Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2019. Issue 2 (44) |
||||||||||
Title: | WHY HAS NOT RUSSIA ADOPTED THE LAW ON CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF LEGAL ENTITIES YET? |
|||||||||
Authors: |
Yu. I. Bytko, Saratov State Law Academy |
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
|
||||||||
ORCID: | 0000-0003-4436-3500 | ResearcherID: | H-1335-2019 | |||||||
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»: | --- | |||||||||
Requisites: | Bytko Yu. I. Pochemu v Rossii do sikh por ne prinyat zakon ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits? [Why Has Not Russia Adopted the Law on Criminal Liability of Legal Entities Yet?]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2019. Issue 2. Pp. 352–373. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-44-352-373 |
|||||||||
DOI: | 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-44-352-373 |
|||||||||
Annotation: |
Introduction: establishment of market relations in Russia, geographical location and geopolitical interests of the country necessitate its more intensive participation in the global economic environment (with many of the countries applying corporate criminal responsibility) as well as bringing legislation, including criminal law, in line with the new realities. Today, the Russian economy needs major investment, including that from abroad. This requires development of solid legal guarantees, with criminal liability of illicit business units being one of these guarantees. Criminal activity of some legal entities contributes to merging of criminal business with the government and to spread of corruption so wide that it threatens the security of the Russian state. The stumbling block on the way to the introduction of criminal liability for legal entities is the conventional idea of inexpediency of such liability and inevitability of breaching the principle of individual and fault-based liability in case the above liability institution is introduced. Purpose: to provide critical assessment of the international practice in the application of legislation on criminal liability of legal entities as well as of the opinions describing advantages and disadvantages of this liability in the Russian legal theory; to develop the author’s concept of addressing this issue in Russia. Methods: the materialist dialectic method with the use of the analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, theoretical modeling techniques. Results: the arguments in support of the idea of liability in question, its expediency and necessity in Russia have been formulated; there has been justified a theoretical model that makes it possible to integrate the corporate criminal liability institution into the formula of individual criminal liability developed by the classical school of criminal law. Conclusions: the hopes for changes regarding the issue of corporate criminal liability in Russia should be associated with the development of small and medium businesses, as corruption and merging of criminal business with the authorities are ruinous for such types of businesses, and therefore participation of their representatives in trial juries as jurors would be rather effective in handling criminal activities of corporations. |
|||||||||
Keywords: | criminal liability; allied entity; legal entity; criminal liability formula; corporation; positivism; sociological school; sanction; fine; deprivation of license; seizure; jury trial; corruption; criminal capital |
|||||||||
download the full-version article | ||||||||||
References: | 1. Budzinskiy S. Nachala ugolovnogo prava [Principles of Сriminal Law]. Warsaw, 1870. 362 p. (In Russ.). 2. Bytko Yu. I. Nuzhen li Rossii takoy zakon (k voprosu o proekte zakona ob ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits) [Does Russia Need Such a Law (to the Problem of the Draft Law on Criminal Responsibility of Legal Entities)?]. Vestnik SGYuA – Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin. 2015. Issue 2 (103). Pp. 182–193. (In Russ.). 3. Volzhenkin B. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskikh lits [Criminal Liability of Legal Entities]. St. Petersburg, 1998. 40 p. (In Russ.). 4. Korobeev A., Chanhai Leun. Yuridiches¬koe litso kak sub"ekt ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: ot kitayskogo nastoyashchego – k rossiyskomu budushchemu [Legal Entity as a Subject of Criminal Liability: from the Chinese Present to the Russian Future]. Ugolovnoe pravo – Ugolovnoe pravo Journal. 2009. Issue 2. Pp. 36–41. (In Russ.). 5. Krylova N. E. Osnovnye cherty novogo ugolovnogo kodeksa Frantsii [Main Features of the New Criminal Code of France]. Moscow, 1996. 124 p. (In Russ.). 6. Orlov V. S. Sub"ekt prestupleniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu [The Subject of the Crime under the Soviet Criminal Law]. Moscow, 1958. 260 p. (In Russ.). 7. Pang Dunmei. Korporativnoe prestuplenie v kitayskom ugolovnom prave [Corporate Crime in Chinese Criminal Law]. Available at: https://cyber-leninka.ru/article/v/korporativnoe-prestuplenie-v-ki¬tayskom-ugolovnom-prave (accessed 18.02.2019). (In Russ.). 8. Reagirovanie na prestupnost': kontseptsii, zakon, praktika [Response to Crime: Concepts, Law, Practice]. Moscow, 2002. 307 p. (In Russ.). 9. Tagantsev N. S. Kurs russkogo ugolovnogo prava. Chast' obshchaya. Uchenie o prestuplenii [The Course of Russian Criminal Law. General Part. Doctrine of Crime]. St. Petersburg, 1874. 292 p. (In Russ.). 10. Tagantsev N. S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. Chast' obshchaya [Russian Criminal Law. General Part]. Tula, 2001. Vol. 1. 800 p. (In Russ.). 11. Tarasov I. T. Uchenie ob aktsionernykh kompaniyakh [Doctrine of Joint Stock Companies]. Moscow, 2000. 666 p. (In Russ.). 12. Traynin A. N. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Zashchita mira i ugolovnyy zakon [Selected Works. Protection of Peace and Criminal Law]. Moscow, 1969. 454 p. (In Russ.). 13. Tumanov V. A. Burzhuaznaya pravovaya ideologiya. K кritikе ucheniy o prave [Bourgeois Legal Ideology. On the Criticism of Doctrines of Law]. Moscow, 1971. 381 p. (In Russ.). 14. Fedorov A. V. Osnovnye polozheniya i osobennosti reglamentatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits za rubezhom [Fundamentals and Features of Regulation of Criminal Liability of Legal Persons Abroad]. Rassledovanie prestupleniy: problemy i puti ikh resheniya – Crime Investigation: Problems and Ways of Their Solution. 2016. Issue 4. Pp. 14–26. (In Russ.). 15. Funk Ya. I., Mikhal'chenko V. A., Khvaley V. V. Aktsionernoe obshchestvo: istoriya i teoriya [Joint Stock Company: History and Theory]. Minsk, 1999. 608 p. (In Russ.). 16. Khanna K. S. Corporate Criminal Liability: What Purpose Does It Serve. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 109. No. 7. Pp. 1477–1534. (In Eng.). 17. Phillimore R. Commentaries upon International Law. London, 1879. Рp. 3–9. (In Eng.). 18. Stessens G. Corporate Criminal Liability: a Comparative Perspective. International and Com¬parative Law Quarterly. 1994. Vol. 43. Issue 13. Pp. 493–520. (In Eng.). |
|||||||||
Received: | 19.02.2019 | |||||||||
Financing: | --- |