Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2018. Issue 3 (41) |
||||||||||
Title: | CONSTITUTIONAL DESIGN (ON THE BEAUTY AND AESTHETICS OF CONSTITUTIONS) |
|||||||||
Authors: |
I. N. Bartsits,Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA) |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
|
||||||||
ORCID: | 0000-0002-1173-9068 |
ResearcherID: | D-8179-2017 |
|||||||
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
Requisites: | Bartsits I. N. Konstitutsionnyy dizayn (o krasote i estetike konstitutsiy) [Constitutional Design (on the Beauty and Aesthetics of Constitutions)]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Juridicheskie Nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2018. Issue 41. Pp. 344–370. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2018-41-344-370 |
|||||||||
DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2018-41-344-370 |
|||||||||
Annotation: |
Introduction: this article aims to comprehend, explore and describe Constitutional Design as a phenomenon of constitutional theory and practice in terms of its usage as a criterion for assessing the aesthetics, beauty and topology of constitutions, as well as the tools of legal linguistics and legal writing. Analyzing different points of view on this matter, the author makes conclusions not only with regard to the usefulness of the concept of Constitutional Design in constitutional and legal practice, text structuring, articulation and prioritization of specific constitutional content but also concerning the features of Constitutional Design – its nature, roots and sources, constitutional customs and traditions of different countries throughout their history and statehood development. The author pays special attention to the evolution of constitutional design as such, constitutional and legal thought, their dependence on profound changes in the course of development of the society, law, and culture. Purpose: to develop a thorough understanding of constitutional design, its content, and applicability to the constitutional theory based on the analysis of scientific sources, practice of constitution-drafting and modeling, texts of constitutions, and other constitutional and legal provisions. Methods: in the course of this empirical study, the author uses methods of comparative analysis, classifies and interprets historical data, and uses a system approach to draw conclusions regarding the importance of Constitutional Design in constitutional theory and practice. Results: it has been proven that in the constitution-making process every society relies upon various techniques and principles of Constitutional Design, peculiar to it or borrowed. However, Constitutional Design structures are not rigid, their content is subject to continuous rethinking and amendment. Substantiating the importance of Constitutional Design to the state and society, the author develops a set of criteria for the analysis of Constitutional Design, in particular its dependence on political and cultural values of the state and society, the need to establish linkages between political views, ideas, political culture, government and social institutions, to develop an institutional framework conducive to the attainment of social welfare goals, etc. Conclusions: comparative legal analysis of different countries’ constitutional texts has revealed both significant differences between constitutional concepts and borrowings of various approaches and even wordings by constitution designers – i. e. migration of constitutional ideas. At the same time, Constitutional Design is an attribute and integral part of constitutionalism. Therefore, developing ways to gain a better understanding of this process facilitates clearer expression of the constitutional and legal thought, underpins the legal beauty and aesthetics of the structure of law, helps to reflect the people’s historical experience and current status of the state, to present the vision by the state of its future development. |
