Issue 2 (52) 2021

 

Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2021. Issue 2 (52)
Title: COURT JUDGEMENT AS A JURAL FACT IN CIVIL LAW: DOCTRINAL DISCOURSE AND THE PROBLEM OF LEGAL FORMULATIONS
Authors:

V. G. Golubtsov, Perm State University

 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0003-3505-2348 ResearcherID: H-4690-2015
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»:       DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-38-474-483
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2018-41-396-419
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-45-484-513
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2020-48-248-273
Requisites: Golubtsov V. G. Sudebnoe reshenie kak yuridicheskiy fakt v grazhdanskom prave: doktrinal'nyy diskurs i problema legal'nykh formulirovok [Court Judgement as a Jural Fact in Civil Law: Doctrinal Discourse and the Problem of Legal Formulations]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2021. Issue 52. Pp. 240–262. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2021-52-240-262
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2021-52-240-262
Annotation:

Introduction: the role of the court judgement that determines civil rights and obligations remains not completely perceived in civil law. In the modern science of civil law, no definite theoretical views on this subject have yet been formed, except for those that were formulated in the period when the science was actively discussing the very fact of referring court judgements to jural facts of civil law. In the article, we address this issue through reviewing, analyzing and generalizing the existing scientific views, with inter-disciplinary aspects also involved. The scope of study includes the disputable issues of the legislative definition of the court judgement seen as the basis for the commencement of civil rights and obligations and also the analysis of methodological positions significant for the research. Purpose: while taking the theory of modificatory claims as what is recognized in the modern doctrine of civil procedural law, to investigate the right-establishing force of the court judgement defined by the legislator as a jural fact of civil law. Methods: the methodological framework of the research is based on the general scientific method of scientific cognition, which reflects the relationship between the doctrine and law enforcement, as well as methods of dialectics, analysis, synthesis, analogy, functional, interdisciplinary, and system approaches. Results: the article proposes a system of concepts with the court judgment in its civil law meaning of a jural fact of substantive law lying at the core. Based on this system, we can state that the relationship between such concepts as the ‘court judgement’ and the ‘jural fact of substantive law’ is to a greater extent speculative. It is not sufficient to explain a court judgement as the basis for the commencement of civil law relations only based on the theory of procedural law, which divides all claims into declarative and constitutive ones. We argue that the concept ‘court judgement’ in its substantive meaning has a dual civil law function: (1) in the meaning of its right-restorative function – as a result of the protection of a violated civil right, and (2) as one of the grounds for the establishment of civil rights and obligations resulting from a private person’s initiative and the court authority. The right of the court to deliver right-establishing judgements that become one of the legal regulation elements within civil law, is an exception to the general civil law rule implying the discretionary method of regulation, according to which the parties determine their rights and obligations by mutual agreement. Following the analysis of the doctrinal views on the concept of the court judgement in its substantive meaning, which many authors consider to be the one not corresponding to its broader procedural meaning, we justify the position that there are no obvious grounds for diagnosticating the alleged contradiction between substantive and procedural legislation in terms of the logical scope of the ‘court judgement’ concept. It is more important to see the real legal meaning of this concept in the civil law reality, which involves a combination of the substantive law significance of a court judgement for establishing civil rights and obligations and the public law essence of this act, which is manifested not in private actions of the interested persons themselves but in unilateral actions of the court as a public law subject. We also formulated some methodological positions that could serve as theoretical guidelines for further research into the problem of the court judgement as one of the jural facts of civil law.
Keywords: judicial act; jural fact of substantive law; constitutive judgement; right-establishing facts; civil rights and obligations
  download the full-version article
References: 1. Abramova E. N., Averchenko N. N., Alferova Yu. N., Arslanov K. M., Baygusheva Yu. V. et al. Grazhdanskoe pravo (uchebnik) [Civil Law (textbook)]. In 3 vols.; 2nd ed., revised and expanded. Ed. by Doctor of Law, Professor A. P. Ser¬geev). Moscow, 2018. Vol. 1. 1040 p. (In Russ.).
2. Abushenko D. B. O material'no- i protsessual'no-pravovykh osobennostyakh iskov i sudebnykh resheniy po trebovaniyam o zaklyuchenii, izmenenii ili prekrashhenii dogovora [On the Substantive Law and Procedural Law Features of Claims and Judicial Decisions on the Requirements for the Conclusion, Modification or Termination of a Contract]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure. 2013. Issue 2. Pp. 60–108. (In Russ.).
