights is reviewed for example theaters performances. Objective: To identify the preconditions consolidation in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of a complex object, fully explore the complex object through the prism of theaters performances, and to identify the distinctive features of the basic characteristics of a complex object. Methods: The methodological basis for the study account for comparative-historical, analytical and systematic methods. Results: The article explains that a significant influence on the formation of the modern design of a complex object has admitted Soviet legislation the possibility of recognition of authorship for legal entities. Negatively assessed elected legislator domestic approach to form an exhaustive list of types of complex object in the absence of a definition and unambiguous signs of a complex object. The author proves the necessity of a consistent regulation of complex object as a whole and theaters presentation particularly in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Conclusions: The special treatment of a complex object introduced to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation to solve the issue of the relationship between the organizer and the rights of the original authors. The basic characteristic of a complex object should be considered as its internal structure: there are several results of intellectual activity that constitute a whole. Second in order of importance is the organizer of the activity, from which, on the one hand, the initiative is based on the creation of a complex object, on the other hand, liability and financial risks. The author states that for theaters as a kind of representation of a complex object is characterized by a single creative idea. A model that allows to enforce the balance of interests of the organizer and director-choreographer theaters performances.
Keywords:results of intellectual activity; complex object; a tricky thing; theaters representation;
copyright legal entities; a single creative concept; production director; organizer; producer
References
1. Voynikanis E.A., Kalyatin V.O. Baza dannykh kak ob''ekt pravovogo regulirovaniya: uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov [Database as an Object of Legal Regulation: a Textbook for High Schools]. Moscow: Statut, 2011. 174 p. (InRuss).
2. Gavrilov E.P. Ob''ekty intellektual'nykh prav i ikh delimost' [Objects of Intellectual Property Rights and Their Divisibility] // Patenty i litsenzii – Patents and Licenses. 2010. № 3. Pp. 19–29. (In Russ).
4. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Avtorskoe pravo. Prava, smezhnye s avtorskimi. Postateynyy kommentariy k glavam 69–71[Civil Code of the Russian Federation . Copyright . Rights Related to Copyright. Commentaries to the Heads of 69–71] / B.M. Gongalo, V.O. Kalyatin, M.Ya. Kirillova i dr.; pod red. P.V. Krasheninnikova. Moscow: Statut, 2014. 510 p. (In Russ).
5. Dozortsev V.A.Intellektual'nye prava: ponyatie, sistema, zadachi kodifikatsii: Sb. statey / Issledovatel'skiy tsentr chastnogo prava. [Intellectual Property Rights: the Concept of the System, the Problem of Codification: Collection of Articles / Research Center for Private Law]. Moscow: Statut, 2005. 416 p.(In Russ).
6. Zaklyuchenie Issledovatel'skogo tsentra chastnogo prava po voprosam tolkovaniya i vozmozhnogo primeneniya otdel'nykh polozheniy chasti chetvertoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii (Redaktsionnyy material) [Conclusion of Private Law Research Center on the Iinterpretation and Possible Application of Certain Provisions of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Editorial Material)] // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava – Herald of Civil Law. 2007. № 3. Pp. 120–130. (In Russ).
7. Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii chasti chetvertoy (postateynyy). [Commentary to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of the Fourth Part (Itemized)] / V.O. Kalyatin, O.M. Kozyr', A.D. Korchagin i dr.; otv. red. L.A. Trakhtengerts. Moscow: KONTRAKT, INFRA-M, 2009. 812 p. (In Russ).
8. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy sudebnoy praktiki v sfere zashchity intellektual'nykh prav[Scientific-Practical Commentary of Judicial Practice in the Field of Protection of Intellectual Property Rights] / V.O. Kalyatin, D.V. Murzin, L.A. Novoselova i dr.; pod obshch. red. L.A. Novoselovoy. Moscow: Norma, 2014. 480 p. (In Russ).
10. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 5, Plenuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF № 29 ot 26 marta 2009 g. «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikshikh v svyazi s vvedeniem v deystvie chasti chetvertoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Regulation of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the RF № 5 , the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the RF № 29 dd March 26, 2009 «On some issues arising in connection with the introduction of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation»] // Ros. gazeta – Russian newspaper. 2009. 22 apr. (In Russ).
12. Savel'yeva I.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie otnosheniy v oblasti khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva. [Legal Regulation of Relations in the Field of Artistic Creativity]. Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1986. 141 p. (In Russ).
2. Tolstoy V.S.Grazhdanskoe informatsionnoe pravo [An Information and Civil Rights]. Moscow: Izd-vo Akademii povysheniya kvalifikatsii i professional'noy perepodgotovki rabotnikov obrazovaniya, 2009. 296 p. (In Russ).