|||||||||
Keywords: | constitution; constitutional design; parliamentarianism; institutional design; democracy; society |
|||||||||
download the full-version article | ||||||||||
References: | 1. Anakhin T. V. Institutsional'nyy dizayn Rossii: evolyutsiya obshchestvennoy sistemy i sotsial'¬naya transformatsiya [Issues of Russia's Institutional Design: Evolution of Public Sys¬tem and Social Transformation]. Vestnik Bu¬ryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – The Buryat State University Bulletin. 2013. Issue 6. Pp. 129–133. (In Russ.). 2. Bol'shoy tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka / Sost. i gl. red. S. A. Kuznetsov [Large Expla-natory Dictionary of the Russian Language; ed. by S. A. Kuznetsov]. Institute for Linguistic Studies, RAS. St. Petersburg, 2000. 1536 p. (In Russ.). 3. Borisov N. A. Institutsional'nyy dizayn gosu-darstv tsentral'noy Azii v protsesse transfor-matsii politicheskikh rezhimov: sluchai Uzbe¬kistana i Kyrgyzstana [Institutional Design of the Central Asian States in the Transformation Process of Political Regimes: the Cases of Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan]. Politicheskaya nauka – Political Science. 2014. Issue 1. Pp. 159–180. (In Russ.). 4. Brodsky I. Forma vremeni. V 2 t. [The Shape of Time. In 2 vols.]. Minsk, 1992. 480 p. (In Russ.). 5. Voevodin L. D., Zlatopol'skiy D. L., Kup-rits N. Ya. Gosudarstvennoe pravo stran na-rodnoy demokratii [Public Law of the Coun-tries of People's Democracy]. Moscow, 1960. 631 p. (In Russ.). 6. Glazychev L. O dizayne. Ocherki po teorii i praktike dizayna na Zapade [On Design. Essays on the Theory and Practice of Design in the West]. Moscow, 1970. 108 p. (In Russ.). 7. Golosov G. V., Liechtenstein A. V. "Partii vlas¬ti" i rossiyskiy institutsional'nyy dizayn: teore¬ticheskiy analiz [The "Parties of Power" and the Russian Institutional Design: Theoretical Ana¬lysis]. Polis – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. Issue 1. Pp. 6–15. (In Russ.). 8. Gudoshnikov L. M. et al. Gosudarstvennoe pravo stran narodnoy demokratii [Public Law of the Countries of People's Democracy]. Moscow, 1961. 572 p. (In Russ.). 9. Gureeva N. P. Nekotorye voprosy razvitiya konstitutsionalizma v Mongolii [Some Ques-tions of Constitutionalism-Development in Mongolia]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta – MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2011. Issue 5. Pp. 182–188. (In Russ.). 10. Dnevnik Smirnovoy-Sazonovoy S. I. Yanvar'-sentyabr' 1906 g. [Diary of S.I. Smirnova-Sazonova. January-September 1906]. Manu¬script Department of the Institute of Russian Literature, Russian Academy of Sciences. Fund 285. Inventory 1. File 48. (In Russ.). 11. Durdenevskiy V. N. Poslevoennye konstitutsii Zapada [Post-War Constitutions of the West]. Leningrad. Issue 1. 1924. 136 p. (In Russ.). 12. Egorova T. V. Slovar' inostrannykh slov sovre¬mennogo russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of Fo¬reign Words of the Modern Russian Language]. Moscow, 2014. 800 p. (In Russ.). 13. Il'inskiy I. P., Shchetinin B. V. Gosudarstvennoe pravo stran narodnoy demokratii [Public Law of the Countries of People's Democracy]. Moscow, 1964. 355 p. (In Russ.). 14. Konstitutsiya v XXI veke: sravnitel'no-pravo-voe issledovanie; otv. red. V. E. Chirkin [Con¬stitution in the 21st Century: Comparative Legal Study; ed. by V. E. Chirkin]. Moscow, 2011. 656 p. (In Russ.). 15. Konstitutsionnoe pravo sotsialisticheskikh stran [Constitutional Law of Socialist Countries]. Moscow, 1963. 327 p. (In Russ.). 16. Krasnov M. A. Postsovetskie gosudarstva: est' li zavisimost' politicheskogo rezhima ot konsti¬tutsionnogo dizayna? [Post-Soviet States: Does a Political Regime Depend on the Constitu¬tional Design?]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie – Comparative Constitutional Re¬view. 2014. Issue 2(99). Pp. 29–45. (In Russ.). 17. Kuritsyn V. M., Shalyagin D. D. Opyt stanovle¬niya konstitutsionalizma v SShA, Yaponii i Sovetskoy Rossii [Experience in the Formation of Constitutionalism in the United States of America, Japan and Soviet Russia]. Moscow, 2004. 