3. Abushenko D. B. Problemy vzaimovliyaniya sudebnykh aktov i yuridicheskikh faktov material'nogo prava v tsivilisticheskom protsesse: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Issues of the Mutual Influence of Judicial Acts and Jural Facts of Substantive Law in the Civil Process: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Tver, 2013. 30 p. (In Russ.).
4. Avdyukov M. G. Sudebnoe reshenie [Judicial Decision]. Moscow, 1959. 192 p. (In Russ.).
5. Alekseev S. S. Odnostoronnie sdelki v mekhanizme grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya [Unilateral Transactions in the Mechanism of Civil Law Regulation]. Antologiya ural'skoy tsivilistiki. 1925-1989 [Anthology of the Ural Civil Law Studies 1925-1989]. Moscow, 2001. Pp. 54–68. (In Russ.).
6. Aleksiy P. V., Karapetyan E. E., Malikov B. Z. Sudebnoe reshenie i yuridicheskiy fakt: dopustimo li otozhdestvlenie? [Judicial Decision and Jural Fact: Is Identification Permissible?]. Zakon i pravo – Law and Legislation. 2015. Issue 1. Pp. 74–76. (In Russ.).
7. Ayusheeva I. Z., Belov V. E., Belova D. A., Bulaevskiy B. A. et al. Grazhdanskoe zakonodatel'stvo i sudebnaya praktika: problemy vzaimodeystviya: monografiya [Civil Legislation and Judicial Practice: Problems of Interaction: monograph]. Ed. by Doctor of Law, Professor V. L. Slesarev. Moscow, 2017. 176 p. (In Russ.).
8. Belov V. A. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Tom II. Kniga 2: Fakty: uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata i magistratury [Civil Law. Vol. II. Book 2. Facts: Textbook for Academic Bachelor's and Master's Degree Programs]. 2nd ed., revised and expanded. Moscow, 2016. 497 p. (In Russ.).
9. Belov V. A. Yuridicheskie fakty v grazhdanskom prave: uchebnoe posobie dlya bakalavriata i magistratury [Jural Facts in Civil Law: Textbook for Bachelor's and Master's Degree Programs]. Moscow, 2016. 450 p. (In Russ.).
10. Bergel J.-L. Obshhaya teoriya prava [General Theory of Law]. Ed. by V. I. Danilenko; transl. by G. V.Churshukov. Moscow, 2000. 576 p. (In Russ.).
11. Bibilo V. N. Sudebnyy akt kak yuridicheskiy termin [Judicial Act as a Legal Term]. Vestnik Grodnenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4. Pravovedenie – Vesnik of Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno. Series 4. Jurisprudence. 2013. Issue 4. Pp. 6–12. (In Russ.).
12. Bozhko M. P. Sudebnoe reshenie kak yuridicheskiy fakt material'nogo prava [Judicial Decision as a Jural Fact of Substantive Law]. Yuridicheskie nauki – Legal Sciences. 2006. Issue 5. Pp. 178–181. (In Russ.).
13. Bratus' S. N. Predmet i sistema sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava [The Subject and System of Soviet Civil Law]. Moscow, 1963. 197 p. (In Russ.).
14. Verdnikov V. G. O planovom kharaktere khozyaystvennogo dogovora [On the Planned Nature of the Economic Contract]. Sovremennoe gosudarstvo i pravo – Modern State and Law. 1966. Issue 4. Pp. 63–70. (In Russ.).
15. Vlasenko V. A. Sudebnoe reshenie kak osnovanie ustanovleniya grazhdanskikh prav i obyazannostey: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Judicial Decision as a Basis for Establishing Civil Rights and Obligations: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Rostov-on-Don, 2011. 28 p. (In Russ.).
16. Galayda E. V. Sudebnoe reshenie kak yuridicheskiy fakt [Judicial Decision as a Jural Fact]. Economics. Law. State. 2019. Issue 2 (4). Pp. 47–51. (In Russ.).
17. Gambarov Yu. S. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Obshhaya chast' [Civil Law. General Part]. Ed. and prefaced by V. A. Tomsinov. Moscow, 2003. 816 p. (In Russ.).
18. Gol'tsov V. B., Golovanov N. M. Sudebnoe reshenie kak osnovanie vozniknoveniya, izmeneniya i prekrashheniya grazhdanskikh prav i obyazannostey [Judicial Decision as a Basis for the Emergence, Modification and Termination of Civil Rights and Obligations]. Znanie – Knowledge. 2018. Issue 2-2 (54). Pp. 55–62. (In Russ.).
19. Grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik dlya yuridicheskikh institutov [Civil Law: Textbook for Juridical Institutes]. Ed. by M. M. Agarkov, D. M. Genkin. Moscow, 1944. Vol. 1. 419 p. (In Russ.).
20. Grazhdanskoe pravo: v 4 t. Tom 3: Obyazatel'stvennoe pravo [Civil Law: in 4 vols. Vol. 3: Law of Obligations]. Ed. by E. I. Sukhanov. 3rd ed., revised and expanded. Moscow, 2005. 800 p. (In Russ.).
21. Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik v 4 t. Tom 1: Obshhaya chast' [Civil Law: Textbook in 4 vols. Vol. 1: General Part]. Ed. by E. A. Sukhanov. 2nd ed., revised and expanded. Moscow, 2019. 576 p. (In Russ.).
22. Gros' L. A. Sudebnoe reshenie – akt primeneniya norm protsessual'nogo i material'nogo prava, yuridicheskiy fakt v protsessual'nom i material'nom prave [Judicial Decision as an Act of Applying the Norms of Procedural and Substantive Law, as a Jural Fact in Procedural and Substantive Law]. Lex Russica. 2004. Issue 1. Pp. 195–201. (In Russ.).
23. Gurvich M. A. Vidy iskov po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu protsessual'nomu pravu [Types of Claims under the Soviet Civil Procedure Law]. Izvestiya akademii nauk SSSR. Otdelenie ekonomiki i prava – Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Department of Economics and Law. 1945. Issue 2. Pp. 1–12. (In Russ.).
24. Demin A. A. Sudebnoe reshenie v mekhanizme grazhdansko-pravovogo regulirovaniya [Judicial Decision in the Mechanism of Civil Law Regulation]. Zakonnost' i pravoporyadok – Legality and Legal Order. 2020. Issue 1 (25). Pp. 26–30. (In Russ.).
25. Didenko A. G. Vyzovy vremeni: teoriya yuridicheskikh faktov i ee otrazhenie v pravovoy deystvitel'nosti [Challenges of the Time: the Theory of Jural Facts and Its Reflection in the Legal Reality]. Izbrannoe [Selection]. Comp. by E. V. Nesterova. Moscow, 2019. Pp. 72–111. (In Russ.).
26. Dolinskaya V. V. Ponyatie i klassifikatsii yuridicheskikh faktov: ocherk sistematizatsii [The Concept and Classification of Jural Facts: an Essay on Systematization]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2018. Issue 4. Pp. 91–102. (In Russ.).
27. de la Morandière L. J. Grazhdanskoe pravo Frantsii [Civil Law of France]. Transl. and prefaced by E. A. Fleyshits. Moscow, 1958. 742 p. (In Russ.).
28. Zagaynova S. K. Teoreticheskie problemy kharakteristiki sudebnykh aktov v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsessakh [Theoretical Problems of the Characteristics of Judicial Acts in Civil and Commercial Processes]. Problemnye voprosy grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessov [Problematic Issues of Civil and Commercial Processes]. Ed. by L. F. Lesnitskaya, M. A. Rozhkova. Moscow, 2008. 400 p. (In Russ.).
29. Zinchenko S. A. Yuridicheskie fakty v mekhanizme pravovogo regulirovaniya [Jural Facts in the Mechanism of Legal Regulation]. Moscow, 2007. 142 p. (In Russ.).
30. Il'ina O. Yu. Sudebnoe reshenie kak osnovanie vozniknoveniya semeynykh prav i obyazannostey [Judicial Decision as a Basis for the Emergence of Family Rights and Obligations]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2016. Issue 8. Pp. 13–17. (In Russ.).
31. Ioffe O. S. Pravootnosheniya po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu [Legal Relations under the Soviet Civil Law]. Leningrad, 1949. 144 p. (In Russ.).
32. Isakov V. B. Problemy teorii yuridicheskikh faktov: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Problems of the Theory of Jural Facts: Synopsis of Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Sverdlovsk, 1985. 27 p. (In Russ.).
33. Isakov B. V. Yuridicheskie fakty [Jural Facts]. Obshhaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava [General Theory of State and Law]. Ed. by M. N. Marchenko. In 3 vols. Moscow, 2002. Vol. 2. 608 p. (In Russ.).
34. Knieper R. Yuridicheskie fakty: vozniknovenie i upadok odnogo pravovogo instituta v nemetskom prave [Jural Facts: the Rise and Decline of Legal Institution in German Law]. Available at: http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id= 32401565#pos=3. (In Russ.).
