Issue 3 (13) 2011

DISTINGUISHING FEATURES OF CORPORATE RELATIONS WITH PUBLIC-LEGAL SUBJECTS PARTICIPATION

DISTINGUISHING FEATURES OF CORPORATE RELATIONS WITH PUBLIC-LEGAL SUBJECTS PARTICIPATION

A.S. Yatsuk

Perm State National Research University
15, Bukirev st., Perm, 614990
E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

The article is dedicated to the analysis of the distinguishing features of corporate relations with participation of the special subject of private-law relations – public-legal subjects. When public-legal subjects become a part of corporate relations, these relationships get some special features, which make them different from other private-law relations. Author of this article gives 4 distinguishing features of corporate relations with participation of government and other public-legal subjects. As a part of these private-law relations public-legal subjects have two-side law nature. From the one hand, they still subjects of public relations, but, from the other hand, they become a special subject of corporate relations, like other “classical” subjects of private-law relations. The 4 distinguishing features of corporate relations with participation of public-legal subjects are: 1) a person, who represents the Government and other public-legal subjects in different corporations, doesn’t make his own decisions. He/she just represent a will of such subjects; 2) public subjects have special rights in corporations, which are called a “golden share”; 3) public subjects have no privileges in corporate relations. They ere the same as other “classical” subjects of private-law relations; 4) corporate relations with a participation of public-law subjects is a part of whole special passive capacity of public-law subjects. All this features make Government and other public-law subjects special subjects of private-law relations. Never the less, public-law subjects are still the main part of public law, in which they have a legislation power and where their position is higher, then other subjects. The combination of private-law essence and public-law essence in Government and other public-law subjects as the part of corporate relations gives us opportunity to make a decision, according to which corporate relations with public-law subjects are differs from the corporate relations with other subjects.

Keywords: public-legal subjects; corporate relations

Bibliograficheskiy spisok

1. Belitskaya A. Pravovoye polozheniye subyektov gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva // Pravo i ekonomika. 2010. №7. S. 66–70.
2. Varvarin A.V. Institut nezavisimykh direktorov v kompaniyakh s gosudarstven­nym uchastiyem: sovremennoye sostoya­niye i perspektivy razvitiya: мaterialy kruglogo stola «Uchastiye gosudarstva v aktsionernykh obshchestvakh: pravovyye problemy» // Predprinimatelskoye pravo. 2009. №3. S. 4–19.
3. Vorobyev A.S. K voprosu effektivnosti i tselesoobraznosti uchastiya gosudarstva v deyatelnosti aktsionernykh obshchestv. Materialy kruglogo stola «Uchastiye gosudarstva v aktsionernykh obshchestvakh: pravovyye problemy» // Predprinimatelskoye pravo. 2009. №3. S. 4–19.
4. Golubtsov V.G. Grazhdansko-pravovoy status gosudarstva i munitsipalnykh obrazovaniy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: monografiya. M., 2006. 272 s.
5. Guyev A.N. Postateynyy kommentariy k ch. 1 GK RF. M., 2000. 430 s.
6. Dedov D.I. «Zolotaya aktsiya» i publichnyye interesy // Yurist. 2003. №9. Dostup iz SPS «KonsultantPlyus».
7. Zelenskiy Ye.N. Materialy kruglogo stola «Uchastiye gosudarstva v aktsionernykh obshchestvakh: pravovyye problemy» // Predprinimatelskoye pravo. 2009. №3. S. 4–19.
8. Kareva Yu.V. Grazhdansko-pravovoy status publichnykh obrazovaniy // Yurist. 2003. №5. S. 20–29.
9. Korporativnoye pravo: uchebnik dlya studentov vuzov, obuchayushchikhsya po napravleniyu «Yurisprudentsiya» / Otv. red. I.S. Shitkina. M., 2007. 648 s.
10. Lafitskiy V.I. K voprosu o yuridicheskikh litsakh publichnogo prava // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2011. №3. S. 103–108.
11. Mozolin V.P. Gosudarstvennaya korporatsiya vs aktsionernoye obshchestvo // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2010. №6(162). S. 19–34.
12. Postanovleniye FAS Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 03.07.2001 g. №F04/1956-620/A45-2001. Dostup iz SPS «KonsultantPlyus».
13. Pyshkin I.I. Predstavitelstvo interesov publichno-pravovykh obrazovaniy v aktsionernykh obshchestvakh // Zakonodatelstvo. 2003. № 10. S. 43–46.
14. Slyshchenkov V.A. Uchastiye gosudarstva v otnosheniyakh, reguliruyemykh grazhdanskim pravom: k voprosu o pravovom polozhenii gosudarstvennykh organov // Vestnik grazhd/ prava. 2010. №6. S. 58–91.
15. Uskov O.Yu. Yuridicheskiye litsa publichnogo prava: ponyatiye i vidy // Zhurnal ros. prava. 2010. №6. S. 101–111.
16. Chirkin V.E. O ponyatii i klassifikatsii yuridicheskikh lits publichnogo prava // Zhurnal ros. prava. 2010. №6. S. 87–101.
17. Shcherbakova N. Uchrezhdeniye khozyaystvennykh obshchestv s uchastiyem publichno-pravovykh obrazovaniy // Khozyaystvo i pravo. 2002. №6(305). S. 91–101.