Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2019. Issue 3 (45)


K. A. Ponomarevа, Dostoevsky Omsk State University

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-2951-3067
ResearcherID: N-7562-2016
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»:       ---
Requisites: Ponomareva K. A. Pravovoe regulirovanie bor'by so zloupotrebitel'nymi nalogovymi praktikami v Evropeyskom Soyuze i Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Legal Regulation of Combating Abusive Tax Practices in the European Union and the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2019. Issue 45. Pp. 418–441. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-45-418-441
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-45-418-441


Introduction: the article is the result of research on the implementation of measures aimed at combating tax base erosion and profit shifting in the European Union (hereinafter – the EU). It is the first work in the Russian language to present a detailed analysis of the EU Council Directive 2016/1164, laying down rules for combating tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market. The fundamental importance of the study is determined by the focus on a comprehensive analysis of the legal support for tax security of the state in the context of international economic integration through the example of the European Union and its Member States, as well as the Russian Federation. Purpose: based on comparative legal research, to reveal the features of legal regulation of the fight against abusive tax practices in the EU and the Russian Federation, as well as to identify possible areas of focus and ways to improve Russian tax legislation. Methods: methods of analysis and synthesis, the principle of unity of theory and practice; principles of objectivity, comprehensiveness and complexity of research; the principle of interdisciplinary research, formal legal method, comparative legal analysis, historical method, statistical method. Results: identification of tax threats accompanying international economic integration and improvement of measures to combat tax abuse, taking into account the experience of supranational associations and current trends in cross-border taxation. Conclusions: there have been identified different objectives underlying the introduction of anti-avoidance measures in the EU and the Russian Federation: by introducing these measures, the EU aims to prevent fragmentation of the internal market, as well as to ensure compatibility with the law of the Union and legal certainty, while the Russian Federation seeks deoffshorization of the economy and intends to tackle the challenges associated with the tax base erosion and tax evasion.

