Issue 1 (23) 2014

BorisevichG.Y. SOME ISSUES OF APPLYING ARTICLE 90 OF THE CRIMINAL AND PROCEDURAL LAW OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

SOME ISSUES OF APPLYING ARTICLE 90 OF THE CRIMINAL AND PROCEDURAL LAW OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

G.Y. Borisevich

Perm State National Research University
15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract: The issues are researched of the problems of applying the criminal procedural legislation prejudice institution by the investigators, prosecutors, judges, as well as the possibilities for their solution.

The timeliness of the research is provided by the fact that the prejudice is a complex legal phenomenon, the definition for which is not included into any norm of the Russian law branches.

A comparative research is made for the legal regulation of the prejudice institution of the RSFSR Criminal and Procedural Code (1960) and the Russian Federation Criminal and Procedural Code.

The author makes it prominent that in accordance with the principles of proving in the civil and arbitration procedure, some of the circumstances are not discovered by the court but are taken as substantiated. The conclusion is made that if the court has not truly settled some of the circumstances in the civil case procedure, for example if they are not sufficiently proved, this conclusion cannot have a prejudicial meaning in the criminal procedure.

In the conclusion, the author notices that the absence of the prejudice notion and the absence of the prejudice subject and cancelling order definitions in the current Russian Federation Criminal and Procedural Code still places the investigators, the prosecutors, the judges in a difficult position, does not provide for progressing of the criminal court procedure and for a reasonable compliance of the person’s and the state’s interests.


Keywords: sector-specific; interbranch; disprovable; prejudice


References

  1. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 15 janvarja 2008g. № 193-O-P «Po zhalobe grazhdanina Surinova Tatevosa Romanovicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav stat'ej 90 Ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» // Vestnik Konstituc. Suda RF. URL: www.ksrf.ru (data obrashhenija: 16.06.2013).

  2. Postanovlenie №30-P «po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozhenij st. 90 UPK RF v svjazi s zhaloboj grazhdanina V.D. Vlasenko i E.A. Vlasenko». URL: www.ksrf.ru (data obrashhenija: 16.06.2013).

  3. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 11 maja 2005 g. №5-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti st. 405 Ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa RF v svjazi s zaprosom Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda, zhalobami Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossijskoj Federacii, proizvodstvenno-tehnicheskogo kooperativa “Sodejstvie”, obshhestva s ogranichennoj otvetstvennost'ju “Karelija” i rjada grazhdan». URL: www.ksrf.ru (data obrashhenija: 16.06.2013).

  4. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 05 fevralja 2007 g. №2-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozhenij statej 16, 20, 112, 336, 376, 377, 380, 381, 382, 383, 387, 388 i 389 Grazhdanskogo processual'nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii v svjazi s zaprosom Kabineta Ministrov Respubliki Tatarstan, zhalobami otkrytyh akcionernyh obshhestv “Nizhnekamskneftehim” i “Hakasjenergo”, a takzhe zhalobami rjada grazhdan». URL: www.ksrf.ru (data obrashhenija: 16.06.2013).

  5. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 17 marta 2009 g. №5-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozhenija, soderzhashhegosja v abzacah chetvertom i pjatom punkta 10 stat'i 89 Nalogovogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii, v svjazi s zhaloboj obshhestva s ogranichennoj otvetstvennost'ju «Varm». URL: www.ksrf.ru (data obrashhenija: 16.06.2013).

  6. Rossijskaja juridicheskaja jenciklopedija. M.: Dom Infra-M, 1999. S. 2394.

  7. Skoblikov P.A. Problemy sovremennoj prejudicii: arbitrazhnyj process blokiruet ugolovnyj? // Zakon. 2010. №4. S. 178–191.

  8. Stenogramma «kruglogo stola» Komiteta po bezopasnosti na temu «O sovershenstvovanii instituta prejudicii v ugolovno – processual'nom zakonodatel'stve RF». URL: http://komitet2-16.km.duma.gov.ru (data obrashhenija: 16.06.2011).

  9. Fursov P.A. Predmet, sistema i osnovnye principy arbitrazhnogo processual'nogo prava: problemy teorii i praktiki. M.: Infra-M, 1999. 451 s.

  10. Juridicheskij jenciklopedicheskij slovar'. M.: Bol'shaja Ros. jenciklopedija, 2002. S. 413.

 


      

      

 
The Perm State University
614990, Perm, street Bukireva, 15
+7 (342) 2 396 275, +7 963 012 6422
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
Publishing 4 times a year
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in РИНЦ (the Russian index of scientific citing)

The founder: the State educational institution of the higher vocational training
“The Perm State University”.