|
Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2021. Issue 1 (51) |
||||||||||
| Title: | CLAIMS FOR RECOGNITION OF A REGISTERED CONTRACT AS TERMINATED AND THE RIGHT OF OBLIGATION AS ABSENT |
|||||||||
| Authors: |
V. A. Boldyrev |
 |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | |||||||
| ORCID: | 0000-0002-1454-6886 | ResearcherID: | H-1270-2016 | |||||||
| Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
| Requisites: | Boldyrev V. A. Iski o priznanii registriruemogo dogovora prekrativshimsya i obyazatel'stvennogo prava otsutstvuyushhim [Claims for Recognition of a Registered Contract as Terminated and the Right of Obligation as Absent]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2021. Issue 51. Pp. 57–83. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2021-51-57-83 |
|||||||||
| DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2021-51-57-83 | |||||||||
| Annotation: |
Introduction: claims for recognition of a registered contract as terminated and the right of obligation as absent combine the following features: (1) they are declaratory; (2) belong to the category of negative ones; (3) are not explicitly stated in the law; (4) are recognized by judicial practice; (5) are aimed solely at eliminating legal uncertainty. The unity of features determines the need to analyze these types of claims within a single study. Purpose: to establish the reasons for the occurrence in practice of claims for recognition of a registered contract as terminated and the right of obligation as absent. Methods: general scientific (dialectical) method of cognition of scientific concepts of private law; special scientific methods of cognition: formal-legal method, historical-legal method, method of comparative legal studies, forecasting. Results: the transition of the claim for recognition of the right of obligation as absent to the category of remedies directly referred to in acts of official interpretation of law entails great risks. As soon as the emerging practice is recorded in an act of interpretation, the following will happen. Firstly, the number of cases of its use in practice will be likely to increase, which will entail an increased burden on courts. Secondly, there will appear the prerequisites for the full formal legalization of the phenomenon, as has already happened with the recognition of a contract as not concluded and the recognition of the right to a thing as absent. Should there be no registration actions in the Russian legal system, there would not be so many claims of a negative legal nature recognized by practice, including the claim for the recognition of a registered contract as terminated. Protective legal rules aimed at regulating claim-based relations that have the purpose of ensuring a more stable existence of regulatory relations are often formalized in the law, being widely applied in practice by the time changes are introduced into the law. |
|||||||||
| Keywords: | Russian law; civil law; right of obligation; negative claims; claim for recognition; claim for award; registration of title; registration of transactions; remedy; Torrens system |
|||||||||
 |
download the full-version article | |||||||||
| References: | 1. Bevzenko R. S. Registratsionnyy konstruktor, ili Kak sozdat'ideal'nuyu registratsionnuyu sistemu? (K russkomu perevodu raboty R. Torrensa) [The Land Registration Toolkit, or How to Establish a Perfect Land Registration System (On the Russian Translation of the Work by R. Torrens)]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava – Civil Law Review. 2018. Issue 2. Pp. 202–225. DOI: 10.24031/1992-2043-2018-18-2-202-225. (In Russ.). 2. Bogdanova E. E. Ponyatie i soderzhanie prava kreditora na zashhitu [The Concept and Essence of the Creditor's Rights to Protection]. Lex Russica. 2018. Issue 2 (135). Pp. 57–64. (In Russ.). 3. Boldyrev V. A. Ponyatie i chastnopravovoe znachenie registratsionnykh deystviy [Concept and Private Law Importance of Registration Actions]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2016. Issue 1. Pp. 70–78. (In Russ.). 4. Boldyrev V. A. Priznanie veshhnogo prava ili obremeneniya otsutstvuyushhim v sisteme sposobov zashhity grazhdanskikh prav [Recognition of the Real Right or Encumbrance as Missing in the System of Ways to Protect Civil Rights]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2020. Issue 3. Pp. 70–81. (In Russ.). 5. Boldyrev V. A. Priznanie dogovora nezaklyuchennym kak sposob zashhity grazhdanskikh prav [Recognizing Contract as not Concluded as a Way of Protecting Civil Rights]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2018. Issue 4. Pp. 63–68. (In Russ.). 6. Boldyrev V. A. Sistema registratsionnykh deystviy [System of Registration Actions]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2016. Issue 6. Pp. 79–86. (In Russ.). 7. Bychkov A. I. Aktual'nye Problemy Sudebnogo Razbiratel'stva [Current Problems of Judicial Proceedings]. Moscow, 2016. 480 p. (In Russ.). 8. Davidyan S., Yudin A. Zashhita obmanutykh dol'shhikov [Protection of Defrauded Homebuyers]. EZh-Yurist – EZh-Jurist. 2007. Issue 8. P. 8. (In Russ.). 9. Karpov M. S. Grazhdansko-pravovye me¬ry operativnogo vozdeystviya: avtoref. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk [Civil Measures of Operational Impact: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2003. 28 p. (In Russ.). 