Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2020. Issue 4 (50)

Title: SUBSTANTIVE AND PROCEDURAL REPRESENTATION: CIVIL LAW AND FAMILY LAW ASPECTS
Authors:

D. B. Korotkov, Perm State University

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-8664-4928
ResearcherID: E-1699-2016
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»:       ---

T. V. Shershen, Perm State University

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0001-7158-3184
ResearcherID: H-4158-2016
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»:       ---
Requisites: Korotkov D. B., Shershen T. V. Material'noe i protsessual'noe predstavitel'stvo: grazhdansko-pravovoy i semeyno-pravovoy aspekty [Substantive and Procedural Representation: Civil Law and Family Law Aspects]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2020. Issue 50. Pp. 738–761. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2020-50-738-761
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2020-50-738-761
Annotation:

 Introduction: representation as a civil law relationship has long been an area of particular research interest, which can be explained by its special significance as one of the guarantors of the subject's right to free participation in civil circulation. At the same time, there have developed certain stereotypes in scientific research concerning the legal relationship of representation, the doctrine lacks a holistic approach to the study of representation as a relationship under civil law, which indicates the necessity of developing such an approach. Taking into consideration the dynamic development of procedural legislation, the legal relationship of representation is also undergoing changes, especially in relation to civil and family law relations. Purpose: to develop a holistic view on the current civil and family law regulation of substantive and procedural representation taking into account new changes in Russian procedural legislation. Methods: empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic; specific scientific methods: legal-dogmatic, comparative legal, method of interpretation of legal norms. Results: the study showed that representation should be considered as an organizational and informational relationship regulated by civil law within the framework of which the representative exercises the authority received from the represented person to perform on behalf of this person in relation to third parties legal actions and closely related to them factual actions entailing the emergence, change or termination of the rights and obligations of the person represented. Accordingly, a stable closed set of legal rules regulating this social relationship is called the institution of representation. Conclusions: representation as a legal relationship can be classified by types and forms: types are distinguished according to the branch affiliation (substantive or procedural law), while forms are distinguished according to the grounds for the emergence of the representative authority (representation by virtue of law, including based on an administrative act; contractual representation; representation from the situation). The legal relationship of representation is different from similar legal relationships (commission legal relationship, agency service, legal participation, activities of a signer’s assistant, activities of a mediator).