496 p. (In Russ.). 18. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem: Per. s angl.; pod red. i s predisl. A. N. Baranova [Metaphors We Live By; transl. from Eng.; ed. by A. N. Baranov]. Moscow, 2004. Pp. 25–43. (In Russ.). 19. Lassalle F. O sushchnosti konstitutsii. Rech', proiznesennaya v odnom berlinskom byurger¬skom okruzhnom sobranii v 1862 godu [On the Essence of the Constitution. Speech Delivered in a Berlin Burgher District Meeting in 1862]. St. Petersburg, 1906. 64 p. (In Russ.). 20. Laffont J.-J. Stimuly i politekonomiya [Incen-tives and Political Economy]. Moscow, 2008. 311 p. (In Russ.). 21. Makartsev A. A. Vsenarodnoe obsuzhdenie pro¬ekta Konstitutsii SSSR 1936 goda kak etap legitimatsii stalinskogo zakonodatel'stva [Pub¬lic Discussion of the Draft Constitution of the USSR of 1936 as a Stage of Legitimation of Stalin Legislation]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo go¬sudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya "Pravo" – Vestnik of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Law. 2006. Vol. 2. Issue 2. Pp. 28–38. (In Russ.). 22. Mau V. A. Ekonomika i vlast': opyt postkom-munisticheskoy transformatsii. Ekonomiches-kaya reforma: skvoz' prizmu konstitutsii i politiki [Economy and Power: the Experience of Post-Communist Transformation. Economic Reform: Through the Prism of the Constitution and Politics]. Moscow, 2017. 352 p. (In Russ.). 23. Medushevskiy A. N. Kak Stalinu udalos' obma¬nut' Zapad: prinyatie Konstitutsii 1936 goda s pozitsiy politicheskogo piara [How Stalin Deceived the West: the Adoption of 1936 Soviet Constitution as Political PR-action]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' – Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 2016. Issue 3. Pp. 122–138. (In Russ.). 24. Medushevskiy A. N. Eksport konstitutsiona-lizma: amerikanskaya model' v Yaponii i Germanii [Export of Constitutionalism: Ame¬rican Model in Japan and Germany]. Kosmo¬polis – Cosmopolis. 2006. Issue 1. Pp. 134–147. (In Russ.). 25. Mishin A. A. Konstitutsionnoe (gosudarstven¬noe) pravo zarubezhnykh stran [Constitutional (State) Law of Foreign Countries]. Moscow, 2013. 520 p. (In Russ.). 26. Mukhametov R. S. Regional'nyy politicheskiy rezhim: institutsional'nyy dizayn (na primere Sverdlovskoy oblasti) [Regional Political Regime: Institutional Design (a Case Study of the Sverdlovsk Region)]. Diskurs-Pi – Dis¬course-P. 2015. Issue 1. Pp. 134–137. (In Russ.). 27. Nikonov V. Konstitutsionnyy dizayn [Constitu¬tional Design]. Sovremennaya rossiyskaya po¬litika: Kurs lektsiy [Contemporary Russian Politics: Course of Lectures]. Moscow, 2007. 418 p. (In Russ.). 28. Parkinson C. N. Zakony Parkinsona: Sbornik: Per. s angl.; Sost. i avt. predisl. V. S. Murav'ev [Parkinson's Law: Collection; transl. from Eng.; ed. by V. S. Murav'ev]. Moscow, 1989. 448 p. (In Russ.). 29. Patrikeeva O. A. Vtoroe rozhdenie Tavriches¬kogo: perestroyka pomeshcheniya dvortsa dlya raboty Gosudarstvennoy dumy Rossiyskoy imperii [The Rebirth of the Tauride Palace: Reconstruction of Premises of the Palace for the State Duma of the Russian Empire]. Noveyshaya istoriya Rossii – Modern History of Russia. 2016. Issue 2. Pp. 95–107. (In Russ.). 30. Petrukhina M. A. Konstitutsionnyy dizayn i konsolidatsiya demokratii v stranakh tret'yey volny demokratizatsii [Constitutional Design and Democracy Consolidation in Countries of Third Wave Democratization]. Politicheskaya nauka – Political Science. 2012. Issue 3. Pp. 214–247. (In Russ.). 31. Pogulich O. V. Institutsional'nyy dizayn anti-korruptsionnoy politiki v sub"ektakh baykal'¬skogo regiona Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Institu¬tional Design of the Anticorruption Policy in the Subjects of the Baikal Region of the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2015. Issue 2(62). Vol. 2. Pp. 81–84. (In Russ.). 