Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2018. Issue 2 (40) |
||||||||||
Title: | JUS COGENS: THE HISTORICAL ASPECT AND CONTEMPORARY VALUE FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW |
|||||||||
Authors: |
I. I. Sinyakin, MGIMO University |
ilc48@mail.ru | ||||||||
ORCID: | 0000-0002-8899-4219 | ResearcherID: | O-3227-2018 | |||||||
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
A. Yu. Skuratova, MGIMO University |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | |||||||||
ORCID: | 0000-0001-8513-8719 |
ResearcherID: | U-7329-2017 |
|||||||
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
Requisites: | Sinyakin I. I., Skuratova A. Yu. Normy jus cogens: istoricheskiy aspekt i sovremennoe znachenie dlya mezhdunarodnogo prava [Jus Cogens: the Historical Aspect and Contemporary Value for International Law]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Juridicheskie Nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2018. Issue 41. Pp. 526–545. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2018-41-526-545 |
|||||||||
DOI: | 0.17072/1995-4190-2018-41-526-545 |
|||||||||
Annotation: |
Introduction:the fundamental role of jus cogens principles in codification and progressive development of international law explains the lasting interest in researching its nature and formation mechanism. The analysis of the International Law Commission’s work makes it possible to get an informative interpretation of jus cogens conception and to predict some contours of its future development. The purpose of the present article is to analyze different approaches towards the substance of peremptory norms of international law, its elements, outlooks for its future development, to consider the currently applied scientific methodology based on the actual materials of Special Rapporteur of the International Law Commission.Methods: systematic, historical,methods of comparison, interpretation; theoretical methods of logical and structural analysis; specific scientific methods. Results:the analysis of the norms of international law and doctrinal researches in the theory of international law and law of treatiesleads us to the conclusion that further development of jus cogens conception could only be justified provided that it is of practical importance to the international community, facing absolutely new threats and challenges. Conclusions: there are no substantial grounds today for the essential progressive development of jus cogens conception; its codification consists primarily in rephrasing of the provisions of Vienna Convention; the nature of the peremptory norm of international law is determined by this Convention. |
|||||||||
Keywords: | principles of jus cogens; peremptory norms of international law; International Law Commission; codification and progressive development of international law; Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969; public order; international community as a whole |
|||||||||
download the full-version article | ||||||||||
References: | 1. Abashidze A. Kh. Printsipy mezhdunarodnogo prava: problemy ponyatiyno–soderzhatel'nogo kharaktera [Principles of International Law: Conceptual and Substantive Problems]. Mosko¬vskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava – Mos¬cow Journal of International Law. 2017. Issue 4. Pp. 19–30. (In Russ.). 2. Bobrov R. L. Osnovnye problemy teorii mezh¬dunarodnogo prava [Fundamental Problems of the Theory of International Law]. Moscow, 1968. 272 p. (In Russ.). 3. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava. Osnovnye insti¬tuty i otrasli sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava. V 6 t.; Gl. red.: F. I. Kozhevnikov [The Course of International Law. Basic Institutes and Branches of Contemporary International Law. In 6 vols.; ed. by F. I. Kozhevnikov]. Moscow, 1968. Vol. 4. 434 p. (In Russ.). 4. Levin D. B. Aktual'nye problemy teorii mezhdu¬narodnogo prava [Current Problems of the Theory of International Law]. Moscow, 1974. 264 p. (In Russ.). 5. Lukashuk I. I. Sovremennoe pravo mezhduna¬rodnykh dogovorov: v 2 tomakh [Contemporary Law of Treaties: in 2 vols.]. Vol. 1. Zaklyuchenie mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov [Conclusion of Treaties]. Moscow, 2004. 672 p. (In Russ.). 6. Lukashuk I. I. Sovremennoe pravo mezhduna¬rodnykh dogovorov: v 2 tomakh [Contemporary Law of Treaties: in 2 vols.]. Vol. 2. Deystvie mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov [Operation of Treaties]. Moscow, 2006. 496 p. (In Russ.). 7. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: uchebnik; pod obshch. red. V. N. Durdenevskogo [International Law: textbook; ed. by V. N. Durdenevskiy]. Mos¬cow, 1947. 612 p. (In Russ.). 8. Movchan A. P. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i miro¬voy poryadok [International Law and the Glo¬bal Order]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhduna¬rodnogo prava – Moscow Journal of Interna¬tional Law. 1993. Issue 2. Pp. 15–38. (In Russ.). 