Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2019. Issue 2 (44)

Title: SYSTEM OF GROUNDS FOR THE TERMINATION (DEPRIVATION) OF PROPERTY RIGHTS AS A NECESSARY CONDITION FOR THE EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF INVIOLABILITY OF PROPERTY
Authors:

L. V. Shchennikova, Kuban State University

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-1972-2287
ResearcherID: H-3447-2016
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»:       ---
Requisites: Shchennikova L. V. Sistema osnovaniy prekrashheniya (lisheniya) prava sobstvennosti kak neobkhodimoe uslovie effektivnoy realizatsii printsipa neprikosnovennosti sobstvennosti [System of Grounds for the Termination (Deprivation) of Property Rights as a Necessary Condition for the Effective Implementation of the Principle of Inviolability of Property]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2019. Issue 2. Pp. 329–351. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-44-329-351
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-44-329-351
Annotation:

Introduction: the author focuses on the civil law principle of inviolability of property, which ensures both the legitimacy of a person’s connection with a thing and its continuous functioning. However, as emphasized in the article, for the effective implementation of this key principle, it is necessary to discern and take into account the social function of property rights associated with the just distribution of resources and establishment of the moral principles of modern civil society. Purpose: to trace the regularities in civil regulation of social relations associated with forcible termination of property rights; to develop scientifically-based recommendations for improving this institution in order to effectively implement the principle of inviolability of property and taking into account both the material and social aspects of its manifestation. Methods: general scientific (dialectic) method of cognition of scientific concepts of private law; special scientific methods of cognition: formal legal, historical legal methods, method of comparative law. Results: the author's conclusions highlight the need to: recognize protection for only such an ownership right that has the legal grounds for its emergence;  establish guarantees against unlawful seizure of not only private but also public property; provide for socialization of property, seen in the system of grounds for the alienation of property for social purposes; specify it to be mandatory for the courts to apply only those grounds for forcible termination of the right of ownership which are enshrined in the civil legislation of the country. It is proved that the current system of grounds for termination of property rights actually lacks the system nature and needs further development. Naturally, in the Civil Code should appear general norms containing socially necessary goals in achieving which forcible seizure of property from the owner is permissible. A review of foreign civil law research suggests that in modern conditions inviolability of property rights is understood not by oversimplifying but through the prism of numerous social tasks that the state must solve through flexible legislative regulation of relations concerning ownership of material goods. At the same time, a special role is assigned to national legislation governing forcible seizure of property from subjects of property rights. It has been established that three standards of expropriation are necessary to follow: stipulation by law, realization of public law interests, and adequate effective and prompt compensation. The analysis of judicial practice allows us to assert that in cases of forced seizure of property the court should investigate all the circumstances proving that seizure is the only necessary means serving public interests. Only a detailed analysis reflected in a judicial act can prove that the principle of inviolability of property in this category of cases is effectively implemented.