32. Ponkin I. V. Gomeostaz sistemy gosudarstven¬nogo upravleniya [Homeostasis of the Public Administration System]. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba – Public Administration. 2018. No. 3. Pp. 18–22. (In Russ.). 33. Populyarnaya khudozhestvennaya entsiklope¬diya. Pod red. V. M. Polevogo [Popular Art Encyclopedia; ed. by V. M. Polevoy]. Moscow, 1986. 447 p. (In Russ.). 34. Poroshin A. V. Vliyanie konstitutsionnogo di-zayna na ustoychivost' odnopartiynogo domini¬rovaniya [Influence of the Constitutional Design on Longevity of Single-Party Domi¬nance]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Politologiya – Review of Political Science. 2017. Issue 1. Pp. 87–97. (In Russ.). 35. Ronin S. L. Istoriya razrabotki, utverzhdeniya i razvitiya stalinskoy konstitutsii [The History of the Drafting, Approval and Development of the Stalin Constitution]. Moscow, 1951. 143 p. (In Russ.). 36. Sapronova M. A. Arabskiy Vostok: vlast' i kon¬stitutsii [The Arab East: Power and Consti¬tutions]. Moscow, 2001. 216 p. (In Russ.). 37. Slovar' inostrannykh slov. 18-e izd., ster. [Dictionary of Foreign Words; 18th ed., stereotype]. Moscow, 1989. 624 p. (In Russ.). 38. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe pravo. Ucheb¬noe posobie. Otv red. V. E. Chirkin [Com¬parative Constitutional Law: Textbook; ed. by V. E. Chirkin]. Moscow, 2002. 448 p. (In Russ.). 39. Stepanov D. I. Ideologicheskaya neytral'nost' institutov konstitutsionnogo dizayna [Ideologi¬cal Neutrality of Constitutional Design Ins¬titutions]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obo¬zrenie – Comparative Constitutional Review. 2017. Issue 3 (118). Pp. 46–70. (In Russ.). 40. Suslov E. V. Institutsional'nyy dizayn kak faktor institutsionalizatsii politicheskikh konfliktov (na primere Estonskoy Respubliki) [Institutional Design as a Factor of Institutionalisation of Political Conflicts (the Republic of Estonia Case Study)]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki – Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki. 2012. Vol. 154. Issue 1. Pp. 246–253. (In Russ.). 41. Tertyshnyy S. A. Institutsional'nyy dizayn mo¬dernizatsii rossiyskoy ekonomiki i obshchestva [Institutional Design of Modernization In Russian Economy and Society]. Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki – Problems of Modern Economics. 2013. Issue 3(47). Pp. 36–41; Issue 4(48). Pp. 72–76. (In Russ.). 42. Feuchtwanger L. Moskva 1937. Otchet o po-ezdke dlya moikh druzey / per. s nem. [Moscow, 1937. The Trip Report for My Friends; transl. from Germ.]. Moscow, 1937. 160 p. (In Russ.). 43. Frankenberg G. Sravnitel'nyy konstitutsionnyy dizayn. Per. s angl. D. Shustrova [Comparative Constitutional Design; transl. from Eng. by D. Shustrov]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie – Comparative Constitutional Re¬view. 2013. Issue 5. Pp. 152–158. (In Russ.). 44. Khabrieva T. Ya., Chirkin V. E. Teoriya sovre¬mennoy konstitutsii [The Theory of the Modern Constitution]. Moscow, 2005. 319 p. (In Russ.). 45. Hans-Adam II, Prince of Liechtenstein. Gosu¬darstvo v tret'yem tysyacheletii / per. s angl. A. B. Mukhametshin [The State in the Third Millennium; transl. from Eng. by A. B. Mukha¬metshin]. Moscow, 2012. 314 p. (In Russ.). 46. Shakhray S. M. O Konstitutsii: Osnovnoy zakon kak instrument pravovykh i sotsial'no-politi¬cheskikh preobrazovaniy [On the Constitution: Basic Law as an Instrument for Legal and Socio-Political Reforms]. Moscow, 2013. 919 p. (In Russ.). 47. Schneider E. Politicheskaya sistema Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Per. s nem. [Political System of the Russian Federation; transl. from Germ.]. Mos¬cow, 2002. 264 p. (In Russ.). 48. Yudin Yu. A. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe pravo: uchebnoe posobie. Otv. red. V. E. Chir¬kin [Comparative Constitutional Law: Text¬book; ed. by V. E. Chirkin.]. Moscow, 2002. 446 p. (In Russ.). 49. Buchanan J. M., Tullock G. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michi¬gan Press, 1962. 