|
Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2022. Issue 4 (58) |
||||||||||
| Title: | THE DEBATE ON THE METHOD OF ROMAN JURISPRUDENCE AND ITS FOUNDER: A SHORT HISTORICAL ESSAY |
|||||||||
| Authors: |
M. M. Pestov, Higher School of Economics, Private Law Research Centre under the President of the Russian Federation named after S. S. Alekseev |
 |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | |||||||
| ORCID: | 0000-0002-2904-3990 |
ResearcherID: | ABF-6297-2020 |
|||||||
| Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: |
--- |
|||||||||
| Requisites: | Pestov M. M. Diskussiya o metode drevnerimskoy yurisprudentsii i ego osnovatele: kratkiy istoricheskiy ocherk [The Debate on the Method of Roman Jurisprudence and Its Founder: a Short Historical Essay]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2022. Issue 58. Pp. 564–578. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-564-578 |
|||||||||
| DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-564-578 |
|||||||||
| Annotation: |
Introduction: the article analyzes a discussion on legal method of Roman law, including the question about the period of time when the method was developed. Purpose: to assess the views presented in the literature on external cultural factors that could influence the development of legal method. The main divergences between the approaches to understanding the Roman legal method are identified and attempts to reconcile them are analyzed. Based on the analysis of ancient juridical and non-juridical sources, the author attempts to determine the historical period when the Roman legal method may have appeared. Results:the analysis of different views showed that rhetoric, logic and intuitive cognition are regarded as the main factors that shaped the legal method of Roman law. However, the study of ancient sources does not give the understanding of a certain time period when it appeared. Conclusions:the different views presented in the literature not so much contradict as supplement each other. Thus, it is be more fruitful to analyze Roman law sources taking into account different approaches. It is not possible to determine a certain historical period when the legal method appeared. Due to the lack of sufficient information in the sources, it is also hardly possible to attribute the emergence of the method to a certain Roman jurist whose treatises would demonstrate a methodology of legal studies developed at that time. It appears to be more reasonable to reconstruct the external circumstances, the cultural environment for each individual period in the history of Roman jurisprudence. |
|||||||||
| Keywords: | legal method; rhetoric; systematization; Quintus Mucius Scaevola |
|||||||||
 |
download the full-version article | |||||||||
| References: | 1. Novitskaya A. A. Stanovlenie ycheniya o kontrakte v rimskoy yurisprudentsii: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Formation of the Doctrine of Contract in Roman Jurisprudence: Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2014. 302 p. (In Russ.). 2. Soboleva A. K. Teodor Fiveg i ego kniga «Topika i yurisprudentsiya: k voprosy ob osnovnom metode issledovaniya v prave» [Theodor Viehweg and His Book 'Topics and Law: A Contribution to Basic Research in Law']. Ritorika –Rhetoric. 1997. Issue 1 (4). Pp. 77 - 94. (In Russ.). 3. Armgardt M. Zur Bedingungsdogmatik im klassischen römischen Recht und zu ihren Grundlagen in der stoischen Logik. Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis. 2008. Vol. 76. Issue 3–4. Pp. 219–235. (In Germ.). 4. Bretone M. Tecniche e idéologie del giuristi romani. 2nd ed. Napoli, 1982. 419 p. (In Ital.). 5. Brozek B., Stelmach J. Methods of Legal Reasoning. Springer, 2006. 219 p. (In Eng.). 6. Crook J. A. The Development of Roman Private Law. The Cambridge Ancient History. Vol. IX. The Last Age of the Roman Republic, 146–43 B.C. Cambridge University Press, 2008. Pp. 531–563. (In Eng.). 7. Frier B. W. The Rise of the Roman Jurists: Studies in Cicero's Pro Caecina. Princeton: University Press, 1985. 311 p. (In Eng.). 8. Giaro T. Geltung und Fortgeltung des römischen Juristenrechts. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung. 1994. Vol. 111. Issue 1. Pp. 66–94. (In Germ.). 