Issue 1 (23) 2014

TeleginA.S. ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROCEDURAL ENFORCEMENT MEASURES: SOME OF THE APPLICATION ISSUES

ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROCEDURAL ENFORCEMENT MEASURES: SOME OF THE APPLICATION ISSUES

A.S. Telegin

Perm State National Research University
15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract:The administrative and procedural enforcement measures are the integrated system of enforcement measures used for collecting and preservation of evidence, for carrying out the necessary activities of the administrative case, for the execution of the decisions taken. They are the efficient means for removing the obstacles on the way toward the fullest, most thorough and objective case solution. In other words, the mentioned measures are very closely connected with the realization of the administrative liability institution, developing the necessary conditions for that.

The special characteristic feature of the mentioned measures is a specific procedural order of their realization that provides for a mandatory issuing of the corresponding protocol. This allows to minimize the discretion element of the officials performing the administrative and jurisdiction activities.

Among the mentioned measures, bringing a person to somewhere, administrative detention of the person and delivering are most frequently met.

Bringing a person, i.e. the enforced accompanying of a private person, is performed for the purpose of issuing the protocol of the administrative offence, in case it cannot be issued at place where the offence happened and the protocol issue is mandatory.

Administrative detention, i.e. a short restriction of liberty of a private person, can be applied in exceptional cases, when it is necessary to provide for the full and timely processing of the administrative offense case, or for the execution of the administrative offence case decision. With this, the detainees are placed into a specially protected room.

Delivering is a forced bringing of the private person or of the truly authorized representative of a legal person prosecuted in accordance with the administrative offense case, or a legal representative of a child brought to an administrative liability, or a witness who deliberately ignore the invitation of the body or the official processing the case.

The analysis of the current legislation shows the insufficient regulation of the number of questions arising in the process of the mentioned measures application; it needs to be improved.


Keywords: administrative enforcement; administrative offense case procedures; bringing; detention; delivering

 

References

  1. Administrativnoe pravo / pod red. A.I. Kap­lunova. M., 2011. 535 s.

  2. Vedomosti Verhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. 1984. №27, st. 909.

  3. Gaponov O.N. Institut dostavlenija: problemy processual'nogo porjadka realizacii // Administrativnoe i administrativno-proces­sual'noe pravo: aktual'nye problemy. M., 2006. S. 266–271.

  4. Guev A.N. Postatejnyj kommentarij k Kodeksu RF ob administrativnyh pravonarushenijah. M.: Infra-M, 2002. 967 s.

  5. Kozlova N. Neljubov' k GAI kak osnovanie dlja aresta // Ros. gazeta. 2007. 27 marta.

  6. Kommentarij k Kodeksu RF ob administrativnyh pravonarushenijah. M.: Jurist, 2002. 1229 s.

  7. Mil'shin Ju.N. O merah administrativno-processual'nogo obespechenija proizvodstva po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2007. №5 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy«Konsul'tantPljus».

  8. Ob osnovah sistemy profilaktiki beznadzornosti i pravonarushenij nesovershennoletnih: Feder. zakon ot 24 ijunja 1999 g. (red. ot 07.05.2013) // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 1999. №26, st. 3177.

  9. O realizacii otdel'nyh polozhenij Kodeksa RF ob administrativnyh pravonarushenijah: prikaz Feder. agentstva po atomnoj jenergii ot 13 apr. 2006 g. №168 // Bjul. normat. aktov feder. organov ispolnit. vlasti. 2006. №26.

  10. Osincev V.D. Metody administrativno – pravovogo vozdejstvija: avtoref. dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2013. 54 s.

  11. O chrezvychajnom polozhenii: Feder. konstituc. zakon ot 30 maja 2001 g. // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva Ros. Federacii. 2001. №23, st. 2277.

  12. Reshetnik Ju.F. Normativno-pravovoe regulirovanie administrativnogo zaderzhanija v sovremennyh uslovijah // Administrativnoe i administrativno-processual'noe pravo: aktual'nye problemy. M., 2006. S. 253–260.

  13. Reshetnik Ju.F. Obstojatel'stva, sposobstvujushhie narusheniju zakonnosti pri primenenii administrativnogo zaderzhanija // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2011. №10 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy«Konsul'tantPljus».

  14. Rossinskij B.V., Starilov Ju.N. Administrativnoe pravo. M.: Norma-Infra-M. 2010. 926 s.

  15. Sambor N.A. Dostavlenie kak mera administrativnogo obespechenija proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnyh pravonarushenijah: processual'nye voprosy zakonnosti primenenija ogranichenij prav i svobod cheloveka // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2012. №11 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy«Konsul'tantPljus»

 


      

      

 
The Perm State University
614990, Perm, street Bukireva, 15
+7 (342) 2 396 275, +7 963 012 6422
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
Publishing 4 times a year
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in РИНЦ (the Russian index of scientific citing)

The founder: the State educational institution of the higher vocational training
“The Perm State University”.