361 p. (In Eng.) 50. Congleton R. D., Swedenborg B. Introduction: Rational Choice, Politics, and Political Insti¬tutions: Toward a Science of Constitutional Design. Democratic Constitutional Design and Public Policy: Analysis and Evidence; ed. by R. D. Congleton, B. Swedenborg. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006. Pp. 408–435. (In Eng.). 51. Constitutional Design for Divided Societies: Integration or Accommodation?; ed. by S. Choudry. Oxford; New York: Oxford Uni¬versity Press, 2008. 474 p. (In Eng.). 52. Dougherty K. L., Edward J. The Calculus of Consent and Constitutional Design. New York: Springer, 2011. 117 p. (In Eng.). 53. Duverger M. Echec au roi. Paris: Michel, 1978. 21 p. (In French). 54. Elazar D. J. The Principles and Traditions Underlying State Constitutions. Publius. 1982. Vol. 12. Issue 1. Pр. 11–25. (In Eng.). 55. Elster J., Offe C., Preuss U. K. Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies. Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. New York: Cambridge Uni¬versity Press, 1998. 350 p. (In Eng.). 56. Frankenberg G. Order from Transfer: Com-parative Constitutional Design and Legal Cul¬ture. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 2013. 366 p. (In Eng.). 57. Frankenberg G., Tom Ginsburg (ed.). Compa¬rative Constitutional Design. Cambridge Uni¬versity Press, 2012. 393 p. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2013. Vol. 11. No. 2. Рp. 537–542. (In Eng.). 58. Gelard Р. Les specifics constitutionnelles Russes. L'etat et le droit d'est en ouest. Melanges offerts au professeur Michel Lesage. 2006. 397 p. (In French). 59. Ginsburg T. Comparative Constitutional De-sign. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge Uni-versity Press, 2012. Pp. xi, 393 p. (In Eng.). 60. Ginsburg T., Huq A. Assessing Constitutional Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016. 442 p. (In Eng.). 61. Ginsburg T. Introduction. Comparative Constitutional Design; ed. by T. Ginsburg. Cambridge University Press, 2012. 393 p. (In Eng.). 62. Horowitz D. L. Constitutional Design: Proposals Versus Processes. The Architecture of Demo¬cracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Manage¬ment, and Democracy; ed. by A. Reynolds. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. 507 p. (In Eng.). 63. Laffont J.-J. Political Economy, Information and Incentives. European Economic Review. 1999. Vol. 43. Pp. 649–669. (In Eng.). 64. Lijphart A. Constitutional Design for Divided Societies. Journal of Democracy. 2004.Vol. 15. No. 2. Pp. 96–109. (In Eng.). 65. Louis M. Imbeau, Steve Jacob. Behind a Veil of Ignorance? Power and Uncertainty in Con¬stitutional Design. Springer International Publi¬shing. Studies in Public Choice. 2015. Vol. 32. 243 p. (In Eng.). 66. Lutz D. S. Principles of Constitutional Design. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 261 p. (In Eng.). 67. Pitkin H. F. The Idea of a Constitution. Journal of Legal Education. 1987. Pp. 167–169. (In Eng.). 68. Przeworski A. Minimalist Conception of Demo¬cracy: A Defense. The Democracy Sourcebook; ed. by R. Dahl, I. Shapiro, J. A. Cheibub. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Tech¬nology, 2003. 556 p. (In Eng.). 69. Ro Joseph Barton Starr. The United States Constitution: Its Birth, Growth and Influence in Asia. Hong Kong University Press, 1988. 322 p. (In Eng.). 70. Sartori Giovanni. Comparative Constitutional Engineering. An Inquiry into Structures, Incen¬tives and Outcomes. Macmillan Press LTD. 1994. 231 p. (In Eng.). 71. Shugart M. S., Carey J. M. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Elec-toral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge Univer¬sity Press, 1992. 332 p. (In Eng.). 72. Simeon R. Constitutional Design and Change in Federal Systems: Issues and Questions. The Journal of Federalism. 2009. Vol. 39. Issue 2. Pp. 241–261. (In Eng.). 73. Tom Ginsburg (ed.). Comparative Constitu-tional Design. Cambridge University Press, 2012. 406 p. (In Eng.). |
|||||||||
Received: | 01.02.2018 | |||||||||
Financing: | --- |