35. Knieper R. Zakon i istoriya. O sostoyanii i izmeneniyakh Germanskogo grazhdanskogo ulozheniya [Law and History. On the State of and Changes in the German Civil Code]. Prefaced by M. K. Suleymenov. Almaty, 2005. 278 p. (In Russ.).
36. Kovalenko E. N. Sudebnoe reshenie: teoretiko-metodologicheskie i tekhniko-yuridicheskie aspekty: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Judicial Decision: Theoretical-Methodological and Technical-Legal Aspects: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Rostov-on-Don, 2009. 26 p. (In Russ.).
37. Kovalenko I. N. Sudebnye resheniya v rossiyskoy pravovoy politike [Judicial Decisions in the Russian Legal Policy]. Jurist-Pravoved. 2008. Issue 6 (31). Pp. 50–53. (In Russ.).
38. Kontseptsiya razvitiya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Concept of the Development of Civil Legislation of the Russian Federation]. Prefaced by A. L. Makovskiy. Moscow, 2009. 160 p. (In Russ.).
39. Korkunov N. M. Lektsii po obshhey teorii prava [Lectures on the General Theory of Law]. Prefaced by Doctor of Law, Professor I. Yu. Kozlikhin. St. Petersburg, 2003. 430 p. (In Russ.).
40. Krasavchikov O. A. Yuridicheskie fakty v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave [Jural Facts in Soviet Civil Law]. Moscow, 1958. 183 p. (In Russ.).
41. Kulisher A. Zashhita sub"ektivnykh publichnykh prav posredstvom iska [Protection of Public Rights by Means of a Claim]. Moscow, 1913. 48 p. (In Russ.).
42. Kutyukhin I. V. O svyazi yuridicheskogo fakta i pravootnosheniya [On the Connection of a Jural Fact and a Legal Relationship]. Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal – Leningrad Legal Journal. 2007. Issue 3. Pp. 38–41. (In Russ.).
43. Mal'ko A. V., Shundikov K. V. Tseli i sred¬stva v prave i pravovoy politike [Goals and Means in Law and Legal Policy]. Saratov, 2003. 296 p. (In Russ.).
44. Osnovnye polozheniya grazhdanskogo prava: postateynyy kommentariy k stat'yam 1-16.1 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Basic Provisions of Civil Law: Article-by-Article Commentary on Articles 1-16.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation]. A. V. Asoskov, V. V. Baybak, R. S. Bevzenko et al.; ed. by A. G. Karapetov. Moscow, 2020. 1469 p. (In Russ.).
45. Podval'nyy I. O. Sudebnoe reshenie: ot teorii voprosa k arbitrazhnoy praktike [Judicial Decision: from the Theory of the Issue to Commercial Practice]. Arbitrazhnye spory – Commercial Disputes. 2005. Issue 3 (31). Pp. 145–161. (In Russ.).
46. Postateynyy kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chasti pervoy [Article-by-Article Commentary on the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Part One]. Ed. by P. V. Krasheninnikov]. Moscow, 2011. 1326 p. (In Russ.).
47. Protasov V. N. Obshhaya teoriya protsessual'nogo prava: uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov [General Theory of Procedural Law: Textbook for Universities]. Moscow, 2020. 186 p. (In Russ.).
48. Rakitov A. I. Problemy logiki nauchnogo poznaniya [Problems of the Logic of Scientific Knowledge]. Moscow, 1964. 410 p. (In Russ.).
49. Rafikova Z. L. Znachenie sistemy yuridicheskikh faktov v grazhdanskom prave [The Significance of the System of Jural Facts in Civil Law]. Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava – Actual Problems of Economics and Law. 2014. Issue 1. Pp. 219–225. (In Russ.).
50. Rozhkova M. A. Ponyatie sudebnogo resheniya v kontekste stat'i 8 GK RF [The Concept of Judicial Decision in the Context of Article 8 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation]. Khozyaystvo i pravo – Business and Law. 2002. Issue 6. Pp. 53–64. (In Russ.).
51. Rozhkova M. A. Yuridicheskie fakty v grazhdanskom prave [Jural Facts in Civil Law]. Prilozhenie k ezhemesyachnomu zhurnalu "Khozyaystvo i pravo" – Appendix to the Monthly Magazine 'Business and Law'. 2006. Issue 7. 78 p. (In Russ.).
52. Rozhkova M. A. Teorii yuridicheskikh faktov grazhdanskogo i protsessual'nogo prava: ponyatiya, klassifikatsii, osnovy vzaimodeystviya: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Theories of Jural Facts of Civil and Procedural Law: Concepts, Classifications, Bases of Interaction: Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2010. 418 p. (In Russ.).