Keywords: tax law; tax base erosion and profit shifting; European Union; BEPS Action Plan; OECD;
tax avoidance; Directive; integration; corporate taxation
  download the full-version article
References: 1. Ayrapetyan L. K. Prakticheskie problemy vypolneniya rekomendatsiy Mery 2 Plana po bor'be s BEPS po izmeneniyu lokal'nogo zakonodatel'stva [Practical Issues of Implementation of the Recommendations of Measure 2 for Local Law Amendments to the BEPS Countering Plan]. Nalogi – Taxes. 2018. Issue 2. Pp. 35–41. (In Russ.).
2. Arakelov S. A. Antiuklonitel'nye normy v mezhdunarodnoy praktike. Novye zakonodatel'nye instrumenty po bor'be protiv ukloneniya ot uplaty nalogov v Rossii [Anti-Avoidance Rules in International Practice. New Legislative Techniques for Countering Tax Avoidance in Russia]. Zakon – ZAKON. 2018. Issue 5. Pp. 109–115. (In Russ.).
3. Vinnitskiy D. V. Dobrosovestnost', obosnovannost' vygody, predely osushchestvleniya prav, ili Kak rossiyskoe nalogovoe pravo okazalos' na peredovykh rubezhakh bor'by so zlom, gnezdyashchimsya v nalogoplatel'shchikakh [Integrity, Justified Benefit, Scope of Exercise of Rights, or How Russia's Tax Law Moved to the Forefront of the Fight against Taxpayers' Vices]. Zakon – ZAKON. 2018. Issue 11. Pp. 44–57. (In Russ.).
4. Vinnitskiy D. V. Mezhdunarodnoe nalogovoe pravo: problemy teorii i praktiki [International Tax Law: Problems of Theory and Practice]. Moscow, 2017. 463 p. (In Russ.).
5. Vladimirova T. V., Ambrasovskaya A. A. O primenenii pravil nedostatochnoy kapitalizatsii k zaymam mezhdu rossiyskimi kompaniyami [On the Use of Thin Capitalization Rules for Loans between Russian Companies]. Nalogoved. 2016. Issue 5. Pp. 30–41. (In Russ.).
6. Demin A. V., Nikolaev A. V. Doktrina benefitsiarnoy sobstvennosti v kontekste BEPS: novye gorizonty [The Doctrine of Beneficial Ownership in the Context of BEPS: the New Horizons]. Zakon – ZAKON. 2018. Issue 8. Pp. 102–113. (In Russ.).
7. Ovsyannikov S. V. Rossiyskie pravila tonkoy kapitalizatsii: vosstanovlenie v pravakh ili impul's k razvitiyu? Kommentariy k Postanovleniyu Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 15 noyabrya 2011 goda № 8654/11 [Russian Rules of Thin Capitalization: theRestoration of Rights or Impulse for Development? Commentary on the Ruling of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation of November 15, 2011. № 8654/11]. Vestnik VAS RF – Herald of the Supreme Arbitrazh Court of the Russian Federation. 2012. Issue 5. Pp. 48–62. (In Russ.).
8. Ponomareva K. A. Paket mer ES po bor'be s ukloneniem ot nalogooblozheniya: osnovnye polozheniya i sootnoshenie s Planom BEPS [The EU's Anti Tax Avoidance Package: the Main Provisions and Correlation with BEPS Action Plan]. Nalogoved. 2016. Issue 11. Pp. 76–87. (In Russ.).
9. Ponomareva K. A. Pravovoe regulirovanie nalogooblozheniya pribyli i dokhodov v Evropeyskom soyuze, Evraziyskom ekonomicheskom soyuze i Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Legal Regulation of Taxation of Profit and Income in the European Union, in the Eurasian Economic Union and in the Russian Federation]. Moscow, 2017. 176 p. (In Russ.).
10. Ponomareva K. A. Printsipy subsidiarnosti i proportsional'nosti v nalogovom pravoprimenenii [Principles of Subsidiarity and Proportionality in Tax Law Enforcement]. Pravoprimenenie – Law Enforcement Review. 2017. Vol. 1. Issue 3. Pp. 71–81. (In Russ.).
11. Ponomareva K. A. Spravedlivoe i effektivnoe nalogooblozhenie korporatsiy v ES: Plan deystviy [Fair and Efficient Taxation of Corporations in the EU]. Nalogoved. 2015. Issue 11. Pp. 81–87. (In Russ.).
12. Semenov S. A., Artyukh A. A. Prezidium Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii utverdil Obzor praktiki po TTsO i tonkoy kapitalizatsii. Kommentarii ot TAXOLOGY [Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation Signed the Review of Practice on Transfer Pricing and Thin Capitalization. Taxology Review]. 2017. Access from the legal reference system 'Consultant Plus'. (In Russ.).
13. Sokrashchat' raskhody, vidimo, pridetsya [The Expenses Should be Obviously Cut Down]. Vedomosti. 12.01.2015. Issue 3747. (In Russ.).