9. Guarino A. L'esegesi delle fonti del diritto romano. Napoli, 1968. 629 p. (In Ital.). 10. Horak F. Rationes decidendi. Entscheidungsbegründungen bei den älteren römischen Juristen bis Labeo. Innsbruck, 1969. 311 p. (In Germ.). 11. Jörs P. Römische Rechtswissenschaft zur Zeit der Republik. Vol. 1. Bis auf die Catonen. Berlin, 1888. 313 p. (In Germ.). 12. Kaser M. Zur Methode der römischen Rechtsfindung. Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, I. Philosophisch-his¬torische Klasse. 1962. Issue 2. Pp. 49–78 (In Germ.). 13. Krüger P. Bemerkungen zu Dig. 40,7, 29 § 1 (Pomponius ad Q. Mucium). Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung. 1903. Vol. 24. Issue 1. Pp. 193–197. (In Germ.). 14. Krüger P. Geschichte der Quellen und Litteratur des römischen Rechts. Leipzig, 1888. 395 p. (In Germ.). 15. Kübler B. Kritische Bemerkungen zum Nexum. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung. 1904. Vol. 25. Issue 1. Pp. 254–283. (In Germ.). 16. Kunkel W. Diligentia. Zeitschrift der Sa¬vig¬ny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Ab¬teilung. 1925. Vol. 45. Issue 1. Pp. 266–351. (In Germ.) 17. Kunkel W. Herkunft und soziale Stellung der römischen Juristen 4 Ab. Graz, Vienna, Cologne: Böhlau, 1967. 415 p. (In Germ.). 18. Lenel O. Das Sabinussystem. Festgabe Rudolf von Ihering zu seinem Doctor-Jubiläum. Strasbourg, 1892. 175 p. (In Germ.). 19. Lenel O. Palingenesia iuris civilis. Lipsiae: ex officina Bernhardi Tauchnitz, 1889. Vol. 2. 1308 p. (In Lat.). 20. Miquel J. Stoische Logik und römische Jurisprudenz. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung. 1970. Vol. 87. Issue 1. Pp. 85–122. (In Germ.). 21. Münzer F. Mucius. Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. 1933. Vol. 16. Pp. 424–425. (In Germ.). 22. Nörr D. Pomponius oder 'Zum Geschichtsverständnis der römischen Juristen'. ANRW. Band 15. Recht (Methoden, Schulen, Einzelne Juristen). Ed. by H. Temporini. De Gruyter, 1976. Pp. 497–604. (In Germ.). 23. Puchta G. F. Cursus der Institutionen. 5th ed. Leipzig, 1856. Vol. 1. 751 p. (In Germ.). 24. Sanio F. D. Zur Geschichte der römischen Rechtswissenschaft. Königsberg, 1858. 116 p. (In Germ.). 25. Schmidlin B. Horoi, pithana und regulae - Zum Einfluß der Rhetorik und Dialektik auf die juristische Regelbildung. ANRW. Band 15. Recht (Methoden, Schulen, Einzelne Juristen). Ed. by H. Temporini. De Gruyter, 1976. Pp. 101–130. (In Germ.). 26. Schulz F. History of Roman Legal Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1946. 358 p. (In Eng.). 27. Stein P. Interpretation and Legal Reasoning in Roman Law. Chicago-Kent Law Review. 1995. Vol. 70. Issue 4. Pp. 1539–1556. (In Eng.). 28. Talamanca M. Lo schema 'genus-spe-cies' nelle sistematiche dei giuristi romani. La filosofia greca e il diritto romano. Rome: Acca-demia Nazionale die Lincei, 1977. Vol. II. 319 p. (In Ital.). 29. Tuori K. The Myth of Quintus Mucius Scaevola: Founding Father of Legal Science? Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis. 2004. Vol. 72. Issue 3-4. Pp. 243–262. (In Eng.). 30. Waldstein W. Konsequenz als Argument klas¬sischer Juristen. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stif¬tung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Ab¬tei¬lung. 1975. Vol. 92. Issue 1. Pp. 26–68. (In Germ.). 31. Wieacker F. Griechische Wurzeln des Institutionensystems. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung. 1953. Vol. 70. Issue 1. Pp. 93–126. (In Germ.). 32. Wieling H. Subjektive Reichweite der materiellen Rechtskraft im römischen Recht. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung. 1985. Vol. 102. Issue 1. Pp. 291–326. (In Germ.). 33. Winkel L. Error iuris nocet: Rechtsirrtum als Problem der Rechtsordnung. Terra Publishing Company, 1985. 183 p. (In Germ.). 34. Winkel L. Quintus Mucius Scaevola once again. Ex iusta causa traditum: Essays in Honour of Eric H. Pool. Pretoria, 2005. Pp. 425–433. (In Eng.). |
|||||||||
| Received: | 01.05.2022 | |||||||||
| Financing: |
--- |
|||||||||
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013
The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing
The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year