9. Movchan A. P. Kodifikatsiya i progressivnoe razvitie mezhdunarodnogo prava [Codification and Progressive Development of International Law]. Moscow, 1972. 214 p. (In Russ.). 10. Reshetov Yu. A. V zashchitu mezhdunarodnogo prava [In Defense of International Law]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava – Moscow Journal of International Law. 1998. Issue 2. Pp. 15–24. (In Russ.). 11. Romashov Yu. S. Ob usloviyakh formirovaniya obshchepriznannykh norm [On the Conditions of the Formation of Universally Recognized Norms]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava – Moscow Journal of International Law. 1999. Issue 2. Pp. 32–40. (In Russ.). 12. Talalaev A. N. Pravo mezhdunarodnykh dogo¬vorov. Deystvie i primenenie dogovorov [Law of Treaties. Operation and Application of Treaties]. Moscow, 1985. 296 p. (In Russ.). 13. Tunkin G.I. Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava [Theory of International Law]. Moscow, 2000. 416 p. (In Russ.). 14. Tiunov O. I. Printsip soblyudeniya mezhdu-narodnykh obyazatel'stv [The Principle of Observance of International Obligations]. Moscow, 1979. 184 p. (In Russ.). 15. Khlestov O. N. Kodifikatsiya i progressivnoe razvitie prava mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov (k 40-letiyu Venskoy konventsii) [Codification and Progressive Development of the Law of Treaties (to the 40th Anniversary of the Vienna Convention]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhduna¬rodnogo prava – Moscow Journal of Interna¬tional Law. 2009. Issue 1. Pp. 5–16. (In Russ.). 16. Khlestov O. N. Prognozy razvitiya mezhduna¬rodnogo prava v XXI veke [Some Predictions of the Development of International Law in the 21st century]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhduna¬rodnogo prava – Moscow Journal of Interna¬tional Law. 2001. Issue 2. Pp. 24–38. (In Russ.). 17. Chernichenko S. V. Printsip samoopredeleniya narodov (sovremennaya interpretatsiya) [The Principle of Self-Determination of Peoples (Contemporary Interpretation)]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava – Moscow Journal of International Law. 1996. Issue 4. Pp. 3–21. (In Russ.). 18. Chernichenko S. V. Vzaimosvyaz' imperativ-nykh norm mezhdunarodnogo prava (jus co-gens) i obyazatel'stv erga omnes [Intercon-nection of Peremptory Norms of International Law and erga omnes Obligations]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2012. Issue 3. Pp. 3–16. (In Russ.). 19. Christenson G. Jus Cogens: Guarding Interests Fundamental to International Society. Virginia Journal of International Law. 1988. Vol. 28. Pp. 585–628. (In Eng.). 20. Kolb R. Conflits Entre Normes de Jus cogens. Droit du Pouvoir, Pouvoir du Droit: Mélanges Offerts à Jean Salmon; ed. by N. Angelet. Brussels, 2007. Pp. 481–505. (In French). 21. Kolb R. Peremptory International Law – Jus cogens. A General Inventory. Oxford, 2015. 168 р. (In Eng.). 22. Kolb R. The formal source of jus cogens in pub¬lic international law. Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht. 1998. Vol. 53. Pp. 69–105. (In Eng.). 23. Monaco R. Observations sur la hiérarchie des sources du droit international. Völkerrecht als Rechtsordnung Internationale Gerichtsbarkeit Menschenrechte. Festschrift für Hermann Mosler. Berlin; New York, 1983. Pp. 599-616. (In French). 24. Nguyen Q., Daillier P., Pellet A. Droit inter-national public. 5th ed. Paris, 1994. 1317 p. (In French). 25. Onuf N. G., Birney R. K. Peremptory Norms of International Law: Their Source, Their Func¬tion and Future. Denver Journal of Interna¬tional Law and Policy. 1974. Vol. 59. Issue 4. Pp. 187–198. (In Eng.). 26. Orakhelashvili A. Peremptory Norms in Inter¬national Law. Oxford, 2006. 622 р. (In Eng.). 27. Schwarzenberger G. International Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals. London, 1957. Vol. 13. 681 p. (In Eng.). 28. Shaw M. N. International Law. 5th ed. Cam-bridge, 2003. 1288 р. (In Eng.). 29. Thierry H. L'évolution du droit international : cours général de droit international public. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. Boston, 1990. Vol. 222. Pp. 9–186. (In French). 30. Thirlway H.W. International Customary Law and Codification. Leiden, 1972. 170 p. (In Eng.). 31. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. A Commentary. Berlin; Heidelberg, 2012. 1415 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-19291-3. (In Eng.). 32. Weatherall T. Jus Cogens: International Law and Social Contract. Cambridge, 2015. 555 p. (In Eng.). 33. Yearbook of the International Law Commission (YILC). 1966. Vol. I. Part I. 134 p. Available at: http://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/eng¬lish/ilc_1966_v1_p1.pdf (accessed 05.06.2018). (In Eng.). 34. Yearbook of the International Law Commi-ssion. 1963. Vol. I. 323 p. Available at: http://legal.un.org/docs/?path=../ilc/publications/yearbooks/english/ilc_1963_v1.pdf&lang=EFS (accessed 05.06.2018). (In Eng.). |
|||||||||
Received: | 01.06.2018 | |||||||||
Financing: | --- |