Keywords: property right; ownership; inviolability of property; civil law; civil legislation;
acquisition of property rights; termination of property rights; forcible seizure of property; judicial practice
  download the full-version article
References: 1. Avak'yan S. A. Konstitucionnoe pravo Rossii [Constitutional Law of Russia]. Moscow, 2014. 864 p. (In Russ.).
2. Alekseev S. S. Pravo sobstvennosti: problemy teorii [Ownership: Issues of Theory]. Moscow, 2007. 240 p. (In Russ.).
3. Annenkov K. N. Sistema russkogo grazhdanskogo prava [The System of Russian Civil Law]. Vol. 2. Prava veschnye [Property Rights]. St. Petersburg, 1900. 697 p. (In Russ.).
4. Baglay M. V. Konstitucionnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federacii: ucheb. dlya vuzov [Constitutional Law of the Russian Federation: Textbook for Universities]. Moscow, 2007. 784 p. (In Russ.).
5. Kasso L. A. Russkoe pozemel'noe pravo [Russian Land Law]. Moscow, 1906. 280 p. (In Russ.).
6. Kommentariy k Konstitucii Rossiyskoy Federacii (postateynyy) / Zor'kin V. D., Andrichenko L. V., Bogolyubov S. A., Bondar' N. S. i dr. 2-e izd., peresmotrennoe [Commentary on the Constitution of the Russian Federation (Article by Article); V. D. Zor'kin, L. V. Andrichenko, S. A. Bogolyubov, N. S. Bondar et al. 2nd ed., revised]. Moscow, 2011. 1008 p. (In Russ.).
7. Konstitucionnoe pravo: universitetskiy kurs: uchebnik: v 2 t. / pod red. A. I. Kazannika, A. N. Kostyukova [Constitutional Law: University Course: Textbook: in 2 vols.; ed. by A. I. Kazannik, A. N. Kostyukov]. Moscow, 2015. Vol. 2. 528 p. (In Russ.).
8. Momotov V. V. Formirovanie russkogo srednevekovogo prava v IX–XIV vv.: monografiya [Formation of Russian Medieval Law in the 9th-14th Centuries: Monograph]. Moscow, 2003. 416 p. (In Russ.).
9. Sukhanov E. A. Veschnoe pravo: nauchno-poznavatel'nyy ocherk [Property Right: Scientific and Perceptual Study]. Moscow, 2012. 560 p. (In Russ.).
10. Engel'man I. Priobretenie prava sobstvennosti na zemli po russkomu pravu. Rassuzhdenie, predstavlennoe yuridicheskomu fakul'tetu Imperatorskogo Sankt-Peterburzhskogo universiteta, kandidata yuridicheskogo fakul'teta dlya polucheniya stepeni magistra grazhdanskogo prava [Acquisition of a Title to Land under Russian Law. The Argument Presented to the Law Faculty of the Imperial Saint Petersburg University by the Candidate of the Law Faculty for a Master's Degree in Civil Law]. St. Petersburg, 1859. 187 p. (In Russ.).
11. Bryan C. Migratory Things on Land: Property Rights and a Law of Capture. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law. October 2002. Vol. 6.3. Available at: http://www.ejcl.org/63/ art63-3.html. (In Eng.).
12. Donahue Ch. The Problem of Definition. Available at: https://www.britannica.com. (In Eng.).
13. James and Others v. United Kingdom, 98 Eur. Ct. H. R. (ser. A), para. 45 (1986). Available at: http://www.humanrights.is/the-human-rights-project/humanrightscasesandmaterials/cases/regionalcases/europeancourtofhumanrights/nr/534. (In Eng.).
14. Leader Y. Land Expropriation in Europe. Available at: https:www.ssrn.com. (In Eng.).
15. Lithgow and Others v. United Kingdom, 102 Eur. Ct. H. R. (ser. A), para. 122 (1986). Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/pub-lisher,ECHR,,GBR,3ae6b7230,0.html. (In Eng.)
16. Mchangama J. The Right to Property in Global Human Rights Law. Available at: https://www.cato.org/policy-report/mayjune-2011/ right-property-global-human-rights-law. (In Eng.).
17. Mattei U. Basic Principles of Property Law. A Comparative Legal and Economic Introduction. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. Apr – Jun 2001. Vol. 53. Issue 2. Pp. 519–521. (In Eng.).
18. Montaner Larson J. B. Land Ownership and Property Rights. Available at: https://www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C10/E5-18-03-02.pdf. (In Eng.).
19. Negrut V. The Property Right and the Requirements of Environmental Protection. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/16403336/ The_Property_Right_and_the_Requirements_of_Environmental_Protection. (In Eng.).
20. Sheehan D. The Principles of Personal Property Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017. (In Eng.).
21. Walzer W. P. and Dunn T. M. Ownership Rights in Real Property. Available at: https://nycbar.org/get-legal-help/article/real-ptoperty-law/ownership-rights-in-real-property. (In Eng.).
Received: 27.01.2019
Financing: The study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research in the framework of the research project No. 18-011-00621
The Perm State University
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing

The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year