10. Karpov M. S. Primenenie mer operativnogo vozdeystviya pri narushenii arendnykh obyazatel'stv [The Application of Operational Measures in Breach of the Lease Obligation]. Kommentariy sudebno-arbitrazhnoy praktiki / pod red. V. F. Yakovleva [Commentary on the Commercial Court Practice; ed. by V. F. Yakovlev]. Moscow, 2002. Issue 9. Pp. 57–71. (In Russ.). 11. Kuranov V. G. Yuridicheski znachimye soobshheniya v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave: dis... kand. jurid. nauk [Legally Significant Messages in Russian Civil Law: Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Perm, 2020. 203 p. (In Russ.). 12. Laptev V. A. Rossiyskie pravovye obychai v predprinimatel'stve [Russian Legal Practices in Business]. Pravo i ekonomika – Law and Economics. 2016. Issue 2. Pp. 4–9. (In Russ.). 13. Makarova R. V. Ponyatie sinallagmaticheskoy svyazi v prave Anglii i Rossii [The Concept of Synallagmatic Link According to the Law of England and Russia]. Pravovedenie. 2018. Issue 2 (337). Pp. 362–381. DOI: 10.21638/11701/ spbu25.2018.206. (In Russ.). 14. Sevast'yanova Yu. Vozmozhnye pravovye posledstviya pandemii koronavirusa dlya bankov [Possible Legal Consequences of the Coronavirus Pandemic for Banks]. Yuridicheskaya rabota v kreditnoy organizatsii – Legal Work in a Credit Organization. 2020. Issue 2. Pp. 6–14. (In Russ.). 15. Sklovskiy K. I. Ob usloviyakh pred"yav¬leniya iska o priznanii prava sobstvennosti [On the Conditions for Filing an Action for Declaration of Ownership]. Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii – Herald of the Supreme Arbitrazh Court of the Russian Federation. 2008. Issue 1. Pp. 38–47. (In Russ.). 16. Somenkov S. A. Institut odnostoronnego otkaza ot ispolneniya dogovora v usloviyakh reformy grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva [Concept of Unilateral Refusal to Execute a Contract in the Framework of Civil Legislation Reform]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2014. Issue 11. Pp. 85–91. (In Russ.). 17. Starovoytova A. S. Priznanie prava kak sposob zashhity obyazatel'stvennykh prav [Recognition of the Right as a Means of Property Rights Protection]. Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava – Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019. Issue 2(99). Pp. 76–84. (In Russ.). 18. Transformatsiya i Tsifrovizatsiya Pravovogo Regulirovaniya Obshhestvennykh Otnosheniy v Sovremennykh Realiyakh i Usloviyakh Pandemii: kollektivnaya monografiya / pod red. I. V. Vorontsovoy [Transformation and Digitalization of Legal Regulation of Social Relations in the Present-Day Realities and Pandemic Conditions: collective monograph; ed. by I. V. Vorontsova]. Kazan, 2020. 415 p. (In Russ.). 19. Shvabauer A. V. Gosudarstvennaya registratsiya prav, obremeneniy prav i sdelok v grazhdanskom oborote nedvizhimogo imushhestva: avtoref. diss. ... kand. jurid. nauk [State Registration of Rights, Encumbrances of Rights and Transactions in Civil Turnover of Real Estate: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2011. 30 p. (In Russ.). 20. Shhennikova L. V. Ponyatie veshhnogo prava v argumentatsii rossiyskikh tsivilistov [The Notion of Right in Rem in Reasoning of Russian Civilists]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2017. Issue 37. Pp. 361–372. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-37-361-372. (In Russ.). 21. Abdulai R. Is Land Title Registration the Answer to Insecure and Uncertain Property Rights in Sub-Saharan Africa. RICS Research Paper Series. April 2006. Vol. 6. Issue 6. 27 p. (In Eng.). 22. Bhandar B. Possession, Occupation and Registration: Recombinant Ownership in the Settler Colony. Settler Colonial Studies. 2016. Vol. 6. Issue 2: Settler Colonial Logics and the Neoliberal Regime. Pp. 119–132. (In Eng.). 23. Cambodia's Economic Transformation; ed. by C. Hughes and K. Un. Copenhagen, 2011. 385 p. (In Eng.). 24. Carret J. R. Land Transfer. A Reply to Criticisms of the Torrens System. Harvard Law Review. April 25, 1893. Vol. 7. Issue 1. Pp. 24–31. (In Eng.). 25. Crowley J. H. The Torrens System. Marquette Law Review. 1922. Vol. 6. Issue 3. Pp. 114–121. (In Eng.). 26. Deininger K., Feder G. Land Registration, Governance, and Development: Evidence and Implications for Policy. The World Bank Research Observer. August 2009. Vol. 24. Issue 2. Pp. 233–266. (In Eng.). 27. McCall F. B. The Torrens System – After Thirty-Five Years. North Carolina Law Review. 1932. Vol. 10. Issue 4. Pp. 329–350. (In Eng.). 28. Niblack W. C. Pivotal Points in the Torrens System. The Yale Law Journal. February 1915. Vol. 24. Issue 4. Pp. 274-285. (In Eng.). 29. O'Connor P. Double Indemnity – Title Insurance and the Torrens System. Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal. June 2003. Vol. 3. Issue 1. Pp. 141-167. DOI: 10.5204/qutlr.v3i1.123. (In Eng.). 30. Patton R. G. The Torrens System of Land Title Registration. Minnesota Law Review. 1935. Issue 19. 2106. Pp. 519–535. (In Eng.). 31. Stoter J., Ploeger H., Roes R., van der Riet E., Biljecki F., Ledoux H., Kok D., Kim S. Registration of Multi-Level Property Rights in 3D in the Netherlands: Two Cases and Next Steps in Further Implementation. International Journal of Geo-Information. 2017. Issue 6. Article 158. Pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi6060158. (In Eng.). |
|||||||||
| Received: | 10.09.2020 | |||||||||
| Financing: | --- | |||||||||
The Perm State University
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013
The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing
The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013
The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing
The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year