14. Starzhenetskaya L. N. Pravovoe regulirovanie nalogooblozheniya kontroliruemykh inostrannykh kompaniy: opyt zarubezhnykh stran i Rossii: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Legal Regulation of Taxation of Controlled Foreign Companies: the Experience of Foreign Countries and Russia: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2016. 225 p. (In Russ.).
15. De Broe L. International Tax Planning and Prevention of Abuse: A Study under Domestic Tax Law, Tax Treaties, and EC Law in Relation to Conduit and Base Companies. Amsterdam, 2007. Available at: files/con-tent/pdf/Doc14_chapter.pdf (accessed 05.05.2019). (In Eng.).
16. De Broe L., Beckers D. The General Anti-Abuse Rule of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive: An Analysis against the Wider Perspective of the European Court of Justice's Case Law on Abuse of EU Law. 26 EC Tax Review. 2017. Issue 3. Pp. 131–144. (In Eng.).
17. Douma S. Optimization of Tax Sovereignty and Free Movement. Amsterdam: IBFD Doctoral Series, 2011. (In Eng.).
18. Dourado A. P. The Interest Limitation Rule in the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) and the Net Taxation Principle. EC Tax Review (2017) 26. Issue 3. Pp. 112–121. (In Eng.).
19. Ginevra G. The EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive* and the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action Plan: Necessity and Adequacy of the Measures at EU Level. EC Tax Review. 2017. Vol. 45. Issue 2. (In Eng.).
20. Helminen М. EU Tax Law: Direct Taxation. IBFD, 2018. 564 p. (In Eng.).
21. Horizontal Tax Coordination; ed. by M. Lang, P. Pistone, J. Schluch, C. Staringer. IBFD, 2012. Р. 128. (In Eng.).
22. Kube H., Reimer E., Spengel C. Tax Policy: Trends in the Allocation of Powers between the Union and Its Member States. EC Tax Review. 25 (2016). Issue 5/6. Pp. 247–261. (In Eng.).
23. Knobbe-Keuk В. Restrictions on the Fundamental Freedoms Enshrined in the EC Treaty by Discriminatory Tax Provisions – Ban and Justification. EC Tax Review. 1994. Vol. 3. Pp. 74–85. (In Eng.).
24. Knoller C.-P. The Efficiency of Thin Capitalization Rules and Their Barriers: An Analysis from the UK and German Perspective. Intertax. 2011. Vol. 39. Issue 6/7. Kluwer Law International. Pp. 317–336. (In Eng.).
25. Krumm M. Constitutional Rights as Principles: On the Structure and Domain of Constitutional Justice, a Review Essay on a Theory of Constitutional Rights, by Robert Alexy. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2004. Vol. 2. Issue 3. Pp. 574–596. (In Eng.).
26. Lang M. Cadburry Schweppes' Line of Case Law from the Member States' Perspective. Prohibition of Abuse of Law: a New General Principle of EU Law? Ed. by R. de la Feria, S. Vogenauer. Hart Publishing, 2011. (In Eng.).
27. Lang M. Die Rechtsprechung des EuGH zu den direkten Steuern. Frankfurt: Verlag Peter Lang GmbH, 2007. (In Germ.).
28. Malherbe J., Malherbe P., Richelle I., Traversa E. Direct Taxation in the Case-Law of the European Court of Justice. Brussels, Larcier, 2008. (In Eng.).
29. Navarro A., Parada L., Schwarz P. The Proposal for an EU Anti-avoidance Directive: Some Preliminary Thoughts. EC Tax Review. 2016. Issue 3. Pp. 117–131. (In Eng.).
30. Schön W. Debt and Equity in Domestic and International Tax Law – A Comparative Policy Analysis. British Tax Review. 2014. Issue 2. Pp. 146–217. (In Eng.).
31. Schön W. Vom steuerlichen Binnenmarkt zum Europa der Finanzämter, in: W. Schön, D. Klein, M. Kerber, M. Ruf, T. Kroh, K. Finke, C. Spengel, A. Oestreicher. EU-Aktionsplan zur Unternehmensbesteuerung: Ein Weg zu größerer Fairness und Effizienz in der Steuerpolitik? ifo Schnelldienst 68 (15). 2015. Pp. 3–21. (In Germ.).
32. Van Arkiel F. Will the New Hybrid Mismatch Legislation Solve Everything? About Implementing Article 9 of the Anti-Avoidance Directive Regarding Hybrid Entity Mismatches into Dutch Law. Master Thesis International Business Taxation. Tilburg School of Law, Tilburg University, 2017. (In Eng.).
33. Zernova D. Exit Taxes on Companies in the Context of the EU Internal Market. Intertax. 2011. Vol. 39. Issue 10. Kluwer Law International BV, The Netherlands. Pp. 471–493. (In Eng.).
Received: 21.05.2019
Financing: ---




The Perm State University
614990, Perm, street Bukireva, 15
+7 (342) 2 396 275
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing

The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year