Keywords: legal relationship of representation; legal representatives; parents; adoptive parents; custodial persons and guardians; custody and guardianship bodies; rights and interests of the child; civil procedure; commercial procedure; civil law; family law; right of custody; right of access
  download the full-version article
References: 1. Bakaeva I. V. Dogovornyy rezhim imushhestva suprugov: brachnyy dogovor [Contractual Regime of Spouses' Property: Marriage Contract]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2019. Issue 1. Pp. 12–18. (In Russ.).
2. Vorozheykin E. M. Semeynye pravootnosheniya v SSSR [Family Relations in the USSR]. Moscow, 1972. (In Russ.).
3. Grazhdanskoe i torgovoe pravo zarubezhnykh stran: uchebnoe posobie /pod obshh. red. V. V. Bezbakha i V. K. Puchinskogo [Civil and Commercial Law of Foreign Countries: Textbook; ed. by V. V. Bezbakh and V.K. Puchinskiy]. Moscow, 2004. (In Russ.).
4. Zamriy O. N. Zloupotreblenie interesom v semeynykh pravootnosheniyakh mezhdu roditelyami i det'mi [Abuse of Interest in Family Legal Relations between Parents and Children]. Tver, 2018. 219 p. (In Russ.).
5. Komissarova E. G., Krasnova T. V. Pravo rebenka na semeynoe vospitanie: regulyativnyy aspekt [The Child's Right to Family Education: the Regulatory Aspect]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2019. Issue 4 (46). Pp. 672–697. (In Russ.).
6. Mikryukov V. A., Mikryukova G. A. O metode grazhdanskogo prava [On the Method of Civil Law]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki - Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2013. Issue 1 (19). (In Russ.).
7. Nevzgodina E. L. Predstavitel'stvo po grazhdanskomu pravu [Representation under Civil Law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo – Soviet State and Law. 1978. Issue 3. (In Russ.).
8. Nersesov N. O. Ponyatie dobrovol'nogo predstavitel'stva v grazhdanskom prave [The Сoncept of Voluntary Representation in Civil Law]. Izbrannye trudy po predstavitel'stvu i tsennym bumagam v grazhdanskom prave [Selected Works on Representation and Securities in Civil Law]. Moscow, 1998. (In Russ.).
9. Oreshin E. I. Dogovory o predstavitel'stve v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Contracts on Representation in Russian Civil Law: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2007. (In Russ.).
10. Oreshin E. I. Pravovaya priroda polnomochiya predstavitelya [The Legal Nature of the Representative's Authorities]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law. 2007. Issue 2. Pp. 113–121. (In Russ.).
11. Saprykin K. N. Predstavitel'stvo prav i interesov rebenka po grazhdanskomu i semeynomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii: diss... kand.yurid.nauk [Representation of the Rights and Interests of the Child in Civil and Family Legislation of the Russian Federation: Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2017. (In Russ.).
12. Suvorov N. S. O yuridicheskikh litsakh po rimskomu pravu [On Legal Entities under Roman Law]. Moscow, 2000. Pp. 98-100. (In Russ.).
13. Shishkin S. N. Predprinimatel'sko-pravovye (khozyaystvenno-pravovye) printsipy gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya ekonomiki [Entrepreneurial and Legal (Economic and Legal) Principles of State Regulation of the Economy]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2011. Issue 3 (13). (In Russ.).
14. Beseler G. Volksrecht und Juristenrecht. 1843. Available at: http://www.deutsches¬text¬ar¬chiv.de/ book/view/beseler_volksrecht_1843?p =152. (In Germ.).
15. Beamont P. R., McEleavy P. E. The Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. Oxford University, 1999. (In Eng.).
16. Bork. BGH, Urteil vom 02.17.1954 - II ZR 63/53, BGHZ 12, 327, 334. Rn. 1582. (In Germ.).
17. Gierke O. von. Deutsches Privatrecht. Vol. 1. Berlin, 1905; ders. Das Wesen der menschlichen Verbande. Berlin, 1902. Available at: https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_JwFCAAAAYAAJ. (In Germ.).
18. Guardianship for Children Deprived of Parental Care. A Handbook to Reinforce Guardianship Systems to Cater for the Specific Needs of Child Victims of Trafficking. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014. Available at: http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/jour-nals/UWSLawRw/2003/5.html. DOI: 10.2811 / 7016. (In Eng.).
19. Kovachek Staniћ G., Samarџiћ S., Kovacheviћ M. Razvod braka i zaјednichko roditeљsko staraњe kao posleditsa razvoda braka u teoriјi i praksi [Divorce and joint parental care as a consequence of divorce in theory and practice]. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu – Collected Papers of the Faculty of Law in Novi Sad. 2017. Vol. 51. Issue 4. Pp. 1285–1303. (In Serb.).
20. Kovachek Staniћ G. B., Samarџiћ S. O. Kriteriјumi za odluchivaњe o vrsheњu roditeљskog prava posle razvoda braka u teoriјi i praksi [Criteria for taking a decision concerning the exercise of parental rights after divorce in theory and practice]. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu – Collected Papers of the Faculty of Law in Novi Sad. 2018. Vol. 52. Issue 3. Pp. 869 – 890. (In Serbian).
21. Lorenz S. Grundwissen-Zivilrecht: Die Vollmacht, JuS 2010, 771, 772. (In Germ.).
22. Sabreen M. Law on the Custody of Children in Pakistan: Past, Present and Future. LUMS Law Journal. 2017. Vol. 4 (1). (In Eng.).
23. Savigny F. C. von. System des heutigen romischen Rechts. 1840. Vol. II. § 85. Available at: http://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/book/view/ savigny_system02_1840?p=486. (In Germ.).
24. Schubert C. MüKo zum BGB, § 164 Rn. 209. (In Germ.).
25. Windscheid B. Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts. 8th ed. Frankfurt, 1900. Vol. I. Available at: https://archive.org/details/lehrbuchdespan d00unkngoog/page/n10/mode/2up. (In Germ.).
Received: 01.08.2020
Financing: ---

 

 

0000-0002-8664-4928 

The Perm State University
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing

The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year