53. Ryzhenkov V. Ya. Yuridicheskie fakty kak mezhotraslevaya kategoriya [Jural Facts as an Intersectoral Category]. Sovremennoe pravo – Modern Law. 2020. Issue 2. Pp. 5–9. (In Russ.).
54. Sinyukov V. N. Yuridicheskie fakty v sisteme obshhestvennogo otnosheniya: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Jural Facts in the System of Public Relations: Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Sverdlovsk, 1984. 225 p. (In Russ.).
55. Sklizkov M. N. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie osnovy issledovaniya sushhnosti sudebnogo resheniya kak yuridicheskogo fakta v grazhdanskom prave [Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of the Study of the Essence of a Judicial Decision as a Jural Fact in Civil Law]. Pravo i politika – Law and Politics. 2012. Issue 11. Pp. 1893–1906. (In Russ.).
56. Sklizkov M. N. O metodologii issledovaniya sudebnogo resheniya v roli yuridicheskogo fakta grazhdanskogo prava [On the Methodology of Studying Judicial Decision as a Jural Fact of Civil Law]. Sovremennaya nauka: aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya: Ekonomika i pravo – Modern Science: Actual Problems of Theory and Practice. Series: Economics and Law. 2020. Issue 3. Pp. 202–207. (In Russ.).
57. Tikhon'kova N. V. Problemy sudebnogo resheniya kak yuridicheskogo fakta: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Problems of Judicial Decision as a Jural Fact: Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Saratov, 2000. 155 p. (In Russ.).
58. Flume V. Obshhaya chast' grazhdanskogo prava. 3 izd. [The General Part of Civil Law. 3rd ed.]. 1979. (In Russ.).
59. Khorunzhiy S. N. Reshenie suda v teorii yuridicheskikh faktov kak osnovanie vozniknoveniya, izmeneniya i prekrashheniya grazhdanskikh prav i obyazannostey [Judicial Decision in the Theory of Jural Facts as the Basis for the Emergence, Modification and Termination of Civil Rights and Obligations]. Gosudarstvo i pravo – State and Law. 2008. Issue 7. Pp. 39–47. (In Russ.).
60. Tsukanova E. Yu. Znachenie yuridicheskikh faktov v sisteme pravovogo regulirovaniya [The Value of Jural Facts in the System of legal Regulation]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Pravo – Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2019. Issue 1. Pp. 39–51. (In Russ.).
61. Chelyshev M. Yu. Kontseptsiya optimizatsii mezhotraslevykh svyazey grazhdanskogo prava: postanovka problemy [The Concept of Optimization of Interbranch Relations of Civil Law: Problem Statement]. Kazan, 2006. 160 p. (In Russ.).
62. Cherdantsev A. F. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik dlya vuzov [Theory of State and Law: Textbook for Universities]. Moscow, 1999. 432 p. (In Russ.).
63. Yarkov V.V. Yuridicheskie fakty v mekhanizme realizatsii norm grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Jural Facts in the Mechanism of Implementation of the Norms of Civil Procedural Law: Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Ekaterinburg, 1992. 523 p. (In Russ.).
64. Yarkov V. V. Yuridicheskie fakty v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Jural Facts in the Civil Process]. Moscow, 2012. 608 p. (In Russ.).
65. Yarkov V. V. Sootnoshenie obyazatel'nosti i ispolnimosti sudebnykh aktov [Relation Between the Binding Nature and Enforceability of Judicial Acts]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal – Russian Juridical Journal. 2018. Issue 5. Pp. 85–91. (In Russ.).
66. Yachmenev Yu. V. Doktrina yuridicheskikh faktov: problemy otraslevogo (tsivilisticheskogo) podkhoda [The Doctrine of Jural Facts: Problems of the Branch-Specific (Civil Law) Approach]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2012. Issue 1 (53). Pp. 75–80. (In Russ.).
67. Yuridicheskie fakty i ikh vliyanie na otraslevye instituty prava: problemy i napravleniya razvitiya. Monografiya [Jural Facts and Their Impact on the Branch-Specific Institutions of Law: Problems and Directions of Development. Monograph]. Ed. by V. N. Sinyukov, M. A. Egorov. Moscow, 2020. 536 p. (In Russ.).
68. Bartin E. Le Jugement Étranger Considéré Comme un Fait. Journal du Droit International. 1924. Issue 51 (4). Pp. 860–861. (In Fr.).
69. von Hippel F. Zur Gesetzmäßigkeit juristischer Systembildung. Berlin, 1930. 39 р. (In Germ.).
Received: 13.11.2020
Financing: ---
The Perm State University
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing

The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year