Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2017. Issue 3 (37)

L. V. Shchennikova,
Kuban State University

 10.17072/1995-4190-2016-34-461-466

Introduction: the definition of right in rem as offered by the developers of the second section of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and consequently the following expectation period of its legislative confirmation gave rise to both the possibility and practical necessity of the more detailed scientific reasoning and study. Purpose: to create a comprehensive image of the given legal framework comprising all the possible shades of its understanding as described in Russian civil law literature. Methods: both general scientific and specific scientific research methods were used, including dialectical, comparative-legal, historical, technical, and linguistic ones. Results: taking into consideration the generalized characteristics of the right in rem, it is concluded that the legal definition offered by the Civil Code of the Russian Federation needs further development. It should concern the nature of the purpose of the right, the proof of the set of powers inherent in any in rem right as well as the indication of the outer side hereof or the so-called negative obligation. Conclusion: the efficiency of applicationof the right in rem legal framework depends on the grade of accuracy and scientific validity of its characteristics as ne­cessarily implemented into the final definition. It is proved that the right in rem is specific as to its object and can be characterized by the internal and external connections reflecting its content. The internal connection predominates over the internal one, letting the party to a legal relationship an immediate opportunity to satisfy his or her demands for the res. The possibilities of the party do not take the form of the specific powers. The internal connection, mediating the obligations of the third parties, shall be provided with a special civil law regulation including the system of real actions.

1. Annenkov K. N. Systema russkogo grazhdan-skogo prava [The System of Russian Civil Law]. Vol. 1. Vvedeniye I obshchaya chast' [Introduction and General Part]. St. Petersburg, 1899. 672 p. (In Russ.).
2. Aristotle. Traktat o dushe [Treatise "On the Soul"]. Moscow, 1976. 105 p. (In Russ.).
3. Aristotle. Metafizika [Metaphysics]. Moscow, 2006. 232 p. (In Russ.).
4. Akhmet'yanova Z. A. Veshchnoe parvo: ucheb. posobie [Property Law: Textbook]. Kazan, 2014. 77 p. (In Russ.).
5. Babaev A. B. Sistema veshchnykh prav [The System of Property Rights]. Moscow, 2007. 408 p. (In Russ.).
6. Belov V. A. Ocherki veshchnogo prava [Essays on Property Law]. Moscow, 2015. 332 p. (In Russ.).
7. Bacon F. Novyi Organon [The New Organon]. Leningrad, 1935. 384 p. (In Russ.).
8. Vas'kovskiy E. V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo prava [Textbook of Civil Law]. Issue II. Veshchnoe pravo [Property Law]. St. Peters-burg, 1896. Available at: http://civil.con-sultant.ru/elib/books/24/page_28.html#46 (ac¬cessed 03.04.2017). (In Russ.).
9. Vronskaya M. V. Grazhdanskoe pravo: ucheb¬nik [Civil Law: Textbook]. Vladivostok, 2015. 410 p. (In Russ.).
10. Grazhdanskoe pravo: v 4 t. [Civil law: in 4 vols.]. Vol. 2: Veshchnoe parvo. Nasledst-vennoe parvo. Isklyuchitel'nye prava. Lichnye neimushchestvennye prava [Property Law. Succession Law. Exclusive Rights. Personal Non-Property Rights; ed. by E. A. Sukhanov]. Moscow, 2005. 496 p. (In Russ.).
11. Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil Law; ed. by A. P. Sergeev, Yu. K. Tolstoy]. Vol. 1. Мoscow, 2001. 632 p. (In Russ.).
12. Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik; v 3 t. [Civil Law: Textbook. In 3 vols.; ed. by A. P. Sergeev]. Vol. 1. Moscow, 2008. 1008 p. (In Russ.).
13. Grazhdanskoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii: uchebnik [Civil Law of the Russian Federation: Textbook; ed. by O. N. Sadikov]. Vol. 1. Moscow, 2006. 493 p. (In Russ.).
14. Descartes R. Pervonachala filosofii [Principles of Philosophy]. Sochineniya [Works: in 2 vols.]. Vol. 1. Moscow, 1989. 654 p. (In Russ.).
15. Il'enkov E. V. Dialekticheskaya logika [Dialec¬tical Logic]. Moscow, 1984. 320 p. (In Russ.).
16. Kant I. Traktaty i pis'ma [Treatises and Letters]. Moscow, 1980. 712 p. (In Russ.).
17. Lenin V. I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy [Comp¬lete Works]. Vol. 29. Moscow, 1973. 780 p. (In Russ.).
18. Meyer D. I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo [Russian Civil Law: in 2 parts]. Moscow, 2003. 831 p. Available at: http://civil.consultant.
ru/elib/books/45/page_28.html#39 (accessed 03.04.2017). (In Russ.).
19. Pobedonostsev K. P. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. Pervaya chast': Votchinnye prava [The Сourse of Civil Law. Part One: Patrimonial Rights]. Moscow, 2002. 800 p. Available at: http://civil.consultant.ru/elib/
books/15/page_26.html#36 (accessed 03.04.
2017). (In Russ.).
20. Rassolova Т. М. Grazhdanskoe parvo [Civil Law: Textbook]. Moscow, 2012. 847 p. (In Russ.).
21. Sinayskiy V. I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo [Russian Civil Law]. Issue 1. Obshchaya chast'. Veshchnoe parvo. Avtorskoe pravo [The General Part. Property Law. Copyright]. Kiev, 1917. 568 p. (In Russ.).
22. Sovremennyy filosofskiy slovar' [The Modern Philosophical Dictionary; ed. by V. E. Ke¬merov]. Moscow, 1998. 1064 p. (In Russ.).
23. Solov'ev V. S. Kritika otvlechennykh nachal [Criticism of Abstract Principles]. Moscow, 1880. 435 p. (In Russ.).
24. Spinoza B. Bogoslovsko-politicheskiy traktat [Theologico-Political Treatise]. Moscow, 2015. 486 p. (In Russ.).
25. Suleymenov M. K. Veshchnye prava v respublike Kazakhstan [Real Rights in the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Almaty. 1999. 360 p. (In Russ.).
26. Feuerbach L. A. Istoriya filosofii: Sobranie proizvedeniy [History of Philosophy. Collected Works in 3 vols.]. Vol. 1. Moscow, 1974. 542 p. (In Russ.).
27. Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' [Philo¬sophical Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow, 1983. 840 p. (In Russ.).
28. Frank S. L. Smysl zhizni [The Meaning of Life]. Brussels, 1976. 169 p. (In Russ.).
29. Engels F. Anti-Dyuring [Anti-Dühring]. Marx K. and Engels F. Sochineniya [Collected Works. In 39 vols.]. Vol. 20. Moscow, 1961. 827 p. (In Russ.).
30. Shershenevich G. F. Uchebnik russkogo grazh¬danskogo prava [Textbook of Russian Civil Law]. Moscow, 2005. 461 p. (In Russ.).
31. Schennikova L. V. Veshchnoe parvo v Grazh¬danskom kodekse: voprosy praktikuyu¬shchego yurista zakonodatelyu [Property Law in the Civil Code: Practicing Lawyer's Questions to the Legislator]. Zakono¬datel'stvo – Legislation. 2000. Issue 10. Pp. 12–16. (In Russ.).